中国农业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (23): 4638-4645.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.23.016

• 畜牧·兽医·资源昆虫 • 上一篇    下一篇

光照节律对北京鸭生产性能、屠宰性能和血液抗氧化功能的影响

辛海瑞1,潘晓花1,毕  晔1,熊本海1,蒋林树2

 
  

  1. 1中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所动物营养学国家重点实验室,北京100193
    2北京农学院动物科学技术学院奶牛营养学北京市重点实验室,北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-26 出版日期:2016-12-01 发布日期:2016-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 熊本海,Tel:010-62811680;E-mail:xiongbenhai@caas.cn。蒋林树,Tel:010- 81798101;E-mail:jls@bac.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:辛海瑞,E-mail:xinshengrui@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家十三五重大专项课题(2016YFD0700205, 2016YFD0700201)

Effects of Lighting Regimes on Production Performance, Carcass Performance and Anti-Oxidant Capacity of the Blood in Peking Ducks

XIN Hai-rui1, PAN Xiao-hua1, BI Ye1, XIONG Ben-hai1, JIANG Lin-shu2   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193
    2Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206
  • Received:2016-01-26 Online:2016-12-01 Published:2016-12-01

摘要: 【目的】北京鸭作为中国典型的肉鸭品种,饲养数量逐年增加,但目前尚未有其标准化的光照参数。文章旨在探究不同光照节律对北京鸭生产性能、屠宰性能及血液抗氧化功能的影响,为北京鸭的实际生产提供可靠的理论依据。【方法】采用单因素随机区组设计,选择320只1日龄健康北京鸭,随机分配到5个处理中,每处理4个重复,每重复16只鸭(公母各半)。试验采用5种光照节律处理,分别为间歇光照(3L﹕1D)、渐增光照、短时光照(16L﹕8D)、渐减光照、连续光照(24L﹕0D)。光照强度统一设置为5 lx,光照来源统一采用白炽灯。以各重复组为单位,记录1—2 w、3—5 w、6 w及1—6 w耗料量和体增重,并计算各阶段的平均耗料量、平均体增重和料重比(耗料量/体增重)。6周龄末,每个重复随机选取6只北京鸭(公母各半)进行称重并屠宰,测定屠体率、全净膛率、胸肌率、腿肌率和腹脂率。6周龄末每个重复组随机抽取4只北京鸭(公母各半)进行翅根静脉采血,血样处理后,及时测定褪黑激素(Mel)、丙二醛(MDA)含量和总超氧化物歧化酶(T-SOD)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)活性。【结果】不同光照节律对北京鸭整个生长阶段(1—6 w)的平均采食量、平均体增重及料肉比无显著差异(P>0.05);但在育雏期(1—2 w)时短时光照组的平均采食量和平均体增重显著低于间歇光照组、渐减光照组和连续光照组(P<0.05),同时渐增光照组的采食量显著低于间歇光照组和渐减光照组,但料肉比却显著低于其他4组(P<0.05);生长期(3—5 w)和肥育期(6 w)时各组间的平均采食量、平均体增重及料肉比无显著差异(P>0.05)。光照节律对北京鸭屠体率、胸肌率、腿肌率和腹脂率均无显著差异(P>0.05),但连续光照组的全净膛率显著低于其他4组(P<0.05)。不同光照节律组血浆中褪黑激素含量、MDA含量、GSH-Px活性差异性不显著(P>0.05),但短时光照组血浆中T-SOD活性显著低于间歇光照组、渐减光照组和连续光照组(P<0.05),渐增光照组也显著低于渐减光照组(P<0.05)。【结论】在育雏期尽管短时光照(16L﹕8D)在育雏期不利于北京鸭的采食量和体增重,但不影响其最终出栏重。而渐增光照则能显著提高育雏阶段的饲料转化率。但短时光照和渐增光照显著降低血浆中T-SOD的活性,不利于机体抗氧化功能。此外,24 h连续光照会降低北京鸭的全净膛率,降低产肉率。

关键词: 北京鸭, 光照节律;生产性能;屠宰性能;抗氧化功能

Abstract: 【Objective】As a typical meat duck variety in China, the amount of Peking Duck is increasing year by year, but there is no standardized lighting parameters for Peking Ducks at present. This trial was conducted to investigate the effects of lighting regimes on production performance, carcass performance and anti-oxidant capacity of the blood in Peking Ducks, aiming to provide a reliable theoretical basis for practical production of Peking Ducks. 【Method】Through single factor randomized block design in this experiment, three hundred and twenty 1-day-old Peking Ducks were randomly divided into 5 treatments, each treatment included 4 replicate groups with 16 ducks per group (half were male). All ducks were exposed to 5 different lighting regimes treatments: intermittent lighting (INT L), increasing lighting (INC L), short-time lighting (ST L), decreasing lighting (DEC L), and continuous lighting (CON L). The lighting intensity was 5 lx, and incandescent lamp was used as lighting source conformably. Feed consumption and body weight gain of 1-2 w, 3-5 w, 6 w and 1-6 w were recorded, and the average feed intake (AFI), average body weight gain (ABWG), feed-weight ratio (F/B) of different stages were calculated. At the end of 6 weeks, six Peking Ducks (half were male) were selected randomly from replicate groups, and those ducks were weighed and slaughtered to determine carcass traits, including dressing percentage, eviscerated percentage, breast muscle percentage, thigh meat percentage and abdominal fat percentage; Blood samples were collected from the bottom wing of four Peking Ducks (half were male) in every replicate groups. Blood samples were centrifuged promptly to determine the levels of Mel, MDA, GSH-Px and the activity of T-SOD. 【Result】The results were shown as follows: For the whole growth stage (1-6 w), lighting regimes had no significant effect on AFI, ABWG and F/B (P>0.05). During brooding period (1-2 w), the AFI and ABWG of ST L groups were significantly lower than INT L, DEC L and CON L groups. The FI of INC L group was obviously lower than INT L and DEC L groups, while the F/B was significantly higher than other groups. Lighting regimes had no significant effects on Peking Ducks’ performance during the growth (3-5 w) and fattening period (1-2 w) (P>0.05). Carcass traits (P>0.05), including dressing percentage, breast muscle percentage, thigh meat percentage and abdominal fat percentage weren’t affected by lighting regimes. However, the eviscerated percentage of CON L groups was significantly lower than other groups. There were no obvious difference in the levels of Mel, MDA and GSH-Px. The activity of T-SOD of ST L group was much lower than INT L, DEC L and CON L groups, and INC L group had lower T-SOD activity than DEC L group. 【Conclusion】 Although short-time lighting has no beneficial effect on AFI and ABWG in brooding period, it doesn’t affect the final slaughter weight of Peking ducks. The Increasing Lighting can improve the AFI in brooding period. Short-time lighting and increasing lighting decreased the activity of T-SOD and were adverse to improve anti-oxidant capacity of Peking Ducks. Besides, 24 h continuous lighting decreased the eviscerated percentage and meat production rate.

Key words: Peking Ducks, lighting regimes, production performance, carcass performance, anti-oxidant capacity