喷施烯效唑对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能及产量的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.24.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】甜荞（Fagopyrum esculentum M.）被誉为21世纪人类的绿色食品之一。倒伏是制约甜荞产量和品质的重要因素。研究喷施不同浓度的烯效唑对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能的影响，为甜荞的抗倒伏栽培提供理论依据。【方法】试验于2013—2014年在西南大学歇马科研基地进行，采用随机区组设计，以中抗甜荞品种“宁荞1号”为试验材料，设置0（CK）、25 mg·L^-1（T1）、50 mg·L^-1（T2）、75 mg·L^-1（T3）和100 mg·L^-1（T4）5个烯效唑浓度处理，于4叶期按100 mL·m^-2进行叶面喷施。分别于开花期、灌浆期和成熟期对茎秆抗折力、倒伏指数、茎秆形态特性和茎秆解剖结构等指标进行测定分析，并于成熟期调查倒伏习性和产量。【结果】（1）茎秆抗折力、茎壁厚度和维管束面积从开花期至成熟期呈先增加后减小的变化趋势，在灌浆期达最大值；倒伏指数、株高、茎秆重心高度、茎秆鲜重、基部第2节间长、基部第2节间粗、机械组织厚度和维管束数目从开花期至成熟期逐渐增加；第2节间干重、节间充实度和机械组织层数从开花期至灌浆期逐渐增加，而后变化不明显。（2）产量、茎秆抗折力、基部第2节间粗、基部第2节间干重、节间充实度、机械组织层数、机械组织厚度、茎壁厚度、维管束数目和维管束面积在CK-T3处理浓度下表现为随浓度的增加而增加，在T3-T4处理浓度下表现为随浓度增加而降低；倒伏率、倒伏指数、株高、茎秆重心高度、茎秆鲜重、基部第2节间长在CK-T3处理浓度下表现为随浓度的增加而降低，在T3-T4处理浓度下表现为随浓度增加而增加。（3）与CK相比，T1、T2、T3和T4处理的产量分别增加了2.3%、6.5%、21.3%和11.3%，倒伏率分别降低了17.9%、40.7%、84.0%和60.5%。（4）不同烯效唑浓度处理间，茎秆抗折力、倒伏指数、茎秆形态特性和茎秆解剖结构均存在显著差异。产量与株高、茎秆重心高度、茎秆鲜重和基部第2节间长、倒伏指数及倒伏率呈极显著负相关，与基部茎秆第2节间粗、基部第2节间干重、节间充实度、机械组织层数、机械组织厚度、茎壁厚度、维管束数目和维管束面积及茎秆抗折力呈极显著正相关。茎秆抗折力、基部第2节间粗、基部第2节间干重、节间充实度、机械组织层数、机械组织厚度、茎壁厚度、维管束数目和维管束面积表现为T3＞T4＞T2＞T1＞CK，倒伏指数、株高、茎秆重心高度、茎秆鲜重和基部第2节间长表现为CK＞T1＞T2＞T4＞T3。【结论】本试验条件下，当烯效唑喷施浓度为75 mg·L^-1时，能有效优化甜荞茎秆结构，改善茎秆质量，减小倒伏发生风险，增加产量。研究结果为甜荞的抗倒伏栽培奠定了基础。

关键词: 甜荞（Fagopyrum esculentum, 烯效唑, 抗倒性能, 茎秆特性, 产量 M.）

Abstract: 【Objective】Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.) has been praised as one of the green foods of human beings in the 21st century. Lodging is an important factor which limiting common buckwheat yield and quality worldwide, so exploring the effects of spraying uniconazole of different concentrations on culm could provide a theoretical basis for lodging resistance cultivation of common buckwheat. 【Method】 The field experiments were conducted as a randomized block design in 2013 and 2014 at the Xiema Experimental Station, Southwest University, China. Ningqiao 1, a moderate lodging resistance cultivar of common buckwheat, was used in this study. 0 mg·L^-1 (CK), 25 mg·L^-1 (T1), 50 mg·L^-1 (T2), 75 mg·L^-1 (T3), and 100 mg·L^-1 (T4) uniconazole were sprayed at the rate of 100 mL·m^-2 on common buckwheat leaf surfaces at the four-leaf stage. The culm snapping resistance, lodging index, culm morphology characteristics, and culm anatomical structure were measured and analyzed at the anthesis stage, filling stage, and maturity stage, respectively. The lodging behavior and yield were investigated at the maturity stage.【Result】The culm snapping resistance, culm wall thickness, and vascular bundle area increased and then decreased from the anthesis stage to maturity stage, and their maximum values appeared in the filling stage. The lodging index, plant height, culm gravity height, culm fresh weight, basal 2nd internode length, basal 2nd internode diameter, mechanical tissue thickness, and vascular bundle number increased from the anthesis stage to the maturity stage. The basal 2nd internode dry weight, filling degree, and mechanical tissue layer number increased from the anthesis stage to the filling stage, but then changes were not obvious. The yield, culm snapping resistance, basal 2nd internode diameter, basal 2nd internode dry weight, filling degree, mechanical tissue layer number, mechanical tissue thickness, culm wall thickness, vascular bundle number, and vascular bundle area increased with the increase of the concentration of uniconazole in the condition of CK-T3 treatments, while decreased with the increase of the concentration of uniconazole in the condition of T3-T4 treatments. The lodging percentage, lodging index, plant height, culm gravity height, culm fresh weight, and basal 2nd internode length decreased with the increase of the concentration of uniconazole in the condition of CK-T3 treatments, while it increased with the increase of the concentration of uniconazole in the condition of T3-T4 treatments. Compared with the control, the yield under the T1, T2, T3 and T4 treatments increased by 2.3%, 6.5%, 21.3%, and 11.3%, respectively, and the lodging percentage decreased by 17.9%, 40.7%, 84.0%, and 60.5%, respectively. There were significant differences in culm snapping resistance, lodging index, culm morphological structure, and culm anatomical structure among different treatments of uniconazole concentration. Plant height, culm gravity height, culm fresh weight, basal 2nd internode length , lodging index, lodging percentage were significant and negatively correlated with the yield. However, the basal 2nd internode diameter, basal 2nd internode dry weight, filling degree, mechanical tissue layer number, mechanical tissue thickness , culm wall thickness, vascular bundle area, vascular bundle number and culm snapping resistance are significantly and positively correlated with the yield. The culm snapping resistance, basal 2nd internode diameter, basal 2nd internode dry weight, filling degree, mechanical tissue layer number, mechanical tissue thickness, culm wall thickness, vascular bundle number, and vascular bundle area showed a trend of T3＞T4＞T2＞T1＞CK, while the lodging index, plant height, culm gravity height, culm fresh weight, and basal 2nd internode length showed a trend of CK＞T1＞T2＞T4＞T3.【Conclusion】In this research, when uniconazole was sprayed 75 mg·L^-1, the culm structure could be optimized effectively, the culm quality improved, the lodging risk decreased and the yield of common buckwheat was enhanced. The result would lay a foundation of lodging resistance cultivation of common buckwheat.

Key words: common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.), uniconazole, lodging resistance, culm characteristics, yield

刘星贝，吴东倩，汪灿，胡丹，杨浩，佘恒志，阮仁武，袁晓辉，易泽林. 喷施烯效唑对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(24): 4903-4915.

LIU Xing-bei, WU Dong-qian, WANG Can, HU Dan, YANG Hao, SHE Heng-zhi, RUAN Ren-wu,YUAN Xiao-hui, YI Ze-lin. Effects of Spraying Uniconazole on Lodging Resistance of Culm and Yield in Common Buckwheat[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(24): 4903-4915.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.24.005

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2015/V48/I24/4903

参考文献

[1] Yokosho K, Yamaji N, Ma J F. Global transcriptome analysis of Al-induced genes in an Al-accumulating species, common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Plant & Cell Physiology, 2014, 55: 2077-2091.

[2] 尹万利, 雷绪劳, 王敬昌, 王喜元, 闫志林. 甜荞的食用价值与高产栽培措施. 陕西农业科学, 2009(3): 207-209.

Yin W L, Lei X L, Wang J C, Wang X Y, Yan Z L. The food value and high yield cultivation measures of common buckwheat. Shanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009(3): 207-209. (in Chinese)

[3] Koyama M, Nakamura C, Nakamura K. Changes in phenols contents from buckwheat sprouts during growth stage. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2013, 50: 86-93.

[4] Sano M, Nakagawa M, Oishi A, Yasui Y, Katsube-Tanaka T. Diversification of 13S globulins, allergenic seed storge proteins, of common buckwheat. Food Chemistry, 2014, 155: 192-198.

[5] 刘淑梅, 韩淑英, 崔国金, 朱丽莎, 吕华. 甜荞麦叶总黄酮降糖、降脂作用及机制. 第四军医大学学报, 2003, 24(19): 1815-1817.

Liu S M, Han S Y, Cui G J, Zhu L S, Lü H. Effects and mechanism of total flavones of buckwheat leaf in lowering serum glucose and lipid. Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University, 2003, 24(19): 1815-1817. (in Chinese)

[6] Hagiwara M, Izusawa H, Inoue N, Matano T. Varietal differences of shoot growth characters related to lodging in tartary buckwheat. Fagopyrum, 1999, 16: 67-72.

[7] 刘传飞, 金乐红, 曾晓春, 严晓华. 烯效唑和多效唑在大豆叶片和土壤中的降解动态比较. 植物生理学通讯, 1998, 34(5): 350-352.

Liu C F, Jin L H, Zen X C, Yan X H. Decomposition of uniconazol and poclobutrazol in soybean fields. Plant Physiology Communications, 1998, 34(5): 350-352. (in Chinese)

[8] Kong E Y, Liu D C, Guo X L, Yang W L, Sun J Z, Li X, Zhan K H, Cui D Q, Lin J X, Zhang A M. Anatomical and chemical characteristics associated with lodging resistance in wheat. The Crop Journal, 2013, 1: 43-49.

[9] 崔海岩, 靳立斌, 李波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 董树亭, 刘鹏. 遮阴对夏玉米茎秆形态结构和倒伏的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(17): 3497-3505.

Cui H Y, Jin L B, Li B, Zhang J W, Zhao B, Dong S T, Liu P. Effects of shading on stalks morphology, structure and lodging of summer maize in field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(17): 3497-3505. (in Chinese)

[10] 王群瑛, 胡昌浩. 玉米茎秆抗倒特性的解剖研究. 作物学报, 1991, 17(1): 70-75.

Wang Q Y, Hu C H. Studies on the anatomical structures of the stalks of maize with different resistance to lodging. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1991, 17(1): 70-75. (in Chinese)

[11] 罗茂春, 田翠婷, 李晓娟, 林金星. 水稻茎秆形态结构特性和化学成分与抗倒伏关系综述. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(11): 2346-2353.

Luo M C, Tian C T, Li X J, Lin J X. Relationship between morpho-anatomical traits together with chemical components and lodging resistance of stem in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2007, 27(11): 2346-2353. (in Chinese)

[12] 马均, 马文波, 田彦华, 杨建昌, 周开达, 朱庆森. 重穗型水稻植株抗倒伏能力的研究. 作物学报, 2004, 30(2): 143-148.

Ma J, Ma W B, Tian Y H, Yang J C, Zhou K D, Zhu Q S. The culm lodging resistance of heavy panicle type of rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30(2): 143-148. (in Chinese)

[13] 杨艳华, 朱镇, 张亚东, 赵庆勇, 周丽慧, 王才林. 水稻茎秆解剖结构与抗倒伏能力关系的研究. 广西植物, 2012, 32(6): 834-839.

Yang Y H, Zhu Z, Zhang Y D, Zhao Q Y, Zhou L H, Wang C L. Relationship between anatomic structure of the stem and lodging resistance of rice. Guihaia, 2012, 32(6): 834-839. (in Chinese)

[14] 张忠旭, 陈温福, 杨振玉, 华泽田, 高日玲, 高勇, 赵迎春. 水稻抗倒伏能力与茎秆物理性状的关系及其对产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1999, 30(2): 81-85.

Zhang Z X, Chen W F, Yang Z Y, Hua Z T, Gao R L, Gao Y, Zhao Y C. Effect of lodging resistance on yield and its relationship with stalk physical characteristics. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 1999, 30(2): 81-85. (in Chinese)

[15] 杨惠杰, 杨仁崔, 李义珍, 姜照伟, 郑景生. 水稻茎秆性状与抗倒性状的关系. 福建农业学报, 2000, 15(2): 1-7.

Yang H J, Yang R C, Li Y Z, Jiang Z W, Zheng J S. Relationship between culm traits and lodging resistance of rice cultivars. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2000,15(2):1-7. (in Chinese)

[16] 冯素伟, 姜小苓, 胡铁柱, 牛立元, 茹振刚, 李笑慧, 尹坤. 不同小麦品种茎秆显微结构与抗倒强度关系研究. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(36): 57-62.

Feng S W, Jiang X L, Hu T Z, Niu L Y, Ru Z G, Li X H, Yin K. Study on relationship between the stem microstructure and lodging resistance with different wheat varieties. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(36): 57-62. (in Chinese)

[17] 王芬娥, 黄高宝, 郭维俊, 张锋伟, 吴建民, 赵多佳. 小麦茎秆力学性能与微观结构研究. 农业机械学报, 2009, 40(5): 92-95.

Wang F E, Huang G B, Guo W J, Zhang F W, Wu J M, Zhao D J. Mechanical properties and micro-structure of wheat stems. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2009, 40(5): 92-95. (in Chinese)

[18] Tripathi S C, Sayre K D, Kaul J N. Growth and morphology of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) culms and their association with lodging: Effects of genotypes, N levels and ethephon. Field Crops Research, 2003, 84: 271-290.

[19] Crook M J, Ennos A R. Stem and root characteristics associated with lodging resistance in four winter wheat cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 1994, 123: 167-174.

[20] Berry P M, Spink J H, Gay A P, Craigon J. A comparison of root and stem lodging risks among winter wheat cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 2003, 141: 191-202.

[21] 张建, 陈金城, 唐章林, 王瑞. 油菜茎秆理化性质与倒伏关系的研究. 西南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 28(5): 763-765.

Zhang J, Chen J C, Tang Z L, Wang R. Study on the physico-chemical properties of stem as related to lodging in rape. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University: Natural Science, 2006, 28(5): 763-765. (in Chinese)

[22] 刘仲发, 勾玲, 赵明, 张保军. 遮阴对玉米茎秆形态特征、穿刺强度及抗倒伏能力的影响. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(4): 91-96.

Liu Z F, Gou L, Zhao M, Zhang B J. Effects of shading on stalk morphological characteristics, rind penetration strength and lodging resistance of maize. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2011, 26(4): 91-96. (in Chinese)

[23] Mi C Q, Zhang X D, Li S M, Yang J Y, Zhu D H, Yang Y. Assessment of environment lodging stress for maize using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2011, 54: 1053-1060.

[24] 王莹, 杜建林. 大麦根倒伏抗性评价方法及其倒伏系数的通径分析. 作物学报, 2001, 27(6): 941-945.

Wang Y, Du J L. Evaluation method of root lodging resistance and its path analysis in barley. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(6): 941-945. (in Chinese)

[25] 黄金堂. 二棱大麦茎秆性状与抗倒性关系的研究. 麦类作物学报, 2004, 24(3): 49-52.

Huang J T. Study on the relationship between culm traits and lodging resistance of two-rowed barley. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2004, 24(3): 49-52. (in Chinese)

[26] 潘瑞炽. 植物生长延缓剂的生化效应. 植物生理学通讯, 1996, 32(3): 161-168.

Pan R C. Biochemical effects of plant growth retardants. Plant Physiology Communications, 1996, 32(3): 161-168. (in Chinese)

[27] Izumi K, Kamiya Y, Sakurai A, Oshio H, Takahashi N. Studies of sites of action of a new plant growth retardant (E)-1-(4- chlorophenyl)-4, 4-dimethyl-2-(1, 2, 4-triazol-1-yl)-1-penten-3-ol (S- 3307) and comparative effects of its stereoisomers in a cell-free system from Cucurbita maxima. Plant & Cell Physiology, 1985, 26: 821-827.

[28] 杨文钰, 樊高琼, 任万军, 王竹, 于振文, 余松烈. 烯效唑干拌种对小麦根叶生理功能的影响. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(7): 1339-1345.

Yang W Y, Fan G Q, Ren W J, Wang Z, Yu Z W, Yu S L. Physiological effect of uniconazole waterless-dressed seeds on root and leaf of wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(7): 1339-1345. (in Chinese)

[29] 张倩, 张海燕, 谭伟明, 段留生. 30%矮壮素·烯效唑微乳剂对水稻抗倒伏及产量的影响. 农药学学报, 2011, 13(2): 144-148.

Zhang Q, Zhang H Y, Tan W M, Duan L S. Effects of chlormequat-uniconazole 300 micro-emulsion on lodging resistance and yield of rice. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2011, 13(2): 144-148. (in Chinese)

[30] 王仁杯, 徐绍英. 烯效唑对大麦的降矮抗倒效应及其机理研究. 浙江农业大学学报, 1996, 22(6): 579-584.

Wang R B, Xu S Y. Study on uniconazole anti-lodgy ability and its mechanism in barley. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 1996, 22(6): 579-584. (in Chinese)

[31] Yan Y H, Gong W Z, Yang W Y, Wan Y, Chen X L, Chen Z Q, Wang L Y. Seed treatment with uniconazole powder improves soybean seedling growth under shading by corn in relay strip intercropping system. Plant Production Science, 2010, 13: 367-374.

[32] 李玥莹, 陈凤玉. 水稻烯效唑浸种对秧苗影响的解剖学观察. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(4): 330-332.

Li Y Y, Chen F Y. Effect of uniconazole on histological structures of rice seeding. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(4): 330-332. (in Chinese)

[33] Wang C, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, Hu D, Yang H, Li Y, Yi Z L. Relationship between lignin metabolism and lodging resistance of culm in buckwheat. Journal of Agricultural Science (Canadian), 2014, 6: 29-36.

[34] Wang C, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, Hu D, Yang H, Li Y, Yi Z L. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and planting density on the lignin synthesis in the culm in relation to lodging resistance of buckwheat. Plant Production Science, 2015, 18: 218-227.

[35] 汪灿, 阮仁武, 袁晓辉, 胡丹, 杨浩, 林婷婷, 何沛龙, 李燕, 易泽林. 荞麦茎秆解剖结构和木质素代谢及其与抗倒性的关系. 作物学报, 2014, 40(10): 1846-1856.

Wang C, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, Hu D, Yang H, Lin T T, He P L, Li Y, Yi Z L. Relationship of anatomical structure and lignin metabolism with lodging resistance of culm in buckwheat. Acta Agronmica Sinica, 2014, 40(10): 1846-1856. (in Chinese)

[36] 汪灿, 阮仁武, 袁晓辉, 王诗学, 李蔓, 易泽林. 不同荞麦品种抗倒伏能力与根系及茎秆性状的关系. 西南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 37(1): 65-71.

Wang C, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, Wang S X, Li M, Yi Z L. Relationship between root and stem traits and lodging resistance in different buckwheat cultivars. Journal of Southwest University: Natural Science Edition, 2015, 37(1): 65-71. (in Chinese)

[37] 乔春贵. 作物抗倒伏性的综合指标——倒伏指数. 吉林农业大学学报, 1988, 10(1): 7-10.

Qiao C G. Lodging index—a synthetic indication of lodging resistance. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 1988, 10(1): 7-10. (in Chinese)

[38] 陈晓光, 史春余, 尹燕枰, 王振林, 石玉华, 彭佃亮, 倪英丽, 蔡铁. 小麦茎秆木质素代谢及其与抗倒性的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37(9): 1616-1622.

Chen X G, Shi C Y, Yin Y P, Wang Z L, Shi Y H, Peng D L, Ni Y L, Cai T. Relationship between lignin metabolism and lodging resistance in wheat. Acta Agronmica Sinica, 2011, 37(9): 1616-1622. (in Chinese)

[39] 魏凤珍, 李金才, 王成雨, 屈会娟, 沈学善. 氮肥运筹模式对小麦茎秆抗倒性能的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(6): 1080-1085.

Wei F Z, Li J C, Wang C Y, Qu H J, Shen X S. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer application model on culm lodging resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(6): 1080-1085. (in Chinese)

[40] Berry P M, Spink J. Predicting yield losses caused by lodging in wheat. Field Crops Research, 2012, 137: 19-26.

[41] Acreche M M, Slafer G A. Lodging yield penalties as affected by breeding in Mediterranean wheats. Field Crops Research, 2011, 122: 40-48.

[42] Peng D L, Chen X G, Yin Y P, Lu K L, Yang W B, Tang Y H, Wang Z L. Lodging resistance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Lignin accumulation and its related enzymes activities due to the application of paclobutrazol or gibberellin acid. Field Crops Research, 2014, 157: 1-7.

[43] 李金才, 尹钧, 魏凤珍. 播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响. 作物学报, 2005, 31(5): 662-666.

Li J C, Yin J, Wei F Z. Effects of planting density on characters of culm and culm lodging resistant index in winter wheat. Acta Agronmica Sinica, 2005, 31(5): 662-666. (in Chinese)

[44] 张喜娟, 李红娇, 李伟娟, 徐正进, 陈温福, 张文忠, 王嘉宇. 北方直立穗型粳稻抗倒性的研究. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(7): 2305-2313.

Zhang X J, Li H J, Li W J, Xu Z J, Chen W F, Zhang W Z, Wang J Y. The lodging resistance of erect panicle japonica rice in northern China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(7): 2305-2313. (in Chinese)

[45] 冯素伟, 李淦, 胡铁柱, 姜小苓, 李小军, 董娜, 茹振钢. 不同小麦品种茎秆抗倒性的研究. 麦类作物学报, 2012, 32(6): 1055-1059.

Feng S W, Li G, Hu T Z, Jiang X L, Li X J, Dong N, Ru Z G. Study on the lodging resistance of different wheat varieties. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2012, 32(6): 1055-1059. (in Chinese)

[46] 陈丽芬, 李凌飞, 陈晔. 烯效唑拌种对苦荞生长的影响. 江西农业学报, 2008, 20(9): 38-39.

Chen L F, Li L F, Chen Y. Effects of uniconazole seed-dressing on growth of tartary buckwheat. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2008, 20(9): 38-39. (in Chinese)

[47] 龚万灼, 张正翼, 杨文钰, 李闻珠. 烯效唑干拌种对大豆形态特征和产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2007, 26(3): 369-376.

Gong W Z, Zhang Z Y, Yang W Y, Li W Z. Effect of uniconazole for dry seed treatment on morphological characteristics and yield of soybean. Soybean Science, 2007, 26(3): 369-376. (in Chinese)

[48] 申广勒, 石英尧, 黄艳玲, 石扬娟, 王维刚, 张从合, 陈多璞. 水稻抗倒伏特性及其与茎秆性状的相关性研究. 中国农学通报, 2007,23(12):58-62.

Shen G L, Shi Y Y, Huang Y L, Shi Y J, Wang W G, Zhang C H, Chen D P. Study on rice lodging resistance character and correlation between the culm traits and lodging resistance traits. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(12): 58-62. (in Chinese)