AIPL (Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory). 2004.Genetic and phenotypic trends. [2012-12-01] http://aipl.arsusda.gov/dynamic/trend /current/trndx.htmlBanos G, Shook G. 1990. Genotype by environment interactionand genetic correlations among parities for somaticcell count and milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 73,2563–2573.Carlén E, Strandberg E, Roth A. 2004. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, and production in thefirst three lactations of Swedish Holstein cows. Journal ofDairy Science, 87, 3062–3070.Castillo-Juarez H, Oltenacu P, Cienfuegos-Rivas E. 2002.Genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk productionand composition traits in primiparous Holstein cows in twodifferent herd environments. Livestock Production Science,78, 223–231.Da Y, Grossman M, Misztal I, Wiggans G. 1992. Estimationof genetic parameters for somatic cell score in Holsteins.Journal of Dairy Science, 75, 2265–2271.Detilleux J, Leroy P, Volckaert D. 1997. Alternative useof somatic cell counts in genetic selection for mastitisresistance. Interbull Bulletin, 15, 34–44.Haile-Mariam M, Goddard M, Bowman P. 2001. Estimates ofgenetic parameters for daily somatic cell count of Australiandairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 1255–1264.Heringstad B, Klemetsdal G, Ruane J. 2000. Selection formastitis resistance in dairy cattle: A review with focus onthe situation in the Nordic countries. Livestock ProductionScience, 64, 95–106.Madsen P, Jensen J. 2007. DMU: A user’s guide. A package foranalysing multivariate mixed models. Version 6, release 4.7.[2007-11-15] http://dmu.agrsci.dk/dmuv6_guide-R4-6-7.pdfMiglior F, Gong W, Wang Y, Kistemaker G, SewalemA, Jamrozik J. 2009. Short communication: Geneticparameters of production traits in Chinese Holsteins usinga random regression test-day model. Journal of DairyScience, 92, 4697–4706.Mrode R, Swanson G. 1996. Genetic and statistical propertiesof somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect meansof reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle. AnimalBreeding Abstracts, 64, 847–857.Mrode R, Swanson G. 2003. Estimation of genetic parametersfor somatic cell count in the first three lactations usingrandom regression. Livestock Production Science, 79,239–247.Ødegård J, Klemetsdal G, Heringstad B. 2003. Variancecomponents and genetic trend for somatic cell countin Norwegian cattle. Livestock Production Science, 79,135–144.Rupp R, Boichard D. 1999. Genetic parameters for clinicalmastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits,and milking ease in first lactation Holsteins. Journal of DairyScience, 82, 2198–2204.Søndergaard E, Sørensen M, Mao I L, Jensen J. 2002. Geneticparameters of production, feed intake, body weight, bodycomposition, and udder health in lactating dairy cows.Livestock Production Science, 77, 23–34.SAS Institute. 2004. STAT 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Publishing,Cary, North Carolina.Seegers J, Fourichon C, Beaudeau F, Bareille N. 1997.Mastitis control programs and related costs in Frenchdairy herds. In: Proceedings of 48th Annual Meeting ofthe European Association of Animal Production. Vienna,Austria Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.pp. 143–146.Shook G, Schutz M. 1994. Selection on somatic cell score toimprove resistance to mastitis in the United States. Journalof Dairy Science, 77, 648–658.Weller J, Ezra E, Leitner G. 2006. Genetic analysis ofpersistency in the Israeli Holstein population by the multitraitanimal model. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 2738–2746. |