导航切换
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
JIA Home
About JIA
Description
Video introduction
Editor-in-chief
Editorial board
Guideline of JIA editorial board
Editorial board
Youth Editorial Board
For authors
Instruction for authors
Title page
Copyright agreement
Templates
Endnote
Subscription
Contact
Journals
Publication Years
Keywords
Search within results
(((MAO Li-li[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])
AND
OR
NOT
Title
Author
Institution
Keyword
Abstract
PACS
DOI
Please wait a minute...
For Selected:
Download Citations
EndNote
Ris
BibTeX
Toggle Thumbnails
Select
Effects of plant density and nitrogen rate on cotton yield and nitrogen use in cotton stubble retaining fields
WANG Shi-hong, MAO Li-li, SHI Jia-liang, NIE Jun-jun, SONG Xian-liang, SUN Xue-zhen
2021, 20 (
8
): 2090-2099. DOI:
10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63323-8
Abstract
(
149
)
PDF in ScienceDirect
Increasing nitrogen (N) rate could accelerate the decomposition of crop residues, and then improve crop yield by increasing N availability of soil and N uptake of crops. However, it is not clear whether N rate and plant density should be modified after a long period of cotton stubble return with high N rate. This study seeks to assess the effects of N rate and plant density on cotton yield, N use efficiency, leaf senescence, soil inorganic N, and apparent N balance in cotton stubble return fields in Liaocheng, China, in 2016 and 2017. Three plant densities 5.25 (D
5.25
), 6.75 (D
6.75
) and 8.25 (D
8.25
) plants m
–2
and five N rates 0 (N
0
), 105 (N
105
), 210 (N
210
), 315 (N
315
), and 420 (N
420
) kg ha
–1
were investigated. Compared to the combination used by local farmers (D
5.25
N
315
), a 33.3% N reduction and a 28.6% increase in plant density (D
6.75
N
210
) can maintain high cotton yield, while a 66.7% N reduction at 6.75 plants m
–2
(D
6.75
N
105)
can only achieve high yield in the first year. Biological yield increased with the increase of N rate and plant density, and the highest yield was obtained under 420 kg N ha
–1
at 8.25 plants m
–2
(D
8.25
N
420
) across the two years under investigation. Compared to D
5.25
N
315
, N agronomic efficiency (NAE) and N recovery efficiency (NRE) in D
6.75
N
210
increased by 30.2 and 54.1%, respectively, and NAE and NRE in D
6.75
N
210
increased by 104.8 and 88.1%, respectively. Soil inorganic N decreased sharply under 105 kg N ha
–1
, but no change was found under 210 kg N ha
–1
at 6.75 plants m
–2
. N deficit occurred under 105 kg N ha
–1
, but it did not occurr under 210 kg N ha
–1
at 6.75 plants m
–2
. Net photosynthetic rate and N concentration of leaves under N rate ranging from 210 to 420 kg ha
–1
were higher than those under N rate of 0 or 105 kg N ha
–1
at all three densities. The findings suggest that D
6.75
N
210
is a superior combination in cotton stubble retaining fields in the Yellow River Valley and other areas with similar ecologies.
Reference
|
Related Articles
|
Metrics
Select
Spatial distribution of bolls affects yield formation in different genotypes of Bt cotton varieties
NIE Jun-jun, YUAN Yan-chao, QIN Du-lin, LIU Yan-hui, WANG Shuang-lei, LI Jin-pu, ZHANG Mei-ling, ZHAO Na, GUO Wen-jun, QI Jie, MAO Li-li, SONG Xian-liang, SUN Xue-zhen
2019, 18 (
11
): 2492-2504. DOI:
10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62617-1
Abstract
(
149
)
PDF in ScienceDirect
To optimize the spatial distribution of cotton bolls and to increase the yield, the relationship between yield components and boll spatial distribution was investigated among different Bt (
Bacillus thuringensis
) cotton varieties. A five-year field experiment was conducted to reveal the reasons for the differences in lint yield and fiber quality across three Bt cotton varieties with different yield formations from 2013 to 2017. The lint yield of Jiman 169 (the average yield from 2013–2017 was 42.2 g/plant) was the highest, i.e., 16.3 and 36.9% higher than Lumianyan 21 (L21) and Daizimian 99B (99B), respectively. And the differences in boll weight among the three cultivars were similar to the lint yield, while the others yield components were not. So the increase in lint yield was mainly attributed to the enlargement in boll weight. However, the change in fiber quality was inconsistent with the lint yield, and the quality of L21 was significantly better than that of Jimian 169 (J169) and 99B, which was caused by the diversity of boll spatial distribution. Compared with 99B, the loose-type J169 had the highest number of large bolls in inner positions; the tight-type L21 had a few large bolls and the highest number of lower and middle bolls. And approximately 80.72% of the lint yield was concentrated on the inner nodes in Jiman 169, compared with 77.44% of L21 and 66.73% of 99B during the five-year experiment. Although lint yield was significantly affected by the interannual changes, the lint yield of J169 was the highest and the most stable, as well as its yield components. These observations demonstrated the increase in lint yield was due to the increase in boll weight, and the large bolls and high fiber quality were attributed to the optimal distribution of bolls within the canopies.
Reference
|
Related Articles
|
Metrics
Select
Resource use efficiency, ecological intensification and sustainability of intercropping systems
MAO Li-li, ZHANG Li-zhen, ZHANG Si-ping, Jochem B Evers, Wopke van der Werf, WANG Jingjing, SUN Hong-quan, SU Zhi-cheng, Huub Spiertz
2015, 14 (
8
): 1542-1550. DOI:
10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61039-5
Abstract
(
2796
)
PDF in ScienceDirect
The rapidly growing demand for food, feed and fuel requires further improvements of land and water management, crop productivity and resource-use efficiencies. Combined field experimentation and crop growth modelling during the past five decades made a great leap forward in the understanding of factors that determine actual and potential yields of monocrops. The research field of production ecology developed concepts to integrate biological and biophysical processes with the aim to explore crop growth potential in contrasting environments. To understand the potential of more complex systems (multi-cropping and intercropping) we need an agro-ecosystem approach that integrates knowledge derived from various disciplines: agronomy, crop physiology, crop ecology, and environmental sciences (soil, water and climate). Adaptation of cropping systems to climate change and a better tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses by genetic improvement and by managing diverse cropping systems in a sustainable way will be of key importance in food security. To accelerate sustainable intensification of agricultural production, it is required to develop intercropping systems that are highly productive and stable under conditions with abiotic constraints (water, nutrients and weather). Strategies to achieve sustainable intensification include developing tools to evaluate crop growth potential under more extreme climatic conditions and introducing new crops and cropping systems that are more productive and robust under conditions with abiotic stress. This paper presents some examples of sustainable intensification management of intercropping systems that proved to be tolerant to extreme climate conditions.
Reference
|
Related Articles
|
Metrics