植物乳杆菌C88对H2O2诱导氧化损伤的 Caco-2细胞的保护作用

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.03.017

中国农业科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 606-613.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.03.017

植物乳杆菌C88对H2O2诱导氧化损伤的 Caco-2细胞的保护作用

李盛钰, 李达, 赵玉娟, 张雪, 黄丽, 赵玉鉴, 杨贞耐

1.吉林省农业科学院农产品加工研究所/国家乳品加工技术研发分中心，长春 130033
2.北京工商大学食品学院，北京 100048

收稿日期:2012-10-08 出版日期:2013-02-01 发布日期:2012-12-21
通讯作者: 通信作者杨贞耐，Tel：0431-87063148；E-mail：yangzhennai@th.btbu.edu.cn
作者简介:李盛钰，E-mail：lisy720@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31071574）、农业部现代农业产业技术体系专项资金（CARS-37）、吉林省科技发展计划项目（20115026）

Protective Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum C88 on H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress in Caco-2 Cells

LI Sheng-Yu, LI Da, ZHAO Yu-Juan, ZHANG Xue, HUANG Li, ZHAO Yu-Jian, YANG Zhen-Nai

1.Institute of Agro-food Technology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National R&D Branch Centre for Milk Processing, Changchun 130033
2.School of Food Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048

Received:2012-10-08 Online:2013-02-01 Published:2012-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】文章旨在研究植物乳杆菌（Lactobacillus plantarum）C88的抗氧化作用。【方法】采用0.1 mmol•L-1 和0.2 mmol•L-1浓度H2O2连续处理Caco-2细胞12—48 h造成氧化损伤，通过测定细胞培养液上清和细胞裂解液的自由基清除能力及抗氧化物酶活性，评价植物乳杆菌C88对Caco-2细胞抗氧化损伤的保护作用。【结果】与氧化损伤模型组相比，植物乳杆菌C88在1011CFU/mL浓度下，能显著提高细胞裂解液的谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶（GSH-Px）活性(P＜0.05)和总抗氧化（T-AOC）能力(P＜0.05)；以及细胞裂解液的羟自由基清除率(P＜0.05)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶（GSH-Px）(P＜0.05)和超氧化歧化酶（SOD）活性。细胞裂解液的羟自由基清除率低于氧化应激对照组。【结论】植物乳杆菌（L. plantarum）C88通过提高Caco-2细胞的自由基清除能力和抗氧化酶活性，表现出了较强的抗氧化活性。

关键词: 乳酸菌 , 植物乳杆菌 , 抗氧化活性 , 益生性

Abstract: 【Objective】 The aim of the study was to evaluate the antioxidant activity of L. plantarum C88 against H2O2 induced Caco-2 cell oxidative stress.【Method】In vitro methods simulating gastric and small intestine digestive processes, coupled with human colon carcinoma cells in oxidative stress, to hydrogen peroxide at concentrations of 0.1 mmol•L-1 and 0.2 mmol•L-1 for 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h, are the valid tools to evaluate the antioxidant activity of L. plantarum C88. The free radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant enzymes activitties in the cell culture supernatants and cell disruptions were measured.【Result】Compared with the oxidative stress group, L. plantarum C88 at 1011CFU/mL signi?cantly increased the glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) (P＜0.05) and the total antioxidation capacity (T-AOC) (P＜0.05) in the cultured supernatants, the hydroxyl radical scavenging ability (P＜0.05), the glutathione peroxidase (GSH Px) (P＜0.05) and the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in the cell disruptions.【Conclusion】Results of the study suggested that L. plantarum C88 could protect the Caco-2 cells against H2O2-induced oxidative stress by renewing the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense system.

Key words: lactic acid bacteria , Lactobacillus plantarum , antioxidant activity , probiotic

李盛钰, 李达, 赵玉娟, 张雪, 黄丽, 赵玉鉴, 杨贞耐. 植物乳杆菌C88对H2O2诱导氧化损伤的 Caco-2细胞的保护作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(3): 606-613.

LI Sheng-Yu, LI Da, ZHAO Yu-Juan, ZHANG Xue, HUANG Li, ZHAO Yu-Jian, YANG Zhen-Nai. Protective Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum C88 on H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress in Caco-2 Cells[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(3): 606-613.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.03.017

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2013/V46/I3/606

参考文献

[1]Ahotupa M, Saxelin M, Korpela R. Antioxidative properties of Lactobacillus GG. Nutrition Today, 1996, 31(6):51-52.

[2]Lee B J, Kim J S, Kang Y M, Lim J H, Kim Y M, Lee M S, Jeong M H, Ahn C B, Je J Y. Antioxidant activity and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) contentinseatangle fermented by Lactobacillus brevis BJ20 isolated from traditional fermented foods. Food Chemistry, 2010, 122(1):271-276.

[3]Lin M Y, Yen C L. Antioxidative ability of lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1999, 47(4):1460-1466.

[4]Amanatidou A, Smid E J, Bennik M H, Gorris L G. Antioxidative properties of Lactobacillus sake upon exposure to elevated oxygen concentrations. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2001, 203(1): 87-94.

[5]Lin M Y, Chang F J. Antioxidative effect of intestinal bacteria Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15708 and Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2000, 45(8): 1617-1622.

[6]Kim H S, Chae H S, Jeong S G, Ham J S, Im S K, Ahn C N, Lee J M. In vitro antioxidative properties of lactobacilli. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2006, 19(2):262-265.

[7]Liu C F, Tseng K C, Chiang S S, Lee B H, Hsu W H, Pan T M. Immunomodulatory and antioxidant potential of Lactobacillus exopolysaccharides. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2011, 91(12): 2284-2291.

[8]Pan D D, Mei X M. Antioxidant activity of an exopolysaccharide purified from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis 12. Carbohydrate Polymer, 2010, 80(3):908-914.

[9]Xu R, Shang N, Li P. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of exopolysaccharide fractions from Bifidobacterium animalis RH. Anaerobe, 2011, 17(5):226-231.

[10]Yi Z J, Fu Y R, Li M, Gao K S, Zhang X G. Effect of LTA isolated from bifidobacteria on D-galactose-induced aging. Experimental Gerontology, 2009, 44(12):760-765.

[11]Mateos R, Pereira-Caro G, Saha S, Cert R, Redondo-Horcajo M, Bravo L, Kroon P A. Acetylation of hydroxytyrosol enhances its transport across differentiated Caco-2 cell monolayers. Food Chemistry, 2011, 125(3):865-872.

[12]De Man J C, Rogosa M, Sharpe M E. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 1960, 23(1):130-135.

[13]Song X, Bao M, Li D, Li Y M. Advanced glycationin D-galacose induced mouse aging model. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 1999, 108(3):239-251.

[14]Yan D, Dong J, Sulik K K, Shen S Y. Induction of the Nrf2-driven antioxidant response by tert-butylhydroquinone prevents ethanol- induced apoptosis in cranial neural crest cells. Biochemical Pharmacology, 2010, 80(1):144-149.

[15]Wijeratne S S, Cuppett S L, Schlegel V. Hydrogen peroxide induced oxidative stress damage and antioxidant enzyme response in Caco-2 human colon cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005, 53(22):8768-8774.

[16]Kim S Y, Kim R H, Huh T L. α-Phenyl-N-t-butylnitrone protects oxidative damage to HepG2 cells. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2000, 34(1): 43-46.

[17]Dash R, Acharya C, Bindu P C. Antioxidant potential of silk protein sericin against hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress in skin fibroblasts. BMB Report, 2008, 41(3): 236-241.

[18]Liu L N, Mei Q B, Liu L. Protective effects of Rheum tanguticum polysaccharide against hydrogen peroxide-induced intestinal epithelial cell injury. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005, 11(10): 1503-1507.

[19]Cilla A, Laparra J M, Alegria A, Barbera R, Farre R. Antioxidant effect derived from bioaccessible fractions of fruit beverages against H2O2-induced oxidative stress in Caco-2 cells. Food Chemistry, 2008, 106 (3): 1180-1187.

[20]Laparra J M, Alegría A, Barberá R, Farré R. Antioxidant effect of casein phosphopeptides compared with fruit beverages supplemented with skimmed milk against H2O2-induced oxidative stress in Caco-2 cells. Food Research International, 2008,41(7) :773-779.

[21]Jing H, Kitts D D. Antioxidant activity of sugar-lysine Maillard reaction products in cell free and cell culture systems. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2004, 429(2) :154-163.

[22]崔志文, 黄琴, 黄怡, 吴红照, 文静, 李卫芬. 鼠李糖乳酸杆菌对Caco-2细胞抗氧化功能的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(23): 4926-4932.

Cui Z W, Huang Q, Huang Y, Wu H Z, Wen J, Li W F. Antioxidative function of Lacbacillus rhamnosus to Caco-2 cells. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(23): 4926-4932.(in Chinese)

[23]崔志文, 黄琴, 黄怡, 吴红照, 文静, 李卫芬. 枯草芽孢杆菌对Caco-2细胞抗氧化功能的影响研究. 动物营养学报, 2011, 23(2):293-298.

Cui Z W, Huang Q, Huang Y, Wu H Z, Wen J, Li W F. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on antioxidative function of Caco-2 cells. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23(2):293-298. (in Chinese)

植物乳杆菌C88对H2O2诱导氧化损伤的 Caco-2细胞的保护作用

Protective Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum C88 on H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress in Caco-2 Cells

PDF

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	侯成立,黄彩燕,郑晓春,刘维华,杨奇,张德权. 宰后不同时间滩羊肉抗氧化活性的变化及可能机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23): 5110-5124.
[2]	赵珊,仲伶俐,秦琳,黄世群,李曦,郑幸果,雷欣宇,雷绍荣,郭灵安,冯俊彦. 不同干燥方式对甘薯叶功能成分及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(21): 4650-4663.
[3]	王翌,李淼,李永锋,孙元,仇华吉. 野猪粪便中乳酸菌的分离鉴定及特性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(14): 2964-2973.
[4]	李杰,贾栩超,张瑞芬,刘磊,池建伟,黄菲,董丽红,张名位. 黑芝麻黑色素的分离纯化、结构表征及体外抗氧化活性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(12): 2477-2492.
[5]	于静,张卫星,马兰婷,胥保华. 饲粮α-亚麻酸水平对意大利蜜蜂工蜂幼虫生理机能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(13): 2368-2378.
[6]	尹雪，郭雪峰，刘俊峰，张秀萍，席琳乔，张苏江. 盐穗木青贮中乳酸菌的分离及筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(14): 2825-2834.
[7]	李晓英，薛梅，樊汶樵，罗洁. 不同干燥方式对蓝莓叶中酚类物质及其抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(13): 2570-2578.
[8]	刘羽，刘盛雨，卢娟芳，于庆帆，席万鹏. 新疆红肉苹果3个品系的风味品质与抗氧化能力评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(8): 1495-1504.
[9]	卜潇，薛雪，程静，刘树文. 葡萄酒中植物乳杆菌苹果酸-乳酸发酵潜能评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(5): 959-968.
[10]	邓媛元，汤琴，张瑞芬，张雁，刘磊，魏振承，马永轩，张名位 . 不同干燥方式对苦瓜营养与品质特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(2): 362-371.
[11]	田平平，李仁宙，简永健，李健明，王杰. 核桃青皮的强抗氧化活性成分及其抗氧化稳定性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3): 543-553.
[12]	赖婷，刘磊，张名位，张瑞芬，张雁，魏振承，邓媛元. 不同乳酸菌发酵对桂圆肉中酚类物质及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(10): 1979-1989.
[13]	应碧，昌晓宇，刘志文，周通，陈瑶，钟平安，徐波. 亚硝酸盐胁迫下植物乳杆菌WU14亚硝酸盐还原酶的食品级高效诱导表达及其酶学性质研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(7): 1415-1427.
[14]	刘磊，汪浩，张名位，张雁，张瑞芬，唐小俊，邓媛元. 龙眼乳酸菌发酵工艺条件优化及其挥发性风味物质变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(20): 4147-4158.
[15]	崔文明, 逄晓阳, 张书文, 刘鹭, 李红娟, 吕加平. N-乙酰胞壁质酶缺失对保加利亚乳杆菌LJJ自溶及形态的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(15): 3058-3068.