中国农业科学 ›› 2008, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 516-524 .doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.02.027

• 园艺 • 上一篇    下一篇

失水胁迫对月季花瓣内肽酶活性的诱导及对花朵衰老进程的影响

赵喜亭,丛日晨,刘晓静,高俊平   

  1. 中国农业大学观赏园艺与园林系
  • 收稿日期:2005-08-19 修回日期:2006-10-09 出版日期:2008-02-10 发布日期:2008-02-10

Water Deficit Stress-Induced Changes of Endoprotease Activity and Types and Acceleration of Flower Senescence Process in Cut Rose ( Rosa hybrida) Samantha

  1. 中国农业大学观赏园艺与园林系
  • Received:2005-08-19 Revised:2006-10-09 Online:2008-02-10 Published:2008-02-10

摘要: 【目的】研究失水胁迫对月季切花花瓣内肽酶活性和种类的诱导与花朵衰老进程加速之间的关系。【方法】以切花月季Samantha为试材,分别进行了如下处理:(1)反复失水胁迫处理,即依次失水胁迫24 h、复水12 h、然后再次失水胁迫24 h,(2)ABA预处理后的失水胁迫处理,即50 μmol•L-1的ABA处理12 h后,失水胁迫24 h;并以直接蒸馏水瓶插作为对照。【结果】(1)失水胁迫和再次失水胁迫,即两次胁迫处理期间花颈的弯曲状况相近,但失水胁迫后花朵的瓶插状况差异非常明显,其中,再次失水胁迫后的花朵出现了严重的僵蕾现象。ABA预处理明显减轻了失水胁迫期间花颈的弯曲程度。(2)第1次失水胁迫后复水6 h,花朵水势能够恢复到胁迫前的水平,而花枝鲜重和花瓣内肽酶活性在复水12 h后才能恢复到胁迫前的水平;再次失水胁迫后,花朵水势下降和花枝鲜重损失率都呈现与第1次胁迫相近的变化,但是花瓣内肽酶活性的变化更为剧烈,上升幅度更大。ABA预处理有效抑制了失水胁迫带来的水势降低、鲜重损失以及内肽酶活性的升高。(3)对照花材在自然开放和衰老进程中,没有检测到金属蛋白酶和巯基蛋白酶活性;丝氨酸蛋白酶活性一直占据主导地位,在衰老时进一步显著升高。失水胁迫对花瓣内肽酶活性和种类的诱导与花朵自然衰老诱导一致。失水胁迫明显诱导提高了丝氨酸蛋白酶活性,复水使其活性恢复到胁迫前的水平,再次失水胁迫进一步加剧其活性的升高。ABA预处理显著降低了失水胁迫诱导的丝氨酸蛋白酶活性的增加。【结论】失水胁迫对花瓣中丝氨酸蛋白酶活性的强烈诱导与复水后瓶插期间衰老进程加速之间存在一定的联系。

关键词: 月季切花, 失水胁迫, 丝氨酸蛋白酶, 衰老进程

Abstract: This work was aimed to investigate relationship between induction of endoprotease (EP)activity and classes and acceleration of flower senescence process by water deficit stress (WDS) in cut rose ( Rosa hybrida L. cv. Samantha). Cut flowers at opening stage 2 were treated by repeated WDS, namely 24 h WDS (the first WDS), 12 water recovery, and 24 h WDS (the second WDS), or by 24 h WDS followed 12 h 50 M ABA pretreatment, or held in distilled water directly as untreated control. The results showed that, A) Between the first WDS and the second WDS, no difference was observed in bend neck phenomena during the treatment, but obvious difference was in vase quality of cut flowers after the treatment, and severe phenomena of bull bud was obtained during vase after the second WDS. However, Bend neck degree of flowers could be alleviated obviously by ABA pretreatment. B) When the first WDS was finished, water potential of flower recovered to a level of before the treatment after 6 h water recovery, while fresh weight loss of branch and EP activity of petals recovered to the low level of before the treatment after 12 h water recovery. As the second WDS was given, the changes of EP activity in petals was much dramatic compared to the first WDS finished, although almost no difference was in water potential and fresh weight loss between the first WDS and the second WDS. The WDS-inducible falling of water potential, loss of fresh weight and raise of EP activity were effectively suppressed by ABA pretreatment. C) For control flowers, during the processes of flower opening and senescence, the hydrolytic activity of metalloprotease and cysteine protease in petals was undetectable, while serine protease hydrolytic activity was dominant, and further increased during senescence. The changes of EP activity and types in petals induced by WDS were consistent with that induced by flower opening and senescence. Serine protease activity in petals was induced strongly by the first WDS, and recovered to the primary level after water recovery; and the activity was elevated dramatically by the second WDS. The increment of serine protease activity induced by WDS was significantly depressed by ABA pretreatment. These results above suggested that increment of serine protease activity induced by WDS might be related to acceleration of flower senescence process after WDS.

Key words: cut rose, water deficit stress, serine protease, flower senescence process