中国农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (22): 4050-4065.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.22.010
陈二影1,秦岭1,杨延兵1,黎飞飞1,王润丰1,张华文1,王海莲1,刘宾1,孔清华2,管延安1,2()
收稿日期:
2019-05-09
接受日期:
2019-06-10
出版日期:
2019-11-16
发布日期:
2019-11-16
通讯作者:
管延安
作者简介:
陈二影,Tel:0531-66658115;E-mail:chenerying_001@163.com
基金资助:
CHEN ErYing1,QIN Ling1,YANG YanBing1,LI FeiFei1,WANG RunFeng1,ZHANG HuaWen1,WANG HaiLian1,LIU Bin1,KONG QingHua2,GUAN YanAn1,2()
Received:
2019-05-09
Accepted:
2019-06-10
Online:
2019-11-16
Published:
2019-11-16
Contact:
YanAn GUAN
摘要:
【目的】明确生产条件下不同谷子品种的耐盐碱性差异,确定谷子大田耐盐碱性鉴定方法和指标。【方法】 以华北夏谷区主推的8个谷子新品种为材料,设置东营滨海盐碱地条件和济南试验地正常条件处理,进行谷子大田耐盐碱性研究。【结果】 在盐碱地和对照正常条件下,参试谷子品种产量均表现出显著差异,变异系数分别为39.1%和13.0%。与对照相比,盐碱地条件下,各品种产量均显著降低,产量盐害率变幅为20.7%—63.4%,变异系数为48.4%;盐碱地条件下,所有品种单穗重、单穗粒重、千粒重、出谷率、株高、SPAD、地上部同化物质积累量和收获指数均降低;盐碱地花前同化物质的转运量提高,平均增幅为34.4%,花后同化物质的积累量降低,平均降幅为42.7%。产量盐害率与单穗重(R=-0.937)、单穗粒重(R=-0.933)、干物质重(R=-0.895)、花前同化物质转运量(R=-0.935)、花前同化物质转运率(R=-0.880)、花前转运同化物质对籽粒贡献率(R=-0.859)、花后同化物质积累量(R=-0.909)和开花期地上部含水量(R=-0.834)均呈显著负相关,与花后同化物质积累量对籽粒贡献率(R=0.859)呈极显著正相关,而与出谷率和千粒重间无显著相关性。通过主成分分析,确定了单穗重、单穗粒重、干物质重和地上部含水量可以作为耐盐碱性鉴定指标,且通过主成分分析和隶属函数进行了谷子耐盐碱性的综合评价,济谷22和济谷21的综合得分值最高。【结论】 在盐碱地条件下,不同谷子品种存在耐盐碱性差异,单穗重、单穗粒重、干物质重和地上部含水量可以作为大田耐盐碱性的鉴定指标,济谷22和济谷21为耐盐碱性品种;在盐碱地条件下,不同谷子品种花前同化物质的转运量提高,且花前转运同化物质对籽粒的贡献率和开花期地上部含水量均与盐害率呈显著负相关,因此,提高开花期地上部各器官的含水量和花前转运同化物对籽粒的贡献率是提高盐碱地条件下谷子产量的重要手段。
陈二影, 秦岭, 杨延兵, 黎飞飞, 王润丰, 张华文, 王海莲, 刘宾, 孔清华, 管延安. 生产条件下谷子品种盐碱耐性的差异及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(22): 4050-4065.
CHEN ErYing, QIN Ling, YANG YanBing, LI FeiFei, WANG RunFeng, ZHANG HuaWen, WANG HaiLian, LIU Bin, KONG QingHua, GUAN YanAn. Variation and Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt and Alkali Tolerance of Different Foxtail Millet Cultivars Under Production Conditions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 4050-4065.
表2
不同谷子品种产量构成因素"
地点 Sites | 品种 Cultivars | 单穗重 WPP (g) | 单穗粒重 GWPP(g) | 出谷率 PGWPP(%) | 千粒重 TKW(g) | 干物重 SBW(kg·hm-2) | 株高 PH(cm) | 收获指数 HI(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
济南 Jinan | 济谷17 Jigu17 | 13.69±0.95bcd | 11.56±0.53cde | 84.55±1.99ab | 3.04±0.031ab | 11779.90±261.00d | 132.0±4.64a | 43.19±0.12bcde |
济谷18 Jigu18 | 15.22±1.09ab | 12.54±1.05abc | 82.32±1.03b | 2.93±0.027c | 12537.40±175.70cd | 122.4±1.39bc | 44.32±2.49bcd | |
济谷19 Jigu19 | 12.10±0.445de | 10.36±0.28def | 85.70±0.82a | 2.92±0.033c | 10290.40±75.40e | 128.8±2.50ab | 45.63±0.57abc | |
济谷20 Jigu20 | 16.16±0.08a | 13.86±0.24a | 85.74±1.01a | 2.99±0.029bc | 12860.15±202.45c | 118.4±3.21cd | 49.28±0.74a | |
济谷21 Jigu21 | 16.10±1.07a | 13.78±0.75a | 85.66±0.99a | 3.07±0.029a | 14832.10±180.10a | 117.0±1.93cd | 42.29±1.27cde | |
济谷22 Jigu22 | 16.05±0.60a | 13.39±0.38ab | 83.42±0.80ab | 2.96±0.018c | 13674.95±174.95b | 117.5±2.54cd | 43.49±0.12bcde | |
中谷2 Zhonggu2 | 14.36±1.01abc | 12.06±1.04bcd | 83.86±1.33ab | 2.97±0.012c | 12497.80±311.90cd | 112.4±2.60de | 44.43±1.56bcd | |
冀谷39 Jigu39 | 14.88±0.44abc | 12.77±0.26abc | 85.84±0.79a | 3.04±0.024ab | 12111.20±123.20cd | 119.6±2.51c | 47.01±1.90ab | |
东营 Dongying | 济谷17 Jigu17 | 12.03±0.42de | 9.46±0.33f | 78.65±0.03c | 2.75±0.003de | 5999.85±82.35g | 107.3±2.90e | 42.55±0.88cde |
济谷18 Jigu18 | 7.76±0.48f | 6.11±0.42g | 78.73±0.49c | 2.51±0.007g | 4711.05±264.15h | 85.0±1.10h | 35.01±0.44f | |
济谷19 Jigu19 | 8.79±1.12f | 6.94±0.82g | 78.96±0.79c | 2.67±0.012f | 4590.45±281.25h | 91.9±2.02fg | 40.63±1.31de | |
济谷20 Jigu20 | 12.89±0.44cde | 10.24±0.36ef | 79.43±0.07c | 2.56±0.006g | 6432.75±474.75g | 96.9±2.60f | 43.10±1.67bcde | |
济谷21 Jigu21 | 15.53±0.60ab | 12.36±0.47abc | 79.57±0.02c | 2.80±0.003d | 8353.35±179.55f | 94.6±1.58fg | 39.94±0.68e | |
济谷22 Jigu22 | 15.90±0.57a | 12.55±0.43abc | 78.91±0.14c | 2.70±0.012ef | 8092.35±508.05f | 94.7±1.81fg | 41.94±1.21cde | |
中谷2 Zhonggu2 | 11.52±0.43e | 9.07±0.35f | 78.71±0.10c | 2.50±0.007g | 6220.35±210.15g | 88.9±1.80gh | 39.34±0.17e | |
冀谷39 Jigu39 | 7.99±0.62f | 6.29±0.50g | 78.76±0.12c | 2.66±0.010f | 4851.90±35.10h | 74.7±2.05i | 35.00±1.53f | |
CV济南(JN) | 13.50 | 13.47 | 2.22 | 3.08 | 15.01 | 20.80 | 7.18 | |
CV东营(DY) | 39.11 | 39.49 | 0.62 | 7.23 | 33.54 | 40.00 | 11.26 | |
F地点 F Site | 84.39** | 143.23** | 177.33** | 899.79** | 2538.64** | 564.60** | 55.27** | |
F品种 FCultivar | 16.99** | 17.52** | 1.64 | 20.99** | 55.53** | 15.10** | 3.77* | |
F地点×品种 F Site× Cultivar | 7.12** | 6.81** | 0.96 | 6.95** | 4.77** | 6.70** | 3.79* |
表3
不同谷子品种产量构成因素的盐害率"
品种 Cultivars | 单穗重盐害率 SIRWPP(%) | 单穗粒重盐害率 SIRGWPP(%) | 出谷率盐害率 SIRPGWPP(%) | 千粒重盐害率 SIRTKW(%) | 干物重盐害率 SIRSBW(%) | 株高盐害率 SIRPH(%) | 籽粒收获指数盐害率 SIRGHI(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
济谷17 Jigu17 | 11.97±3.07cd | 18.13±0.96cd | 6.98±0.02ab | 9.63±0.96c | 49.05±0.45de | 18.69±3.01c | 1.49±0.02d |
济谷18 Jigu18 | 48.99±0.47a | 51.20±0.75a | 4.35±0.60c | 14.43±0.76ab | 62.45±1.55a | 30.56±1.49b | 20.83±3.48a |
济谷19 Jigu19 | 27.55±6.61b | 33.25±6.06b | 7.87±0.04a | 8.64±1.01c | 55.40±2.40bc | 28.62±2.19b | 11.02±2.00bc |
济谷20 Jigu20 | 20.23±2.32bc | 26.12±1.34bc | 7.36±1.02ab | 14.27±0.77ab | 50.00±2.90cd | 18.10±1.72c | 12.57±2.08b |
济谷21 Jigu21 | 3.53±0.35de | 10.23±1.46de | 7.10±1.10ab | 8.79±0.91c | 43.70±0.50ef | 19.16±1.81c | 5.54±1.25cd |
济谷22 Jigu22 | 0.94±0.16e | 6.30±0.58e | 5.40±0.74bc | 8.99±0.46c | 40.85±2.95f | 19.35±2.45c | 3.59±0.29d |
中谷2 Zhonggu2 | 19.61±2.73bc | 24.50±3.66bc | 6.15±0.25abc | 15.84±0.46a | 50.25±0.45cd | 20.95±1.80c | 11.38±2.76bc |
冀谷39 Jigu39 | 46.39±2.61a | 50.78±2.92a | 8.25±0.71a | 12.39±0.53b | 59.90±0.70ab | 37.50±2.59a | 25.63±2.37a |
标准差 SD | 25.34 | 23.80 | 1.85 | 5.12 | 10.55 | 27.20 | 11.79 |
F值 F value | 35.19** | 35.27** | 3.68* | 15.10** | 16.86** | 10.35** | 15.78** |
表4
不同谷子同化物质积累转运及对籽粒贡献率"
地点 Site | 品种 Cultivars | 花前同化物质转运量 ATAPA (g/plant) | 花前同化物质转运率 ATRPA (%) | 花前转运同化物质对籽粒贡献率CRTAPA (%) | 花后同化物质积累量 AAAPA (g/plant) | 花后同化物质积累量 对籽粒贡献率 CRAAPA (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
济南 Jinan | 济谷17 Jigu17 | 2.27±0.15ef | 12.98±0.28ef | 19.63±0.39efg | 9.29±0.39abc | 80.37±0.04abc |
济谷18 Jigu18 | 2.61±0.04de | 14.26±0.041def | 20.94±1.41def | 9.93±1.01ab | 79.06±1.41bcd | |
济谷19 Jigu19 | 2.14±0.16ef | 14.75±1.01def | 20.69±2.13def | 8.23±0.45bcd | 79.32±2.13bcd | |
济谷20 Jigu20 | 3.28±0.19bc | 18.74±1.59bc | 23.72±1.78d | 10.58±0.43a | 76.29±1.78d | |
济谷21 Jigu21 | 2.98±0.27cd | 13.69±1.04ef | 21.60±0.77de | 10.80±0.49a | 78.41±0.77cd | |
济谷22 Jigu22 | 2.31±0.03ef | 11.75±0.96f | 17.24±0.65fg | 11.05±0.66a | 82.77±0.65ab | |
中谷2 Zhonggu2 | 2.63±0.18de | 14.87±0.85def | 21.82±0.04de | 9.43±1.22ab | 78.18±0.42cd | |
冀谷39 Jigu39 | 2.01±0.16f | 12.27±1.43ef | 15.69±0.89g | 10.77±0.11a | 84.31±0.89a | |
东营 Dongying | 济谷17 Jigu17 | 3.69±0.19b | 22.43±0.93ab | 39.03±0.68a | 5.77±0.14efg | 60.97±0.68g |
济谷18 Jigu18 | 1.97±0.04f | 14.84±0.55def | 32.40±1.57c | 4.14±0.76g | 67.61±1.57e | |
济谷19 Jigu19 | 2.18±0.14ef | 17.80±1.26cd | 31.63±1.72c | 4.76±0.96fg | 68.37±1.72e | |
济谷20 Jigu20 | 3.87±0.01b | 22.31±1.82ab | 37.82±1.38ab | 6.38±0.37def | 62.18±1.38fg | |
济谷21 Jigu21 | 5.18±0.46a | 21.77±1.35ab | 41.83±2.13a | 7.18±0.01de | 58.18±2.13g | |
济谷22 Jigu22 | 5.12±0.37a | 22.83±2.74a | 40.72±1.55a | 7.43±0.80cde | 59.28±1.55g | |
中谷2 Zhonggu2 | 2.97±0.16cd | 17.54±1.22cd | 32.73±0.51c | 6.10±0.51ef | 67.27±0.51e | |
冀谷39 Jigu39 | 2.19±0.07ef | 15.79±0.01cde | 34.91±1.69bc | 4.11±0.57g | 65.10±1.69ef | |
CV济南(JN) | 24.36 | 21.61 | 18.20 | 13.76 | 4.60 | |
CV东营(DY) | 53.60 | 23.83 | 15.52 | 31.86 | 8.87 | |
F地点 F Site | 74.59** | 69.53** | 569.32** | 178.46** | 569.33** | |
F品种 F Cultivar | 28.64** | 5.26** | 5.65** | 4.47** | 5.65** | |
F地点×品 F Site×Cultivar | 17.02** | 4.45** | 6.62** | 1.91** | 6.62** |
表5
盐碱胁迫下各性状的相关性分析"
指标 Index | 产量盐 害率 SIRY | 单穗重 WPP | 单穗粒重 GWPP | 出谷率 PGWPP | 千粒重 TKW | 干物重 SBW | 籽粒收获 指数 HI | SPAD | 花前同化物质转运量ATAPA | 花前同化物质转运率ATRPA | 花前转运同化物质对籽粒贡献率CRTAPA | 花后同化物质积累量AAAPA | 花后同化物质积累量对籽粒贡献率CRAAPA | 开花期地上部含水量SWCAA | 成熟期地上部总含水量SWCAM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量盐害率 SIRY | 1.000 | ||||||||||||||
单穗重WPP | -0.937** | 1.000 | |||||||||||||
单穗粒重GWPP | -0.933** | 1.000** | 1.000 | ||||||||||||
出谷率PGWPP | -0.286 | 0.546 | 0.559 | 1.000 | |||||||||||
千粒重TKW | -0.618 | 0.48 | 0.482 | 0.314 | 1.000 | ||||||||||
干物重SBW | -0.895** | 0.977** | 0.978** | 0.559 | 0.473 | 1.000 | |||||||||
籽粒收获指数HI | -0.688 | 0.665 | 0.663 | 0.348 | 0.374 | 0.494 | 1.000 | ||||||||
SPAD | -0.564 | 0.707 | 0.704 | 0.305 | -0.120 | 0.718* | 0.309 | 1.000 | |||||||
花前同化物质转运量 ATAPA | -0.935** | 0.987** | 0.988** | 0.573 | 0.570 | 0.976** | 0.620 | 0.636 | 1.000 | ||||||
花前同化物质转运率 ATRPA | -0.880** | 0.879** | 0.879** | 0.488 | 0.561 | 0.774* | 0.887** | 0.463 | 0.882** | 1.000 | |||||
花前转运同化物质对籽粒贡献率 CRTAPA | -0.859** | 0.866** | 0.868** | 0.519 | 0.702 | 0.864** | 0.521 | 0.438 | 0.929** | 0.852** | 1.000 | ||||
花后同化物质积累量 AAAPA | -0.909** | 0.989** | 0.988** | 0.533 | 0.380 | 0.957** | 0.687 | 0.758* | 0.953** | 0.853** | 0.785* | 1.000 | |||
花后同化物质积累量对籽粒贡献率 CRAAPA | 0.859** | -0.866** | -0.868** | -0.519 | -0.702 | -0.864** | -0.521 | -0.438 | -.929** | -0.852** | -1.000** | -0.785* | 1.000 | ||
开花期地上部含水量 SWCAA | -0.834* | 0.828* | 0.830* | 0.528 | 0.702 | 0.769* | 0.733* | 0.383 | 0.856** | 0.918** | 0.894** | 0.783* | -0.894** | 1.000 | |
成熟期地上部含水量 SWCAM | 0.706 | -0.794* | -0.794* | -0.506 | -0.192 | -0.689 | -0.840** | -0.446 | -0.742* | -0.825* | -0.56 | -0.826* | 0.560 | -0.639 | 1.000 |
表6
主成分的特征值、贡献率和载荷矩阵"
主成分 Principal component | I | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |
---|---|---|---|---|
特征值Eigen value | 11.175 | 1.475 | 1.029 | |
贡献率Contribution (%) | 74.498 | 9.835 | 6.863 | |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution (%) | 74.498 | 84.334 | 91.196 | |
载荷因子 Load factor | 产量盐害率YSIR | -0.940 | 0.048 | -0.016 |
单穗重WPP | 0.983 | 0.143 | 0.073 | |
单穗粒重GWPP | 0.984 | 0.140 | 0.075 | |
出谷率PGWPP | 0.577 | 0.011 | 0.049 | |
千粒重TKW | 0.578 | -0.765 | 0.090 | |
干物重SBW | 0.942 | 0.144 | 0.266 | |
籽粒收获指数HI | 0.728 | 0.008 | -0.660 | |
SPAD | 0.611 | 0.672 | 0.295 | |
花前同化物质转运量ATAPA | 0.987 | 0.017 | 0.135 | |
花前同化物质转运率ATRPA | 0.939 | -0.089 | -0.283 | |
花前转运同化物质对籽粒贡献率CRTAPA | 0.916 | -0.269 | 0.208 | |
花后同化物质积累量AAAPA | 0.957 | 0.262 | 0.015 | |
花后同化物质积累量对籽粒贡献率CRAAPA | -0.916 | 0.269 | -0.208 | |
开花期地上部含水量SWCAA | -0.793 | -0.271 | 0.471 | |
成熟期地上部含水量SWCAM | 0.906 | -0.281 | -0.089 |
表7
各品种的综合性状指标、权重、μ(X)及综合评价值"
品种 Variety | CI1 | CI2 | CI3 | μ(X1) | μ(X2) | μ(X3) | D | 排名Order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
济谷17JG17 | 0.421 | -1.344 | -1.111 | 0.674 | 0.000 | 0.069 | 0.556 | 4 |
济谷18JG18 | -1.312 | 0.288 | 0.299 | 0.000 | 0.545 | 0.582 | 0.103 | 8 |
济谷19JG19 | -0.784 | -0.459 | -1.301 | 0.205 | 0.296 | 0.000 | 0.200 | 6 |
济谷20JG20 | 0.541 | 0.835 | -0.855 | 0.721 | 0.728 | 0.162 | 0.680 | 3 |
济谷21JG21 | 1.258 | -0.700 | 0.937 | 1.000 | 0.215 | 0.814 | 0.901 | 2 |
济谷22JG22 | 1.210 | 0.557 | 0.520 | 0.981 | 0.635 | 0.662 | 0.920 | 1 |
中谷2ZG2 | -0.309 | 1.649 | 0.062 | 0.390 | 1.000 | 0.495 | 0.464 | 5 |
冀谷39JG39 | -1.026 | -0.827 | 1.449 | 0.111 | 0.173 | 1.000 | 0.185 | 7 |
权重Weights | 0.817 | 0.108 | 0.075 |
[1] | LIANG W J, MA X L, WANG P, LIU L . Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: A review. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2018,495(2):286-291. |
[2] | MUNNS R . Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2002,25(2):239-250. |
[3] | ASHRAF M . Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 2004,199(5):361-376. |
[4] | SHRIVASTAVA P, KUMAR R . Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2015,22(2):123-131. |
[5] | JAMIL A, RIAZ S, ASHRAF M, FOOLAD M R . Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2011,30(5):435-458. |
[6] | 杨劲松 . 我国盐渍土资源利用与管理研究的回顾与展望//中国土壤科学的现状与展望. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 2005: 211-215. |
YANG J S. Review and prospect of utilization and management of saline soil resources in China//The present Situation and Prospect of Soil Science in China. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 2005, 211-215. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 陈二影, 秦岭, 程炳文, 杨延兵, 张华文, 刘宾, 王海莲, 陈桂玲, 管延安 . 夏谷氮、磷、钾肥的效应研究. 山东农业科学, 2015,47(1):61-65. |
CHEN E Y, QIN L, CHENG B W, YANG Y B, ZHANG H W, LIU B, WANG H L, CHEN G L, GUAN Y A . Application effect of N, P, K fertilizers on summer foxtail millet. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2015,47(1):61-65. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 陈二影, 杨延兵, 程炳文, 秦岭, 张华文, 刘宾, 王海莲, 陈桂玲, 管延安 . 不同夏谷品种的产量与氮肥利用效率. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(2):93-97. |
CHEN E Y, YANG Y B, CHENG B W, QIN L, ZHANG H W, LIU B, WANG H L, CHEN G L, GUAN Y A . Yield and nitrogen use efficiency in summer foxtail millet. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2015(2):93-97.(in Chinese) | |
[9] | 黄锁, 胡利芹, 徐东北, 李微微, 徐兆师, 李连城, 周永斌, 刁现民, 贾冠清, 马有志, 陈明 . 谷子转录因子SiNF-YA5通过ABA非依赖途径提高转基因拟南芥耐盐性. 作物学报, 2016,42(12):1787-1797. |
HUANG S, HU L Q, XU D B, LI W W, XU Z S, LI L C, ZHOU Y B, DIAO X M, JIA G Q, MA Y Z, CHEN M . Transcription factor SiNF-YA5 from foxtail millet (Setaria italica) conferred tolerance to high-salt stress through ABA-independent pathway in transgenic Arabidopsis. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016,42(12):1787-1797. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 秦玉海, 张小, 冯露, 李微, 徐兆, 李连, 周永, 马有志, 刁现民, 贾冠清, 陈明, 闵东红 . 谷子转录因子基因Sib ZIP42在拟南芥中对高盐和ABA的响应. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(17):3276-3286. |
QIN Y H, ZHANG X, FENG L, LI W, XU Z, LI L, ZHOU Y, MA Y Z, DIAO X M, JIA G Q, CHEN M, MIN D H . Response of millet transcription factor gene Sib ZIP42 to high salt and ABA treatment in transgenic Arabidopsis. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(17):3276-3286. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 宁蕾, 王曙光, 琚鹏举, 柏星轩, 葛林豪, 齐欣, 姜奇彦, 孙现军, 陈明, 孙黛珍 . 过表达谷子SiANT1对水稻耐盐性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(10):1830-1841. |
NING L, WANG S G, JU P J, BAI X X, GE L H, QI X, JIANG Q Y, SUN X J, CHEN M, SUN D Z . Rice overexpression of millet SiANT1 gene increases salt tolerance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(10):1830-1841. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 田伯红, 王素英, 李雅静, 王建广, 张立新, 梁凤芹, 翟玉柱, 刘金荣 . 谷子地方品种发芽期和苗期对NaCl胁迫的反应和耐盐品种筛选. 作物学报, 2008,34(12):2218-2222. |
TIAN B H, WANG S Y, LI Y J, WANG J G, ZHANG L X, LIANG F Q, ZHAI Y Z, LIU J R . Response to sodium chloride stress at germination and seedling and identification of salinity tolerant genotypes in foxtail millet landraces originated from China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008,34(12):2218-2222. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 崔兴国, 时丽冉 . 衡水地区14份夏谷品种种子萌发期耐盐性研究. 作物杂志, 2011,35(4):117-119. |
CUI X G, SHI L R . Evaluation of salt tolerance of 14 foxtail millet summer varieties in Hengshui. Crops, 2011,35(4):117-119. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 张永芳, 宋喜娥, 王润梅, 湛润生, 赵治海, 范光宇 . Na2CO3胁迫对谷子种子萌发的影响. 种子, 2015,34(11):94-97. |
ZHANG Y F, SONG X E, WANG R M, ZHAN R S, ZHAO Z H, FAN G Y . Effect of Na2CO3 stress on different seed germination of millet. Seed, 2015,34(11):94-97. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 郭瑞锋, 张永福, 任月梅, 杨忠 . 混合盐碱胁迫对谷子萌发、幼芽生长的影响及耐盐碱品种筛选. 作物杂志, 2017,11(4):63-66. |
GUO R F, ZHANG Y F, REN Y M, YANG Z . Effects of saline-alkali stress on millet germination and shoots growth and saline-alkali tolerance variety screening. Crops, 2017,11(4):63-66. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 徐心志, 代小东, 杨育峰, 马超, 王雁南, 朱灿灿, 秦娜, 杨国红, 李君霞 . 盐胁迫对谷子幼苗生长及光合特性的影响. 河南农业科学, 2016,45(10):24-28. |
XU X Z, DAI X D, YANG Y F, MA C, WANG Y N, ZHU C C, QIN N, YANG G H, LI J X . Effect of salt stress on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of foxtail millet seedlings. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016,45(10):24-28. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 崔兴国, 时丽冉, 李明哲 . 盐胁迫对不同品种夏谷幼苗抗氧化能力的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2012,40(6):86-88. |
CUI X G, SHI L R, LI M Z . Effect of salt stress on antioxidant ability of different foxtail millet at seedling stage. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2012,40(6):86-88. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 韩飞, 诸葛平, 娄燕, 王会, 张乃丹, 何伟, 晁赢 . 63份谷子种质的耐盐综合评价及耐盐品种筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018,19(4):685-693. |
HAN F, ZHU G P, LOU Y, WANG H, ZHANG N D, HE W, YAO Y . Evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of 63 foxtail millet germplasm. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018,19(4):685-693. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 田伯红, 王建广, 李雅静, 张立新, 孔德平 . 谷子发芽期和幼苗前期耐盐性鉴定指标的研究. 河北农业科学, 2008,12(7):4-6. |
TIAN B H, WANG J G, LI Y J, ZHANG L X, KONG D P . Studies on screening indexes for salt tolerance of millet during germination period and early seedling stage. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2008,12(7):4-6. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 崔正勇, 李新华, 裴艳婷, 高国强, 张凤云, 孙明柱, 李鹏 . 氮磷配施对冬小麦干物质积累、分配及产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(3):339-346. |
CUI Z Y, LI X H, PEI Y T, GAO G Q, ZHANG F Y, SUN M Z, LI P . Effect of nitrogen-phosphorus-combined application on characteristics of dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of winter wheat. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2018,27(3):339-346. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 温樱, 王东 . 底肥分层条施提高冬小麦干物质积累及产量. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(5):1387-1393. |
WEN Y, WANG D . Basal fertilization in strips at different soil depths to increase dry matter accumulation and yield of winter wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017,23(5):1387-1393. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | PAPAKOSTA D K, GAGIANAS A A . Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, translocation, and losses for Mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agronomy Journal, 1991,83(5):864-870. |
[23] | 周婵婵, 王术, 黄元财, 王岩, 胡继杰, 贾宝艳 . 不同水稻品种产量和品质对盐碱胁迫的响应. 种子, 2017,36(11):29-33. |
ZHOU C C, WANG S, HUANG Y C, WANG Y, HU J J, JIA B Y . Response of different rice yield and quality to saline-alkali stress. Seed, 2017,36(11):29-33. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 冯国艺, 张谦, 雷晓鹏, 祁虹, 王树林, 王燕, 梁青龙, 林永增 . 滨海盐碱地不同适性棉花品种的筛选及其性状特征. 河北农业科学, 2017,1(3):25-29. |
FENG G Y, ZHANG Q, LEI X P, QI H, WANG S L, WANG Y, LIANG Q L, LIN Y Z . Screening and characteristics of different adaptable cotton varieties in coastal saline-alkali area. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2017,1(3):25-29. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 任根增, 高志远, 张瑜, 崔江慧, 张素梅, 常金华 . 混合盐碱胁迫对高粱农艺性状及生理指标的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(1):100-106. |
REN G Z, GAO Z Y, ZHANG Y, CUI J H, ZHANG S M, CHANG J H . The influence of mixed salt and alkali stress on physiological and agronomic traits of sorghum. Crops, 2017(1):100-106. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | 孟祥浩, 张玉梅, 薛远赛, 刘义国, 张洪生, 林琪, 穆平 . 滨海盐碱地条件下不同小麦品种(系)花后旗叶可溶性物质、灌浆速率及产量因素的分析. 作物杂志, 2016(1):135-139. |
MENG X H, ZHANG Y M, XUE Y S, LIU Y G, ZHANG H S, LIN Q, MU P . Analysis of soluble substances, filling rate and yield of wheat under the coastal saline at post floral stage. Crops, 2016(1):135-139. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | 李辉, 康健, 赵耕毛, 尹晓明, 梁明祥 . 盐胁迫对菊芋干物质和糖分积累分配的影响. 作物杂志, 2014,23(2):160-170. |
LI H, KANG J, ZHAO G M, YIN X M, LIANG M X . Effects of salinity on accumulation and distribution mode of dry matter and soluble sugar of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Crops, 2014,23(2):160-170. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 谷艳芳, 丁圣彦, 李婷婷, 王欣, 李俊娇, 张丽霞 . 盐胁迫对冬小麦幼苗干物质分配和生理生态特性的影响. 生态学报, 2009,29(2):840-845. |
GU Y F, DING S Y, LI T T, WANG X, LI J J, ZHANG L X . Effects of saline stress on dry matter partitioning and Eco physiological characteristics of winter wheat seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009,29(2):840-845. (in Chinese) | |
[29] | 龚秋, 王欣, 后猛, 唐维, 闫会, 张允刚, 刘亚菊, 李强, 马代夫 . 盐胁迫对紫甘薯光合特性及干物质积累的影响. 西南农业学报, 2015,28(5):1986-1991. |
GONG Q, WANG X, HOU M, TANG W, YAN H, ZHANG Y G, LIU Y J, LI Q, MA D F . Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic properties and dry matter accumulation of purple sweet potato. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015,28(5):1986-1991. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 刘伟, 张吉旺, 吕鹏, 杨今胜, 刘鹏, 董树亭, 李登海, 孙庆泉 . 种植密度对高产夏玉米登海661产量及干物质积累与分配的影响. 作物学报, 2011,37(7):1301-1307. |
LIU W, ZHANG J W, LÜ P, YANG J S, LIU P, DONG S T, LI D H, SUN Q Q . Effect of plant density on grain yield dry matter accumulation and partitioning in summer maize cultivar Denghai 661. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011,37(7):1301-1307. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 郭增江, 于振文, 石玉, 赵俊晔, 张永丽, 王东 . 不同土层测墒补灌对小麦旗叶光合特性和干物质积累与分配的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40(4):731-738. |
GUO Z J, YU Z W, SHI Y, ZHAO J Y, ZHANG Y L, WANG D . Photosynthesis characteristics of flag leaf and dry matter accumulation and allocation in winter wheat under supplemental irrigation after measuring moisture content in different soil layers. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014,40(4):731-738. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | KANG S Z, ZHANG L, LIANG Y L, HU Y T, CAI H J, GU B J . Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management, 2002,55:203-216. |
[33] | XUE Q W, ZHU Z X, MUSICK J T, STEWART B A, DUSEK D A . Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased water use efficiency in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2006,163:154-164. |
[34] | 戴海芳, 武辉, 阿曼古丽·买买提阿力, 王立红, 麦麦提·阿皮孜, 张巨松 . 不同基因型棉花苗期耐盐性分析及其鉴定指标筛选. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(4):1290-1300. |
DAI H F, WU H, AMANGULI M M T A L, , WANG L H MAIMAITI A P Z, ZHANG J S . Analysis of salt tolerance and determination of salt tolerant evaluation indicators in cotton seedlings of different genotypes. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014,47(4):1290-1300. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | 孙东雷, 卞能飞, 陈志德, 邢兴华, 徐泽俊, 齐玉军, 王晓军, 王幸 . 花生萌发期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017,18(6):1079-1087. |
SUN D L, BIAN N F, CHEN Z D, XING X H, XU J Z, QI Y J, WANG X J, WANG X . Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) at germination stage. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017,18(6):1079-1087. (in Chinese) | |
[36] | 宋世佳, 任晓利, 魏志敏, 崔纪菡, 刘猛, 赵宇, 刘斐, 南春梅, 夏雪岩, 李顺国 . 覆膜对夏播谷子生长发育与产量的影响机制及其相关性分析. 华北农学报, 2016,31:25-30. |
SONG S J, REN X L, WEI Z M, CUI J H, LIU M, ZHAO Y, LIU F, NAN C M, XIA X Y, LI S G . Influence mechanism and correlation analysis of film mulching on growth development and yield of summer foxtail millet. Acta Agriculturae Boreall-Sinica, 2016,31:25-30. (in Chinese) | |
[37] | 张艾英, 刁现民, 郭二虎, 范惠萍, 王丽霞, 李瑜辉, 程丽萍, 吴引生, 张莉 . 西北春谷早熟区谷子品种十五年变化趋势及主要性状分析. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(23):4496-4506. |
ZHANG A Y, DIAO X M, GUO E H, FAN H P, WANG L X, LI Y H, CHENG L P, WU Y S, ZHANG L . Research progress and major traits of foxtail millet cultivars developed in the early-mature spring-sowing region in the past 15 years. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(23):4496-4506. (in Chinese) | |
[38] | 魏萌涵, 解慧芳, 邢璐, 宋慧, 王淑君, 王素英, 刘海萍, 付楠, 刘金荣 . 华北地区谷子产量与农艺性状的综合评价分析. 作物杂志, 2018(4):42-47. |
WEI M H, XIE H F, XING L, SONG H, WANG S J, WANG S Y, LIU H P, FU N, LIU J R . Comprehensive evaluation of yield and agronomic characters of foxtail millet germplasms from North China. Crops, 2018(4):42-47. (in Chinese) | |
[39] | 赵禹凯, 王显瑞, 陈高勋, 赵敏, 李书田 . 谷子主要农艺性状的相关和通径分析. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2018,35(2):42-47. |
ZHAO Y K, WANG X R, CHEN G X, ZHAO M, LI S T . Correlation analysis and path analysis on major agronomic traits of millet. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018,35(2):42-47. (in Chinese) | |
[40] | 朱元刚, 高凤菊 . 不同行株距配置下夏播谷子产量及相关性状的多重分析. 核农学报. 2014,28(12):2290-2299. |
ZHU Y G, GAO F J . Multiple analysis of yield and related characteristics of summer- sowing foxtail millet under different arrangement of row and plant spacing. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014,28(12):2290-2299. (in Chinese) | |
[41] | 邵庆勤, 闫素辉, 李文阳, 任兰天, 许峰, 杨安中 . 沿淮地区不同小麦品种花后生长差异及其与产量的相关性. 西北农业学报, 2019,28(1):1-10. |
SHAO Q Q, YAN S H, LI W Y, REN L T, XU F, YANG A Z . Study on growth difference after anthesis of different wheat varieties and correlation analysis with yield in the region along Huaihe river. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019,28(1):1-10. (in Chinese) | |
[42] | 孙璐, 周宇飞, 汪澈, 肖木辑, 陶冶, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬 . 高粱品种萌发期耐盐性筛选与鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(9):1714-1722. |
SUN L, ZHOU Y F, WANG C, XIAO M J, TAO Z, XU W J, HUANG R D . Screening and identification of sorghum cultivars for salinity tolerance during germination. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(9):1714-1722. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 王秀秀,邢爱双,杨茹,何守朴,贾银华,潘兆娥,王立如,杜雄明,宋宪亮. 陆地棉种质资源表型性状综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094. |
[2] | 贾冠清, 刁现民. 中国谷子种业创新现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 653-665. |
[3] | 杜金霞,李奕莎,李美霖,陈文浛,张木清. 甘蔗不同基因型对白条病抗性的评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130. |
[4] | 郭淑青,宋慧,柴少华,郭岩,石兴,杜丽红,邢璐,解慧芳,张扬,李龙,冯佰利,刘金荣,杨璞. 谷子生育期及穗相关性状的QTL定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2883-2898. |
[5] | 武翠卿,孙静鑫,郭平毅,王宏富,武新慧. 农艺措施对谷子产量及抗倒伏力学性能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(6): 1127-1142. |
[6] | 张婷,王根平,罗焱杰,李琳,高翔,程汝宏,师志刚,董立,张喜瑞,杨伟红,许立闪. 色差分析在优质小米选育中的应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5): 901-908. |
[7] | 李顺国, 刘斐, 刘猛, 程汝宏, 夏恩君, 刁现民. 中国谷子产业和种业发展现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3): 459-470. |
[8] | 郭淑青,宋慧,杨清华,高金锋,高小丽,冯佰利,杨璞. 谷子株高及穗部性状主基因+多基因混合遗传模型分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(24): 5177-5193. |
[9] | 王国丽,常芳弟,张宏媛,卢闯,宋佳珅,王婧,逄焕成,李玉义. 不同厚度秸秆隔层对河套灌区盐碱土壤温度、水分和食葵产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19): 4155-4168. |
[10] | 李敏, 苏慧, 李阳阳, 李金鹏, 李金才, 朱玉磊, 宋有洪. 黄淮海麦区小麦耐热性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(16): 3381-3392. |
[11] | 张硕,智慧,唐婵娟,罗明昭,汤沙,贾冠清,贾彦超,刁现民. 谷子条纹叶突变体A36-S的细胞学特性分析及基因定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(14): 2952-2964. |
[12] | 张林林,智慧,汤沙,张仁梁,张伟,贾冠清,刁现民. 谷子抽穗时间基因SiTOC1的表达与单倍型变异分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(11): 2273-2286. |
[13] | 张斌斌,蔡志翔,沈志军,严娟,马瑞娟,俞明亮. 观赏桃种质资源表型性状多样性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(11): 2406-2418. |
[14] | 王珊珊,赵晨辉,李红莲,张冰冰,梁英海,宋宏伟. 东北地区10份李种质资源果实香气成分分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(11): 2476-2486. |
[15] | 杨延兵,秦岭,王润丰,陈二影,尹秀波,刘玉芹,张素梅,丛新军,李国瑜,王乐政,管延安. 山东省不同生态条件气候因素对谷子产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(7): 1348-1358. |
|