中国农业科学 ›› 2008, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 1937-1946 .doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.07.008

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦氮素积累动态的高光谱监测

冯 伟,朱 艳,姚 霞,田永超,庄 森,曹卫星   

  1. 南京农业大学/江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室/农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-09 修回日期:2007-11-05 出版日期:2008-07-10 发布日期:2008-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 曹卫星

Monitoring Plant Nitrogen Accumulation Dynamics with Hyperspectral Remote Sensing in Wheat

Feng Wei Zhu yan Tian Yong-chao Yao xia Sen Zhuang   

  1. 南京农业大学/江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室/农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室
  • Received:2007-07-09 Revised:2007-11-05 Online:2008-07-10 Published:2008-07-10

摘要: 【目的】研究小麦地上部氮积累量与冠层高光谱参数的定量关系,分析多种高光谱参数估算地上部氮积累量的效果。【方法】连续3年采用不同蛋白质含量的小麦品种在不同施氮水平下进行大田试验,于小麦不同生育期采集田间冠层高光谱数据并测定植株不同器官生物量和氮含量。【结果】植株氮积累量随着施氮水平的提高而增加,不同地力水平间存在明显差异。植株氮积累量的光谱敏感波段主要存在于近红外平台和可见光区,而地上部氮积累量与冠层光谱的相关性明显降低。对植株氮积累量的光谱估算,在不同品种、氮素水平、生育时期和年度间可以使用统一的光谱模型。在籽粒灌浆期间植株氮积累量自开花期随时间进程的积分累积值与对应时期籽粒氮素积累状况存在显著的定量关系,根据特征光谱参数植株氮素营养籽粒氮积累量这一技术路径,以植株氮积累量为交接点将模型链接,建立高光谱参数与籽粒氮积累量间定量方程。将植株氮积累量与籽粒氮积累量相加,确立了基于高光谱参数的籽粒灌浆期间地上部氮积累量监测模型。经不同年际独立资料的检验表明,利用光谱参数SDr/SDb、VOG2、VOG3、RVI(810,560)、[(R750-800)/(R695-740)]-1和Dr/Db建立模型可以实时监测小麦地上部氮素积累动态变化,预测精度R2分别为0.774、0.791、0.803、0.803、0.802和0.778,相对误差RE分别为16.7%、15.5%、15.6%、18.5%、15.5%和17.3%。【结论】利用关键特征光谱参数可以有效地评价小麦地上部氮素积累状况,其中尤以植被指数VOG2、VOG3和[(R750-800)/(R695-740)]-1的效果更好。

关键词: 小麦, 高光谱遥感, 氮素积累, 监测模型

Abstract: 【Objective】Crop nitrogen status is a key indicator for evaluating crop growth, enhancing grain yield and quality. Non-destructive and rapid assessment of leaf nitrogen is required for improving nitrogen management in wheat production. 【Method】This study aimed at identification of the quantitative relationship between plant nitrogen accumulation and canopy reflectance spectra in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using three field experiments with different wheat varieties and nitrogen levels. The time-course measurements were taken on canopy hyperspectral reflectance and weights and nitrogen contents in different plant parts during the experiment periods. 【Result】The results showed that the nitrogen accumulation in wheat plant increased with increasing nitrogen fertilization rates, with significant differences among growing seasons. The bands sensitive to plant nitrogen accumulation occurred during visible light and near-infrared region mostly, and correlation decreased between canopy reflectance and above-ground nitrogen accumulation. The regression analyses between vegetation indices and plant N accumulation indicated that several key spectral parameters could accurately estimate the changes in plant N status across different growth stages, nitrogen levels and growing seasons, with same spectral parameters for each wheat cultivar. The cumulative value of plant N accumulation from anthesis to specific day were highly correlated with grain N accumulation at corresponding day, with the determination of coefficient (R2) as 0.883 and standard error (SE) from linear equation, respectively. Based on the technical route of key spectral parametersplant N nutrition indexgrain N accumulation, estimating models on grain N accumulation were constructed on the basis of canopy hyper-spectral parameters by linking the above two models with plant N nutrition as intersection in wheat. Total monitoring models on above-ground N accumulation during filling period were established using canopy hyper-spectral parameters by adding grain N accumulation to plant N accumulation. Tests with other independent dataset showed that several key spectral indices such as SDr/SDb, VOG2, VOG3, RVI(810,560), [(R750-800)/(R695-740)]-1 and Dr/Db could be used to predict above-ground nitrogen accumulation. 【Conclusion】It can be concluded that above-ground N accumulation in wheat could be monitored directly by key vegetation indices, with more reliable estimation from VOG2, VOG3 and [(R750-800)/(R695-740)]-1.

Key words: Wheat, Hyperspectral remote sensing, Nitrogen accumulation, Monitoring model