农民田间学校培训对农民环境友好型技术采用的影响研究——以北京市设施番茄生产为例

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.05.025

中国农业科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1023-1030.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.05.025

• 研究简报 • 上一篇

农民田间学校培训对农民环境友好型技术采用的影响研究——以北京市设施番茄生产为例

蔡金阳, 胡瑞法, 肖长坤, 王晓兵

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所农业政策研究中心，北京 100101
2.北京理工大学管理与经济学院，北京 100081
3.中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院，北京 100193
4.北京市植物保护站，北京 100029

收稿日期:2011-06-15 出版日期:2012-03-01 发布日期:2011-09-15
通讯作者: 通信作者胡瑞法，Tel：010-68918707； E-mail：ruifa@bit.edu.cn
作者简介:蔡金阳，Tel：010-64888982-200；E-mail：jinyangcai@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71173014）

Impacts of Technology Training Programs in Farmer Field Schools on the Adoption of Environment-Friendly Technology: Empirical Evidences from the Tomato Production in Beijing

CAI Jin-Yang, HU Rui-Fa, XIAO Chang-Kun, WANG Xiao-Bing

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所农业政策研究中心，北京 100101
2.北京理工大学管理与经济学院，北京 100081
3.中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院，北京 100193
4.北京市植物保护站，北京 100029

Received:2011-06-15 Online:2012-03-01 Published:2011-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究农民田间学校培训对农民环境友好型技术采用的影响。【方法】以北京市农户设施番茄生产为例，通过对农民田间学校农户的随机抽样调查，采用probit模型估计农民田间学校培训对农民环境意识影响的净效果。【结果】目前条件下，北京市农民在番茄生产上采用环境友好型技术的比例还不足20%。在控制其它因素的条件下，农民田间学校培训使田间学校学员采用环境友好灌溉技术的比例比非田间学校村农户高14.7%，而采用环境友好施肥技术农户的比例比非田间学校村农户高8.3%。【结论】农民田间学校培训显著提高了农民的环境保护意识，使其在生产上较多地采用了环境友好型灌溉和施肥技术。

关键词: 农民田间学校, 环境友好型技术, probit模型

Abstract: 【Objective】The impacts of technology training programs in farmer field schools (FFS) on the adoption of environment-friendly technology was analyzed.【Method】 Through random sampling strategy of the farmers in tomato production in suburbans of Beijing, the econometric method was used to obtain the corresponding results. 【Result】The descriptive statistics indicate that the percentage of farmers who adopt the environment-friendly technology is less than 20%. The empirical analysis shows that under the conditions of other variables are controlled, the proportion of the environment-friendly technology in irrigation adopted by farmers who have attended the technology training programs in FFS is 14.7% higher than that for the farmers who have not attended the training program. In respect to adopting the environment-friendly fertilization technology, the proportion of farmers who have attended the training program in FFS is 8.3% higher than those who have not attended the training program. 【Conclusion】The results show that the training program in FFS significantly enhanced the adoption of environment-friendly technology, especially the irrigation and fertilization technologies in production.

Key words: farmer field school, environment-friendly technology, probit model

蔡金阳, 胡瑞法, 肖长坤, 王晓兵. 农民田间学校培训对农民环境友好型技术采用的影响研究——以北京市设施番茄生产为例[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(5): 1023-1030.

CAI Jin-Yang, HU Rui-Fa, XIAO Chang-Kun, WANG Xiao-Bing. Impacts of Technology Training Programs in Farmer Field Schools on the Adoption of Environment-Friendly Technology: Empirical Evidences from the Tomato Production in Beijing[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(5): 1023-1030.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.05.025

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I5/1023

参考文献

[1]朱兆良. 合理使用化肥充分利用有机肥发展环境友好施肥体系. 中国科学院院刊，2003, 18(2): 89-93.

Zhu Z L. Fertilizer management strategies for the harmonization of agriculture development with environment protection. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2003, 18(2): 89-93. (in Chinese)

[2]Metz B, Davidson O R, Bosch P R, Dave R, Meyer L A. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

[3]Godtland E, Sadoulet E, De Janvry A, Murgai R, Ortiz O. The impact of farmer field schools on knowledge and productivity: a study of potato farmers in the Peruvian Andes. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2004, 53(1): 63-92.

[4]Pontius J, Dilts R, Bartlett A. Ten Years of IPM Training in Asia-from Farmer Field School to Community IPM. Bangkok: FAO Community IPM Programme, 2002.

[5]Hanson J C, Just R E. The potential for transition to paid extension: some guiding economic principles. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, 83(3): 777-784.

[6]Wiebers U C. Integrated pest management and pesticide regulation in developing Asia. World Bank, Washington D.C., 1993.

[7]Feder G, Murgai R, Quizon J B. Sending farmers back to school: the impact of farmer field schools in Indonesia. Review of Agricultural Economics, 2003, 26(1): 45-62.

[8]Kenmore P E. Indonesia’s Integrated Pest Management: a Model for Asia. Manila: Food and Agriculture Organization, 1991.

[9]Kenmore P. A perspective on IPM. Information on Low External-Input and Sustainable Agriculture Newsletter, 1997, 13(4): 8.

[10]Birkhaeuser D, Evenson R V, Feder G. The economic impact of agricultural extension: a review. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1991, 39(3): 607-650.

[11]Rosenzweig M, Foster A D. Learning by doing and learning from others: human capital and technical change in agriculture. Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103(6): 1176-1209.

[12]Nelson R, Orrego R, Ortiz O, Tenorio J, Mundt C, Fredrix M, Vien N V. Working with resource-poor farmers to manage plant diseases. Plant Disease, 2001, 85(7): 684-695.

[13]Röling N, Van de Fliert E. Transforming extension for sustainable agriculture: the case of integrated pest management in rice in Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values, 1994, 11(2): 96-108.

[14]Huan N H, Mai V, Escalada M M, Heong K L. Changes in rice farmers’ pest management in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Crop Protection, 1999, 18(2): 557-563.

[15]Birkhaeuser D, Evenson R E, Feder G. The economic impact of agricultural extension: a review. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1991, 39(3): 607-650.

[16]北京市人民政府. 关于推进基层农业技术推广体系改革工作的实施意见. 2007.

The People’s Government of Beijing Municipality. Suggestions of promoting the innovation of grassroots agricultural extension system. 2007. (in Chinese)

[17]北京市全民科学素质工作领导小组办公室. 北京市农民科学素质行动实施方案. 2007.

The People’s Scientific Quality Office in Beijing. The implementation of Beijing farmer’s scientific quality. 2007. (in Chinese)

[18]北京市农业局. 关于加快京郊农民田间学校建设的实施意见. 2008.

Beijing Municipal Bureau of Agriculture. Suggestions of speeding up the construction of farmer field schools in suburban Beijing. 2008. (in Chinese)

[19]肖长坤, 郑建秋, 王大山. 北京农民田间学校建设与创新. 中国植保导刊, 2007, 27(10): 45-46.

Xiao C K, Zheng J Q, Wang D S. The construction and innovation of farmer field school in Beijing. China Plant Protection, 2007, 27(10): 45-46. (in Chinese)

[20]胡瑞法, 肖长坤, 蔡金阳, 项诚. 农民田间学校对生产管理知识提高和生产的影响：以北京市设施番茄农户为例. 中国软科学, 2011(7): 93-101.

Hu R F, Xiao C K, Cai J Y, Xiang C. The impact of farmer field school on farmer’s knowledge and production: a case study of facility tomato farmers in Beijing. China Soft Science, 2011(7): 93-101. (in Chinese)

[21]肖长坤, 胡瑞法, 蔡金阳, 陈阜, 张涛. 农民田间学校推广农业技术的效果评估——以北京市设施番茄种植户为例. 中国农业大学学报, 2011, 16(4): 176-182.

Xiao C K, Hu R F, Cai J Y, Chen F, Zhang T. Impact assessment of technical extension through farmer field school: a case of greenhouse tomato farmers in Beijing. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2011, 16(4): 176-182. (in Chinese)

[22]Griliches Z. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, 1957, 25 (4): 501-522.

[23]Feder G, Just R E, Zilberman D. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1985, 33(2): 255-298.

[24]胡瑞法, 黄季焜, 袁飞. 技术扩散的内在动因——水稻优良品种的扩散模型及其影响因素分析. 农业技术经济, 1994(4): 37-41.

Hu R F, Huang J K, Yuan F, The intrinsic motivation of technology diffusion-the rice varieties spread model and its influencing factors. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 1994(4): 37-41. (in Chinese)

[25]伍德里奇 J M. 计量经济学导论: 现代观点. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003.

Wooldridge J M. Introductory Econometrics: a Modern Approach. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2003. (in Chinese)

农民田间学校培训对农民环境友好型技术采用的影响研究——以北京市设施番茄生产为例

Impacts of Technology Training Programs in Farmer Field Schools on the Adoption of Environment-Friendly Technology: Empirical Evidences from the Tomato Production in Beijing

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0