Journals
  Publication Years
  Keywords
Search within results Open Search
Please wait a minute...
For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
Predicting soil depth in a large and complex area using machine learning and environmental correlations
LIU Feng, YANG Fei, ZHAO Yu-guo, ZHANG Gan-lin, LI De-cheng
2022, 21 (8): 2422-2434.   DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63692-4
Abstract152)      PDF in ScienceDirect      

Soil depth is critical for eco-hydrological modeling, carbon storage calculation and land evaluation.  However, its spatial variation is poorly understood and rarely mapped.  With a limited number of sparse samples, how to predict soil depth in a large area of complex landscapes is still an issue.  This study constructed an ensemble machine learning model, i.e., quantile regression forest, to quantify the relationship between soil depth and environmental conditions.  The model was then combined with a rich set of environmental covariates to predict spatial variation of soil depth and straightforwardly estimate the associated predictive uncertainty in the 140 000 km2 Heihe River basin of northwestern China.  A total of 275 soil depth observation points and 26 covariates were used.  The results showed a model predictive accuracy with coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.587 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.98 cm (square root scale), i.e., almost 60% of soil depth variation explained.  The resulting soil depth map clearly exhibited regional patterns as well as local details.  Relatively deep soils occurred in low lying landscape positions such as valley bottoms and plains while shallow soils occurred in high and steep landscape positions such as hillslopes, ridges and terraces.  The oases had much deeper soils than outside semi-desert areas, the middle of an alluvial plain had deeper soils than its margins, and the middle of a lacustrine plain had shallower soils than its margins.  Large predictive uncertainty mainly occurred in areas with a lack of soil survey points.  Both pedogenic and geomorphic processes contributed to the shaping of soil depth pattern of this basin but the latter was dominant.  This findings may be applicable to other similar basins in cold and arid regions around the world.

Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
An integrated method of selecting environmental covariates for predictive soil depth mapping
LU Yuan-yuan, LIU Feng, ZHAO Yu-guo, SONG Xiao-dong, ZHANG Gan-lin
2019, 18 (2): 301-315.   DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)61936-7
Abstract299)      PDF (20438KB)(198)      
Environmental covariates are the basis of predictive soil mapping.  Their selection determines the performance of soil mapping to a great extent, especially in cases where the number of soil samples is limited but soil spatial heterogeneity is high.  In this study, we proposed an integrated method to select environmental covariates for predictive soil depth mapping.  First, candidate variables that may influence the development of soil depth were selected based on pedogenetic knowledge.  Second, three conventional methods (Pearson correlation analysis (PsCA), generalized additive models (GAMs), and Random Forest (RF)) were used to generate optimal combinations of environmental covariates.  Finally, three optimal combinations were integrated to produce a final combination based on the importance and occurrence frequency of each environmental covariate.  We tested this method for soil depth mapping in the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin in Northwest China.  A total of 129 soil sampling sites were collected using a representative sampling strategy, and RF and support vector machine (SVM) models were used to map soil depth.  The results showed that compared to the set of environmental covariates selected by the three conventional selection methods, the set of environmental covariates selected by the proposed method achieved higher mapping accuracy.  The combination from the proposed method obtained a root mean square error (RMSE) of 11.88 cm, which was 2.25–7.64 cm lower than the other methods, and an R2 value of 0.76, which was 0.08–0.26 higher than the other methods.  The results suggest that our method can be used as an alternative to the conventional methods for soil depth mapping and may also be effective for mapping other soil properties.
Reference | Related Articles | Metrics