Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (9): 1821-1834.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.09.001

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mechanism of DA-6 Treatment Regulating Wheat Seed Vigor After Anthesis

XU Chen(),WANG WenJing,CAO Shan,LI RuXue,ZHANG BeiBei,SUN AiQing(),ZHANG ChunQing()   

  1. College of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong
  • Received:2020-08-24 Accepted:2020-10-19 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-05-10
  • Contact: AiQing SUN,ChunQing ZHANG E-mail:xuchen0905@foxmail.com;saqsshh@sdau.edu.cn;cqzhang@sdau.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Background】High-vigor seeds germinate quickly and efficiently, and they are highly stress resistant and advantageous during crop production. Diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate (DA-6), as a tertiary amine plant growth regulator, increases plant photosynthetic rates, regulates carbon and nitrogen metabolism and improves crop quality and yield. However, there are limited studies on its effects on seed vigor. 【Objective】This study analyzed the effects of spraying DA-6 post-flowering on the compounds accumulated in grains, expression levels of key genes associated with metabolism and stress-resistance, 1000-grain weights, chemical compositions and seed vigor to determine DA-6’s mechanism for regulating wheat seed vigor, which has important theoretical and practical significance in the production of high-vigor wheat seeds. 【Method】Wheat varieties, Liangxing 77 and Shannong 23, grown in fields of the Mazhuang Experimental Base of Shandong Agricultural University in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 (117°E, 36°N) were sprayed with DA-6. Two treatment concentrations (0 and 6 g·L-1 DA-6), two treatment periods (2 and 6 days after anthesis) and three zone groups, each having an area of 6 m × 3 m, were used. Fresh samples of grains, stems below spikes and flag leaves were collected at the early and middle stages of grain filling (12 and 22 days after anthesis, respectively), and the expression levels of key metabolism-related enzymes were analyzed. Samples were taken on different days of grain development (25, 30, 35 and 40 days after anthesis), and the 1000-grain weights, protein contents and starch contents were determined after natural drying and threshing. For wheat spikes harvested at the maturity stage, the germination and vigor indices of the whole ear, different spike positions (upper, middle and lower) and different grain positions (lower and upper grain) were measured. 【Result】Spraying 6 g·L-1 DA-6 at 6 days after anthesis significantly increased the 1000-grain weights, seed protein contents, and plant dry weights of the upper spikes and upper grains in both wheat varieties, and it significantly improved the seed vigor indices. DA-6 spraying at 6 days after anthesis effectively reduced the seed vigor difference between different spike and grain positions, and it improved the seed vigor of different spike and grain positions in wheat as a whole, especially those of upper and middle spikes, as well as the upper grain. However, DA-6 spraying at 2 days after anthesis significantly reduced seed vigor, 1000-grain weights and seed protein contents. The 1000-grain weights of Liangxing 77 and Shannong 23 increased first and then decreased as the grain-filling period was extended. However, relative and absolute protein contents increased with time. Additionally, both varieties showed the highest 1000-grain weights and protein contents after spraying 6 g·L-1 DA-6 at 6 days after anthesis. While the 1000-grain weight of Liangxing 77 was not significantly different from that of the control group, the relative and absolute protein contents were significantly greater. The 1000-grain weight and absolute protein content of Shannong 23 significantly increased after spraying 6 g·L-1 DA-6 at 6 days after anthesis. DA-6 spraying at 2 days after anthesis had no significant effects on 1000-grain weights, relative and absolute protein contents or starch contents. Real fluorescence quantitative PCR showed that DA-6 spraying at 6 days after anthesis significantly increased the expression levels of protein phosphatase and sucrose phosphate synthase in flag leaves. The expression levels of class I heat shock protein (hsp) and hsp70 in the stem, like those of protein disulfide isomerase and hsp82 in grains, increased significantly. The α-amylase activity during seed germination was measured in samples sprayed with DA-6 at 6 days after anthesis. The activity gradually increased along with germination time in both control and treated Shannong 23. DA-6 spraying at 6 days after anthesis significantly increased the α-amylase activity levels in seeds of both varieties after germinating for 72 h. 【Conclusion】Spraying DA-6 at 6 days after anthesis promoted the expression levels of proteins, key enzyme-encoding genes of sucrose metabolism and hsps. It also facilitated the synthesis of seed storage substances, increased the protein contents of seeds and significantly increased the 1000-grain weights. The dry weight of individual plants during germination and seed vigor of upper, middle spikes and the upper grain of harvested seeds in two varieties significantly improved after spraying DA-6. The seed vigor difference between different spike positions decreased, and the α-amylase activity increased during seed germination. Thus, spraying DA-6 after anthesis promoted the accumulation of seedling dry matter and improved material transformation capacities during seed germination. Additionally, seed vigor improved. Our studies suggest that spraying 6 g·L-1 DA-6 on wheat at 6 days after anthesis is an effective way to improve seed vigor.

Key words: wheat, DA-6, seed vigor, real-time PCR

Table 1

Primers used for qRT-PCR"

基因Gene 引物名称Primer name 序列Sequence (5′-3′)
肌动蛋白基因(内参)Actin gene (internal reference) Actin-F CGAAGCGACATACAATTCCATC
Actin-R GAACCTCCACTGAGAACAACAT
蛋白磷酸酶基因Protein phosphatase gene TraesCS3B02G277900-F CTGGCAGGTGGTTGGAGGAAT
TraesCS3B02G277900-R GCAATAGGCTCAGGACGGATCT
蔗糖磷酸合成酶基因Sucrose phosphate synthase gene TraesCS3A02G015500-F GTGCCAATGGTCTTCACAGGTC
TraesCS3A02G015500-R TCAGCCTCAATCCGTCGCATTA
蛋白质二硫键异构酶基因Protein disulfide isomerase gene TraesCS4A02G214200-F CCCTGACAACCATCCTTACCTCT
TraesCS4A02G214200-R CCTTGCCACTGAACTCCTCTACA
hsp82 TraesCS2A02G033700-F GCTGCTCTCGCTCATCATCAAC
TraesCS2A02G033700-R TGCTCTTGTCTGTCAGGCTCTC
Ⅰ类hsp ClassⅠ hsp TraesCS4B02G211700-F ACAAGGAGCAGGAGGAGAAGAC
TraesCS4B02G211700-R TGACGGTGAGCACGCTGTT
hsp70 TraesCS1D02G284000-F CGGCATCCTGAACGTGTCTG
TraesCS1D02G284000-R TCTTCTTGTGCTCCTCGTCCTC

Fig. 1

Comparison of vigor index of seeds in different spike and grain positions of Liangxing 77 in 2018 A: Plant dry weight; B: Vigor index. D2: 2 days after anthesis; D6: 6 days after anthesis; * represents significant difference at the 5% level; ** represents significant differences at the 1% level. The same as below"

Fig. 2

Comparison of vigor index of seeds in different spike and grain positions of Liangxing 77 in 2019 A: Plant dry weight; B: Vigor index"

Fig. 3

Comparison of vigor index of seeds in different spike and grain positions of Shannong 23 in 2019 A: Plant dry weight; B: Vigor index"

Fig. 4

Changes of 1000-grain weight during the seed development of Liangxing 77 and Shannong 23 A: 1000-grain weight of Liangxing 77 in 2018; B: 1000-grain weight of Liangxing 77 in 2019; C: 1000-grain weight of Shannong 23 in 2019. D2: 2 days after anthesis; D6: 6 days after anthesis; D25: 25 days after anthesis; D30: 30 days after anthesis; D35: 35 days after anthesis; D40: 40 days after anthesis. The same as below"

Fig. 5

Chemical composition changes during seed development of Liangxing 77 in 2018 A: Relative content of protein, RCP; B: Absolute content of protein, ACP; C: Relative content of starch, RCS; D: Absolute content of starch, ACS"

Fig. 6

Chemical composition changes during seed development of Liangxing 77 in 2019 A: Relative content of protein, RCP; B: Absolute content of protein, ACP; C: Relative content of starch, RCS; D: Absolute content of starch, ACS"

Fig. 7

Chemical composition changes during seed development of Shannong 23 in 2019 A: Relative content of protein, RCP; B: Absolute content of protein, ACP; C: Relative content of starch, RCS; D: Absolute content of starch, ACS"

Fig. 8

Gene expression of protein phosphatase and sucrose phosphate synthase in wheat leaves after DA-6 spraying A: Protein phosphatase gene in Liangxing 77 leaves; B: Protein phosphatase gene in Shannong 23 leaves; C: Sucrose phosphate synthase gene in Liangxing 77 leaves; D: Sucrose phosphate synthase gene in Shannong 23 leaves"

Fig. 9

Effects of DA-6 spraying on gene expression of Class I hsp and hsp70 in wheat stems A: Class I hsp gene in Liangxing 77 stems; B: Class I hsp gene in Shannong 23 stems; C: hsp70 gene in Liangxing 77 stems; D: hsp70 gene in Shannong 23 stems"

Fig. 10

Effects of DA-6 on the expression of protein disulfide isomerase and hsp82 in wheat grains A: Protein disulfide isomerase gene in Liangxing 77 grains; B: Protein disulfide isomerase gene in Shannong 23 grains; C: hsp82 gene in Liangxing 77 grains; D: hsp82 gene in Shannong 23 grains"

Fig. 11

Effect of DA-6 spraying on the α-amylase activity of Liangxing 77 and Shannong 23 A: Shannong 23; B: Liangxing 77; C: Shannong 23"

[1] 孙群, 王建华, 孙宝启. 种子活力的生理和遗传机理研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(1):48-53.
SUN Q, WANG J H, SUN B Q. Advances on seed vigor physiological and genetic mechanisms. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007,40(1):48-53. (in Chinese)
[2] PERRY D, DA P. The concept of seed vigor and its relevance to seed production techniques//HEBBLATHWAITE P D. ed.. Seed Production. London: Botterworths, 1980: 585-591.
[3] TEKRONY D M, EGLI D B. Relationship of seed vigor to crop yield: A review. Crop Science, 1991,31(3):816-822.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100030054x
[4] VENTURA L, DONÀ M, MACOVEI A, CARBONERA D, BUTTAFAVA A, MONDONI A, ROSSI G, BALESTRAZZI A. Understanding the molecular pathways associated with seed vigor. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2012,60:196-206.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.07.031
[5] ZHANG H, XIE L, XU P, JIANG S. Dissipation of the plant growth regulator hexanoic acid 2-(diethylamino) ethylester in pakchoi and soil. International Journal of Environmental and Analytical Chemistry, 2008,88(8):561-569.
doi: 10.1080/03067310802002490
[6] JIANG Y, JIANG Y, HE S, ZHANG H, PAN C. Dissipation of diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate (DA-6) residues in pakchoi, cotton crops and soil. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2012,88(4):533-537.
doi: 10.1007/s00128-012-0565-3
[7] 马庆华, 谭晓红, 梁丽松, 王贵禧. 生长调节剂DA-6和DCPTA处理对冬枣果实发育过程中活性氧及其相关生理指标的影响. 食品科学, 2011,32(8):296-299.
MA Q H, TAN X H, LIANG L S, WANG G X. Effects of plant growth regulators DA-6 and DCPTA on reactive oxygen species and related physiological indices of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. cv.‘Dongzao’during growth. Food Science, 2011,32(8):296-299. (in Chinese)
[8] 崔洪秋, 冯乃杰, 孙福东, 刘春娟, 何天明, 赵晶晶, 刘洋, 龚屾, 师臣, 郑殿峰. DTA-6和S3307对大豆存留荚和脱落荚生理调控的效应. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(15):2921-2931.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.15.006
CUI H Q, FENG N J, SUN F D, LIU C J, HE T M, ZHAO J J, LIU Y, GONG S, SHI C, ZHENG D F. Effects of DTA-6 and S3307 on physiological regulation in normal and abscission pods of soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(15):2921-2931. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.15.006
[9] 刘春娟, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 宫香伟, 孙福东, 石英, 崔洪秋, 张盼盼, 赵晶晶. 植物生长调节剂S3307和DTA-6 对大豆源库碳水化合物代谢及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(4):657-666.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.04.005
LIU C J, FENG N J, ZHENG D F, GONG X W, SUN F D, SHI Y, CUI H Q, ZHANG P P, ZHAO J J. Effects of plant growth regulators S3307 and DTA-6 on carbohydrate content and yield in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(4):657-666. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.04.005
[10] 孙晓慧, 李成亮, 陈剑秋, 刘龙飞, 王秋双, 杨帆. 不同胺鲜酯 (DA-6) 浓度及施用方式对菠菜生长的影响. 北方园艺, 2017(13):122-128.
SUN X H, LI C L, CHEN J Q, LIU L F, WANG Q S, YANG F. Effects of different DA-6 concentrations and application methods in growth of spinach. Northern Horticulture, 2017(13):122-128. (in Chinese)
[11] 周旭红, 梁华, 李纯佳, 蒋亚莲. 植物生长调节剂对香石竹生长发育的影响研究. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(2):23-27.
ZHOU X H, LIANG H, LI C J, JIANG Y L. Effect of compound sodium nitrophenolate and DA-6 on carnation growth. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018,34(2):23-27. (in Chinese)
[12] XIE T, GU W, MENG Y, LI J, LI L, WANG Y, QU D, WEI S. Exogenous DCPTA ameliorates simulated drought conditions by improving the growth and photosynthetic capacity of maize seedlings. Scientific Reports, 2017,7(1):1-13.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x
[13] 张志芳, 贾海丽, 张小会. DA-6对番茄生长的影响. 现代农业科技, 2012,6:193-194+197.
ZHANG Z F, JIA H L, ZHANG X H. Influence of DA-6 for tomato growth. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2012,6:193-194+197. (in Chinese)
[14] 陈艳丽, 范飞, 王旭, 李绍鹏, 曹振木. DA-6对高温胁迫下黄灯笼辣椒幼苗的影响. 热带作物学报, 2014,35(9):1795-1801.
CHEN Y L, FAN F, WANG X, LI S P, CAO Z M. Effects of DA-6 on Capsicum chinense jacq. seedlings subjected to high temperature. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2014,35(9):1795-1801. (in Chinese)
[15] 王丹, 马青松, 范佐旺, 李小婷, 宛骏, 袁蕾, 陈晓鹭, 邹纯礼, 庞玉新. DA-6 对冬季迟缓期的艾纳香生长和有效成分含量的影响. 中国现代中药, 2015,17(11):1184-1187+1192.
WANG D, MA Q S, FAN Z W, LI X T, WAN J, YUAN L, CHEN X L, ZOU C L, PANG Y X. Effect of DA-6 on growth and contents of effective constituents in Blumea balsamifera in slow growth period of winter. Modern Chinese Medicine, 2015,17(11):1184-1187+1192. (in Chinese)
[16] 杨修一, 李圣会, 梅宇超, 杨广, 孙晓慧, 赵晨浩, 张民, 李成亮. DA-6对水培生菜生长及生理特性的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2017,36(1):32-38.
YANG X Y, LI S H, MEI Y C, YANG G, SUN X H, ZHAO C H, ZHANG M, LI C L. Effects of DA-6 on growth and physiological characteristics in hydroponic lettuce. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2017,36(1):32-38. (in Chinese)
[17] 聂乐兴, 姜兴印, 吴淑华, 王燕, 李俊虎, 戈大庆, 张吉旺, 刘鹏. 胺鲜酯对高产夏玉米产量及叶片光合羧化酶和保护酶活性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(10):2558-2564.
NIE L X, JIANG X Y, WU S H, WANG Y, LI J H, GE D Q, ZHANG J W, LIU P. Effects of DA-6 on leaf photosynthetic carboxylase and protective enzyme activities and grain yield of high-yielding summer maize. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010,21(10):2558-2564. (in Chinese)
[18] 聂乐兴, 姜兴印, 吴淑华, 张吉旺, 刘鹏. 胺鲜酯对高产玉米的调控作用研究. 玉米科学, 2010,18(6):33-37.
NIE L X, JIANG X Y, WU S H, ZHANG J W, LIU P. Regulation of DA-6 on new species of high yield maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2010,18(6):33-37. (in Chinese)
[19] ZHOU W, CHEN F, ZHAO S, YANG C, MENG Y, SHUAI H, LUO X, DAI Y, YIN H, DU J. DA-6 promotes germination and seedling establishment from aged soybean seeds by mediating fatty acid metabolism and glycometabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2019,70(1):101-114.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery247
[20] KEITHLY J, YOKOYAMA H, GAUSMAN H. Enhanced yield of tomato in response to 2-(3, 4-dichlorophenoxy) triethylamine (DCPTA). Plant Growth Regulation, 1990,9(2):127-136.
doi: 10.1007/BF00027440
[21] 孔祥森. DTA-6浸种对水稻种子发芽及幼苗生长的影响. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2008,20(4):9-11.
KONG X S. Effects of seed soaked with DTA-6 on seed germination and seedling growth of rice. Journal of Heilongjiang August First Land Reclamation University, 2008,20(4):9-11. (in Chinese)
[22] 戴红燕, 华劲松, 张荣萍, 蔡光泽. DA-6浸种对有色红稻种子发芽及幼苗性状的影响. 种子, 2018,37(5):38-44.
DAI H Y, HUA J S, ZHANG R P, CAI G Z. Effect of DA-6 soaking on the seed germination and seedling traits of colored red rice. Seed, 2018,37(5):38-44. (in Chinese)
[23] 文言. 二烷氨基乙醇羧酸脂对玉米种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1999,22(1):72-74.
WEN Y. The effects of N,N-diethyl aminoethyl hexanote on germination of maize seeds and the growing of seedling. Journal of Liaoning Normal University (Natural Science), 1999,22(1):72-74. (in Chinese)
[24] XIE T, GU W, MENG Y, LI J, LI L, WANG Y, QU D, WEI S. Exogenous DCPTA ameliorates simulated drought conditions by improving the growth and photosynthetic capacity of maize seedlings. Scientific Reports, 2017,7(1):1-13.
[25] LI L, GU W, LI J, LI C, XIE T, QU D, MENG Y, LI C, WEI S. Exogenously applied spermidine alleviates photosynthetic inhibition under drought stress in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings associated with changes in endogenous polyamines and phytohormones. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2018,129:35-55.
[26] WEN D, HOU H, MENG A, MENG J, XIE L, ZHANG C. Rapid evaluation of seed vigor by the absolute content of protein in seed within the same crop. Scientific Reports, 2018,8(1):1-8.
[27] SCHWEIZER C J, RIES S K. Protein content of seed: Increase improves growth and yield. Science, 1969,165(3888):73-75.
[28] RIES S, AYERS G, WERT V, EVERSON E. Variation in protein, size and seedling vigor with position of seed in heads of winter wheat cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1976,56(4):823-827.
[29] SNIDER J L, COLLINS G D, WHITAKER J. The impact of seed size and chemical composition on seedling vigor, yield, and fiber quality of cotton in five production environments. Field Crops Research, 2016,193:186-195.
[30] 朱建峰, 陈春环, 吉万全. 基因型和种子大小对小麦种子活力的影响. 种子, 2016,35(5):108-109.
ZHU J F, CHEN C H, JI W Q. The effects of genotypes and seed size on the viability of wheat. Seed, 2016,35(5):108-109. (in Chinese)
[31] BERNFELD P. Amylases alpha and beta//COLOWICK I S P, KAPLAN N O. Methods in Enzymology. New York: Academic Press 1955,1:149-158.
[32] FAROOQ M, BARSA S M A, WAHID A. Priming of field-sown rice seed enhances germination, seedling establishment, allometry and yield. Plant Growth Regulation, 2006,49(2/3):285-294.
[33] WEN D X, LI Y, HE L F, ZHANG C Q. Transcriptome analysis reveals the mechanism by which spraying diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate after anthesis regulates wheat grain filling. BMC Plant Biology, 2019,19:10.
[34] 李孟良, 时侠清. 小麦不同粒位、粒重及其种子活力研究. 中国农学通报, 2001,17(1):14-16.
LI M L, SHI X Q. Study on grain weight in different part of wheat ear and its seed vitality. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2001,17(1):14-16. (in Chinese)
[35] 刘旭欢, 加得拉·努尔兰, 童婷, 张峥嵘, 贾永红, 阿里别里根·哈孜太, 卓方方, 石书兵. 籽粒成熟度与穗部位置对春小麦种子活力的影响. 西北农业学报, 2014,23(10):71-75.
LIU X H, JIADELA· N, TONG T, ZHANG Z R, JIA Y H, ALIBIELIGEN· H, ZHUO F F, SHI S B. Effect of maturity and head position on seed vigor of spring wheat. Acta Agriculturae Boreali- occidentalis Sinica, 2014,23(10):71-75. (in Chinese)
[36] 温大兴. 种子生产过程中氮肥和水分调控小麦种子活力的机理解析[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017.
WEN D X. Mechanism analysis of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation during seed production regulating seed vigor in wheat[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agriculture University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[37] 任红, 周培禄, 赵明, 董志强, 李从锋, 齐华. 不同类型化控剂对春玉米产量及生长发育的调控效应. 玉米科学, 2017,25(2):81-85.
REN H, ZHOU P L, ZHAO M, DONG Z Q, LI C F, QI H. Effect of spraying different type chemical control agents on plant growth and grain yield of spring maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2017,25(2):81-85. (in Chinese)
[38] 杨学举. 小麦蛋白成分和淀粉特性对面包品质的影响及品质改良应用[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2004.
YANG X J. Effect of protein components and starch properties on bread quality and utilization in wheat quality improvement[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2004. (in Chinese)
[1] CHEN JiHao, ZHOU JieGuang, QU XiangRu, WANG SuRong, TANG HuaPing, JIANG Yun, TANG LiWei, $\boxed{\hbox{LAN XiuJin}}$, WEI YuMing, ZHOU JingZhong, MA Jian. Mapping and Analysis of QTL for Embryo Size-Related Traits in Tetraploid Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 203-216.
[2] YAN YanGe, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, ZHAO BingQiang, YUAN Liang. Effects of Dextran Modified Urea on Winter Wheat Yield and Fate of Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[3] XU JiuKai, YUAN Liang, WEN YanChen, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, LI HaiYan, ZHAO BingQiang. Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Livestock Manure in the Winter Wheat Growing Season [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[4] ZHAI XiaoHu,LI LingXu,CHEN XiaoZhu,JIANG HuaiDe,HE WeiHua,YAO DaWei. Quantitative Detection Technology of Porcine-Derived Materials in Meat by Real-time PCR [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 156-164.
[5] ZHAO HaiXia,XIAO Xin,DONG QiXin,WU HuaLa,LI ChengLei,WU Qi. Optimization of Callus Genetic Transformation System and Its Application in FtCHS1 Overexpression in Tartary Buckwheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1723-1734.
[6] WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[7] TANG HuaPing,CHEN HuangXin,LI Cong,GOU LuLu,TAN Cui,MU Yang,TANG LiWei,LAN XiuJin,WEI YuMing,MA Jian. Unconditional and Conditional QTL Analysis of Wheat Spike Length in Common Wheat Based on 55K SNP Array [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1492-1502.
[8] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[9] LIU Shuo,ZHANG Hui,GAO ZhiYuan,XU JiLi,TIAN Hui. Genetic Variations of Potassium Harvest Index in 437 Wheat Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1284-1300.
[10] WANG YangYang,LIU WanDai,HE Li,REN DeChao,DUAN JianZhao,HU Xin,GUO TianCai,WANG YongHua,FENG Wei. Evaluation of Low Temperature Freezing Injury in Winter Wheat and Difference Analysis of Water Effect Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[11] GOU ZhiWen,YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,FAN ZhiLong,HU FaLong,ZHAO Cai,YU AiZhong,FAN Hong. Analysis of Sustainability of Multiple Cropping Green Manure in Wheat-Maize Intercropping After Wheat Harvested in Arid Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1319-1331.
[12] ZHI Lei,ZHE Li,SUN NanNan,YANG Yang,Dauren Serikbay,JIA HanZhong,HU YinGang,CHEN Liang. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Lead Tolerance in Wheat at Seedling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1064-1081.
[13] QIN YuQing,CHENG HongBo,CHAI YuWei,MA JianTao,LI Rui,LI YaWei,CHANG Lei,CHAI ShouXi. Increasing Effects of Wheat Yield Under Mulching Cultivation in Northern of China: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109.
[14] CAI WeiDi,ZHANG Yu,LIU HaiYan,ZHENG HengBiao,CHENG Tao,TIAN YongChao,ZHU Yan,CAO WeiXing,YAO Xia. Early Detection on Wheat Canopy Powdery Mildew with Hyperspectral Imaging [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1110-1126.
[15] ZONG Cheng, WU JinXin, ZHU JiuGang, DONG ZhiHao, LI JunFeng, SHAO Tao, LIU QinHua. Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality of Agricultural By-Products and Wheat Straw Mixed Silage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 1037-1046.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!