[1] 于金成,李 喆,于 宁,赵 辉. 基于F2群体的豁眼鹅豁眼性状遗传分析. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(19): 3845-3851.
YU J J, LI Z, YU N, ZHAO H. Genetic analysis of Huoyan trait based on F2 resource population in Huoyan Goose. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(19): 3845-3851.(in Chinese)
[2] LI A G, BAKIR M, HAMUD O A, GERAMI S. An autosomal recessive syndrome of nasal anomalies associatedwith renal and anorectal malformations. Clinical Dysmorphology, 2002, 11: 33-38.
[3] LI C, MARLES S L, GREENBERG C R, CHODIRKER B N, VAN DE KAMP J, SLAVOTINEK A, CHUDLEY A E. Manitoba Oculotrichoanal (MOTA) syndrome: report of eight new cases. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2007, 143(8):853-7.
[4] YEUNG A, AMOR D, SAVARIRAYAN R. Familial upper eyelid coloboma with ipsilateral anterior hairline abnormality: two new reports of MOTA syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2009, 149(4): 767-769.
[5] MINE N, IWAMOTO R, MEKADA E. HB-EGF promotes epithelial cell migration ineyelid development. Development, 2005, 132: 4317-4326.
[6] RAO W W Y, XIA Y, LIU C Y. Signaling pathways in morphogenesis of cornea and eyelid. The Ocular Surface, 2008, 6(1): 9-23.
[7] ALAZAMI A M, SHAHEEN R, ALZAHRANI F, SNAPE K, SAGGAR A, BRINKMANN B, BAVI P, LI A G, ALKURAYA F S. FREM1 mutations cause bifid nose, renal agenesis, and anorectal malformations syndrome. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2009, 85(3):414-418.
[8] DAUWERSE J G, DIXON J, SELAND S. Mutations in genes encoding subunits of RNApolymerases I and III cause Treacher Collins syndrome. Nature Genetics, 2011, 43: 20-22.
[9] OHUCHI H. Wakayama Symposium: Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in eyelid development. The Ocular Surface, 2012, 10(4): 212-216
[10] Shi F, Fan Y, Zhang L, Meng L, Zhi H, Hu H, Lin A. The expression of Pax6 variants is subject to posttranscriptional regulation in the developing mouse eyelid. PloS One, 2013, 8(1):e53919.
[11] PETROU P, MAKRYGIANNIS A K, CHALEPAKIS G. The Fras1/Frem family of extracellular matrix proteins: structure, function, and association with Fraser syndrome and the mouse bleb phenotype. Connective Tissue Research, 2008, 49(3-4): 277-282.
[12] SMYTH I, DU X, TAYLOR M S, JUSTICE M J, BEUTLER B, JACKSON I J. The extracellular matrix gene Frem1 is essential for the normal adhesion of the embryonic epidermis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(37):13560-13565.
[13] SLAVOTINEK A M, BARANZINI S E, SCHANZE D, LABELLE- DUMAIS C, SHORT K M, CHAO R, YAHYAVI M, BIJLSMA E K, CHU C, MUSONE S, WHEATLEY A. Manitoba-oculo-tricho-anal (MOTA) syndrome is caused by mutations in FREM1. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2011, 48(6): 375-382.
[14] MITTER D, SCHANZE D, STERKER I, MÜLLER D, TILL H, ZENKER M. MOTA syndrome: Molecular genetic confirmation of the diagnosis in a newborn with previously unreported clinical features. Molecular Syndromology, 2012, 3(3):136-139.
[15] MATEO R K, JOHNSON R, LEHMANN O J. Evidence for additional FREM1 heterogeneity in Manitoba oculotrichoanal syndrome. Molecular Vision, 2012, 18: 1301–1311.
[16] WIRADJAJA F, COTTLE D L, JONES L, SMYTH I. Regulation of PDGFC signalling and extracellular matrix composition by FREM1 in mice. Disease Models and Mechanisms, 2013, 6(6):1426-1433.
[17] BECK T F, SHCHELOCHKOV O A, YU Z, KIM B J, HERNÁNDEZ-GARCÍA A, ZAVERI H P, BISHOP C, OVERBEEK P A, STOCKTON D W, JUSTICE M J, SCOTT D A. Novel frem1-related mouse phenotypes and evidence of genetic interactions with gata4 and slit3. PloS One, 2013, 8(3):e58830.
[18] NATHANSON J, SWARR DT, SINGER A, LIU M, CHINN A, JONES W, HURST J, KHALEK N, ZACKAI E, SLAVOTINEK A. Novel FREM1 mutations expand the phenotypic spectrum associated with manitoba-oculo-tricho-anal (MOTA) syndrome and bifid nose renal agenesis anorectal malformations (BNAR) syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2013, 161(3):473-478.
[19] GRIFFIN D K, ROBERTSON L B, TEMPEST H G, SKINNER B M. The evolution of the avian genome as revealed by comparative molecular cytogenetics. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 2007, 117(1-4):64-77.
[20] DAWSON D A, ÅKESSON M, BURKE T, PEMBERTON J M, SLATE J, HANSSON B. Gene order and recombination rate in homologous chromosome regions of the chicken and a passerine bird. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2007, 24(7):1537-1552.
[21] NANDA I, SICK C, MÜNSTER U, KASPERS B, SCHARTL M, STAEHELI P, SCHMID M. Sex chromosome linkage of chicken and duck type I interferon genes: further evidence of evolutionary conservation of the Z chromosome in birds. Chromosoma, 1998, 107(3): 204-210.
[22] BACKSTRÖM N, BRANDSTRÖM M, GUSTAFSSON L, QVARNSTRÖM A, CHENG H, ELLEGREN H. Genetic mapping in a natural population of collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis): conserved synteny but gene order rearrangements on the avian Z chromosome. Genetics, 2006, 174(1):377-386.
[23] ISLAM F B, UNO Y, NUNOME M, NISHIMURA O, TARUI H, AGATA K, MATSUDA Y. Comparison of the chromosome structures between the chicken and three Anserid species, the Domestic Duck (Anas platyrhynchos), Muscovy Duck (Cairina moschata), and Chinese Goose (Anser cygnoides), and the delineation of their karyotype evolution by comparative chromosome mapping. The Journal of Poultry Science, 2014, 51(1):1-3.
[24] LU L, CHEN Y, WANG Z, LI X, CHEN W, TAO Z, SHEN J, TIAN Y, WANG D, LI G, CHEN L. The goose genome sequence leads to insights into the evolution of waterfowl and susceptibility to fatty liver. Genome Biology, 2015, 16(1):1.
[25] KUMAR P, HENIKOFF S, NG P C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nature Protocols, 2009, 4:1073-1081.
[26] YUE P, LI Z, MOULT J. Loss of protein structure stability as a major causative factor in monogenic disease. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2005, 353(2):459-473.
[27] KHAN S, VIHINEN M. Performance of protein stability predictors. Human Mutation, 2010, 31(6):675-684.
[28] CAPRIOTTI E, FARISELLI P, ROSSI I, CASADIO R. A three-state prediction of single point mutations on protein stability changes. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9(2):1.
[29] CHENG J, RANDALL A, BALDI P. Prediction of protein stability changes for single-site mutations using support vector machines. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2006, 62(4): 1125-1132.
[30] SHORT K, WIRADJAJA F, & SMYTH I. Let's stick together: the role of the Fras1 and Frem proteins in epidermal adhesion. IUBMB Life, 2007, 59(7): 427-435.
[31] BURG M A, TILLET E, TIMPL R, STALLCUP W B. Binding of the NG2 proteoglycan to type VI collagen and other extracellular matrix molecules. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1996, 271(42): 26110-26116.
[32] GORETZKI L, BURG M A, GRAKO K A, STALLCUP W B. High- affinity binding of basic fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor-AA to the core protein of the NG2 proteoglycan. Journal of Biological Chemistry,1999, 274(24): 16831-16837.
[33] PETROU P, CHIOTAKI R, DALEZIOS Y, CHALEPAKIS G. Overlapping and divergent localization of Frem1 and Fras1 and its functional implications during mouse embryonic development. Experimental Cell Research,2007, 313(5):910-920.
[34] STAUB E, HINZMANN B, ROSENTHAL A. A novel repeat in the melanoma‐associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan defines a new protein family. FEBS Letters,2002, 527(1-3):114-118. |