Compositional and Structural Difference of Fulvic Acid from Black Soil Applied with Different Organic Materials: Assessment After Three Years

doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60397-4

Journal of Integrative Agriculture ›› 2013, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (10): 1865-1871.DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60397-4

Compositional and Structural Difference of Fulvic Acid from Black Soil Applied with Different Organic Materials: Assessment After Three Years

LI Jian-ming , WU Jing-gui

College of Resource and Environment Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, P.R.China

收稿日期:2012-10-20 出版日期:2013-10-01 发布日期:2013-10-01
通讯作者: Correspondence WU Jing-gui, Mobile: 13074353281, E-mail: jgwu68@sohu.com
作者简介:LI Jian-ming, Mobile: 15948399925, E-mail: ljmok1986@hotmail.com
基金资助:
The study was funded by the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2012BAD14B05, 2013BAC09B01), the Major Achievement Transfer Project of Jilin Province, China (20130309005NY).

Compositional and Structural Difference of Fulvic Acid from Black Soil Applied with Different Organic Materials: Assessment After Three Years

LI Jian-ming , WU Jing-gui

College of Resource and Environment Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, P.R.China

Received:2012-10-20 Online:2013-10-01 Published:2013-10-01
Contact: Correspondence WU Jing-gui, Mobile: 13074353281, E-mail: jgwu68@sohu.com
About author:LI Jian-ming, Mobile: 15948399925, E-mail: ljmok1986@hotmail.com
Supported by:
The study was funded by the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2012BAD14B05, 2013BAC09B01), the Major Achievement Transfer Project of Jilin Province, China (20130309005NY).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Knowledge of different effects of various organic materials on soil humic substance is important for both environmental safety and sustainable agriculture. A pot experiment was conducted at Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Province in northeast China to discover the influence of herb residue, animal excrement, woody residue, animal remnant on fulvic acid (FA) composition and structure using differential thermal analysis-thermogravimetric (DTA-TG), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and elemental analysis. DTA-TG showed the range of peak temperature in the first exothermic reaction increased following the trend: CK>herb residue>animal excrement>woody residue=animal remnant, and the most weight loss was observed in animal excrement. Moreover, the second exothermic reaction of CK- and animal excrement-FA was presented as double peaks, the order of weight loss in that area was animal remnant>CK>woody residue>animal excrement>herb residue. According to FTIR, herb residue displayed higher adsorption intensity at 2 950, 1 420, 1 240 and 1 030 cm-1, animal excrement was in reverse. At the same time, herb residue- and animal excrement-FA had an absorption peak at 1 720 cm-1, while other organic materials didn’t have this peak. As elemental analysis showed, FA isolated from various treatments was significantly distinct. It was clearly shown from our results that FA composition and structure in amended soils may be affected in different ways and at various extents on dependence of the nature and origin of amendment.

关键词: different organic materials , fulvic acid , DTA-TG , FTIR , elemental analysis

Abstract: Knowledge of different effects of various organic materials on soil humic substance is important for both environmental safety and sustainable agriculture. A pot experiment was conducted at Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Province in northeast China to discover the influence of herb residue, animal excrement, woody residue, animal remnant on fulvic acid (FA) composition and structure using differential thermal analysis-thermogravimetric (DTA-TG), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and elemental analysis. DTA-TG showed the range of peak temperature in the first exothermic reaction increased following the trend: CK>herb residue>animal excrement>woody residue=animal remnant, and the most weight loss was observed in animal excrement. Moreover, the second exothermic reaction of CK- and animal excrement-FA was presented as double peaks, the order of weight loss in that area was animal remnant>CK>woody residue>animal excrement>herb residue. According to FTIR, herb residue displayed higher adsorption intensity at 2 950, 1 420, 1 240 and 1 030 cm-1, animal excrement was in reverse. At the same time, herb residue- and animal excrement-FA had an absorption peak at 1 720 cm-1, while other organic materials didn’t have this peak. As elemental analysis showed, FA isolated from various treatments was significantly distinct. It was clearly shown from our results that FA composition and structure in amended soils may be affected in different ways and at various extents on dependence of the nature and origin of amendment.

Key words: different organic materials , fulvic acid , DTA-TG , FTIR , elemental analysis

LI Jian-ming, WU Jing-gui. Compositional and Structural Difference of Fulvic Acid from Black Soil Applied with Different Organic Materials: Assessment After Three Years[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(10): 1865-1871.

LI Jian-ming , WU Jing-gui. Compositional and Structural Difference of Fulvic Acid from Black Soil Applied with Different Organic Materials: Assessment After Three Years[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(10): 1865-1871.

参考文献

[1]Annabi M Y, Bissonnais L, Villio-Poitrenaud M L, Houot S. 2011. Improvement of soil aggregate stability by repeated applications of organic amendments to a cultivated silty loam soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 144, 382-389.

[2]Aranda V, Ayora-Canada M J, Domínguez-Vidal A, Martín- García J M, Calero J, Delgado R, Verdejo T, González- Vila F J. 2011. Effect of soil type and management (organic vs. conventional) on soil organic matter quality in olive groves in a semi-arid environment in Sierra Mágina Natural Park (Spain). Geoderma, 164, 54-63.

[3]Baddi G A, Hafidi M, Cegarra J, Alburquerque J A, Gonzalvez J, Gilard V, Revel J C. 2004. Characterization of fulvic acids by elemental and spectroscopic (FTIR and 13C-NMR) analyses during composting of olive mill wastes plus straw. Bioresource Technology, 93, 285-290.

[4]Bandyopadhyay P K, Saha S, Mani P K, Mandal B. 2010. Effect of organic inputs on aggregate associated organic carbon concentration under long-term rice-wheat cropping system. Geoderma, 154, 379-386.

[5]Bertoncini E I, D’Orazio V, Senesi N, Mattiazzo M E. 2008. Effects of sewage sludge amendment on the properties of two Brazilian oxisols and their humic acids. Bioresource Technology, 99, 4972-4979.

[6]Brunetti G, Plaza C, Clapp C E, Senesi N. 2007. Compositional and functional features of humic acids from organic amendments and amended soils in Minnesota, USA. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39, 1355- 1365.

[7]Carletti P, Roldán M L, Francioso O, Nardi S, Sanchez- Cortes S. 2010. Structural characterization of humic-like substances with conventional and surface-enhanced spectroscopic techniques. Journal of Molecular Structure, 982, 169-175.

[8]Caricasole P, Provenzano M R, Hatcher P G, Senesi N. 2011. Evolution of organic matter during composting of different organic wastes assessed by CPMAS 13C NMR spectroscopy. Waste Management, 31, 411-415.

[9]Chai X L, Takayuki S, Cao X Y, Guo Q, Zhao Y C. 2007. Spectroscopic studies of the progress of humification processes in humic substances extracted from refuse in a landfill. Chemosphere, 69, 1446-1453.

[10]Clark G J, Dodgshun N, Sale P W G, Tang C. 2007. Changes in chemical and biological properties of a sodic clay subsoil with addition of organic amendments. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39, 2806-2817.

[11]Clark G J, Sale P W G, Tang C. 2009. Organic amendments initiate the formation and stabilisation of macroaggregates in a high clay sodic soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 47, 770-780.

[12]Dell’Abate M T, Benedetti A, Sequi P. 2000. Thermal methods of organic matter maturation monitoring during a composting process. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 61, 389-396.

[13]Fernández J M, Hockaday W C, Plaza C, Polo A, Hatcher P G. 2008. Effects of long-term soil amendment with sewage sludges on soil humic acid thermal and molecular properties. Chemosphere, 73, 1838-1844.

[14]Fernández J M, Plaza C, Polo A, Plante A F. 2012. Use of thermal analysis techniques (TG-DSC) for the characterization of diverse organic municipal waste streams to predict biological stability prior to land application. Waste Management, 32, 158-164.

[15]Francioso O, Montecchio D, Gioacchini P, Cavani L, Ciavatta C, Trubetskoj O, Trubetskaya O. 2009. Structural differences of Chernozem soil humic acids SEC-PAGE fractions revealed by thermal (TG-DTA) and spectroscopic (DRIFT) analyses. Geoderma, 152, 264- 268.

[16]Giovanela M, Crespo J S, Antunes M, Adamatti D S, Fernandes A N, Barison A, Silva C W P, Guégan R, Motelica-Heino M, Sierra M M D. 2010. Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of humic acids extracted from the bottom sediments of a Brazilian subtropical microbasin. Journal of Molecular Structure, 981, 111- 119.

[17]Gondar D, Lopez R, Fiol S, Antelo J M, Arce F. 2005. Characterization and acid-base properties of fulvic and humic acids isolated from two horizons of an ombrotrophic peat bog. Geoderma, 126, 367-374.

[18]Hargreaves J C, Adl M S, Warman P R. 2008. A review of the use of composted municipal solid waste in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 123, 1-14.

[19]Kawasaki S, Maie N, Kitamura S, Watanabe A. 2009. Effect of organic amendment on amount and chemical characteristics of humic acids in upland field soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 59, 1027-1037.

[20]Kowaljow E, Mazzarino M J. 2007. Soil restoration in semiarid Patagonia: Chemical and biological response to different compost quality. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39, 1580-1588.

[21]Lima D L D, Santos S D, Scherer H M W, Schneider R J, Duarte A C, Santos E B H, Esteves V I. 2009. Effects of organic and inorganic amendments on soil organic matter properties. Geoderma, 150, 38-45.

[22]Marinari S, Liburdi K, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Grego S. 2007. Humification-mineralization pyrolytic indices and carbon fractions of soil under organic and conventional management in central Italy. Soil & Tillage Research, 92, 10-17.

[23]Plante A F, Fernández J M, Leifeld J. 2009. Application of thermal analysis techniques in soil science. Geoderma, 153, 1-10.

[24]Plaza C, Senesi N, García-Gil J C, Brunetti G, D’Orazio V, Polo A. 2002. Effects of pig slurry application on soils and soil humic acids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 4867-4874.

[25]Plaza C, Hernandez D, Fernandez J M, Polo A. 2006. Long-term effects of amendment with liquid swine manure on proton binding behavior of soil humic substances. Chemosphere, 65, 1321-1329.

[26]Senesi N, Loffredo E. 2005. Metal ion complexation by soil humic substances. In: Sparks D L, Tabatabai M A, eds., Chemical Processes in Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Madison, WI. pp. 563-618.

[27]Senesi N, Plaza C, Brunetti G, Polo A. 2007. A comparative survey of recent results on humic-like fractions in organic amendments and effects on native soil humic substances. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39, 1244-1262.

[28]Singh S, Mishra R, Singh, Ghoshal N, Singh K P. 2009. Soil physico-chemical properties in a grassland and agroecosystem receiving varying organic inputs. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73, 1530-1538.

[29]Spaccini R, Mbagwu J S C, Conte P, Piccolo A. 2006. Changes of humic substances characteristics from forested to cultivated soils in Ethiopia. Geoderma, 132, 9-19.

[30]Steelink C. 1985. Implications of elemental characteristics of humic substances. In: Aiken G R, McKnight D M, Warshaw R L, eds., Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water. Wiley, New York. pp. 457-476.

[31]Tatzber M, Stemmer M, Spiegel H, Katzlberger C, Haberhauer G, Mentler A, Gerzabek M H. 2007. FTIR-spectroscopic characterization of humic acids and humin fractions obtained by advanced NaOH, Na4P2O7 and Na2CO3 extraction procedures. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170, 522-529.

[32]Tejada M, Gonzalez J L, Garca-Martnez A M, Parrado J. 2008. Effects of difierent green manures on soil biological properties and maize yield. Bioresource Technology, 99, 1758-1767.

[33]Ussiri D A N, Johnson C E. 2003. Characterization of organic matter in a northern hardwood forest soil by 13C NMR spectroscopy and chemical methods. Geoderma, 111, 123-149.

[34]Vergnoux A, Guiliano M, Di Rocco R, Domeizel M, Théraulaz F, Doumenq P. 2011. Quantitative and mid-infra-red changes of humic substances from burned soils. Environmental Research, 111, 205-214.

[35]Weber J, Karczewska A, Drozd J, Licznar M, Licznar S, Jamroz E, Kocowicz A. 2007. Agricultural and ecological aspects of a sandy soil as affected by the application of municipal solid waste composts. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39, 1294-1302.

[36]Zaccheo P,Cabassi G,Ricca G,CrippaL.2002. Decomposition of organic residues in soil: experimental technique and spectroscopic approach. Organic Geochemistry, 33, 327-334.

Compositional and Structural Difference of Fulvic Acid from Black Soil Applied with Different Organic Materials: Assessment After Three Years

Compositional and Structural Difference of Fulvic Acid from Black Soil Applied with Different Organic Materials: Assessment After Three Years

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics