[1]Awmack C S, Leather S R. 2002. Host plant quality andfecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review ofEntomology, 47, 817-844[2]Chen H, Stout M J, Qian Q, Chen F. 2012. Genetic, molecularand genomic basis of rice defense against insects.Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 31, 74-91[3]Cunninghama J P, West S A. 2008. How host plantvariability influences the advantages to learning: atheoretical model for oviposition behaviour inLepidoptera. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 251, 404-410[4]Dirie A M, Cohen M B, Gould F. 2000. Larval dispersal andsurvival of Scirpophaga incertulas (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae) and Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera:Crambidae) on cry1Ab-transformed and non-transgenicrice. Environmental Entomology, 29, 972-978[5]Ghareyazie B, Alinia F, Menguito C A, Rubia L G, de PalmaJ M, Liwanag E A, Cohen M B, Khush G S, Bennett J.1997. Enhanced resistance to two stem borers in anaromatic rice containing a synthetic cry1Ab gene.Molecular Breeding, 3, 401-414[6]Han Y Q, Liu C, Hou M L. 2010. Silicon-mediated effects ofrice plants on boring behavior of Chilo suppressalislarvae. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 5967-5974[7](inChinese)Hao L X, Han Y Q, Hou M L, Liao X L. 2008. Resistance ofjaponica rice varieties in Liaohe Valley to Chilosuppressalis and its underlying mechnisms. ActaEcologica Sinica, 28, 5987-5993[8](in Chinese)Hasan F, Ansari M S. 2011. Effects of differentbrassicaceous host plants on the fitness of Pierisbrassicae (L.). Crop Protection, 30, 854-862[9]Hou M L, Han Y Q, Lin W. 2009. Influence of soil moistureon supercooling capacity and associated physiologicalparameters of overwintering larvae of rice stem borer.Entomological Science, 12, 155-161[10]Jiang W H, Jiang X J, Ye J R, Fu Q, Feng Y B, Luo J, Han ZJ. 2011. Rice striped stem borer, Chilo suppressalis(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), overwintering in super rice andits control using cultivation techniques. CropProtection, 30, 130-133[11]Jiao X, Xuan W, Sheng C. 2006. Effects of delayed matingand male mating history on longevity and reproductiveperformance of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis(Walker) (Lep., Pyralidae). Journal of AppliedEntomology, 130, 108-112[12]Lin K J, Hou M L, Han L Z, Liu Y D. 2008. Research progressin host selection and underlying mechanisms, andfactors affecting population dynamics of Chilosuppressalis. Plant Protection, 34, 22-28[13](in Chinese)Liu G J, Huang H P, Xie X F, Gui L Q, Fang W R. 1998.Study on the mechanisms of the resistance in earlyseasonrice varieties to the striped stem borer (Chilosuppressalis) and its biochemical basis. Journal ofSouthwest Agricultural University, 20, 512-515[14](inChinese)Luo J, Zhang X X, Zhai B P, Guo Y R. 2006. Resistance andmechanism of four selected rice varieties to rice stemborers (Chilo suppressalis and Scirpophagaincertulas) in Shanghai area, China. Chinese Journalof Rice Science, 20, 97-101[15](in Chinese)Mody K, Unsicker S B, Linsenmair K E. 2007. Fitness related diet-mixing by intraspecific host-plant-switching ofspecialist insect herbivores. Ecology, 88, 1012-1020[16]Muralidharan K, Pasalu I C. 2006. Assessments of croplosses in rice ecosystems due to stem borer damage(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Crop Protection, 25, 409-417[17]Patanakamjorn S, Pathak M D. 1967. Varietal resistance ofrice to the Asiatic rice borer, Chilo suppressalis(Lepidoptera: Crambidae), and its association withvarious plant characters. Annals of the EntomologicalSociety of America, 60, 287-292[18]Qu H F, Huang X F, Ye J R, Feng Y B. 2007. Diseases andinsect pests in super rice Yongyou 6 and their control.Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 17, 98-99[19]Rahman M T, Khalequzzaman M, Khan M A R. 2004.Assessment of infestation and yield loss by stem borerson variety of rice. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology,7, 89-95[20]Ramesh S, Nagadhara D, Pasalu I C, Kumari P A, Sarma N P,Reddy V D, Rao K V. 2004. Development of stem borerresistant transgenic parental lines involved in theproduction of hybrid rice. Journal of Biotechnology,111, 131-141[21]Saeed R, Sayyed A H, Shad S A, Zaka S M. 2010. Effect ofdifferent host plants on the fitness of diamond-backmoth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).Crop Protection, 29, 178-182[22]Sayyed A H, Ahmad M, Crickmore N. 2008. Fitness costslimit the development of resistance to indoxacarb anddeltamethrin in Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 101,1927-1933[23]Schoonhoven L M, van Loon J J A, Dicke M. 2005. Insect-Plant Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Soleimannejad S, Fathipour Y, Moharramipour S, ZaluckiM P. 2010. Evaluation of potential resistance in seedsof different soybean cutivars to Helicoverpa armigera(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using demographic parametersand nutritional indices. Journal of EconomicEntomology, 103, 1420-1430[24]Soufbaf M, Fathipour Y, Karimzadeh J, Zalucki M P. 2010.Development and age specific mortality of diamondbackmoth on Brassica host plants: pattern and cause ofmortality under laboratory conditions. Annals of theEntomological Society of America, 100, 574-579[25]Vila L, Quilis J, Meynard D, Breitler J C, Marfà V, Murillo I,Vassal J M, Messeguer J, Guiderdoni E, San SegundoB. 2005. Expression of the maize proteinase inhibitor(mpi) gene in rice plants enhances resistance againstthe striped stem borer (Chilo suppressalis): effects onlarval growth and insect gut proteinases. PlantBiotechnology Journal, 3, 187-202[26]Xu H X, Zhong X, Chen J M, Zheng X S, Yu X P. 2006.Resistance of different rice varieties to the striped stemborer, Chilo suppressalis and its relationship with themorphological and anatomic characteristics of rice. ActaPhytophylacica Sinica, 33, 241-245[27](in Chinese)Xu S, Wang M L, Ding N, Ma W H, Li Y N, Lei C L, WangX P. 2011. Relationships between body weight ofoverwintering larvae and supercooling capacity;diapause intensity and post-diapause reproductivepotential in Chilo suppressalis walker. Journal of InsectPhysiology, 57, 653-659[28]Zhu Z R, Romena A, Cohen M B. 2002. Comparison of stemborer damage and resistance in modern indica ricecultivars and prototype lines of a new plant type. FieldCrops Research, 75, 37-45. |