[1]Ajmone Marsan P, Castiglioni P, Fusari F, Kuiper M, Motto M. 1998. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 96, 219-227. [2]Austin D F, Lee M, Veldboom L R, Hallauer A R. 2000. Genetic mapping in maize with hybrid progeny across testers and generations: grain yield and grain moisture. Crop Science, 40, 30-39. [3]Bauman L F. 1981. Review of methods used by breeders to develop superior corn inbreds. Proceedings of the Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference, 36, 199-208. [4]Bernardo R. 1991. Correlation between testcross performance of lines at early and late selfing generations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 82, 17-21. [5]Bernardo R. 1996. Testcross additive and dominance effects in best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 93, 1098-1102. [6]Betran F J, Beck D, Banziger M, Edmeades G O. 2003. Genetic analysis of inbred and hybrid grain yield under stress and nonstress environments in tropical maize. Crop Science, 43, 807-817. [7]Casa A M, Mitchell S E, Smith O S, Register III J C, Wessler S R, Kresovich S. 2002. Evaluation of Hbr (MITE) markers for assessment of genetic relationships among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 104, 104-110. [8]Comstock R E, Robinson H F, Harvey P H. 1949. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. Agronomy Journal, 41, 360-367. [9]Doerksen T K, Kannenberg L W, Lee E A. 2003. Effect of recurrent selection on combining ability in maize breeding populations. Crop Science, 43, 1652-1658. [10]Duvick D N, Smith J S C, Cooper M. 2004. Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. Plant Breeding Reviews, 24, 109-152. [11]Duvick D N. 1999. Heterosis: Feeding people and protecting natural resources. In: Coors J G, Pandey S, eds., The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI. pp. 19-29. [12]Frascaroli E, Canè M A, Pè M E, Pea G, Morgante M, Landi P. 2009. QTL detection in maize testcross progenies as affected by related and unrelated testers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 118, 993-1004. [13]Frisch M, Thiemann A, Fu J, Schrag T A, Scholten S, Melchinger A E. 2010. Transcriptome-based distance measures for grouping of germplasm and prediction of hybrid performance in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120, 441-450. [14]Genter C F, Eberhart S A. 1974. Performance of original and advanced maize populations and their diallel crosses. Crop Science, 14, 880-885. [15]Gopal J. 1998. General combining ability and its repeatability in early generations of potato breeding programmes. Potato Research, 41, 21-28. [16]Griffing B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 9, 463-493. [17]Gu L X. 2007. General combining ability analysis and its QTL mapping of maize DH lines. MSc thesis, Hubei Agricultural University, Hubei. (in Chinese) [18]Hallauer A R, Russell W A, Lamkey K R. 1988. Corn breeding. In: Sprague G F, Dudley J W, eds., Corn and Corn Improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI. pp. 469-565. [19]Hallauer A R. 1990. Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica, 35, 1-16. [20]Jenkins M T. 1935. The effect of inbreeding and of selection within inbred lines of maize upon the hybrids made after successive generations of selfing. Iowa State College Journal of Science, 9, 215-236. [21]Johnson G R. 1982. Two-locus theory in recurrent selection for general combining ability in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 61, 279-283. [22]Lande R, Thompson R. 1990. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics, 124, 743-756. [23]Li H H, You Y G, Wang J K. 2007. A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics, 175, 361-374. [24]Lile S M, Hallauer A R. 1994. Relation between S2 and later generation testcrosses of two corn populations. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science, 101, 19-23. [25]Lin J L, Yu B, Gao H M, Suo J, Yang P, Lv C B. 2000. Present and strategies of inbred breeding of maize in China. Rain Fed Crops, 25, 4-7. (in Chinese) [26]Lonnquest J H. 1950. The effect of selection for combining ability within segregating lines of corn. Agronomy Journal, 42, 503-508. [27]Matzinger D F. 1953. Comparison of three types of testers for the evaluation of inbred lines of corn. Agronomy Journal, 45, 493-495. [28]Melchinger A E, Gumber R K. 1998. Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. In: Lamkey K R, Staub J E, eds., Concepts and Breeding of Heterosis in Crop Plants. CSSA, Madison, WI. pp. 29-44. [29]Melchinger A E, Utz H F, Schön C C. 1998. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics, 149, 383-403. [30]Ojo G O S, Adedzwa D K, Bello L L. 2007. Combining ability estimates and heterosis for grain yield and yield components in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Sustainable Development in Agriculture Environment, 3, 49-57. [31]Peng Z B, Tian Z G, Liu X Z. 2004. Improvement efficiency of modified S1-HS alternant recurrent selection in maize population ZZ4. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 37, 1598-1603. (in Chinese) [32]Richey F D. 1946. Hybrid vigor and corn breeding. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 38, 833-841. [33]Rodriguez O A, Hallauer A R. 1991. Variation among full-sib families of corn in different generations of inbreeding. Crop Science, 31, 43-47. [34]Rubino D B, Wehner T C. 1986. Efficiency of early generation testing in pickling cucumber. Euphytica, 35, 89-96. [35]Schnell F W. 1961. On some aspects of reciprocal recurrent selection. Euphytica, 10, 24-30. [36]Sprague G F. 1946. Early testing of inbred lines of corn. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 38, 108-117. [37]Sprague G F. 1964. Early testing and recurrent selection. In: Gowen J W, ed., Heterosis. Hafner Publishing Company, New York. pp. 400-417. [38]Sprague G F, Tatum L A. 1942. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 34, 923-932. [39]Stupar R M, Gardiner J M, Oldre A G, Haun W J, Chandler V L, Springer N M. 2008. Gene expression analyses in maize inbreds and hybrids with varying levels of heterosis. BMC Plant Biology, 8, 33. [40]Szalma S J, Hostert B M, LeDeaux J R, Stuber C W, Holland J B. 2007. QTL mapping with near-isogenic lines in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 114, 1211-1228. [41]Tang J, Yan J, Ma X, Teng W, Wu W, Dai J, Dhillon B S, Melchinger A E, Li J. 2010. Dissection of the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite maize hybrid by QTL mapping in an immortalized F2 population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120, 333-340. [42]Zhang J H. 2009. Plant height, internodes, ear traits, general combining ability analysis and their QTLs mapping using double haploid lines of maize. MSc thesis, Hebei Agricultural University, China. (in Chinese) [43]Zou C Y, Li L J, Yang K C, Pan G T, Rong T Z. 2010. Effects of improvement by mass selection on the different maize synthetic populations. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 36, 76-84. (in Chinese) |