Abd-Alla M H, Vuong T D, Harper J E. 1998. Genotypicdifferences in nitrogen fixation response to NaCl stressin intact and grafted soybean. Crop Science, 38, 72-77Abdel-Hamid A M E, Mohamed H I. 2014. The effect of theexogenous gibberellic acid on two salt stressed barleycultivars. European Scientific Journal, 10, 228-245Adinarayanamurty V V, Rao M V B, Satyanarayana A,Subramanyam D. 1993. The crossability of V. mungo andV. radiata with V. trilobata. International Journal of TropicalAgricultural, 11, 209-213Agarwal P K, Shukla P S, Gupta K, Jha B. 2013. Bioengineeringfor salinity tolerance in plants: State of the art. MolecularBiotechnology, 54, 102-123Ahmad F, Gaur P M, Croser J S. 2005. Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.). In: Singh R J, Jauhar P P, eds., Genetic Resources,Chromosome Engineering and Crop Improvement. vol.1. Grain legumes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. pp.187-217Ahmad M, Sandhu G R. 1988. Response of legumes to saltstress: Effect on growth and nitrogen status of soybean.Pakistan Journal Agriculture Research, 9, 463-468Ashraf M Y, Sarwar G, Ashraf M, Afaf R, Sattar A. 2002. Salinityinduced changes in α-amylase activity during germinationand early cotton seedling growth. Biologia Plantarum, 45,589-591Asif M, Mehboob-Ur-Rahman, Zafar Y. 2006. Genotypinganalysis of six maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids using DNAfingerprinting technology. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38,1425-1430Birchler J A, Yao H, Chudalayandi S. 2006. Unraveling thegenetic basis of hybrid vigor. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103,12957-12958Boling M, Sander D A, Matlock R S. 1961. Mungbeanhybridization technique. Agronomy Journal, 53, 54-55Chaudhary D, Sainger M, Sahoo L, Jaiwal P K. 2010. Genetictransformation of Vigna species: Current status and futureprospective. In: Proceedings of the 14th InternationalWorkshop on Genetic Resources and ComparativeGenomics of Soybean and Vigna. National Institute ofAgrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba, Japan. pp. 1-8Epstein E, Norlyn J O, Rush D W, Kingsbury R W, Kelly D B,Cunningham G A, Wrona A F. 1980. Saline culture of crops.Science, 210, 399-404FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), PNMS (PlantNutrition Management Service). 2009. How to feed theworld in 2050. [2012-05-25]. http://www.fao.org/wsfs/forum2050/en/Groszmann M, Gonzalez-Bayon R, Greaves I K, Wang L,Huen A K, Peacock W J, Dennis E S. 2014. Intraspecificarabidopsis hybrids show different patterns of heterosisdespite the close relatedness of the parental genomes.Plant Physiology, 166, 265-280Kausar A, Ashraf M Y, Ali I, Niaz M, Abbass Q. 2012.Evaluation of sorghum varieties/lines for salt tolerance usingphysiological indices as screening tool. Pakistan Journal ofBotany, 44, 47-52Khajudparn P, Prajongjai T, Poolsawat O, Tantasawat PA. 2012. Application of ISSR markers for verification of F1 hybrids in mungbean (Vigna radiata). Genetics andMolecular Research, 11, 3329-3338Khan M A, Shirazi M U, Khan M A, Mujtaba S M, Islam E,Mumtaz S, Shereen A, Ansari R U, Ashraf M Y. 2009.Role of proline, K/Na ratio and chlorophyll content in salttolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journalof Botany, 41, 633-638Khattak G S S, Ashraf M, Saeed I, Alam B. 2006. A new highyielding mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) variety“ramzan” for the agro climatic conditions of NWFP. PakistanJournal of Botany, 38, 301-310Kumar B S, Prakash M, Narayanan S, Gokulakrishnan J. 2012.Breeding for salinity tolerance in mungbean. APCBEEProcedia, 4, 30-35Lin X C, Lou Y F, Liu J, Peng J S, Liao G L, Fang W. 2010.Crossbreeding of phyllostachys species (Poaceae) andidentification of their hybrids using ISSR markers. Geneticsand Molecular Research, 9, 398-404Mohammed A H M A. 2007. Physiological aspects of mungbeanplant (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) in response to salt stressand gibberellic acid treatment. Research Journal ofAgriculture and Biological Sciences, 3, 200-213Nair R M, Schafleitner R, Kenyon L, Srinivasan R, EasdownW, Ebert A, Hanson P. 2012. Genetic improvement ofmungbean. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics,44, 177-190Pandiyan M, Senthil N, Anitha M, Raveendran M, Sudha M,Latha M, Nagarajan P, Toomoka N, Balasubramanian P.2012. Diversity analysis of Vigna sp. through morphologicalmarkers. Wudpecker Journal of Agricultural Research, 1,335-340Parida A, Das A B. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effectson plants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 60,324-349Paroda R S, Thomas T A. 1988. Genetic resources ofmungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) in India. In: Mungbean:Proceedings of the Second International Symposium. 16-20November 1987, Bangkok, Thailand AVRDC, Shanhua,Tainan, Taiwan, China. pp. 19-28Reddy M P, Sarla N, Siddiq E A. 2002. Inter simple sequencerepeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plantbreeding. Euphytica, 128, 9-17Saha P, Chatterjee P, Biswas A K. 2010. NaCl pretreatmentalleviates salt stress by enhancement of antioxidant defenseand osmolyte accumulation in mungbean (Vigna radiataL. Wilczek). Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 48,593-600Sahoo L, Jaiwal P K. 2008. Asiatic beans 115-132 In: Kole C,Hall T C, eds., A Compen dium of Transgenic Crop Plants.Blackwell Publ, Oxford, UK.Sehrawat N, Bhat K V, Kaga A, Tomooka N, Yadav M, JaiwalP K. 2014a. Development of new gene-specific markersassociated with salt tolerance for mungbean (Vigna radiataL. Wilczek). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12,732-741Sehrawat N, Bhat K V, Sairam R K, Jaiwal P K. 2013a.Identification of salt resistant wild relatives of mungbean(Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Asian Journal of Plant Scienceand Research, 3, 41-49Sehrawat N, Bhat K V, Sairam R K, Jaiwal P K. 2014b.Screening of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]genotypes for salt tolerance. International Journal of Plant,Animal and Environmental Sciences, 4, 36-43Sehrawat N, Bhat K V, Sairam R K, Toomoka N, Kaga A, ShuY, Jaiwal P K 2013b. Diversity analysis and confirmation ofintra-specific hybrids for salt tolerance in mungbean (Vignaradiata L. Wilczek). International Journal of IntegrativeBiology, 14, 65-73Sehrawat N, Yadav M, Bhat K V, Sairam R K, Jaiwal P K. 2014c.Evaluation of mungbean genotypes for salt tolerance atearly seedling growth stage. Biocatalysis and AgriculturalBiotechnology, 3, 108-113Singh T P, Malhotra R S. 1975. Crossing technique in mungbean(Phaseolus aureus Roxb.). Current Science, 44, 64-65Virmani S S, Singh K B, Singh K, Malhotra R S. 1983. Evaluationof mungbean germplasm. Indian Journal of Genetics andPlant Breeding, 43, 54-58Win T, Oo A Z, Hirasawa T, Ookawa T, Yutaka H. 2011.Genetic analysis of Myanmar Vigna species in responsesto salt stress at the seedling stage. African Journal ofBiotechnology, 10, 1615-1624Yohe J M, Poehlman J M. 1972. Genetic variability in themungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Crop Science, 12,461–464. |