Journals
  Publication Years
  Keywords
Search within results Open Search
Please wait a minute...
For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
Role of TRP channels and HSPs in thermal stress response in the aphid parasitoid Aphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae)
LIU Xiang, KANG Zhi-wei, YU Xing-lin, LI Fan, LIU Tong-xian, LI Qiang
2020, 19 (6): 1530-1542.   DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62869-8
Abstract127)      PDF in ScienceDirect      
Aphelinus asychis is an important aphid endoparasitoid.  Under field and greenhouse conditions, high temperature is one of the factors limiting the application of A. asychis for biological pest control.  To explore the potential role of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and heat shock proteins (HSPs) in this process, we identified 11 genes encoding TRP channels and nine genes encoding HSPs.  Three proteins (AasyTRPA5, AasyPyrexia, AasyPainless) that belong to transient receptor potential ankyrin (TRPA) subfamily and nine HSPs are involved in the response to high temperature.  We also investigated the survival of A. asychis and the response of the identified TRP channels and HSPs to high temperature.  The results showed that the maximum temperature that allowed A. asychis survival was approximately 41°C; females had higher survival rates than that of the males at 40 and 41°C.  Short-term heat-shock resulted in increased expression of Aasyshsp in males, and Aasyhsp40, Aasyhsp68, Aasyhsp70-4, Aasyhsp70-5 and Aasyhsp90 were upregulated and then downregulated, whereas Aasyhsp70-3 was upregulated at 41°C.  Moreover, Aasyhsp40 and Aasyhsp90 showed higher expression levels in females, while Aasyshsp and Aasyhsp70-3 presented opposite expression patterns.  At temperature above 35°C, expression of AasyPyrexia in females was significant higher than that in males, whereas AasyPainless and AasyTRPA5 presented higher expression in males at 40 and 41°C, respectively.  Altogether, these results indicate that protection against thermal stress in A. asychis is coordinated by TRP channels and HSPs.  These findings provide a basis for understanding the potential mechanism of A. asychis in response to high temperatures.
 
Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
Physiology and defense responses of wheat to the infestation of different cereal aphids
LIU Fang-hua, KANG Zhi-wei, TAN Xiao-ling, FAN Yong-liang, TIAN Hong-gang, LIU Tong-xian
2020, 19 (6): 1464-1474.   DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62786-3
Abstract101)      PDF in ScienceDirect      
Cereal aphids are major insect pests of wheat, which cause significant damages to wheat production.  Previous studies mainly focused on the resistance of different wheat varieties to one specific aphid species.  However, reports on the physiology and defense responses of wheat to different cereal aphids are basically lacking.  In this work, we studied the feeding behavior of three cereal aphids: the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Fabricius), the greenbugs, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), and the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus) on winter wheat, and the physiology and defense responses of wheat to the infestation of these cereal aphids with focus on how these cereal aphids utilize divergent strategies to optimize their nutrition requirement from wheat leaves.  Our results indicated that S. graminum and R. padi were better adapted to penetrating phloem tissue and to collect more nutrition than S. avenae.  The harm on wheat physiology committed by S. graminum and R. padi was severer than that by S. avenae, through reducing chlorophyll concentration and interfering metabolism genes.  Furthermore, cereal aphids manipulated the plant nutrition metabolism by increasing the relative concentration of major amino acids and percentage of essential amino acids.  In addition, different cereal aphids triggered specific defense response in wheat.  All of these results suggested that different cereal aphids utilize divergent strategies to change the physiological and defense responses of their host plants in order to optimize their nutrition absorption and requirement.  These findings not only extend our current knowledge on the insect–plant interactions but also provide useful clues to develop novel biotechnological strategies for enhancing the resistance and tolerance of crop plants against phloem-feeding insects.
 
Reference | Related Articles | Metrics