Comparison of Two Dripper Line Designs to Assess Cotton Yield, Water Use, and Net Return in Northwest China

doi:10.1016/S1671-2927(00)8728

Journal of Integrative Agriculture ›› 2012, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (11): 1924-1932.DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(00)8728

• 论文 • 上一篇

Comparison of Two Dripper Line Designs to Assess Cotton Yield, Water Use, and Net Return in Northwest China

WANG Ruo-shui; ;WAN Shu-qin;KANG Yue-hu ; LIU Shi-ping

1.Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R.China
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R.China

收稿日期:2012-02-15 出版日期:2012-11-01 发布日期:2012-11-24
通讯作者: Correspondence WAN Shu-qin, Mobile: 18901115998, Fax: +86-10-64856516, E-mail: wansq@iqsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
This study was supported by the National High-Tech R&D Program of China (2011AA100507), the Action Plan for the Development of Western China of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-XB3-16), and the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (51009126).

Comparison of Two Dripper Line Designs to Assess Cotton Yield, Water Use, and Net Return in Northwest China

WANG Ruo-shui; ;WAN Shu-qin;KANG Yue-hu ; LIU Shi-ping

1.Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R.China
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R.China

Received:2012-02-15 Online:2012-11-01 Published:2012-11-24
Contact: Correspondence WAN Shu-qin, Mobile: 18901115998, Fax: +86-10-64856516, E-mail: wansq@iqsnrr.ac.cn
Supported by:
This study was supported by the National High-Tech R&D Program of China (2011AA100507), the Action Plan for the Development of Western China of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-XB3-16), and the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (51009126).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： This study aimed to compare the effects of two types of drip irrigation line design on cotton yield, water use, and net returns. The experiments were carried out in the arid region of Xinjiang, Northwest China, during 2009-2010 growing years. The two types of lateral placement are commonly used by the local farmers in the area: double lines (two laterals controlling four rows) and single line designs (one lateral controlling four rows). The results indicated that less irrigation water was applied by single line compared with double lines design. This implies that more irrigation water could be saved using single line, by reducing the water consumption of cotton. The emergence rates for double lines were 2 and 6% higher than those for single line design in 2009 and 2010. The seed cotton yields for double lines design were 5.76 and 6.41 Mg ha-1 which were 13 and 9% higher than for single line design in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Single lines could however lower the investment cost compared to double lines, which produced 10 and 7% more net income in 2009 and 2010, respectively. By contrast, the double lines was more profitable and suitable for the farmers in Northwest China than single line design.

关键词: drip irrigation , lateral layout , economic benefit , water saving , water use efficiency (WUE)

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the effects of two types of drip irrigation line design on cotton yield, water use, and net returns. The experiments were carried out in the arid region of Xinjiang, Northwest China, during 2009-2010 growing years. The two types of lateral placement are commonly used by the local farmers in the area: double lines (two laterals controlling four rows) and single line designs (one lateral controlling four rows). The results indicated that less irrigation water was applied by single line compared with double lines design. This implies that more irrigation water could be saved using single line, by reducing the water consumption of cotton. The emergence rates for double lines were 2 and 6% higher than those for single line design in 2009 and 2010. The seed cotton yields for double lines design were 5.76 and 6.41 Mg ha-1 which were 13 and 9% higher than for single line design in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Single lines could however lower the investment cost compared to double lines, which produced 10 and 7% more net income in 2009 and 2010, respectively. By contrast, the double lines was more profitable and suitable for the farmers in Northwest China than single line design.

Key words: drip irrigation , lateral layout , economic benefit , water saving , water use efficiency (WUE)

WANG Ruo-shui, WAN Shu-qin, KANG Yue-hu , LIU Shi-ping. Comparison of Two Dripper Line Designs to Assess Cotton Yield, Water Use, and Net Return in Northwest China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 12(11): 1924-1932.

参考文献

[1]Aujla M S, Thind H S, Buttar G S. 2005. Cotton yield andwater use efficiency at various levels of water and Nthrough drip irrigation under two methods of planting.Agricultural Water Management, 71, 167-179

[2]Bozkurt Y, Yazar A, Gencel B, Sezen M S. 2006. Optimumlateral spacing for drip-irrigated corn in theMediterranean Region of Turkey. Agricultural WaterManagement, 85, 113-120

[3]Camp C R, Bauer P J, Hunt P G. 1997. Subsurface drip irrigation lateral spacing and management for cotton inthe southeastern coastal plain. Transaction of theASAE, 40, 993-999

[4]Cai H, Shao G, Zhang Z. 2002. Lateral layout of dripirrigation under plastic mulch for cotton. Transactionsof the CSAE, 18, 45-48 (in Chinese)

[5]Cetin O, Uygan D. 2008. The effect of drip line spacing,irrigation regimes and planting geometries of tomatoon yield, irrigation water use efficiency and net return.Agricultural Water Management, 95, 949-958

[6]Cetin O, Bilgel L. 2002. Effect of different irrigation methodson shedding and yield of cotton. Agricultural WaterManagement, 54, 1-15

[7]Da delen N, Baþal H, Yýlmaz E, Gürbüz T, Akçay S. 2009.Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield,water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey.Agricultural Water Management, 96, 111-120

[8]Ertek A, Kanber R. 2003. Effects of different drip irrigationprograms on the boll number and shedding percentageand yield of cotton. Agricultural Water Management,60, 1-11

[9]Hunsaker D J, Clemmens A J, Fangmeier D D. 1998. Cottonresponse to high frequency surface irrigation.Agricultural Water Management, 37, 55-74

[10]Hu X, Chen H, Wang J, Meng X, Chen F. 2009. Effects ofsoil water content on cotton root growth and distributionunder mulched drip irrigation. Agricultural Sciencesin China, 8, 709-716

[11]Ibragimov N, Evett S R, Esanbekov Y, Kamilov B S, MirzaevL, Lamers J P A. 2007. Water use efficiency of irrigatedcotton in Uzbekistan under drip and furrow irrigation.Agricultural Water Management, 90, 112-120

[12]Karam F, Lahoud R, Masaad R, Daccache A, Mounzer O,Rouphael Y. 2006. Water use and lint yield response ofdrip irrigated cotton to the length of irrigation season.Agricultural Water Management, 85, 287-295

[13]Kanwar R S, Rizvi H A, Ahmed M, Horton R, Marlev S J.1989. Measurement of field-saturated hydraulicconduct ivi ty by using Guelph and Veloci typermeameters. Transactions of the American Societyof Agricultural Engineers, 32, 1885-1890

[14]Lamm F R, Stone L R, Manges H L, O’Brien D M. 1997.Optimum lateral spacing for drip-irrigated corn.Transaction of the ASAE, 40, 1021-1027

[15]Onder D, Akiscan Y, Onder S, Mert M. 2009. Effect ofdifferent irrigation water level on cotton yield and yieldcomponents. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8,1536-1544

[16]Patel N, Rajput T B S. 2007. Effect of drip tape placementdepth and irrigation level on yield of potato.Agricultural Water Management, 88, 209-223

[17]Plaut Z, Carmi A, Grava A. 1988. Cotton growth andproduction under drip-irrigation restricted soil wetting.Irrigation Sciences, 9, 143-156

[18]Rawitz E, Lior H, Rimon M. 1990. The effect of drip-lineplacement and residue incorporation on the growth ofdrip-irrigated cotton. Soil and Tillage Research, 16,227-232

[19]Ünlü M, Kanber R, Koç D L, Tekin S, Kapur B. 2011. Effectsof deficit irrigation on the yield and yield componentsof drip irrigated cotton in a Mediterranean environment.Agricultural Water Management, 98, 597-605

[20]Wang X, Tian C, Wen Q, Wu H, Mao J. 2007. Influence ofland utilization way on soil salt in Karamay AgriculturalDevelopment Zones. Journal of Xinjiang AgriculturalUniversity, 30, 38-40

[21](in Chinese)Xu F, Li Y, Ren S. 2003. Investigation and discussion ofdrip irrigation under mulch in Xinjiang UygurAutonomous Region. Transaction of the CSAE, 19, 25-27. (in Chinese)

Comparison of Two Dripper Line Designs to Assess Cotton Yield, Water Use, and Net Return in Northwest China

Comparison of Two Dripper Line Designs to Assess Cotton Yield, Water Use, and Net Return in Northwest China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	ZHANG Li-wei, Til Feike, Jirko Holst, Christa Hoffmann, Reiner Doluschitz. Comparison of energy consumption and economic performance of organic and conventional soybean production - A case study from Jilin Province, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(8): 1561-1572.
[2]	Lü Guo-hua, SONG Ji-qing, BAI Wen-bo, WU Yong-feng, LIU Yuan, KANG Yao-hu. Effects of different irrigation methods on micro-environments and root distribution in winter wheat fields[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(8): 1658-1672.
[3]	Sel?uk ?zmen, R?za Kanber, Nebahat Sar?, Mustafa ünlü. The effects of deficit irrigation on nitrogen consumption, yield, and quality in drip irrigated grafted and ungrafted watermelon[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(5): 966-976.
[4]	ZHANG Jian-jun, LI Jiu-sheng, ZHAO Bing-qiang, LI Yan-ting. Simulation of water and nitrogen dynamics as affected by drip fertigation strategies[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(12): 2434-2445.
[5]	LI Yan-feng, LI Jiu-sheng, ZHANG Hang. Effects of Chlorination on Soil Chemical Properties and Nitrogen Uptake for Tomato Drip Irrigated with Secondary Sewage Effluent[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(9): 2049-2060.
[6]	Yasemin Kuslu, Ustun Sahin, Fatih M Kiziloglu, Selcuk Memis. Fruit Yield and Quality, and Irrigation Water Use Efficiency of Summer Squash Drip-Irrigated with Different Irrigation Quantities in a Semi-Arid Agricultural Area[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(11): 2518-2526.
[7]	JIANG Zhi-yun, LI Xiao-yan, MA Yu-jun. Water and Energy Conservation of Rainwater Harvesting System in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(8): 1389-1395.
[8]	GUAN Hong-jie, LI Jiu-sheng, LI Yan-feng. Effects of Drip System Uniformity and Irrigation Amount on Water and Salt Distributions in Soil Under Arid Conditions[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(5): 924-939.
[9]	LIU Hao, DUAN Ai-wang, LI Fu-sheng, SUN Jing-sheng, WANG Yan-cong , SUN Chi-tao. Drip Irrigation Scheduling for Tomato Grown in Solar Greenhouse Based on Pan Evaporation in North China Plain[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(3): 520-531.
[10]	TANG Qiu-xiang, Wilko Schweers, LEI Bao-kun, LIN Tao, ZHANG Gui-long . Study on Environmental Risk and Economic Benefits of Rotation Systems in Farmland of Erhai Lake Basin[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 12(6): 1038-1047.
[11]	LIU Mei-xian, LI Xiao-ming, YU Mei, WANG Jin. Effects of Irrigation Water Quality and Drip Tape Arrangement on Soil Salinity, Soil Moisture Distribution, and Cotton Yield (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Under Mulched Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 12(3): 502-511.
[12]	LI Jiu-sheng, LI Yan-feng, ZHANG Hang. Tomato Yield and Quality and Emitter Clogging as Affected by Chlorination Schemes of Drip Irrigation Systems Applying Sewage Effluent[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 12(10): 1744-1754.
[13]	Clinton C Shock, Candace B Shock. Research, Extension, and Good Farming Practices Improve Water Quality and Productivity[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 12(1): 14-30.
[14]	ZHANG He-xi, CHI Dao-cai, WANG Qun, FANG Jun, FANG Xiao-yu. Yield and Quality Response of Cucumber to Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilization Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation in Solar Greenhouse[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2011, 10(6): 921-930.