Ammonia (NH3) emissions should be mitigated to improve environmental quality. Croplands are one of the largest NH3 sources, they must be managed properly to reduce their emissions while achieving the target yields. Herein, we report the NH3 emissions, crop yield and changes in soil fertility in a long-term trial with various fertilization regimes, to explore whether NH3 emissions can be significantly reduced using the 4R nutrient stewardship (4Rs), and its interaction with the organic amendments (i.e., manure and straw) in a wheat–maize rotation. Implementing the 4Rs significantly reduced NH3 emissions to 6 kg N ha–1 yr–1 and the emission factor to 1.72%, without compromising grain yield (12.37 Mg ha–1 yr–1) and soil fertility (soil organic carbon of 7.58 g kg–1) compared to the conventional chemical N management. When using the 4R plus manure, NH3 emissions (7 kg N ha–1 yr–1) and the emission factor (1.74%) were as low as 4Rs, and grain yield and soil organic carbon increased to 14.79 Mg ha–1 yr–1 and 10.09 g kg–1, respectively. Partial manure substitution not only significantly reduced NH3 emissions but also increased crop yields and improved soil fertility, compared to conventional chemical N management. Straw return exerted a minor effect on NH3 emissions. These results highlight that 4R plus manure, which couples nitrogen and carbon management can help achieve both high yields and low environmental costs.
The inhibition of nitrification by mixing nitrification inhibitors (NI) with fertilizers is emerging as an effective method to reduce fertilizer-induced nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. The additive 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) apparently inhibits ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) more than ammonia oxidizing archaea (AOA), which dominate the nitrification in alkaline and acid soil, respectively. However, the efficacy of DMPP in terms of nitrogen sources interacting with soil properties remains unclear. We therefore conducted a microcosm experiment using three typical Chinese agricultural soils with contrasting pH values (fluvo-aquic soil, black soil and red soil), which were fertilized with either digestate or urea in conjunction with a range of DMPP concentrations. In the alkaline fluvo-aquic soil, fertilization with either urea or digestate induced a peak in N2O emission (60 μg N kg–1 d–1) coinciding with the rapid nitrification within 3 d following fertilization. DMPP almost eliminated this peak in N2O emission, reducing it by nearly 90%, despite the fact that the nitrification rate was only reduced by 50%. In the acid black soil, only the digestate induced an N2O emission that increased gradually, reaching its maximum (20 μg N kg–1 d–1) after 5–7 d. The nitrification rate and N2O emission were both marginally reduced by DMPP in the black soil, and the N2O yield (N2O-N per NO2–+NO3–-N produced) was exceptionally high at 3.5%, suggesting that the digestate induced heterotrophic denitrification. In the acid red soil, the N2O emission spiked in the digestate and urea treatments at 50 and 10 μg N kg–1 d–1, respectively, and DMPP reduced the rates substantially by nearly 70%. Compared with 0.5% DMPP, the higher concentrations of DMPP (1.0 to 1.5%) did not exert a significantly (P<0.05) better inhibition effect on the N2O emissions in these soils (either with digestate or urea). This study highlights the importance of matching the nitrogen sources, soil properties and NIs to achieve a high efficiency of N2O emission reduction.
Denitrification-induced nitrogen (N) losses from croplands may be greatly increased by intensive fertilization. However, the accurate quantification of these losses is still challenging due to insufficient available in situ measurements of soil dinitrogen (N2) emissions. We carried out two one-week experiments in a maize–wheat cropping system with calcareous soil using the 15N gas-flux (15NGF) method to measure in situ N2 fluxes following urea application. Applications of 15N-labeled urea (99 atom%, 130–150 kg N ha−1) were followed by irrigation on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days after fertilization (DAF 1, 3, and 5, respectively). The detection limits of the soil N2 fluxes were 163–1 565, 81–485, and 54–281 μg N m−2 h−1 for the two-, four-, and six-hour static chamber enclosures, respectively. The N2 fluxes measured in 120 cases varied between 159 and 2 943 (811 on average) μg N m−2 h−1, which were higher than the detection limits, with the exception of only two cases. The N2 fluxes at DAF 3 were significantly higher (by nearly 80% (P<0.01)) than those at DAF 1 and 5 in the maize experiment, while there were no significant differences among the irrigation times in the wheat experiment. The N2 fluxes and the ratios of nitrous oxide (N2O) to the N2O plus N2 fluxes following urea application to maize were approximately 65% and 11 times larger, respectively (P<0.01), than those following urea application to wheat. Such differences could be mainly attributed to the higher soil water contents, temperatures, and availability of soil N substrates in the maize experiment than in the wheat experiment. This study suggests that the 15NGF method is sensitive enough to measure in situ N2 fluxes from intensively fertilized croplands with calcareous soils.