[1]Akalin A, Gönç S, Akba Y. 2002. Variation in organic acidscontent during ripening of pickled white cheese.Journal of Dairy Science, 85, 1670-1676[2]Alamouti A A, Alikhani M, Ghorbani G, Zebeli Q. 2009.Effects of inclusion of neutral detergent soluble fibresources in diets varying in forage particle size on feedintake, digestive processes, and performance of midlactationHolstein cows. Animal Feed Science andTechnology, 154, 9-23[3]AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed.Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, Arlington,VA.Ariza P, Bach A, Stern M, Hall M. 2001. Effects ofcarbohydrates from citrus pulp and hominy feed onmicrobial fermentation in continuous culture. Journalof Animal Science, 79, 2713.[4]Barrios-Urdaneta A, Fondevila M, Castrillo C. 2003. Effectof supplementation with different proportions of barleygrain or citrus pulp on the digestive utilization ofammonia-treated straw by sheep. Animal Science-Glasgow Then Penicuik, 76, 309-318[5]Brückner J. 1955. Estimation of monosaccharides by theorcinol-sulphuric acid reaction. Biochemical Journal,60, 200-205[6]Broderick G, Luchini N, Reynal S, Varga G, Ishler V. 2008.Effect on production of replacing dietary starch withsucrose in lactating dairy cows. Journal of DairyScience, 91, 4801-4810[7]Brown W, Johnson D. 1991. Effects of energy and proteinsupplementation of ammoniated tropical grass hay onthe growth and carcass characteristics of cull cows.Journal of Animal Science, 69, 348-357[8]Bueno M, Ferrari E, Bianchini D, Leinz F, Rodrigues C.2002. Effect of replacing corn with dehydrated citruspulp in diets of growing kids. Small Ruminant Research,46, 179-185[9]Chamberlain D G, Robertson S, Choung J J. 1993. Sugarsversus starch as supplements to grass silage: effectson ruminal fermentation and the supply of microbialprotein to the small intestine, estimated from the urinaryexcretion of purine derivatives, in sheep. Journal ofthe Science of Food and Agriculture, 63, 189-194[10]Coen J A, Dehority B. 1970. Degradation and utilization ofhemicellulose from intact forages by pure cultures ofrumen bacteria. Applied Microbiology, 20, 362-368[11]Cotta M A. 1993. Utilization of xylooligosaccharides by selected ruminal bacteria. Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 59, 3557-3563[12]Cotta M A, Zeltwanger R L. 1995. Degradation andutilization of xylan by the ruminal bacteria Butyrivibriofibrisolvens and Selenomonas ruminantium. Appliedand Environmental Microbiology, 61, 4396-4402[13]Dehority B. 1967. Rate of isolated hemicellulose degradationand utilization by pure cultures of rumen bacteria.Applied Microbiology, 15, 987-993[14]Fluharty F L, Dehority B A. 1995. Effects of sugar beet pulpand corn as energy supplements for cattle fed foragediets on diet digestibility and ruminal microorganisms.In: Special Circular - Ohio Agricultural Research andDevelopment Center Issue: No. 156. The Ohio StateUniversity, Columbus, Ohio, USA. pp. 51-55[15]Gholizadeh H, Naserian A. 2010. The effects of replacingdried citrus pulp with barley grain on the performanceof Iranian Saanen kids. Journal of Animal andVeterinary Advances, 9, 2053-2056[16]Hall M, Larson C, Wilcox C. 2010. Carbohydrate sourceand protein degradability alter lactation, ruminal, andblood measures. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 311-322[17]Hall M B, Hoover W H, Jennings J P, Webster T K M. 1999.A method for partitioning neutral detergent-solublecarbohydrates. Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture, 79, 2079-2086[18]Hall M B, Weimer P. 2007. Sucrose concentration altersfermentation kinetics, products, and carbon fatesduring in vitro fermentation with mixed ruminalmicrobes. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 1467-1478[19]Hemingway R, Parkins J, Fraser J. 1986. A note on the effectof molasses inclusion in sugar beet pulp on the yieldand composition of the milk of dairy cows. AnimalProduction, 42, 417-420[20]Huhtanen P. 1988. The effects of barley, unmolassed sugarbeetpulp and molasses supplements on organic matter,nitrogen and fibre digestion in the rumen of cattle givena silage diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology,20, 259-278[21]Jommuengbout P, Pinitglang S, Kyu K, RatanakhanokchaiK. 2009. Substrate-binding site of family 11 xylanasefrom Bacillus firmus K-1 by molecular docking Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 73, 833-839[22]Kajikawa H, Jin H, Terada F, Suga T. 2003. Operation andcharacteristics of newly improved and marketableartificial rumen (Rusitec). Memoirs of National Instituteof Livestock and Grassland Science, 2, 1-30[23]Khalili H, Huhtanen P. 1991. Sucrose supplements in cattlegiven grass silage-based diet. 2. Digestion of cell wallcarbohydrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology,33, 263-273[24]Koike S, Kobayashi Y. 2001. Development and use ofcompetitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolyticbacteria: Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcusalbus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. FEMSMicrobiology Letters, 204, 361-366[25]Marounek M, Dušková D. 1999. Metabolism of pectin inrumen bacteria Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and Prevotellaruminicola. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 29, 429-433[26]McDougall E. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. Thecomposition and output of sheep’s saliva. BiochemicalJournal, 43, 99-109[27]Migwi P, Godwin I, Nolan J, Kahn L. 2011. The effect ofenergy supplementation on intake and utilisationefficiency of urea-treated low-quality roughage in sheepi. Rumen digestion and feed intake. Asian-AustralasianJournal of Animal Sciences, 24, 623-635[28]Moe P, Tyrrell H. 1979. Methane production in dairy cows.Journal of Dairy Science, 62, 1583-1586[29]Odenyo A, Mackie R, Fahey G, White B. 1991. Degradationof wheat straw and alkaline hydrogen peroxide-treatedwheat straw by Ruminococcus albus 8 andRuminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 Journal of AnimalScience, 69, 819-826[30]Odenyo A A, Mackie R I, Stahl D A, White B A. 1994. Theuse of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes tostudy competition between ruminal fibrolytic bacteria:development of probes for Ruminococcus species andevidence for bacteriocin production. Applied andEnvironmental Microbiology, 60, 3688-3696[31]Oh Y, Kim K, Kim J, Choung J, Chamberlain D. 1999. Theeffect of the form of nitrogen in the diet on ruminalfermentation and the yield of microbial protein in sheepconsuming diets of grass silage supplemented withstarch or sucrose. Animal Feed Science andTechnology, 78, 227-237[32]Owens D, McGee M, Boland T, O’Kiely P. 2008. Intake,rumen fermentation and nutrient flow to the omasum inbeef cattle fed grass silage fortified with sucrose and/or supplemented with concentrate. Animal FeedScience and Technology, 144, 23-43[33]Pan J, Suzuki T, Koike S, Ueda K, Kobayashi Y, Tanaka K,Okubo M. 2003. Effects of urea infused into the rumenon liquid- and particle-associated fibrolytic enzymeactivities in steers fed low quality grass hay. AnimalFeed Science and Technology, 104, 13-27[34]Penner G, Guan L, Oba M. 2009. Effects of feedingFermenten on ruminal fermentation in lactating Holsteincows fed two dietary sugar concentrations. Journal ofDairy Science, 92, 1725-1733[35]Pinzon F, Wing J. 1976. Effects of citrus pulp in high urearations for steers1. Journal of Dairy Science, 59, 1100-1103[36]Rajaram S, Varma A. 1990. Production and characterizationof xylanase from Bacillus thermoalkalophilus grownon agricultural wastes. Applied Microbiology andBiotechnology, 34, 141-144[37]Ranilla M, Carro M. 2003. Diet and procedures used todetach particle-associated microbes from ruminaldigesta influence chemical composition of microbes andestimation of microbial growth in Rusitec fermenters.Journal of Animal Science, 81, 537-544[38]Reynal S, Broderick G. 2009. Technical note: A new highperformanceliquid chromatography purine assay forquantifying microbial flow. Journal of Dairy Science,92, 1177-1181[39]Soliva C, Hess H. 2007. Measuring Methane Emission ofRuminants by In Vitro and In Vivo Techniques.Dordrecht, Springer, The Netherlands.Strobel H. 1993. Evidence for catabolite inhibition inregulation of pentose utilization and transport in theruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Appliedand Environmental Microbiology, 59, 40-46[40]Strobel H J, Dawson K A. 1993. Xylose and arabinoseutilization by the rumen bacterium Butyrivibriofibrisolvens. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 113, 291-296[41]Strobel H J, Russell J B. 1986. Effect of pH and energyspilling on bacterial protein synthesis by carbohydratelimitedcultures of mixed rumen bacteria. Journal ofDairy Science, 69, 2941-2947[42]van Soest P J, Robertson J, Lewis B. 1991. Methods fordietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarchpolysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journalof Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597[43]Thurston B, Dawson K, Strobel H. 1994. Pentose utilizationby the ruminal bacterium Ruminococcus albus. Appliedand Environmental Microbiology, 60, 1087-1092[44]Vallimont J, Bargo F, Cassidy T, Luchini N, Broderick G,Varga G. 2004. Effects of replacing dietary starch withsucrose on ruminal fermentation and nitrogenmetabolism in continuous culture. Journal of DairyScience, 87, 4221-4229[45]Waghorn G, Woodward S, Tavendale M, Clark D. 2006.Inconsistencies in rumen methane production - effectsof forage composition and animal genotype.International Congress Series, 1293, 115-118[46]Walker D, Hopgood M. 1961. The hydrolysis of wheatenhay hemicellulose by a purified enzyme from rumenmicroorganisms. Australian Journal of AgriculturalResearch, 12, 651-660[47]Weatherburn M. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction fordetermination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry, 39,971-974. |