Abstract: To better interpret summer maize stomatal conductance (g_s) variation under conditions of changing water status at different growth stages, three water stress indicators, soil water content (SWC), leaf-air temperature difference (?T) and leaf level water stress index (CWSI_L) were employed in Jarvis model, which were J_S, J_T and J_C models respectively.  Measurements of g_s were conducted in a summer maize field experiment during the year 2012–2013.  In the insufficient irrigation experiment, three levels of irrigation amount were applied at four different growth stages of summer maize.  We constructed three scenarios to evaluate the performance of the three water stress indicators for estimating maize g_s in a modified Jarvis model.  Results showed that J_T and J_C models had better simulation accuracy than the J_S model, especially at the late growth stage (Scenario 1) or considering the plant recovery compensation effects (Scenario 2).  Scenario 3 indicated that the more environmental factors were adopted, the better prediction performance would be for J_S model.  While for J_T model, two environmental factors (photosynthesis active radiation (PAR), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD)) seemed good enough to obtain a reliable simulation.  When there were insufficient environmental data, CWSI_L would be the best option.  This study can be useful to understand the response of plant stomatal to changing water conditions and will further facilitate the application of the Jarvis model in various environments.

Key words: summer maize, stomatal conductance, water status, recovery compensation, water stress indicators, Jarvis model