Abdel-Aziz N A, El-Adawy M M, Salem A Z M, Cerrillo-Soto MA, Camacho L M, Borhami B E. 2014. Effects of exogenousenzymes, Lactobacillus acidophilus or their combinationon feed intake, digestibility and performance of rabbits fedsugarcane bagasse. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology,14, 137-145Abdel-Aziz N A, El-Adawy M, Mariezcurrena-Berasain M A,Salem A Z M, Olivares-Pérez J, Kholif A E, Borhami BE. 2015a. Effects of exogenous enzymes, Lactobacillusacidophilus or their combination on feed performanceresponse and carcass characteristics of rabbits fedsugarcane bagasse. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14,544-549Abdel-Aziz N A, Salem A Z M, El-Adawy M M, Camacho LM, Kholif A E, Elghandour M M Y, Borhami B E. 2015b.Biological treatments as a mean to improve feed utilizationin agriculture animals-An overview. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 14, 534-543Abo-Donia F M, Abdel-Azim S N, Elghandour M M Y, SalemA Z M, Buendia G, Soliman N A M. 2014. Feed intake,nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation activities insheep fed peanut hulls treated with Trichoderma viride orurea. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 46, 221-228Alli I, Baker B E. 1982. Studies on the fermentation of choppedsugarcane. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 7,411-417Alli I, Fairbairn R, Baker B E, Garcia G. 1983. The effectsof ammonia on the fermentation of chopped sugarcane.Animal Feed Science and Technology, 9, 291-299AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2007.Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Association of OfficialAnalytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.Aranda E M, Mendoza G D, Ramos J A, da Silva I C, Vitti AC. 2010. Effect of fibrolitic enzymes on rumen microbialdegradation of sugarcane fiber. Ciencia Animal Brasileira,11, 448-495(in Portuguese)Aranda E M, Ruiz P, Mendoza G D, Marcoff C F, Ramos J A,Elías A. 2004. Changes in the digestion of three varietiesof sugarcane and their fiber fractions. Cuban Journal ofAgricultural Science, 38, 135-141Avila C L S, Bravo M C E C, Schwan R F. 2010. Identificationand characterization of yeasts in sugarcane silages. Journalof Applied Microbiology, 109, 1677-1686Avila C L S, Pinto J C, Carvalho B F. 2013. Use of additives inensiling of sugar cane. Informe Agropecuario, 34, 65-72(in Portuguese)Avila C L S, Pinto J C, Figueiredo H C P, Shwan R F. 2009.Effects of an indigenous and a commercial Lactobacillusbuchneri strain on quality of sugar cane silage. Grass andForage Science, 64, 384-394Bergamaschine A F, Passipiéri M, Veriano F W V, IseponO J, de Almeida C L. 2006. Quality and nutritive valueof marandugrass (Brachiaria brizanthia, cv. Marandu)silage prepared with additive or wilting. Revista Brasileirade Zootecnia (Brazilian Journal of Animal Science), 35,1454-1462Bolsen K.1995. Silage: Basic principles. In: Barnes R F, MillerD A, Nelson C J, eds., Forages. Iowa State University,UAS. pp. 163-176Carvalho B F, Avila C L S, Pinto J C, Schwan R. F. 2013. Effectof propionic acid and Lactobacillus plantarum UFLA SIL 1on the sugarcane silage with and without calcium oxide.African Journal of Microbiology Research, 7, 4159-4168Daniel J L P, Weiß K, Custódio L, Neto A S, Santos M C,Zopollatto M, Nussio L G. 2013. Occurrence of volatileorganic compounds in sugarcane silages. Animal FeedScience and Technology, 185, 101-105Elghandour M M Y, Salem A Z M, Martínez Castañeda J S,Camacho L M, Kholif A E, Vázquez Chagoyán J C. 2015.Direct-fed microbes: A tool for improving the utilization oflow quality roughages in ruminants. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 14, 526-533Espinoza F, Argenti P, Carrillo C, Araque C, Torres A, Valle A.2006. Strategic use of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum)in dual purpose pregnant heifers. Zootecnia Tropical, 24,95-107 (in Spanish)Ferreira D A, Gonçalves L, Molina L R, Castro-Neto A, TomichT R. 2007. Fermentation of sugarcane silage treated withurea, zeolita, bacteria inoculant and bacteria/enzymatic inoculants. Arquivo Brasileira de Medicina VeterináriaZootecnia, 59, 423-433García H, Abreu M, Soto J M. 2008. Digestion of residualsof the crop cane treatment with OHNa. 1. Determinationof digestibility in situ. REDVET (Electronic Journal ofVeterinary Medicine), 11, 1-8 (in Spainish)Khattab I M, Salem A Z M, Abdel-Wahed A M, Kewan K Z. 2013.Effects of urea supplementation on nutrient digestibility,nitrogen utilization and rumen fermentation in sheep feddiets containing dates. Livestock Science, 155, 223-229Kung Jr L, Stanley R W. 1982. Effect of stage of maturity onthe nutritive value of whole-plant sugarcane preserved assilage. Journal of Animal Science, 54, 689-696Liu J J, Liu X P, Ren J W, Zhao H Y, Yuan X F, Wang X F,Salem A Z M, Cui Z J. 2015. The effects of fermentationand adsorption using lactic acid bacteria culture broth on thefeed quality of rice straw. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,14, 503-513McCullough H. 1967. The determination of ammonia in wholeblood by a direct colorimetric method. Clinica Chimica Acta,17, 297-304McDonald I. 1981. A revised model for estimation of proteindegradability in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science,96, 251-252Molina A S, Sierra J F, Febles I. 1999. Sugar cane silage withprotein synthesis: Combined effect of additives and density.Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 33, 205-208Muck R E. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control throughadditives. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Brazilian Journalof Animal Science), 39, 183-191Ørskov E R, McDonald I. 1979. The estimation of proteindegradability in the rumen from incubation measurementsweighted according to rate of passage. Journal ofAgricultural Science, 92, 499-503Pedroso A F, Andrade R A, Barioni B J, Batista S G.2011. Fermentation parameters, quality and losses insugarcane silages treated with chemical additives anda bacterial inoculant. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia(Brazilian Journal of Animal Science), 40, 2318-2322Pedroso A F. 2003. Chemical additive and microbial inoculantseffects on the fermentation and on the control of the alcoholproduction in sugarcane silages. Ph D thesis, University ofSão Paulo, Piracicaba, Brasil. p. 120.Pedroso A F, Nussio L, Lourdes D R. 2007. Effect of treatmentwith chemical additives and bacterial losses and quality ofsilage from sugar cane. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia(Brazilian Journal of Animal Science), 36, 558-564Pedroso A F, Nussio L, Paziani S F. 2005. Fermentation andepiphytic microflora dynamics in sugar cane silage. ScientiaAgricola, 62, 427-432Rezende S G, Andrade R R, Schoken R P I, Fernandes B T,Vieira P A J, Toledo P R M, Toledo P R M. 2007. Chemicaland bacterial addition association on the sugarcaneensilage. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Brazilian Journalof Animal Science), 36, 789-798Rezende S G, Andrade R R, Schocken-Iturrino R P, VieiraP A J, Fernandes B T, Toledo P R M. 2010. Burning andchemical and bacterial additives in sugar cane silage.Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Brazilian Journal of AnimalScience), 39, 103-112(in Portuguese)Rocha K D, Pereira O G, Valadares F S C, Oliveira A P, PachecoL B B, Chizzotti F H M. 2006. Nutritive value of corn silage(Zea mays L.) produced with enzymatic-bacterial inoculants.Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Brazilian Journal of AnimalScience), 35, 389-395 (in Portuguese)Rocha V A, Cardoso P J, Da Silva A C, Ricardo E A, Botego TV, Freitas S R. 2009. Effect of the addition of Lactobacillussp. in sugarcane silages. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia(Brazilian Journal of Animal Science), 38,1009-1017 (inPortuguese)Rötz C A, Muck R E. 1994. Changes in forage quality duringharvest and storage. In: Fahey G C J, Collins M, MertensD R, Moser L E, eds., Forage Quality, Evaluation andUtilization. Madison, WI. pp. 828-868Ruiz B O, Castillo Y, Anchondo A, Rodríguez C, Beltrán R, LaO O, Payán J. 2009. Enzyme and inoculant effects on cornsilage composition. Archivos de Zootecnia, 58, 163-172(in Spanish)Russell B J, Wilson B D. 1996. Why are ruminal cellulolyticbacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH? Journal ofDairy Science, 79, 1503-1509Salem A Z M, Zhou C S, Tan Z L, Mellado M, Odongo N E,Cipriano-Salazar M, Elghandour M M Y. 2013. In vitrodigestibility, chemical composition, and kinetics of gasproduction of foliage from four fodder trees ensiled withor without molasses and urea. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 12, 1234-1242SáNeto A N, Nussio L G, Zopollatto M, Junges D, Wosniak AB. 2013. Corn and sugarcane silages with Lactobacillusbuchneri alone or associated with L. plantarum. PesquisaAgropecuaria Brasileira, 48, 528-535 (in Portuguese)Sampaio I B M. 1988. Experimental designs and modellingtechniques in the study of roughage degradation in rumenand growth of ruminants. Ph D thesis, University of Reading,United Kingdom. p. 214.Santos M C, Nussio L G, Mourão G B. 2009. Nutritive value ofsugarcane silage treated with chemical additives. ScientiaAgricola, 66, 159-163SAS. 1999. User’s Guide: Statistics. 8th ed. SAS Institute,Cary NC.Van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. 1991. Methodsfor dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starchpolysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal ofDairy Science, 74, 3583-3597Tejada de Hernández I. 1985. Laboratory Manual for Analysisof Ingredients Used in Animal Feeding. Board SupportResearch and Experimentation in Mexico Cattle, Mexico.p. 387. (in Spanish)Vanzant E S, Cochran R C, Titgemeyer E C. 1998.Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuffevaluation. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 2717-2729 |