Journals
  Publication Years
  Keywords
Search within results Open Search
Please wait a minute...
For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
Virucidal activity of MICRO-CHEM PLUS against African swine fever virus
JIANG Cheng-gang, SUN Ying, ZHANG Fan, AI Xin, LU Ming, QIN Jia-lin, ZHANG Xian-feng, WANG Jing-fei, BU Zhi-gao, ZHAO Dong-ming, HE Xi-jun
2023, 22 (11): 3560-3563.   DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2023.09.021
Abstract270)      PDF in ScienceDirect      
Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
Chinese herbal formulae defend against Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection
WANG Ying-jie, LIANG Ya-xi, HU Fu-li, SUN Ying-fei, ZOU Meng-yun, LUO Rong-long, PENG Xiu-li
2022, 21 (10): 3026-3036.   DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.07.038
Abstract321)      PDF in ScienceDirect      

Mycoplasma gallisepticum HS strain (MG-HS) is a pathogen that causes chronic respiratory disease (CRD) in chicken, which is characterized by host respiratory inflammatory damage, brings huge economic losses to the poultry industry.  Recently, emerging Chinese herbal medicines (CHM) have been used to treat CRD.  This study was aimed to investigate the preventive and therapeutic effects and their potential mechanisms of Chinese herbal medicinal formulae (CHMF), which consisted of 10 kinds of Chinese herbal medicine including Scutellaria, Houttuynia cordate and licorice, on MG-induced CRD in chickens.  With respect to the preventive effect, the results showed that CHMF could effectively recover the MG-induced decrease on body weight and feed conversion ratio.  Histopathological analysis showed that both prevention and treatment of CHMF could significantly alleviate the severe respiratory inflammation induced by MG infection.  Moreover, compared with the MG infection group, both the prevention groups and the treatment groups of CHMF could effectively reduce the expression of MG adhesion protein (pMGA1.2) to inhibit the proliferation of MG, and thus effectively inhibit the expression of MG-induced inflammatory factors interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α).  In summary, these findings confirm that CHMF can protect chickens from various tissue damage caused by MG infection and has no adverse effects on the performance of chickens in the short term.  And its efficacy against MG is equal to or better than that of tiamulin.

Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
Viricidal activity of several disinfectants against African swine fever virus
JIANG Cheng-gang, SUN Ying, ZHANG Fan, AI Xin, FENG Xiao-ning, HU Wei, ZHANG Xian-feng, ZHAO Dong-ming, BU Zhi-gao, HE Xi-jun
2021, 20 (11): 3084-3088.   DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63631-6
Abstract114)      PDF in ScienceDirect      
Prevention of African swine fever, a disease caused by African swine fever virus (ASFV), requires maintenance of high biosecurity standards, which principally relies on disinfection.  Finding the perfect disinfectant against ASFV is difficult because of the lack of relevant data.  Therefore, we aimed to find the most effective disinfectant and to optimise its concentration as well as contact time to confirm the viricidal effect against ASFV in vitro.  We evaluated the viricidal activity of three concentrations each of six common disinfectants against ASFV using immersion disinfection assay (IDA) and spray disinfection assay (SDA); the concentrations of these disinfectants at which complete viral inactivation occurred were almost same as the manufacturer-recommended concentrations, but the exposure times for viral inactivation are different.  The following disinfectants (assay: concentration, exposure time) showed complete inactivation: iodine and acid mixed solution (IDA/SDA: 0.5%, 10 min); compound potassium peroxymonosulfate (IDA: 0.25%, 30 min; SDA: 0.25%, 60 min); citric acid (IDA: 0.25%, 60 min; SDA: 0.5%, 60 min); sodium dichloroisocyanurate (IDA: 0.125%, 60 min; SDA: 0.25%, 60 min); and glutaral ang deciquam (IDA/SDA: 0.2%, 60 min); and deciquam (IDA/SDA: 0.5%, 60 min).  However, in the presence of organic material contamination, disinfectants did not show a marked inactivation effect.  Therefore, disinfection procedures should be performed in two steps: thorough mechanical cleaning followed by application of disinfectant.  In conclusion, all the tested disinfectants can inactivate ASFV; these can be used as alternative disinfectants to enhance biosecurity.
 
Related Articles | Metrics