中国农业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 503-517.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.03.009

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮循环与中国农业氮管理

王敬国,林杉,李保国   

  1. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院/植物-土壤相互作用教育部重点实验室,北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-17 出版日期:2016-02-01 发布日期:2016-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 王敬国,Tel:010-62732198;E-mail:wangjg@cau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王敬国,Tel:010-62732198;E-mail:wangjg@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(41230856,51139006)、国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD15B01)

Nitrogen Cycling and Management Strategies in Chinese Agriculture

WANG Jing-guo, LIN Shan, LI Bao-guo   

  1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2015-08-17 Online:2016-02-01 Published:2016-02-01

摘要: 作为全球活性氮制造量和氮肥消费量均最大的国家,中国农业生态系统的氮平衡问题受到了国内外广泛的关注。普遍认为中国农田施氮过量问题突出,并产生了严重的环境污染。为全面了解中国农业生态系统的来源和去向,找出引起氮肥消费量高的原因,本研究运用氮循环基本原理,以2010年为例,根据近年来发表的文献和国家统计资料,详细讨论了不同空间尺度上中国农业生态系统的氮输出和输入,重点分析了作物-土壤系统氮循环与氮平衡的特征。2010年中国农业生态系统氮投入总体上过量,其数量基本上相当于经生物地球化学循环返回作物–土壤系统的氮量,大致在5 Tg N左右。在全国水平上,2010年化肥和有机肥带入农田的氮量,相等于作物吸氮量和农田氮损失量之和;由于化学氮肥流向的多样化,如林、牧、渔业和城市绿化等的氮肥消耗,以及部分经济作物包括果树和蔬菜,特别是设施蔬菜的高量施氮,总体上粮食作物过量施氮的问题并不十分突出。在耕地资源有限(占全球8%的耕地面积,养活20%的世界人口)、有机废弃物中氮养分循环利用率低于30%、豆科作物播种面积较少且生物固氮占农田总氮投入不足15%的情况下,中国的农业生产只有依靠氮肥。然而,中国氮肥消费存在着很大的地区差异,在土地生产力水平较高的黄淮海、长江中下游和珠江三角洲地区,单位农作物播种面积的施氮量显著高于全国平均水平。这些地区氮肥消费量较大与粮食单产高、复种指数高和豆科作物种植比例低有密切关系。因此,为保证人们不断增长的食物需求和膳食结构的改善,加之土壤基础肥力相对较低,农田化学氮肥投入较高具有一定的合理性。然而,农业生产过程中发生的氮损失,既浪费了资源,也污染了环境。损失进入大气和水中活性氮以及环境中新产生的活性氮,经生物地球化学循环过程以大气沉降和灌溉水返回农田,已经成为作物-土壤系统氮的重要投入项。由于农业生态系统中氮素转化过程的多样性和生物地球化学循环的复杂性,循环过程中的氮损失不可避免。只有通过在不同空间尺度上对氮素进行优化管理,才能将氮损失降低到最低。在保证粮食安全的基础上,尽可能地降低农田施氮的环境风险,需要多学科、多部门的协作与共同努力,在不同空间尺度上实现氮优化管理、达到降低农业生态系统氮肥投入的目的。

关键词: 农业生态系统, 氮生物地球化学循环, 氮平衡, 氮损失, 氮管理

Abstract: It is in general thought that nitrogen (N) fertilizer is overused in Chinese croplands and that the overuse has resulted in severe environmental problems. As the biggest reactive nitrogen producer and N fertilizer consumer in the world, China is facing a great challenge to reduce nitrogen consumption in agriculture. The objectives of this review are to examine the sources and fate of reactive nitrogen in agroecosystems, to find out why N fertilizer consumption reaches such a high level, and provide with suggestions for better N management practices. To understand the current agricultural use of reactive N in China, principles of biogeochemical N cycling are used to discuss N flows in the agroecosystems in the year 2010, with focus on N input/output and balances in crop-soil systems. At the national level, input of reactive N to croplands was excessive in 2010, and the surplus was approximately equal to the quantity of the reactive N recycled back to crop fields by atmospheric N deposition and irrigation with N-polluted water, about 5 Tg N. Generally speaking, the use of N fertilizer in cereal crops is not extraordinarily high since N fertilizer is also distributed for other uses: Forestation, feeding livestock and fishes, and application to the green fields in urban areas. It is common and significant that there are much higher N application rates to fruit tree plantations and vegetable production, especially to the greenhouse vegetable growing system, in comparison with that applied to cereal crops. With the facts of the limited arable lands, low recycling rates of organic wastes, and low input of biological fixed N, crop production has to depend heavily on the use of N fertilizer in China. There is a low acreage of arable land per capita, with 8% of global arable land feeding 20% of the world population. Recycled rate of nutrient N in the organic wastes are lower than 30% and input of biological N fixation to croplands is less than 15%. Therefore, to meet the demands of Chinese population for both food and improving diets under the condition of the predominance of the croplands with medium to low productivities, high N fertilizer input is understandable. However, N fertilizer consumption is much higher than the national average in some highly productive regions, including the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, the Yangtze Basin, and Zhujiang Delta (Guangdong) regions, and is closely connected with higher crop yields/multiple cropping indices, and smaller proportion of legume crops to the total cropping area. It is clear that the N losses from food production-processing-consumption chain have resulted in resource wasting and environmental risks. On the other hand, part of the environment received reactive N from the losses of croplands and the other pollution sources, returns to the fields via atmospheric deposition and the irrigations with polluted waters, and becomes an important source of N input to croplands. Due to the complexity of N transformation in agroecosystems and biogeochemical N cycling, N losses are unavoidable. Therefore, the best management practices at various spatial levels should be taken as the options to reduce the fertilizer use in croplands to the minimum. Integrated measures, including multi-disciplinary researches and the cooperation of various social sectors, have been suggested to optimize N management practices at each spatial level, in order to reach the fundamental goals of maintaining/improving soil fertility, securing food, reducing nitrogen fertilizer use, and minimizing environmental risks.

Key words: agroecosystem, biogeochemical nitrogen cycling, nitrogen balance, nitrogen losses, nitrogen management