Browse by section

    Content of THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC RESTORATION OF DEGRADED GRASSLAND in our journal
        Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    Systematic Restoration for Degraded Grasslands: Concept, Mechanisms and Approaches
    WANG DeLi,WANG Ling,XIN XiaoPing,LI LingHao,TANG HuaJun
    Scientia Agricultura Sinica    2020, 53 (13): 2532-2540.   DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.13.002
    Abstract480)   HTML73)    PDF (2259KB)(412)       Save

    Grasslands occupying the most terrestrial land surface display multiple functions. The long-term overgrazing of livestock often occur, and additional climate changes brings about the negative effects on the ecological stability, and therefore, grassland degradation is worldwide prevailing, which reduce the multiple functions of grasslands, and how to restore those degraded grasslands remains a crucial challenge for the human beings. For the past several decades, most researches on grassland restoration have focused on restoration practice rather than underlying theoretical basis, and the general restoration theory is lacking. Consequently, it is hard to have a practical solution for degraded grasslands due to lack of the available techniques. In this paper, the authors summarize the previous grassland restoration theories or models from restoration succession trajectory to the threshold model, the alternative state model and the filter model. A new concept, named as “systematic restoration for degraded grasslands” is put forward, which emphasizes three dimensions as key structure components (trophic species and dominant species of plant-animal-microbe), self-organized processes (water-nutrient coupling, linkage between aboveground and belowground), and multi-functionality (synergy and stability of grassland multiple functions), and also give the further explanations for contexts and mechanisms of the grassland systematic restoration (GSR): system structure integration, self-organization of ecological processes, and multi-functionality. Generally, the target of grassland restoration is approaching to the climax community or primordial state of ecosystem. The authors here emphasize the restoration of system self-organization, resulting from the interactions among the species like plant-soil feedback, as well as grassland multiple functions (goods and ecological services)characterized by their synergism and coupling. At last, the authors discuss the potential restoration practices like natural restoration by fencing and resting, intervening restoration with artificial inputs, and stimulating restoration with utilizing such as grazing and cutting, and perhaps the latter is the feasible mean for practical grassland restoration. The restoration mechanisms and practices for degraded grasslands are more complicated than thought, and here we attempt to establish a comprehensive conceptual framework to provide a new insight into grassland restoration theory. Certainly, it needs more evidence and experiments to enrich this new concept, GSR.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    A Discussion on the Diffusion Pathway of Leymus Chinensis in the Natural Grassland of China Based on Differentiation in the Phenotypes and Genotypes
    YANG YunFei,XIN XiaoPing,LI JianDong
    Scientia Agricultura Sinica    2020, 53 (13): 2541-2549.   DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.13.003
    Abstract270)   HTML13)    PDF (851KB)(325)       Save

    Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. is a Gramineous plant which is widely distributed in Eurasian steppe. It often forms dominant or single dominant species communities in different steppe types in China, such as dominance typical steppe and meadow steppe, or recessive meadow. This paper traces the references on the scientific names of L. chinensis, refers to the research of phylogenetic evolution position of L. chinensis in the genus and the origin and diffusion pathway of Leymus Hochst., and makes a comprehensive analysis and inference according to the systematic literature on the divergence and adaptation of L. chinensis. The type specimens of L. chinensis was collected by Russian botanist A. Bunge in Beijing, China in 1831. After German botanist B. Trinius and A. Bunge named the species to the type specimens in 1833, there were five historical changes of generic names and five species names, and up to 15 plant taxonomists participated successively. In the phylogenetic Sect. Racemosus, Sect. Leymus and Sect. Anisopyrum, L. chinensis was mostly divided into the Sect. Leymus, and its evolutionary level was lower in Sect. Leymus. The leaf color of L. chinensis in different habitats is generally grey-green and yellow-green ecotypes. In the same habitat, the morphological, physiological and molecular genetic characteristics of the two ecotypes are all obviously differentiated. The genetic diversity was higher in gray-green ecotype than in the yellow-green ecotype. The genetic diversity of two ecotypes decreased gradually from east to west in the 900 km longitude transect of northeast grassland. Through comprehensive analysis, it is inferred that between the two ecotypes, the yellow-green ecotype is primitive and the grey-green ecotype is evolutionary. In the grassland of northeast China, L. chinensis is the most primitive in the westernmost in Inner Mongolia plateau, while it is more evolutionary in the eastern Songnen plain. The two ecotypes both extend from west to east in the grassland of northeast China. This paper can provide important reference for further research on the origin and evolution of L. chinensis, the formation process of different types of L. chinensis grassland and their community assembly.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
      First page | Prev page | Next page | Last page Page 1 of 1, 2 records