中国农业科学

• • 上一篇    

最新录用:引黄灌区连续减施化肥对春小麦产量稳定性的影响

王月梅1,田海梅1,王西娜1*,郝雯悦1,吕喆铭1,于金铭1,谭军利2,王朝辉3
  

  1. 1宁夏大学农学院,银川 750021;2宁夏大学土木与水利工程学院,银川 750021;3西北农林科技大学资源与环境学院, 陕西杨凌712100
  • 发布日期:2023-05-23

Effect of Continuous Reduction of Fertilizer Application on Yield Stability of Spring Wheat in Yellow River Irrigation Area of Ningxia

WANG YueMei1, TIAN HaiMei1, WANG XiNa1*, HAO WenYue1, LÜ ZheMing1, YU JingMing1, TAN JunLi2, WANG ZhaoHui3 #br#   

  1. 1Agricultural College of Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021; 2School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021; 3College of Natural Resources and Environment, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi 
  • Online:2023-05-23

摘要: 【目的探索宁夏引黄灌区连续减施化肥对土壤氮、磷、钾养分供应及春小麦产量的影响,并分析影响产量稳定性的因素,为化肥合理减施、春小麦高产稳产提供理论依据。方法以宁春4号春小麦为供试作物2019—2022年连续4开展化肥减施田间定位试验,试验设置常规施肥(CFN 270 kg·hm-2P2O5 150 kg·hm-2K2O 75 kg·hm-2)、减量施肥下限(RF1N 180 kg·hm-2P2O5 45 kg·hm-2K2O 30 kg·hm-2,与传统施肥相比减N 33.3%、减P2O5 70.0%、减K2O 60.0%减量施肥上限(RF2N 225 kg·hm-2P2O5 75 kg·hm-2K2O 45 kg·hm-2,与传统施肥相比减N 17.0%、减P2O5 50.0%、减K2O 40.0%)及不施肥(CK)处理,分析春小麦生育期间气候因素,播前土壤水分含量,播前和收获期土壤矿质态氮速效磷、速效钾含量,收获期春小麦地上部干物质累积量、籽粒产量及产量构成因素的差异及相互关系。结果2019-2022年播前土壤水分含量存在年际差异,其中2022年的较低,平均值仅为19.5%;除2020年受施肥处理显著影响外,其余年份各施肥处理之间无显著差异。播前和收获期土壤矿质态氮、速效钾和速效磷含量均以常规施肥CF处理较高,RF2处理次之,且两者之间无显著差异,而RF1处理的趋于降低。2019年,地上部干物质累积产量均以CF处理最高,分别为23 261.79449.0 kg·hm-2RF2处理增幅分别为2.8%4.5%3.2%16.0%,而2020—2022均以RF2处理较高但与CF处理之间无显著差异,但在4年籽粒产量中表现最稳定从年际变化来看所有施肥处理的公顷穗数千粒重、产量均呈逐年下降的趋势,因此施肥量并不是造成产量年际差异的主要原因,而是与播前土壤水分、降水量、气温、湿度和风速有密切关系,其中2022年产量的降低主要与较低的播前土壤水分、灌浆期的干热风现象及氮肥基追比的改变有关结论宁夏引黄灌区连续适量减施化肥(N 225 kg·hm-2P2O5 75 kg·hm-2K2O 45 kg·hm-2相对常规施肥N 17.0%,减P2O5 50.0%,减K2O 40.0%)不会显著降低土壤氮、磷、钾的供应能力,且一定程度上提高了春小麦公顷穗数、穗粒数和千粒重,促进地上部干物质量向籽粒的转移和积累,从而趋于提高春小麦的籽粒产量。但是,春小麦产量受降雨、风速、湿度等气候因素和土壤墒情、连作障碍、氮肥追施比等的影响而存在年际差异,其中,气温、相对湿度和风速是影响小麦产量差异的主要因素,其对施肥效果的影响需做进一步研究。


关键词: 春小麦, 连续减施化肥, 土壤速效养分, 干物质量, 产量稳定性, 引黄灌区

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to explore the effects of continuous reduction of chemical fertilizer on supply of soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and grain yield of spring wheat in Yellow River Irrigation Area of Ningxia (NYRIA), and to analyze the factors affecting yield stability, and then to provide a theoretical basis for rational fertilizer reduction and high yield and stable yield of spring wheat. 【Method】The field positioning experiment of chemical fertilizer reduction application was carried out for four consecutive years from 2019 to 2022 with Ningchun 4 cultivar of spring wheat as the test crop. Treatments included conventional fertilization (CF with N 270 kg·hm-2, P2O5 150 kg·hm-2, K2O 75 kg·hm-2), the lower limit of reduced fertilization (RF1) with N180 kg·hm-2, P2O5 45 kg·hm-2, K2O 30 kg·hm-2, which reduced N, P2O5, K2O by 33.3%, 70.0%, and 60.0%, respectively, compared with conventional fertilization, the upper limit of fertilization reduction (RF2) with  N 225 kg·hm-2, P2O5 75 kg·hm-2, K2O 45 kg·hm-2, which reduced N, P2O5, K2O by 17.0%, 50.0%, 40.0%, respectively, compared with traditional fertilization, and no fertilization (CK). The climatic factors during the growth period of spring wheat, soil moisture content before sowing and harvest of spring wheat, soil mineral nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium content, dry matter accumulation in shoot, grain yield and yield components of spring wheat at harvest were analyzed, and correlations among them were also discussed. 【Result2019-2022 were inter-annual differences in soil moisture content before sowing, among which the average was only 19.5% in 2022. Except for 2020, which was significantly affected by fertilization treatment, there was no significant difference of soil moisture content before sowing between fertilization treatments in other years. The contents of mineral nitrogen, available potassium and available phosphorus in the soil before sowing and harvesting were higher with conventional fertilization CF treatment, followed by RF2 treatment, and there was no significant difference between them, while which of the RF1 treatment tended to decrease. In 2019, the CF treatment had the highest accumulation of dry matter in shoot and grain yield, which is 23261.7 kg·hm-2 and 9449.0 kg·hm-2, respectively, and has an increase of 2.8%-4.5% and 3.2%-16.0% compared to the RF2 treatment. However, from 2020 to 2022, the RF2 treatment had the highest accumulation of dry matter in shoot and grain yield, and there was no significant difference between the RF2 treatment and the CF treatment, but the yield of RF2 treatment performed the most stable at 4 years. From the perspective of inter-annual changes, the number of ears, 1000 grain weights and yields of hectares for all treatments showed a downward trend year by year, so the fertilization rate was not the main reason for the inter-annual difference in grain yield, but which was closely related to soil moisture before sowing, precipitation, temperature, humidity and wind speed. The decrease in yield in 2022 was accompanied by a lower soil moisture before sowing, hot dry air phenomenon during the filling period and a change in the nitrogen fertilizer base ratio. 【Conclusion】 In NYRIA, continuous and appropriate reduced application of chemical fertilizer with N 225 kg·hm-2, P2O5 75 kg·hm-2, K2O 45 kg·hm-2 would not significantly reduce the supply capacity of soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and increase the number of ears, ear grains and 1000 grain weights in the hectares of spring wheat, and promote the transfer and accumulation of dry matter in shoot to grains to a certain extent, then tend to increase the grain yield of spring wheat. However, there are interannual differences in spring wheat yield due to climate factors such as rainfall, wind speed, and humidity, as well as soil moisture, continuous cropping obstacles, and nitrogen fertilizer application ratios. Among them, temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed are the main factors affecting interannual variation of wheat yield, and their impact on fertilization effects needs further research.


Key words: spring wheat, continuous reduction of fertilizer application, soil available nutrients, dry matter mass, yield stability, Yellow River Irrigation Area of Ningxia