| [1]Abel G J W, Springer F, Willmitzer L, Kossmann J. 1996.Cloning and functional analysis of a cDNA encoding anovel 139 kDa starch synthase from potato (Solanumtuberosum L.). The Plant Journal, 10, 981-991.[2]Andersson M, Melander M, Pojmark P, Larsson H, BülowL, Hofvander P. 2006. Targeted gene suppression byRNA interference: an efficient method for productionof high-amylose potato lines. Journal of Biotechnology,123, 137-148.[3]Buleon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S. 1998. Starchgranules: structure and biosynthesis. InternationalJournal of Biological Macromolecules, 23, 85-112.[4]Chen Y Q. 2002. Methods and Technologies of BiochemistryExperiment. High Eduction Press, Beijing. pp. 175-178.(in Chinese)[5]Craig J, Lloyd J R, Tomlinson K, Barber L, Edwards A,Wang T L, Martin C, Hedley C L, Smith A M. 1998.Mutations in the gene encoding starch synthase IIprofoundly alter amylopectin structure in pea embryos.The Plant Cell, 10, 413-426.[6]Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C. 1991. A simple andrapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNAfor PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 19, 1349.Edwards A, Marshall J, Sidebottom C, Visser R G F, Smith AM, Martin C. 1995. Biochemical and molecularcharacterization of a novel starch synthase from potatotubers. The Plant Journal, 8, 283-294.[7]Edwards A, Fulton D C, Hylton C M, Jobling S A, Gidley M,Rossner U, Martin C, Smith A M. 1999. A combinedreduction in activity of starch synthase II and III ofpotato has novel effects on the starch of tubers. ThePlant Journal, 17, 251-261.[8]Fontaine T, D′Hulst C, Maddelein M L, Routier F, Pépin TM, Decq A, Wieruszeski J M, Delrue B, van-denKoornhuyse N, Bossu J P. 1993. Toward anunderstanding of the biogenesis of the starch granule.Evidence that Chlamydomonas soluble starch synthaseII controls the synthesis of intermediate size glucansof amylopectin. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268,16223-16230.[9]Gao M, Wanat J, Stinard P S, James M G, Myers AM. 1998.Characterization of dull1, a maize gene coding for anovel starch synthase. The Plant Cell, 10, 399-412.[10]Guo X M, Zhang X D, Liang R Q, Chen X Q, Yang F P, LiuQ, Song X Y. 2008. Increase of maize amylose contentthrough RNA interference. Journal of AgriculturalBiotechnology, 16, 658-661. (in Chinese)[11]Jobling S A, Westcott R J, Tayal A, Jeffcoat R, Schwall G P.2002. Production of a freeze-thaw-stable potato starchby antisense inhibition of three starch synthase genes.Nature Biotechnology, 20, 295-299.[12]Lloyd J R, Landschütze V, Kossmann J. 1999. Simultaneousantisense inhibition of two starch-synthase isoformsin potato tubers leads to accumulation of grosslymodified amylopectin. Biochemical Journal, 338, 515-521.[13]Lorberth R, Ritte G, Willmitzer L, Kossmann J. 1998.Inhibition of a starch-granule-bound protein leads tomodified starch and repression of cold sweetening.Nature Biotechnology, 16, 473-477.[14]Marshall J, Sidebottom C, Debet M, Martin C, Smith A M,Edwards A. 1996. Identification of the major starchsynthase in the soluble fraction of potato tubers. ThePlant Cell, 8, 1121-1135.[15]Martinl C, Smith AM. 1995. Starch biosynthesis. The PlantCell, 7, 971-985.[16]Shimada T, Otani M, Hamada T, Kim S H. 2006. Increase ofamylose content of sweetpotato starch by RNAinterference of the starch branching enzyme II gene(IbSBEII). Plant Biotechnology, 23, 85-90.[17]Si H J, Xie C H, Liu J. 2003. An efficient protocol forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation of microtuberand the introduction of an antisense class I patatingene into potato. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 29, 801-805.[18]Slattery C J, Halil K I, Okita T W. 2000. Engineering starchfor increased quantity and quality. Trends in PlantScience, 5, 291-298.[19]Swinkels J J M. 1985. Composition and properties ofcommercial native starches. Starch/Stärke, 37, 1-5.[20]Tomlinson K, Craig J, Smith A M. 1998. Major differencesin isoform composition of starch synthase betweenleaves and embryos of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Planta,204, 86-92.[21]Regina A, Bird A, Topping D, Bowden S, Freeman J, BarsbyT, Kosar-Hashemi B, Li Z Y, Rahman S,Morell M. 2006.High-amylose wheat generated by RNA interferenceimproves indices of large-bowel health in rats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 3546-3551.[22]Roldán I, Wattebled F, Lucas M M, DelvalléD, Planchot V,Jiménez S, Pérez R, Ball S, D’Hulst C, Mérida A. 2007.The phenotype of soluble starch synthase IV defectivemutants of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests a novelfunction of elongation enzymes in the control of starchgranule formation. The Plant Journal, 49, 492-504.[23]Yang T, Zhang N, Li L, Liu H Y, Si H J, Wang D. 2009.Cloning and bioinformatic analysis of soluble starchsynthase SSIII gene in potato. Molecular PlantBreeding, 7, 545-549. (in Chinese)[24]Yu T F, Xia P. 2005. Characteristic and use of the potatostarch. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 21, 55-58. (in Chinese)[25]Zhang X, Myers AM, James M G. 2005. Mutations affectingstarch synthaseIII in Arabidopsis alter leaf starchstructure and increase the rate of starch synthesis.Plant Physiology, 138, 663-674. (in Chinese)[26]Zhang X, Szydlowski N, Delvallé D, D’Hulst C, James M G,Myers A M. 2008. Overlapping functions of the starchsynthases SSII and SSIII in amylopectin biosynthesisin Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biology, 8, 96.Zhang Y C, Tian F. 2007. Research Methods of PotatoExperiments. China Agricultural Science andTechnology Press, Beijing. pp. 185-186. (in Chinese) |
