粗糙集理论在土壤肥力评价指标权重确定中的应用

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.04.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】土壤肥力是土壤诸多基本特性的综合反映，科学、合理、实用地评价土地肥力将为指导农业生产、土地利用规划和管理提供理论依据。其评价过程是一个无决策属性的多属性决策过程，而解决多属性决策问题的重要前提是各属性权重分配问题。【方法】确定指标权重的方法主要有主观赋权法和客观赋权法，然而，主观赋权法往往需要大量的先验知识，评价结果有一定的主观随意性，而且较少考虑评价指标之间的依赖关系；客观赋权法没有充分考虑到各参评因素对评价的重要度不同，统计数据有相关性也并不意味着两个事件具有因果联系。综合考虑主、客观赋权法各自的优缺点，利用粗糙集理论中知识约简和相对正域理论在消除冗余信息和处理不确定性信息等方面的优势，探究土壤肥力评价过程中一种主观和客观相结合的权重确定方法，并利用作物产量对评价结果进行验证。【结果】粗糙集理论在土壤肥力评价中的具体赋权思路包括：数据的离散化、土壤肥力综合等级的初步确定、属性值约简、等价类划分、属性重要度的计算和指标权重计算等步骤。以北京大兴区农田土壤样点的肥力评价对上述赋权思路进行实例分析，对比传统特尔斐法和粗糙集理论赋权结果发现，特尔斐法确定的土壤有机质、全氮、有效磷和速效钾等指标的权重分别为0.300、0.250、0.250和0.200，利用其评价得到的土壤综合肥力指数（IFI）与产量显著线性相关，R2为0.77，均方根误差（RMSE）为1.25；而粗糙集理论确定的土壤有机质、全氮、有效磷和速效钾等指标的权重依次为0.455、0.111、0.111和0.333，利用其评价得到的IFI与产量也显著线性相关，R2达0.83，RMSE为1.09，精度均较特尔斐法有了提高，其中RMSE相对精度提高值达12.80%。【结论】粗糙集理论在土壤肥力评价中的具体赋权思路基本是可行的，且相对于特尔斐法其确定出各指标权重更为合理、准确，可为土壤肥力评价及相关领域的评价提供一个有益的思路。

关键词: 权重 , 土壤肥力评价 , 粗糙集理论

Abstract: 【Objective】Soil fertility is controlled by many basic soil characters. Assessing soil fertility scientifically, rationally and practicably is of importance for guidance of agricultural production, land use planning and administration. Evaluation of soil fertility is a multiattribute decision-making process without decision attribute. The premise of multiattribute decision-making process is to determine attribute weights. 【Method】The methods to determine attribute weights mainly include subjective weighting method (SWM) and objective weighting method (OWM). However, the SWM usually requires massive prior knowledge, which is somewhat subjective and do not consider the dependency between evaluation indexes. The OWM has not fully considered the difference of each index’s influence on evaluation. Meanwhile, even if statistical data have well correlations, it does not necessarily mean that the two variables have causation relationship. By considering the advantages and disadvantages of SWM and OWM, the concepts of reduction of knowledge and relative positive region in rough set theory were adopted in this study to explore the method for determination of indexes weights by combining subjective method with objective method in soil fertility evaluation and by testifying the evaluation results using crop yield data. 【Result】The determination of weight using rough set theory for soil fertility evaluation involve several steps: data discretization, preliminary determination of soil fertility grade, attribute value reduction, equivalence partitioning, attribute significance calculation, and index weights calculation. Taking soil fertility evaluation of farmland samples in Daxing district in Beijing City, China as an example, the weights of soil organic matter, total N, available P and available K determined by Delphi method were 0.300, 0.250, 0.250, and 0.200, respectively. There was a significant linear correlation between soil integrated fertility index (IFI) and crop yield. The determination coefficient R2 was 0.77 and root mean square error (RMSE) was 1.25. Using rough set theory, the determined weights of soil organic matter, total N, available P, and available K were 0.455, 0.111, 0.111, and 0.333, respectively. Again, a significant linear correlation between IFI and crop yield was observed. The later method has higher accuracy, as indicated by higher values of R2 (0.83) and lower value of RMSE (1.06). 【Conclusion】Results of this study indicates that it is feasible to adopt rough set theory for determining the index weights of soil fertility, which provides a useful choice for evaluation of soil fertility and other related fields.

Key words: weight , soil fertility evaluation , rough set theory

叶回春1, 张世文2, 黄元仿1, 周志明1, 沈重阳1. 粗糙集理论在土壤肥力评价指标权重确定中的应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(4): 701-717.

YE Hui-Chun-1, ZHANG Shi-Wen-2, HUANG Yuan-Fang-1, ZHOU Zhi-Ming-1, SHEN Zhong-Yang-1. Application of Rough Set Theory to Determine Weights of Soil Fertility Factor[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(4): 701-717.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.04.011

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2014/V47/I4/701

参考文献

[1]黄定轩, 武振业, 宗蕴璋. 基于属性重要性的多属性客观权重分配方法. 系统工程理论方法应用, 2004, 13(3): 203-207.

Huang D X, Wu Z Y, Zong Y Z. An impersonal multi-attribute weight allocation method based on attribute importance. Systems Engineering: Theory Methodology Applications, 2004, 13(3): 203-207. (in Chinese)

[2]Ma J, Fan Z, Huang L. A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 112(2): 397-404.

[3]Wang T, Lee H. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(5): 8980-8985.

[4]Rao R V, Patel B K. A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection. Materials & Design, 2010, 31(10): 4738-4747.

[5]Zhang B, Zhang Y, Chen D, White R E, Li Y. A quantitative evaluation system of soil productivity for intensive agriculture in China. Geoderma, 2004, 123(3): 319-331.

[6]陈海生, 刘国顺, 刘大双, 陈伟强. GIS支持下的河南省烟草生态适宜性综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(7): 2425-2433.

Chen H S, Liu G S, Liu D S, Chen W Q. Studies on comprehensive evaluation of tobacco ecological suitability of Henan Province supported by GIS. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(7): 2425-2433. (in Chinese)

[7]Ying X, Zeng G, Chen G, Tang L, Wang K, Huang D. Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality-A case study of Hunan Province, China. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 209(2): 97-109.

[8]张昊, 陶然, 李志勇, 杜华. 判断矩阵法在网页恶意脚本检测中的应用. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(4): 469-473.

Zhang H, Tao R, Li Z Y, Du H. The application of judgment matrix approach in detection of vicious script in HTML. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(4): 469-473. (in Chinese)

[9]Zou, Z H, Yun, Y, Sun, J N. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2006, 18(5): 1020-1023.

[10]王广月, 崔海丽, 李倩. 基于粗糙集理论的边坡稳定性评价中因素权重确定方法的研究. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(8): 2418-2422.

Wang G Y, Cui H L, Li Q. Investigation of method for determining factors weights in evaluating slope stability based on rough set theory. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(8): 2418-2422. (in Chinese)

[11]叶回春, 张世文, 黄元仿, 王胜涛. 北京延庆盆地农田表层土壤肥力评价及其空间变异. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(15): 3151-3160.

Ye H C, Zhang S W, Huang Y F, Wang S T. Assessment of surface soil fertility and its spatial variability in Yanqing Basin, Beijing, China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(15): 3151-3160. (in Chinese)

[12]刘东海, 梁国庆, 周卫, 王秀斌, 夏文建. 基于神经网络的土壤肥力综合评价. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011, (5): 12-19.

Liu D H, Liang G Q, Zhou W, Wang X B, Xia W J. Fuzzy comprehensive fertility evaluation based on BP artificial network. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2011, (5): 12-19. (in Chinese)

[13]Gau, H S, Hsieh, C Y, Liu, C W. Application of grey correlation method to evaluate potential groundwater recharge sites. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 2006, 20(6): 407-421.

[14]王树涛, 李新旺, 门明新, 许皞. 基于改进灰色关联度法的河北省粮食波动影响因素研究. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(1): 176-184.

Wang S To, Li X W, Men M X, Xu H. Study on the influencing factors of grain production in Hebei Province based on gray correlation degree method. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(1): 176-184. (in Chinese)

[15]崔潇潇, 高原, 吕贻忠. 北京市大兴区土壤肥力的空间变异. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(9): 327-333.

Cui X X, Gao Y, Lü Y Z. Spatial variability of soil fertility in Daxing District of Beijing. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(9): 327-333. (in Chinese)

[16]马永红, 周荣喜, 李振光. 基于离差最大化的决策者权重的确定方法. 北京化工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 34(2): 177-180.

Ma Y H, Zhou R X, Li Z G. The method of determining the weights of decision-makers based on the maximizing deviation. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 34(2): 177-180. (in Chinese)

[17]陶菊春, 吴建民. 综合加权评分法的综合权重确定新探. 系统工程理论与实践, 2001, 21(8): 43-48.

Tao J C, Wu J M. New study on determining the weight of index in synthetic weighted mark method. Systems Engineering-theory & Practice, 2001, 21(8): 43-48. (in Chinese)

[18]宋苏苏, 黄林, 陈勇. 基于粗糙集的土壤肥力组合评价研究. 农机化研究, 2011, 33(12): 10-13.

Song S S, Huang L, Chen Y. Study on Soil Fertility Combination Evaluation Based on Rough Set. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2011, 33(12): 10-13. (in Chinese)

[19]Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 1982, 11(5): 341-356.

[20]周献中, 黄兵, 李华雄, 魏大宽. 不完备信息系统知识获取的粗糙集理论与方法. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2010.

Zhou X Z, Huang B, Li H X, Wei D K. Rough Sets Theory & Approaches for Knowledge Acquisition in Incomplete Information Systems. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

[21]王灿, 王德建, 孙瑞娟, 林静慧. 长期不同施肥方式下土壤酶活性与肥力因素的相关性. 生态环境, 2008, 17(2): 688-692.

Wang C, Wang D J, Sun R J, Lin J H. The relationship between soil enzyme activities and soil nutrients by long-term fertilizer experiments. Ecology and Environment, 2008, 17(2): 688-692. (in Chinese)

[22]于寒青, 徐明岗, 吕家珑, 包耀贤, 孙楠, 高菊生. 长期施肥下红壤地区土壤熟化肥力评价. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(7): 1772-1778.

Yu H Q, Xu M G, Lü J L, Bao Y X, Sun N, Gao J S. Variations of soil fertility level in red soil region under long-tem fertilization. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(7): 1772-1778. (in Chinese)

[23]钟波, 肖智, 周家启. 组合预测中基于粗糙集理论的权值确定方法. 重庆大学学报, 2002, 25(7): 127-130.

Zhong B, Xiao Z, Zhou J Q. Determination to weighting coefficient of combination forecast based on rough set theory. JournaI of Chongging University, 2002, 25(7): 127-130. (in Chinese)