大豆开花盛期快速叶绿素荧光参数的QTL分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.002

中国农业科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (24): 4980-4987.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.002

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇下一篇

大豆开花盛期快速叶绿素荧光参数的QTL分析

印志同, 孟凡凡, 宋海娜, 晁毛妮, 许晓明, 邓德祥, 喻德跃

1.南京农业大学国家大豆改良中心/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，南京 210095
2.扬州大学农学院/作物遗传生理江苏省重点实验室/植物功能基因组学教育部重点实验室，江苏扬州 225009
3.南京农业大学生命科学学院，南京210095

收稿日期:2011-06-22 出版日期:2011-12-15 发布日期:2011-10-17
通讯作者: 通信作者喻德跃，Te1/ Fax：025-84396410；E-mail：dyyu@njau.edu.cn
作者简介:印志同，Tel：0514-87972178；E-mail：ztyin@yzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家“973”项目（2010CB125906，2009CB118400）、江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

QTL Mapping for Fast Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Soybean

YIN Zhi-Tong, MENG Fan-Fan, SONG Hai-Na, CHAO Mao-Ni, XU Xiao-Ming, DENG De-Xiang, YU De-Yue

1.南京农业大学国家大豆改良中心/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，南京 210095
2.扬州大学农学院/作物遗传生理江苏省重点实验室/植物功能基因组学教育部重点实验室，江苏扬州 225009
3.南京农业大学生命科学学院，南京210095

Received:2011-06-22 Online:2011-12-15 Published:2011-10-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】定位大豆R2时期（开花盛期）快速叶绿素荧光参数（JIP参数）QTL，分析不同参数间的遗传关系，比较参数在R2和R6时期（鼓粒盛期）遗传基础的异同。【方法】以大豆品种科丰1号和南农1138-2及其杂交衍生的184份重组自交系为材料，在盆栽条件下测定R2时期JIP参数，检测其QTL。【结果】检测到16个JIP参数QTL，分布在连锁群A1、C2、D2、I、M、N和O上，单个QTL的LOD值为2.40—5.65，贡献率为4.40%—20.06%；检测到3个同时控制多个参数的染色体区间，分别是连锁群C2上标记区间Satt286—Satt316、连锁群I上标记区间Sat_418—Satt650和连锁群O上标记区间Sat_231—Sat_196。【结论】不同JIP参数间既有共同的控制基因（QTL），也有各自独特的控制基因；JIP参数多数QTL不能在R2和R6时期重复检测到，控制其表达的遗传机制较为复杂；连锁群O上标记区间Sat_231—Sat_196在大豆R2和R6时期均检测到，该区间可能存在稳定表达的控制光合器官内禀结构和功能的基因，具有一定的育种价值。

关键词: 大豆, 快速叶绿素荧光参数(JIP参数), 重组自交系, QTL定位

Abstract: 【Objective】 The present study is aimed to identify QTL associated with fast chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (JIP parameters), examine the genetic relationships among different parameters, and compare the genetic base underlying the parameters between the two growth stages of R2 and R6 in soybean. 【Method】 A pot experiment was carried out to evaluate five JIP parameters at R2 growth stage using 184 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from a cross between two varieties of Kefeng 1 and Nannong 1138-2, and then the QTL of above parameters were detected and mapped. 【Result】 A total of 16 QTL, located on linkage groups (LGs) A1, C2, D2, I, M, N and O, respectively, were identified, and explained phenotypic variation ranging from 4.40% to 20.06% with the LOD score from 2.40 to 5.65. Three major genomic regions were detected to be associated with several parameters simultaneously, which were between markers Satt286 and Satt316 on LG C2, marker Sat_418 and Satt650 on LG I, and marker Sat_231 and sat_196 on LG O, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Different JIP parameters might be controlled by the same or different genes. Most of the QTL associated with JIP parameters were not detected consistently at R2 and R6 growth stage, indicating that the genetic mechanism underlying the JIP parameters is relatively complicated. The marker interval between Sat_231 and Sat_196 on LG O was detected at both R2 and R6 growth stage, and this genomic region may contain stably expressing genes underlying the intrinsic features of the photosynthetic apparatus and be useful in the breeding practice of soybean.

Key words: soybean, fast chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (JIP parameters), recombinant inbred line (RIL), QTL mapping

印志同, 孟凡凡, 宋海娜, 晁毛妮, 许晓明, 邓德祥, 喻德跃. 大豆开花盛期快速叶绿素荧光参数的QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(24): 4980-4987.

YIN Zhi-Tong, MENG Fan-Fan, SONG Hai-Na, CHAO Mao-Ni, XU Xiao-Ming, DENG De-Xiang, YU De-Yue. QTL Mapping for Fast Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Soybean[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(24): 4980-4987.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.002

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2011/V44/I24/4980

参考文献

[1]Krause G, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 1991, 42: 313-349.

[2]Stirbet A, Govindjee Z. On the relation between the Kautsky effect (chlorophyll a fluorescence induction) and photosystem II: Basics and applications of the OJIP fluorescence transient. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, 2011, 236-257.

[3]李鹏民, 高辉远, Strasser R J. 快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学分析在光合作用研究中的应用. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 2005, 31(6): 559-566.

Li P M, Gao H Y, Strasser R J. Application of the fast chlorophyll fluorescence induction dynamics analysis in photosynthesis study. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 2005, 31(6): 559-566. (in Chinese)

[4]Bilger W, Schreiber U. Energy-dependent quenching of dark-level chlorophyll fluorescence in intact leaves. Photosynthesis Research, 1986, 10: 303-308.

[5]Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1989, 900: 87-92.

[6]Strasser R J, Srivastava A, Tsimilli-Michael M. Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient//Papageorgiou G C, Govindjee. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis (Advances in photosynthesis and respiration). The Netherlands: Springer, 2004: 321-362.

[7]梁慧珍, 王树峰, 余永亮, 练云, 王庭峰, 位艳丽, 巩鹏涛, 刘学义, 方宣钧. 大豆异黄酮与脂肪、蛋白质含量基因定位分析. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(8): 2652-2660.

Liang H Z, Wang S F, Yu Y L, Lian Y, Wang T F, Wei Y L, Gong P T, Liu X Y, Fang X J. QTL mapping of isoflavone, oil and protein content in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(8): 2652-2660. (in Chinese)

[8]丁安明, 崔法, 李君, 赵春华, 王秀芹, 王洪刚. 小麦单株产量与株高的QTL分析. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(14): 2857-2867.

Ding A M, Cui F, Li J, Zhao C H, Wang X Q,Wang H G. QTL analysis on grain yield per plant and plant height in wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(14): 2857-2867. (in Chinese)

[9]Yin Z T, Meng F F, Song H N, Wang X L, Xu X M, Yu D Y. Expression quantitative trait loci analysis of two genes encoding rubisco activase in soybean. Plant Physiology, 2010,152: 1625-1637.

[10]Jompuk C, Fracheboud Y, Stamp P, Leipner J. Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with chilling tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings grown under field conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2005, 56: 1153-1163.

[11]Guo P, Baum M, Varshney R K, Graner A, Grando S, Ceccarelli S. QTLs for chlorophyll and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in barley under post-flowering drought. Euphytica, 2008, 163:203-214.

[12]Yin Z T, Meng F F, Song H N, He X H, Xu X M, Yu D Y. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in soybean (glycine max (L.) merr.). Planta, 2010, 231: 875-885.

[13]Yin Z T, Meng F F, Song H N, Wang X L, Chao M N, Zhang G Z, Xu X M, Deng D X, Yu D Y. The expression of the GmFtsH9 gene correlates with in vivo photosystem II function, probed by chlorophyll a transient and eQTL mapping in a soybean population of recombinant inbred lines. Planta, 2011,234: 815-827.

[14]Fu S X, Zhan Y, Zhi H J, Gai J Y, Yu D Y. Mapping of SMV resistance gene Rsc-7 by SSR markers in soybean. Genetica, 2006, 128: 63-69.

[15]Cregan P B, Jarvik T, Bush A L, Shoemaker R C, Lark K G, Kahler A L, Kaya N, VanToai T T, Lohnes D G, Chung J, Specht J E. An integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean genome. Crop Science, 1999, 39: 1464-1490.

[16]Wang S C, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. Windows QTL Cartographer v2.5. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, 2011.

[17]Churchill G A, Doerge R W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative triat mapping. Genetics, 1994, 138: 963-971.

[18]Lee S Y, Ahn J H, Cha Y S, Yun D W, Lee M C, Ko J C, Lee K S, Eun M Y. Mapping QTLs related to salinity tolerance of rice at the young seedling stage. Plant Breeding, 2007, 126: 43-46.

[19]Landjeva S, Neumann K, Lohwasser U, Börner A. Molecular mapping of genomic regions associated with wheat seedling growth under osmotic stress. Biologia Plantarum, 2008, 52: 259-266.

[20]印志同, 宋海娜, 孟凡凡, 许晓明, 喻德跃. 大豆光合气体交换参数的QTL分析. 作物学报, 2010, 36(1): 92-100.

Yin Z T, Song H N, Meng F F, Xu X M, Yu D Y. QTL mapping for photosynthetic gas-exchange parameters in soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(1): 92-100. (in Chinese)

[21]Fracheboud Y, Jompuk C, Ribaut J M, Stamp P, Leipner J. Genetic analysis of cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize. Plant Molecular Biology, 2004, 56: 241-253.

[22]Fracheboud Y, Ribaut J M, Vargas M, Messmer R, Stamp P. Identification of quantitative trait loci for cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002, 53: 1967-1977.

[23]Cui S Y, He X H, Fu S X, Meng Q C, Gai J Y, Yu D Y. Genetic dissection of the relationship of apparent biological yield and apparent harvest index with seed yield and yield related traits in soybean. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008, 59: 86-93.

[24]Padraic J F, Jeremy H, Mark G M A. Natural genetic variation in plant photosynthesis. Trends in Plant Science, 2011, 16: 327-335.

[25]Sinclair T R, Purcell L C, Sneller C H. Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends in Plant Science, 2004, 9: 70-75.

[26]Lazar D. Modeling of light-induced chlorophyll a fluorescence rise (O-J-I-P transient) and changes in 820 nm-transmittance signal. Photosynthetica, 2009, 47: 483-498.

大豆开花盛期快速叶绿素荧光参数的QTL分析

QTL Mapping for Fast Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Soybean

PDF

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈吉浩, 周界光, 曲翔汝, 王素容, 唐华苹, 蒋云, 唐力为, $\boxed{\hbox{兰秀锦}}$, 魏育明, 周景忠, 马建. 四倍体小麦胚大小性状QTL定位与分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 203-216.
[2]	董永鑫,卫其巍,洪浩,黄莹,赵延晓,冯明峰,窦道龙,徐毅,陶小荣. 在中国大豆品种上创建ALSV诱导的基因沉默体系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722.
[3]	李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[4]	郭世博,张方亮,张镇涛,周丽涛,赵锦,杨晓光. 全球气候变暖对中国种植制度的可能影响XIV.东北大豆高产稳产区及农业气象灾害分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[5]	马小艳,杨瑜,黄冬琳,王朝辉,高亚军,李永刚,吕辉. 小麦化肥减施与不同轮作方式的周年养分平衡及经济效益分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[6]	阿依木古丽·阿不都热依木,阿尔祖古丽·阿依丁,王家敏,石嘉琛,马芳芳,蔡勇,乔自林. 大豆异黄酮对牦牛卵巢颗粒细胞增殖和凋亡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1667-1675.
[7]	赵凌, 张勇, 魏晓东, 梁文化, 赵春芳, 周丽慧, 姚姝, 王才林, 张亚东. 利用高密度Bin图谱定位水稻抽穗期剑叶叶绿素含量QTL[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 825-836.
[8]	王绿阳,崔雷鸿,冯江银,洪秋霞,游美敬,保浩宇,杭苏琴. 钙敏感受体和胆囊收缩素-1受体介导大豆蛋白水解物对小鼠食欲的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 807-815.
[9]	姜芬芬, 孙磊, 刘方东, 王吴彬, 邢光南, 张焦平, 张逢凯, 李宁, 李艳, 贺建波, 盖钧镒. 世界大豆生育阶段光温综合反应的地理分化和演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(3): 451-466.
[10]	刘进,胡佳晓,马小定,陈武,勒思,Jo Sumin,崔迪,周慧颖,张立娜,Shin Dongjin,黎毛毛,韩龙植,余丽琴. 水稻RIL群体高密度遗传图谱的构建及苗期耐热性QTL定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4327-4341.
[11]	闫强,薛冬,胡亚群,周琰琰,韦雅雯,袁星星,陈新. 大豆根特异性GmPR1-9启动子的鉴定及其在根腐病抗性中的应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(20): 3885-3896.
[12]	邹林翰,周新颖,张泽源,蔚睿,袁梦,宋晓朋,简俊涛,张传量,韩德俊,宋全昊. 小麦周8425B×小偃81重组自交系群体千粒重相关性状的QTL定位及单倍型分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3473-3483.
[13]	王巧娟,何虹,李亮,张超,蔡焕杰. 基于AquaCrop模型的大豆灌溉制度优化研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3365-3379.
[14]	常立国,何坤辉,刘建超. 多环境下玉米保绿相关性状遗传位点的挖掘[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3071-3081.
[15]	原程,张玉先,王孟雪,黄炳林,辛明强,尹小刚,胡国华,张明聪. 中耕时间和深度对大豆光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2911-2926.