中国农业科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 786-795.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.04.019

• 农业经济与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

耕地资源非农化价值损失评价模型与补偿机制研究

 任平, 吴涛, 周介铭   

  1. 西南土地资源评价与监测教育部重点实验室/四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院,成都 610066
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-23 出版日期:2014-02-15 发布日期:2013-10-05
  • 通讯作者: 周介铭,E-mail:zjm@sicnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:任平,E-mail:pren121680@ 126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41301196)、国家社会科学基金项目(11XJY019)

Study on Value Loss Evaluation Model and Compensation Mechanism of Cultivated Land Conversion

 REN  Ping, WU  Tao, ZHOU  Jie-Ming   

  1. Key Lab of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest, Ministry of Education/ Institute of Geography and Resources Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066
  • Received:2013-04-23 Online:2014-02-15 Published:2013-10-05

摘要: 【目的】耕地资源生态价值和社会价值长期被忽视是我国耕地保护中最大的不足和缺陷,耕地非农化价值损失远远超过传统意义上的经济价值损失。耕地资源流失、非农化的核心问题之一是对耕地资源非农化价值理论认知的缺失,是对耕地资源(保护)非农化价值构成、体系、方法等科学问题研究还不够透彻、不够深入,这是必须认识到的一个基础理论问题。通过构建耕地价值评价方法与模型,实现耕地资源(保护)非农化价值损失定量评价与模拟,以期为耕地保护、耕地补偿决策等提供理论和实践参考。【方法】以耕地资源价值分类为基础,运用收益还原法、等效替代法、市场价值法构建耕地资源经济价值、社会价值和生态服务价值综合评价模型。耕地资源经济价值主要通过修正不同农作物的收益差异权重指数,运用收益还原法计算经济价值;耕地资源社会价值主要运用等效替代法计算,其中采用城镇养老保险金修正参数代替基本保障价值,用农民农业生产效益参数代替农民就业工资水平,用区域粮食供需差额参数代替社会稳定价值;耕地资源生态服务价值在修正单位耕地面积生态当量因子的基础上,考虑生态服务当量因子的经济价值与平均粮食单产市场价值的相关关系,运用市场价值法进行计算。【结果】(1)评价模型客观地还原了耕地资源货币化价值,具有一定的可行性和科学性,并可以实现不同区域耕地价值的评价与模拟,具有较强的通用性和适用性。(2)实证研究表明,四川省耕地资源保护价值为122.85万元/hm2,其中经济价值、社会价值与生态服务价值分别占5.74%、64.17%、30.09%。(3)以2010年为基准年,四川省耕地资源保护价值为82 555.20亿元,是四川省当年GDP的4.8倍,耕地非农化价值损失量为436.12亿元,为当年GDP的2.5%。【结论】(1)耕地(保护)非农化利益主体的微观响应表明,中央政府不能被排除在耕地资源(保护)非农化价值损失补偿之外,其应该承担耕地保护的生态服务价值和社会稳定价值,并以此为基础建立耕地保护基金提供给耕地保护者,地方政府和非农用地企业要承担耕地非农化损失全部价值补偿。(2)耕地资源价值具有较强的区域性差异性,建立耕地价值评价和修正体系是今后需要解决的重要技术问题之一。(3)该评价方法和结果可用于耕地资源非农化价值损失评价实践,研究结果为中央政府应承担耕地保护基金提供了理论依据,为具体补偿标准制定提供了技术支撑,为耕地补偿机制建立提供了一个新的视角,有助于改变传统耕地保护模式并建立耕地保护补偿新机制。

关键词: 耕地资源 , 非农化价值 , 评价模型 , 补偿机制

Abstract: 【Objective】The most serious problem associated with the cultivated land protection project in China is the long-term neglect of ecological value and social value existing within cultivated land. The value loss along with the cultivated land conversion is much beyond the economic value estimated with traditional perspective. Based on such understanding, this research is considering the deficiency of theory for understanding cultivated land conversion, and the insufficiency of comprehensive research on the scientific questions associated with cultivated land protection/conversion, such as the value constitute, the system, and the research method, are the core problems when studying cultivated land loss and conversion. Such questions are the basic theoretic issues that must be understood. To realize quantitative evaluation and simulation of value loss happening with cultivated land conversion, this paper established a value evaluation method and model for cultivated land, so as to provide a theoretical and practical reference for cultivated land protection and compensation policy.【Method】Based on the value classification method for cultivated land resources, income capitalization approach, equivalent replacement method, and market value method were applied to establishing a comprehensive evaluation model incorporating resource economic value, social value, and ecological service value. The economic value of cultivated land resource is based on through income capitalization approach, by which a serious of yield variance weights indices for different crops are modified. The social value is estimated by equivalent replacement method, in which the basic security value is replaced by the correction parameter of urban endowment insurance, the wage level for farmers’ employment is replaced by the productivity effect of agricultural labor, and the social stability value is replaced by the regional food supply-and-demand difference parameter. Finally, based on the amendment of unit ecological equivalence factor, the economical service value of cultivated land resource is calculated by market value method, through which the correlation between the economic value of ecological service equivalence factor and the food average yield per unit area is considered. 【Result】 The evaluation model objectively restored the monetization value for cultivated land resources. The entire approach is scientific and also feasible. Besides, the model is regional-cross for the evaluation and simulation functions can be applied to different areas-it possesses favorable universality and applicability. The evaluation results by such model also showed that for Sichuan province the cultivated land protection value in 2010 was 1 million and 22.85 thousand yuan per hm2 , of which the economic value, social value and ecological service value account for 5.74%, 64.17% and 30.09% respectively. (3) Taking 2010 as the basic analysis year, the total cultivated land protection value for the entire Sichuan province in 2010 was 825 trillion and 55.2 billion yuan, and the value loss happening with the non-agriculture conversion was 43.612 billion yuan, which accounts for 2.5% of Sichuan’s GDP.【Conclusion】According to the response mode at micro level for different interest agents associated with cultivated land conversion, the function by the central government should not exclude from the compensation for value loss caused by cultivated land conversion (protection). The central government should accept the responsibility of ecological service value and social stability value for cultivated land protection, based on which a security fund will be created to support the cultivated land protectors. Meanwhile the local governments and enterprises should take the responsibility of value compensation for cultivated land value loss. There is a regional difference in cultivated land resource value. So, it is an important technical issue for construct a value assessment and amendment system for cultivated land resource in future work. Such evaluation methods and the results derived from such research could be applied to practical evaluation of value loss for cultivated land conversion. The research results could supply a theoretical foundation to create a security fund as the central government’s responsibility. Such results also will offer technical supports for framing a concrete compensation standard. Furthermore, this research will provide a new perspective for constituting the compensation mechanism of cultivated land conversion, and promote the upgrade of cultivated land protection from the traditional mode and the establishment of a new compensation mechanism for cultivated land protection.

Key words: cultivated land resources , non-agriculture value , evaluation model , compensation mechanism