Journal of Integrative Agriculture ›› 2014, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 265-281.DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60646-2

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

IPM Strategies and Their Dilemmas Including an Introduction to www. eurowheat.org

Lise Nistrup Jørgensen; Mogens Støvring Hovmøller; Jens Grønbæk Hansen; Poul Lassen; Bill Clark; Rosemary Bayles; Bernd Rodemann; Kerstin Flath; Margot Jahn; Tomas Goral; Jerzy Czembor J; Philip Cheyron; Claude Maumene; Claude De Pope; Rita Ban; Ghita Cordsen Nielsen; Gunilla Berg   

  1. 1.Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Flakkebjerg, Forsøgsvej 1, Slagelse 4200, Denmark
    2.Aarhus University, Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, Tjele 8830, Denmark
    3.NIAB/TAG, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0LE, United Kingdom
    4.Julius Kuehn Institute, Messerweg 11, Braunsweig 38104, Germany
    5.Julius Kuehn Institute, Stahndorfer Damm 81, Kleinmachnow14532, Germany
    6.Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, IHAR-PIB Radzikow, Blonie 05-870, Poland
    7.Arvalis du Vegetal, Boigneville 91720, France
    8.Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Thiverval Grinon 78850, France
    9.Szent István University, Pater K.Street 1, Godollo 2100, Hungary
    10. Knowledge Centre for Agriculture, Skejby, Aarhus N 8200, Denmark
    11.Swedish Board of Agriculture, Plant Protection Centre, Alnarp 23053, Sweden
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-09 出版日期:2014-02-01 发布日期:2014-02-06
  • 通讯作者: Lise Nistrup J?rgensen, Tel: +45-87158234, Fax: +45-87156082, E-mail: LiseN.Jorgensen@agrsci.dk
  • 作者简介:Lise Nistrup J?rgensen, Tel: +45-87158234, Fax: +45-87156082, E-mail: LiseN.Jorgensen@agrsci.dk
  • 基金资助:

    Thanks to ENDURE, European Network for the Durable Exploitation of Crop Protection Strategies, which was organized as “network of excellence (NoE)” financed by the EU’s 6th Framework Programme.

IPM Strategies and Their Dilemmas Including an Introduction to www. eurowheat.org

Lise Nistrup Jørgensen; Mogens Støvring Hovmøller; Jens Grønbæk Hansen; Poul Lassen; Bill Clark; Rosemary Bayles; Bernd Rodemann; Kerstin Flath; Margot Jahn; Tomas Goral; Jerzy Czembor J; Philip Cheyron; Claude Maumene; Claude De Pope; Rita Ban; Ghita Cordsen Nielsen; Gunilla Berg   

  1. 1.Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Flakkebjerg, Forsøgsvej 1, Slagelse 4200, Denmark
    2.Aarhus University, Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, Tjele 8830, Denmark
    3.NIAB/TAG, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0LE, United Kingdom
    4.Julius Kuehn Institute, Messerweg 11, Braunsweig 38104, Germany
    5.Julius Kuehn Institute, Stahndorfer Damm 81, Kleinmachnow14532, Germany
    6.Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, IHAR-PIB Radzikow, Blonie 05-870, Poland
    7.Arvalis du Vegetal, Boigneville 91720, France
    8.Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Thiverval Grinon 78850, France
    9.Szent István University, Pater K.Street 1, Godollo 2100, Hungary
    10. Knowledge Centre for Agriculture, Skejby, Aarhus N 8200, Denmark
    11.Swedish Board of Agriculture, Plant Protection Centre, Alnarp 23053, Sweden
  • Received:2013-07-09 Online:2014-02-01 Published:2014-02-06
  • Contact: Lise Nistrup J?rgensen, Tel: +45-87158234, Fax: +45-87156082, E-mail: LiseN.Jorgensen@agrsci.dk
  • About author:Lise Nistrup J?rgensen, Tel: +45-87158234, Fax: +45-87156082, E-mail: LiseN.Jorgensen@agrsci.dk
  • Supported by:

    Thanks to ENDURE, European Network for the Durable Exploitation of Crop Protection Strategies, which was organized as “network of excellence (NoE)” financed by the EU’s 6th Framework Programme.

PDF

摘要： Information about disease management in winter wheat (Triticum aestiva) in eight European countries was collated and analysed by scientists and extension workers within the European Network for the Durable Exploitation of Crop Protection Strategies (ENDURE). This included information about specific disease thresholds, decision support systems, host varieties, disease prevalence and pathogen virulence. Major differences in disease prevalence and economic importance were observed. Septoria tritici blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) was recognized as the most yield reducing disease in countries with intensive wheat production, but also rust diseases (Puccinia striiformis and Puccinia triticina), powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis) and Fusarium head blight (Fusarium spp.) were seen as serious disease problems. Examples of current integrated pest management (IPM) strategies in different countries have been reported. Disease management and fungicide use patterns showed major differences, with an average input equivalent to 2.3 full dose rates (TFI) in the UK and a TFI of 0.6 in Denmark. These differences are most likely due to a combination of different cropping systems, climatic differences, disease prevalence, and socio-economic factors. The web based information platform www.eurowheat.org was used for dissemination of information and results including information on control thresholds, cultural practices which can influence disease attack, fungicide efficacy, fungicide resistance, and pathogen virulence, which are all elements supporting IPM for disease control in wheat. The platform is open to all users. The target groups of EuroWheat information are researchers, advisors, breeders, and similar partners dealing with disease management in wheat.

关键词: winter wheat , IPM , fungicides , diseases , cultural methods

Abstract: Information about disease management in winter wheat (Triticum aestiva) in eight European countries was collated and analysed by scientists and extension workers within the European Network for the Durable Exploitation of Crop Protection Strategies (ENDURE). This included information about specific disease thresholds, decision support systems, host varieties, disease prevalence and pathogen virulence. Major differences in disease prevalence and economic importance were observed. Septoria tritici blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) was recognized as the most yield reducing disease in countries with intensive wheat production, but also rust diseases (Puccinia striiformis and Puccinia triticina), powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis) and Fusarium head blight (Fusarium spp.) were seen as serious disease problems. Examples of current integrated pest management (IPM) strategies in different countries have been reported. Disease management and fungicide use patterns showed major differences, with an average input equivalent to 2.3 full dose rates (TFI) in the UK and a TFI of 0.6 in Denmark. These differences are most likely due to a combination of different cropping systems, climatic differences, disease prevalence, and socio-economic factors. The web based information platform www.eurowheat.org was used for dissemination of information and results including information on control thresholds, cultural practices which can influence disease attack, fungicide efficacy, fungicide resistance, and pathogen virulence, which are all elements supporting IPM for disease control in wheat. The platform is open to all users. The target groups of EuroWheat information are researchers, advisors, breeders, and similar partners dealing with disease management in wheat.

Key words: winter wheat , IPM , fungicides , diseases , cultural methods