|
Special Issue:
动物营养合辑Animal Nutrition
|
|
|
|
| Effects of yeast and yeast cell wall polysaccharides supplementation on beef cattle growth performance, rumen microbial populations and lipopolysaccharides production |
PENG Quan-hui1*, CHENG Long2*, KANG Kun3, Tian Gang1, Mohammad AL-MAMUN4, XUE Bai1, WANG Li-zhi1, ZOU Hua-wei1, Mathew Gitau GICHEHA5, WANG Zhi-sheng1 |
1 Key Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safe Production, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China
2 Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3647, Australia
3 Angel Yeast Co., Ltd., Yichang 443000, P.R.China
4 Department of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
5 Department of Animal Sciences, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi P.O.Box 62000-00200, Kenya |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of live yeast and yeast cell wall polysaccharides on growth performance, rumen function and plasma lipopolysaccharides (LPS) content and immunity parameters of beef cattle. Forty Qinchuan cattle were randomly assigned to one of four treatments with 10 replicates in each treatment. The dietary treatments were: control diet (CTR), CTR supplemented with 1 g live yeast (2×1010 live cell g–1 per cattle per day (YST1), CTR supplemented with 2 g live yeast per cattle per day (YST2) and CTR supplemented with 20 g of yeast cell wall polysaccharides (30.0%≤β-glucan≤35.0%, and 28.0%≤mannanoligosaccharide≤32.0%) per cattle per day (YCW). The average daily gain was higher (P=0.023) and feed conversion ratio was lower (P=0.042) for the YST2 than the CTR. The digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (P=0.039) and acid detergent fiber (P=0.016) were higher in yeast supplemented groups. The acetic acid:propionic acid of the YST2 was lower compared with the CTR (P=0.033). Plasma LPS (P=0.032), acute phase protein haptoglobin (P=0.033), plasma amyloid A (P=0.015) and histamine (P=0.038) were lower in the YST2 compared with the CTR. The copies of fibrolytic microbial populations such as Fibrobacter succinogenes S85, Ruminococcus albus 7 and Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 of the YST2 were higher (P<0.001), while the copies of typical lactate producing bacteria Streptococcus bovis JB1 was lower (P<0.001) compared with the CTR. Little differences were observed between the CTR, YST1 and YCW in growth performance, ruminal fermentation characteristics, microbial populations, immunity indices and total tract nutrient digestibility. It is concluded that the YST2 could promote fibrolytic microbial populations, decrease starch-utilizing bacteria, reduce LPS production in the rumen and LPS absorption into plasma and decrease inflammatory parameters, which can lead to an improvement in growth performance in beef cattle.
|
|
Received: 28 November 2018
Accepted:
|
| Fund: Author Prof. Peng Quanhui thanks for the financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0502005). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence WANG Zhi-sheng, E-mail: wangzs67@163.com
|
| About author: PENG Quan-hui, E-mail: pengquanhui@126.com;
* These authors contributed equally to this study. |
Cite this article:
PENG Quan-hui, CHENG Long, KANG Kun, Tian Gang, Mohammad AL-MAMUN, XUE Bai, WANG Li-zhi, ZOU Hua-wei, Mathew Gitau GICHEHA, WANG Zhi-sheng.
2020.
Effects of yeast and yeast cell wall polysaccharides supplementation on beef cattle growth performance, rumen microbial populations and lipopolysaccharides production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(3): 810-819.
|
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1990. Officials Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.
Bach A, Iglesias C, Devant M. 2007. Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 136, 146–153.
Beauchemin K A, Krehbiel C R, Newbold C J. 2006. Enzymes, bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast: Principles for use in ruminant nutrition. Biology of Growing Animals, 4, 251–284.
Blaxter K L. 1989. Energy Metabolism in Animals and Man. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Broderick G A, Kang J H. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Scicence, 63, 64–75.
Chaucheyras-Durand F, Durand H. 2010. Probiotics in animal nutrition and health. Beneficial Microbes, 1, 3–9.
Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fonty G, Bertin G, Salmon J M, Gouet P. 1996. Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Levucell®? SC1) a microbial additive for ruminants, on lactate metabolisms in vitro. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 42, 927–933.
Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvax-Ponter C, Sauvant D. 2009. Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 1620–1632.
Emmanuel D G V, Madsen, K L, Churchill T A, Dunn S M, Ametaj B N. 2007. Acidosis and lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli B:055 cause hyperpermeability of rumen and colon tissues. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 5552–5557.
Ferraretto L F, Shaver R D, Bertics S J. 2011. Effect of dietary supplementation with live-cell yeast at two dosages on lactation performance, ruminal fermentation, and total-tract nutrient digestibility in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 4017–4028.
Firmin S, Morgavi D P, Yiannikouris A, Boudra H. 2011. Effectiveness of modified yeast cell wall extracts to reduce aflatoxin B1 absorption in dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 5611–5619.
Griswold K E, White B A, Mackie R I. 1999. Proteolytic activities of the starch-fermenting ruminal bacterium, Streptococcus bovis. Current Microbiology, 39, 180–186.
Hassanein S M, Soliman K N. 2010. Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) adding to diets on intestinal microflora and performance of Hy-Line layers hens. Journal of Animal Science, 6, 159–169.
Heather K A, Uri Y L, Torey L, Meggan B, Thomas A C. 2013. Treatment, promotion, commotion: Antibiotic alternatives in food-producing animals. Trends in Microbiology, 21, 114–119.
Hunter R A, Siebert B D. 1985. Utilization of low-quality roughage by Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. 1. Rumen digestion. British Journal of Nutrition, 53, 637–648.
Jouany J P. 2006. Optimizing rumen functions in the close-up transition period and early lactation to drive dry matter intake and energy balance in cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 96, 250–264.
Kawas J R, García-Castillo R, Fimbres-Durazo H, Garza-Cazare F, Hernádez-Vidal J F G, Olivares-Sáenz E, Lu C D. 2007. Effects of sodium bicarbonate and yeast on nutrient intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation of light-weight lambs fed finishing diets. Small Ruminant Research, 67, 149–156.
Van Keulen J, Young B A. 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science, 44, 282–287.
Khadem A A, Pahlavan A, Afzalzadeh A, Rezaeian M. 2007. Effects of live yeast Saccharomy cescerevisiae on fermentation parameters and microbial populations of rumen, total tract digestibility of diet nutrients and on the in situ degradability of alfalfa hay in Iranian Chall sheep. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 10, 590–597.
Khafipour E, Krause D O, Plaizier J C. 2009. Alfalfa pellet-induced subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows increases bacterial endotoxin in the rumen without causing inflammation. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 1712–1724.
Korosteleva S N, Smith T K, Boermans H J. 2007. Effects of feed borne Fusarium mycotoxins on the performance, metabolism and immunity of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 3867–3873.
Lei C, Dong G Z, Jin L, Zhang S, Zhou J. 2013. Effects of dietary supplementation of montmorillonite and yeast cell wall on lipopolysaccharide adsorption, nutrient digestibility and growth performance in beef cattle. Livestock Science, 158, 57–63.
Liu Y, Huang G L, Lv M J. 2018. Extraction, characterization and antioxidant activities of mannan from yeast cell wall. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 118, 952–956.
Lodgeivey S L, Brownesilva J, Horvath M B. 2009. Technical note: Bacterial diversity and fermentation end products in rumen fluid samples collected via oral lavage or rumen cannula. Journal of Animal Science, 87, 2333–2337.
Marden J P, Julien C, Monteils V, Auclair E, Moncoulon R, Bayourthe C. 2008. How does live yeast differ from sodium bicarbonate to stabilize ruminal pH in high-yielding dairy cows? Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 3528–3535.
Martin L M, Wood K M, Mcewen P L, Smith T K, Mandel I B, Yannikouris A, Swanson K C. 2010. Effects of feeding corn naturally contaminated with fusarium mycotoxins and/or a modified yeast cell wall extract on the performance, immunity and carcass characteristics of grain-fed veal calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 159, 27–34.
Pal K, Paul S K, Biswas P, Patra A K, Bhunia T, Pakhira M C. 2010. Responses of addition of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) from rice distillers grains with solubles with or without trace minerals on the performance of Black Bengal kids. Small Ruminant Research, 94, 45–52.
Pomorskamól M, Markowska-Daniel I, Kwit K, Stepniewska K, Pejsak Z. 2013. C-reactive protein, haptoglobin, serum amyloid A and pig major acute phase protein response in pigs simultaneously infected with H1N1 swine influenza virus and Pasteurella multocida. BMC Veterinary Research, 9, 14–22.
Saxton A M. 1998. A Macro for Converting Mean Separation Output to Letter Groupings in PROC MIXED. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute , Cary, NC, USA. pp. 1243–1246.
Silberberg M, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Commnu L, Mialon M M, Monteils V, Mosoni P, Morgavi D P, Martin C. 2013. Repeated acidosis challenges and live yeast supplementation shape rumen microbiota and fermentations and modulate inflammatory status in sheep. Animal, 7, 1910–1920.
Van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597.
Sousa D O, Oliveira C A, Velasquez A V, Souza J M, Chevaux E, Mari L J, Silva L F P. 2018. Live yeast supplementation improves rumen fibre degradation in cattle grazing tropical pastures throughout the year. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 236, 149–158.
Stevenson D, Weimer P. 2007. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 75, 165–174.
Stiehler T, Heuwieser W, Pfützner A, Burfeind O. 2016. Serum haptoglobin and C-reactive protein concentration in relation to rectal and vaginal temperature of early postpartum sows. Theriogenology, 86, 862–867.
Vyas D, Uwizeye A, Mohammed R, Yang W Z, Walker N D, Beauchemin K A. 2014. The effects of active dried and killed dried yeast on subacute ruminal acidosis, ruminal fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 724–732.
Weimer P J, Waghorn G C, Odt C L, Mertens D R. 1999. Effect of diet on populations of three species of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 122–134.
Young T R, Ribeiro F R B, Sanchez N C B, Carroll J A, Jennings M A, Cribbs J T, Rathmann R J, Corley J R, Johnson B J. 2016. Yeast cell wall supplementation alters the performance and health of beef heifers during the receiving period. Professional Animal Scientist, 33, 166–175. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
