Bänziger M, Edmeades G, Lafitte H. 1999. Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields across a range of nitrogen levels. Crop Science, 39, 1035–1040.
Birchler J A, Yao H, Chudalayandi S, Vaiman D, Veitia R A. 2010. Heterosis. The Plant Cell, 22, 2105–2112.
Bolaños J, Edmeades G. 1996. The importance of the anthesis–silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crops Research, 48, 65–80.
Bonnett O. 1954. The inflorescences of maize. Science, 120, 77–87.
Boyle M G, Boyer J S, Morgan P W. 1991. Stem infusion of liquid culture medium prevents reproductive failure of maize at low water potential. Crop Science, 31, 1246–1252.
Cárcova J, Otegui M E. 2001. Ear temperature and pollination timing effects on maize kernel set. Crop Science, 41, 1809–1815.
Cárcova J, Otegui M E. 2007. Ovary growth and maize kernel set. Crop Science, 47, 1104–1110.
Cawoy V, Lutts S, Ledent J F, Kinet J M. 2007. Resource availability regulates reproductive meristem activity, development of reproductive structures and seed set in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum). Physiologia Plantarum, 131, 341–353.
Chapman S, Edmeades G. 1999. Selection improves drought tolerance in tropical maize populations: II. Direct and correlated responses among secondary traits. Crop Science, 39, 1315–1324.
Chen Z J. 2010. Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor. Trends in Plant Science, 15, 57–71.
Cox W J. 1996. Whole plant physiological and yield responses of maize to plant density. Agronomy Journal, 88, 489–496.
Edmeades G, Bolanos J, Elings A, Ribaut J M, Bänziger M, Westgate M. 2000. The role and regulation of the anthesis-silking interval in maize. Physiology and Modeling Kernel Set in Maize, CSSA Special Publication No. 29. CSSA, Madison, WI. pp. 43–73.
Freier G, Vilella F, Hall A. 1984. Within-ear pollination synchrony and vernel set in maize. Maydica, 29, 317–324.
Fuad-Hassan A, Tardieu F, Turc O. 2008. Drought-induced changes in anthesis–silking interval are related to silk expansion: A spatio-temporal growth analysis in maize plants subjected to soil water deficit. Plant Cell and Environment, 31, 1349–1360.
Kaplinsky N J, Freeling M. 2003. Combinatorial control of meristem identity in maize inflorescences. Development, 130, 1149–1158.
Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg S L. 2015. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nature Methods, 12, 357–360.
Mansfield B. 2012. Survey of plant density tolerance in U.S. Maize Germplasm, 54, 157–173.
McLaughlin J E, Boyer J S. 2004. Sugar-responsive gene expression, invertase activity, and senescence in aborting maize ovaries at low water potentials. Annals of Botany, 94, 675–689.
New B, Duthion C, Turc O. 1994. Phenological response of pea to water stress during reproductive development. Crop Science, 34, 141–146.
Oury V, Tardieu F, Turc O. 2016. Ovary apical abortion under water deficit is caused by changes in sequential development of ovaries and in silk growth rate in maize. Plant Physiology, 171, 986–996.
Pacala S W, Weiner J. 1991. Effects of competitive asymmetry on a local density model of plant interference. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 149, 165–179.
Reif J, Hallauer A, Melchinger A. 2005. Heterosis and heterotic patterns in maize. Maydica, 50, 215.
Ren B, Liu W, Zhang J, Dong S, Liu P, Zhao B. 2017. Effects of plant density on the photosynthetic and chloroplast characteristics of maize under high-yielding conditions. Naturwissenschaften, 104, 12.
Ribaut J M, Hoisington D A, Deutsch J A, Jiang C, Gonzalez-de-Leon D. 1996. Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize. 1. Flowering parameters and the anthesis–silking interval. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 92, 905–914.
Sangoi L. 2001. Understanding plant density effects on maize growth and development: An important issue to maximize grain yield. Ciência Rural, 31, 159–168.
Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley D R, Pimentel H, Salzberg S L, Rinn J L, Pachter L. 2012. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature Protocol, 7, 562–578.
Trapnell C, Williams B A, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, Van Baren M J, Salzberg S L, Wold B J, Pachter L. 2010. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotechnology, 28, 511.
Varshney R K, Thudi M, Nayak S N, Gaur P M, Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Jaganathan D, Koppolu J, Bohra A, Tripathi S. 2014. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127, 445–462.
Wang X, Wang G, Turner N C, Xing Y, Li M, Guo T. 2020. Determining optimal mulching, planting density, and nitrogen application to increase maize grain yield and nitrogen translocation efficiency in Northwest China. BMC Plant Biology, 20, 282.
Welcker C, Boussuge B, Bencivenni C, Ribaut J M, Tardieu F. 2007. Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of anthesis–silking interval to water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 339–349.
Willey R, Heath S. 1969. The quantitative relationships between plant population and crop yield. In: Advances in Agronomy. Elsevier, England. pp. 281–321.
Zinselmeier C, Lauer M, Boyer J. 1995a. Reversing drought-induced losses in grain yield: Sucrose maintains embryo growth in maize. Crop Science, 35, 1390–1400.
Zinselmeier C, Westgate M E, Schussler J R, Jones R J. 1995b. Low water potential disrupts carbohydrate metabolism in maize (Zea mays L.) ovaries. Plant Physiology, 107, 385–391.
Zinselmeier C, Westgate W E, Jones R J. 1995c. Kernel set at low water potential does not vary with source/sink ration in maize. Crop Science, 35, 158–163.
|