JIA-2022-0420 冬枣质地评价指标的筛选研究

doi:10.1016/j.jia.2022.09.007

Journal of Integrative Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (12): 3658-3668.DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.09.007

JIA-2022-0420 冬枣质地评价指标的筛选研究

收稿日期:2022-03-22 接受日期:2022-04-27 出版日期:2022-12-01 发布日期:2022-04-27

Development of a texture evaluation system for winter jujube (Ziziphus jujuba ‘Dongzao’)

KONG Xia-bing¹, XU Min¹, WAN Hao-liang¹, HAN Ling-xi¹, LIU Xiao-li¹, LI Qing-jun², HAO Bian-qing³, ZHANG Shao-jun⁴, LI Xiao-ming¹, LIU Yi-hui¹, NIE Ji-yun^1*

¹College of Horticulture, Qingdao Agricultural University/Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Fruit (Qingdao), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/National Technology Centre for Whole Process Quality Control of FSEN Horticultural Products (Qingdao)/Qingdao Key Lab of Modern Agriculture Quality and Safety Engineering, Qingdao, 266109, China
²Management Service Center of Shandong Binzhou National Agricultural Science and Technology Park, Binzhou, 256600, China
³Shanxi Center for Testing of Functional Agro-Products, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan, 030031, China
⁴Institute of Biotechnology and Food Science, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China

Received:2022-03-22 Accepted:2022-04-27 Online:2022-12-01 Published:2022-04-27
About author:KONG Xia-bing, E-mail: kxiabing@163.com; Correspondence NIE Ji-yun, E-mail: jiyunnie@163.com
Supported by:

This work was supported by the National Program for Quality and Safety Risk Assessment of Agricultural Products of China (GJFP2019011) and the Scientific Research Foundation for High Level Talents of Qingdao Agricultural University, China (665-1120015).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

冬枣（Ziziphus jujuba cv. Dongzao）是中国优良的晚熟鲜食枣品种。质地是水果的重要感官品质指标。为探究冬枣质地指标间的关系，建立冬枣质地品质评价体系，采用TMS-Touch质地多面分析法（TPA）对采自中国三大主产区的1150个冬枣果实进行8项质地指标测定，包括胶粘性、咀嚼性、内聚性、粘附性、破裂力、弹性、硬度和最大粘附力，其最佳拟合分布分别为弹性—Beta General分布，咀嚼性、胶粘性和硬度—Inv Gauss分布，粘附性和内聚性—Log Logistic分布，破裂力—Pearson分布，最大粘附力—Weibull分布。每项冬枣质地指标均可基于最佳拟合分布，用第10、30、70和90百分位点值划分为极低、低、中、高和极高五个等级。相关分析显示，冬枣质地指标间的28个相关系数中，82%的相关系数达到极显著（p<0.01）。其中，咀嚼性与弹性和胶粘性均呈极显著正相关，相关系数分别达0.8692和0.8096；粘附性与最大粘附力呈极显著负相关，相关系数为-0.7569。在胶粘性、咀嚼性、内聚性、弹性、硬度等5项冬枣质地指标中，各指标均存在关于其余4项指标的多元线性回归方程，决定系数均在0.94以上，平均拟合误差和平均预测误差均小于10%。基于因子分析建立了冬枣质地综合评价模型：Q = 0.370C₁+ 0.251C₂+ 0.241C₃+ 0.138C₄，综合得分较高的冬枣果实表现为较高的弹性和咀嚼性，以及较低的最大粘附力和粘附性。通过因子分析和聚类分析，可将8项冬枣质地指标分为4组（内聚因子、粘附因子、梗硬因子和酥脆因子），其代表性指标分别为弹性、粘附性、硬度和破裂力。本研究探讨了冬枣果实8项质地指标及其相互关系，筛选出了代表性指标，并建立了冬枣果实质地评价体系。研究结果可为冬枣质地评价提供方法依据和技术支撑。

Abstract:

Winter jujube (Ziziphus jujuba ‘Dongzao’) is an excellent late maturing variety of fresh-eating jujubein China. Fruit texture is an important indicator of sensory quality. To investigate the correlations among texture indices and establish an evaluation system for winter jujube texture, we used the TMS-Touch instrument to perform a texture profile analysis (TPA) on 1 150 winter jujubes from three major producing areas in China. Eight indices and their best-fit distribution were obtained, including fracture (Pearson), hardness (InvGauss), adhesive force (Weibull), adhesiveness (LogLogistic), cohesiveness (LogLogistic), springiness (BetaGeneral), gumminess (InvGauss), and chewiness (InvGauss). Based on the best-fit distribution curves, each index was divided into five grades (lower, low, medium, high and higher) by the 10th, 30th, 70th and 90th percentiles. Among the texture indices, 82% of the correlation coefficients were highly significant (P<0.01); meanwhile, chewiness was significantly (P<0.01) and positively correlated with springiness and gumminess, of which the correlation coefficients were up to 0.8692 and 0.8096, respectively. However, adhesiveness was significantly (P<0.01) and negatively related to adhesive force with a correlation coefficient of –0.7569. Among hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness, each index could be well fitted by a multiple linear regression with the remaining four indices, with the coefficients above 0.94 and the mean fitting error and mean prediction error lower than 10%. A comprehensive evaluation model was consequently established based on factor analysis to evaluate the texture quality of winter jujube. The results demonstrated that winter jujube with higher comprehensive scores generally exhibited higher springiness and chewiness, but had lower adhesive force and adhesiveness. We used factor analysis and clustering analysis to divide the eight studied texture into four groups (cohesive factor, adhesive-soft factor, tough-hard factor, and crispness factor), whose representative indices were springiness, adhesiveness, hardness, and fracture, respectively. Overall, this study investigated the variation in each index of winter jujube texture, explored the association among these indices, screened the representative indices, and established a texture evaluation system. The results provide a methodological basis and technical support for evaluating winter jujube texture.

Key words: winter jujube , texture , TPA , evaluation , representative indices

. JIA-2022-0420 冬枣质地评价指标的筛选研究[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(12): 3658-3668.

KONG Xia-bing, XU Min, WAN Hao-liang, HAN Ling-xi, LIU Xiao-li, LI Qing-jun, HAO Bian-qing, ZHANG Shao-jun, LI Xiao-ming, LIU Yi-hui, NIE Ji-yun. Development of a texture evaluation system for winter jujube (Ziziphus jujuba ‘Dongzao’)[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(12): 3658-3668.

参考文献

Bianchi T, Guerrero L, Gratacós-Cubarsí M, Claret A, Argyris J, Garcia-Mas J, Hortós M. 2016. Textural properties of different melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit types: Sensory and physical-chemical evaluation. Scientia Horticulturae, 201, 46–56.
Billy L, Mehinagic E, Royer G, Renard C M G C, Arvisenet G, Prost C, Jourjon F. 2008. Relationship between texture and pectin composition of two apple cultivars during storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 47, 315–324.
Bourne M C. 2002. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement. Academic Press, London.
Bourne M C. 2004. Relation between texture and mastication. Journal of Texture Studies, 35, 125–143.
Brookfield P L, Nicoll S, Gunson F A, Harker F R, Wohlers M. 2011. Sensory evaluation by small postharvest teams and the relationship with instrumental measurements of apple texture. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 59, 179–186.
Cao S Y, Cao Q F, Meng Y P. 2017. Map of Local Varieties of Chinese Jujube. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Cao Y, Shi Q L. 2014. Optimization of determining the textural properties of winter jujube in south Xinjiang by TPA. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 42, 5947–5949. (in Chinese)
Christofi M, Mourtzinos I, Lazaridou A, Drogoudi P, Tsitlakidou P, Biliaderis C G, Manganaris G A. 2021. Elaboration of novel and comprehensive protocols toward determination of textural properties and other sensorial attributes of canning peach fruit. Journal of Texture Studies, 52, 228–239.
Coffey R, Cummins E, Ward S. 2009. Exposure assessment of mycotoxins in dairy milk. Food Control, 20, 239–249.
Contador L, Diaz M, Hernandez E, Shinya P, Infante R. 2016. The relationship between instrumental tests and sensory determinations of peach and nectarine texture. European Journal of Horticultural Science, 81, 189–196.
Contador L, Shinya P, Infante R. 2015. Texture phenotyping in fresh fleshy fruit. Scientia Horticulturae, 193, 40–46.
Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B. 1993. Statistical Distributions. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Galindo A, Noguera-Artiaga L, Cruz Z N, Burló F, Hernández F, Torrecillas A, Carbonell-Barrachina Á A. 2015. Sensory and physico-chemical quality attributes of jujube fruits as affected by crop load. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 63, 899–905.
Gao H S, Jia Y R, Wei J M, Ran X T, Yue W Q. 2012. Studies on the post-harvested fruit texture changes of ‘Yali’ and ‘Jingbaili’ pears by using texture analyzer. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 39, 1359–1364. (in Chinese)
Guiné R P F, Andrade S, Correia A C, Jordão A M, Lopes A D, Ferreira D. 2011. Evaluation of textural properties in apples of regional varieties. International Journal of Food Properties, 14, 331–338.
Gummow B, Botha C J, Noordhuizen J P T M, Heesterbeek J A P. 2005. The public health implications of farming cattle in areas with high background concentrations of vanadium. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 72, 281–290.
Guo Y X, Shan G H. 2010. Chinese Jujube. Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
HAC (Huazhong Agricultural College). 1979. Research Methods for Fruit Tree. Agricultural Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Infante R, Meneses C, Crisosto C H. 2009. Preconditioning treatment maintains taste characteristic perception of ripe ‘September Sun’ peach following cold storage. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 44, 1011–1016.
Jia Y R, Wei J M, Gao H S. 2011. Study and application of texture analyzer in the assessment for fruits and vegetables texture. Food Science, 32, 184–186. (in Chinese)
Jiang S, Chen Q L. 2006. Researches on the changing rule of juicy peaches’ texture during storage. Food Research and Development, 27, 4–5, 8. (in Chinese)
Kuang L X, Nie J Y, Li Z X, Guan D K, Wu Y L, Yan Z, Cheng Y. 2017. Factor analysis and cluster analysis of mineral elements contents in different apple varieties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 50, 2807–2815. (in Chinese)
Law A M. 2015. Simulation Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
Lázaro A, de Lorenzo C. 2014. Texture analysis in melon landraces through instrumental and sensory methods. International Journal of Food Properties, 18, 1575–1583.
Li D K. 2006. Descriptors and Data Standard for Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Li Z W, Zhang P, Zhang K M, Ren Z H. 2011. Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene combined with controlled freezing-point storage on texture of grape fruit. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 42, 176–181. (in Chinese)
Liu M J. 1992. Studies on the variations and grading standard of several economic characters of peach. Journal of Beijing Agricultural College, 7, 98–104. (in Chinese)
Liu M J. 1996. Studies on the variations and probability gradings of major quantitative characters of Chinese jujube. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 23, 105–109. (in Chinese)
Liu M J, Wang M. 2009. Germplasm Resourses of Chinese Jujube. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Liu P, Liu M J, Zhou J Y, Bi P. 2003. Distribution and probability grading index system of quantitative character of Chinese jujube. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 39, 77–82. (in Chinese)
Liu Y P, Li H B. 2010. Review on the application of texture analyzer and TPA in the assessment for fruits and vegetables texture. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 30, 188–192. (in Chinese)
Liu Y X, Cao M J, Liu G M. 2019. Evaluation Technologies for Food Quality. Woodhead Publishing, United Kingdom.
Ma Q H, Li Y H, Liang L S, Li Q, Wang H, Xu Y F, Sun Y B, Wang G X. 2010. Factor analysis and synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of Dongzao (Ziziphus jujuba Mill. ‘Dongzao’) advanced selections. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 43, 2491–2499. (in Chinese)
Ma Q H, Wang G X, Liang L S. 2011. Establishment of the detecting method on the fruit texture of Dongzao by puncture test. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44, 1210–1217. (in Chinese)
Ma X H, Zhao Q F, Dong Z G, Tang X P, Wang M, Ren R. 2013. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of table grape resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 14, 1185–1189. (in Chinese)
Nie J Y, Li Z X, Li H F, Li J, Wang K, Wu Y L, Xu G F, Yan Z, Wu X, Qin X. 2012. Evaluation indices for apple physicochemical quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 45, 2895–2903. (in Chinese)
Nie J Y, Wu Y L, Li H F, Wang K, Xu G F, Yan Z, Wu X. 2013. Evaluation system established for fresh apple juice quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 46, 1657–1667. (in Chinese)
Olivas G I, Mattinson D S, Barbosa-Cánovas G V. 2007. Alginate coatings for preservation of minimally processed ‘Gala’ apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 45, 89–96.
Pan H B, Liu D, Shao Q X, Gao G, Qi H Y. 2019. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of textural quality of ripe fruits from different varieties of oriental melon (Cucumis melo var. makuwa Makino). Food Science, 40, 35–42. (in Chinese)
Pan X J, Tu K. 2005. Comparison of texture properties of post-harvested apples using texture profile analysis. Transactions of the CSAE, 21, 166–170. (in Chinese)
Pham Q T, Liou N S. 2017. Investigating texture and mechanical properties of Asian pear flesh by compression tests. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31, 3671–3674.
Qu Z Z, Wang Y H. 1993. China Fruit’s Monograph - Chinese Jujube Volume. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Rahman M S, Al-Farsi S A. 2005. Instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) of date flesh as a function of moisture content. Journal of Food Engineering, 66, 505–511.
Rolle L, Siret R, Segade S R, Maury C, Gerbi V, Jourjon F. 2012. Instrumental texture analysis parameters as markers of table-grape and winegrape quality: A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63, 11.
Singh V, Guizani N, Al-Alawi A, Claereboudt M, Rahman M S. 2013. Instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) of date fruits as a function of its physico-chemical properties. Industrial Crops and Products, 50, 866–873.
Su J J. 2019. Fruit quality characterization of fresh jujube cultivars in northern Shaanxi China. MSc thesis, Northwest A&F University, China. (in Chinese)
Sun Y Q, Wu C Y, Wang D, Wang Z Q. 2016. Selection of quality indicators and factor analysis for fruit quality evaluation of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa germplasms. Food Science, 37, 29–34. (in Chinese)
Swisher L L, Beckstead J W, Bebeau M J. 2004. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis using a professional role orientation inventory as an example. Physical Therapy, 84, 784–799.
Szczesniak A S. 1963. Classification of textural characteristics. Food Science, 28, 385–389.
Szczesniak A S. 2002. Texture is a sensory property. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 215–225.
Tang Q Y, Feng M G. 2006. DPS© Data Processing System-Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Modeling. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Wang L R, Zhu G R, Fang W C. 2005. The evaluating criteria of some fruit quantitative characters of peach (Prunus persica L.) genetic resources. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 32, 1–5. (in Chinese)
Wu M D, Chen Y, Jin B Q. 2010. Detection of texture properties of kiwi fruits by texture profile analysis and simulation of manual chewing. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 31, 146–148, 152. (in Chinese)
Yan Z, Zheng L J, Nie J Y, Li Z X, Cheng Y. 2018. Evaluation indices of sour flavor for apple fruit and grading standards. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17, 994–1002.
Yang L. 2004. Fruit nourishment component analysis of wild jujube germplasm resources and germplasm evaluation. MSc thesis, Hebei Agricultural University, China. (in Chinese)
Yang L, Xiao L, Wang Q, Zhang C X, Cong P H, Tian Y. 2014. Study on texture properties of apple flesh by using texture profile analysis. Journal of Fruit Science, 31, 977–985. (in Chinese)
Yang L J, Yang G H, Yang J F, Luo S X, Xu A L, Li Y J, Hu L P. 2019. Research on main indexes for evaluating Huaniu apple quality. China Fruits, 5, 29–34. (in Chinese)
Yang Z, Wang Z L. 2019. Evaluation and cluster analysis of jujube fruit texture based on TPA method. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 56, 1860–1868. (in Chinese)
Yang Z F, Zheng Y H, Cao S F, Tang S S, Ma S J, Li N. 2007. Effects of storage temperature on textural properties of Chinese bayberry fruit. Journal of Texture Studies, 38, 166–177.
Yu K, Hu Z Y, Yu X L, Yu L P, Wang D F, Chen C S, Huang Z X. 2006. Effects of testing parameters on texture measurement of litchi fruit. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 6, 101–105. (in Chinese)
Zhang J, Nie J Y, Zhang H, Li J, Li Y. 2019. Evaluation indexes for blueberry quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 52, 2128–2139. (in Chinese)
Zhang W, Li X, Wang X, Wang G, Zheng J, Abeysinghe D C, Ferguson I B, Chen K. 2007. Ethanol vapour treatment alleviates postharvest decay and maintains fruit quality in Chinese bayberry. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 46, 195–198.
Zhang Y Z, Jin Y, Huang Y C. 2020. Color Atlas of Control Techniques for Dongzao Pest. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Zhao J M, Zhou A Y. 2016. High Quality and High Yield Cultivation of Dongzao. Jindun Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Zheng L J, Nie J Y, Li M Q, Kang Y L, Kuang L X, Ye M L. 2015. Study on screening of taste evaluation indexes for apple. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 48, 2796–2805. (in Chinese)
Zhou R, Mo Y, Li Y, Zhao Y, Zhang G, Hu Y. 2008. Quality and internal characteristics of Huanghua pears (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai, cv. Huanghua) treated with different kinds of coatings during storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 49, 171–179. v

JIA-2022-0420 冬枣质地评价指标的筛选研究

Development of a texture evaluation system for winter jujube (Ziziphus jujuba ‘Dongzao’)

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics