|
|
|
|
|
Leveraging core capabilities and environmental dynamism for food traceability and firm performance in a food supply chain: A moderated mediation model |
SONG Mo-xi1, YANG Morgan Xin2 |
1 Department of Management, College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
2 Department of Marketing, School of Business, The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R.China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper develops a moderated mediation model in which the interactive effects of food traceability and environmental dynamism on firm performance are mediated by the core capabilities (operating capabilities and marketing capabilities) in food supply chain context, by invoking the indirect view of organizational learning theory. Our hypotheses were tested using hierarchical regression and bootstrapping methods with a sample of 216 food manufacturing firms in China, and a survey-based, two-informant design was used to collect data. The results revealed that operating and marketing capabilities fully mediate the food traceability-performance link. In addition, environmental dynamism positively moderates the food traceability-core capabilities link. Moreover, it is found that operating and marketing capabilities transform the interactive impacts of environmental dynamism and food traceability into firm performance. Our study offers a fine-grained picture of the essential food traceability-performance link by revealing for the first time that there is an interactive impacts of food traceability and environmental dynamism on firm performance via core capabilities.
|
|
Received: 12 June 2018
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This study was supported by the research grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71803183)and the Financial Funds of Ministry of Agriculture (051821301112421010). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence SONG Mo-xi, E-mail: songmoxi87@aliyun.com
|
| About author:
|
Cite this article:
SONG Mo-xi, YANG Morgan Xin.
2019.
Leveraging core capabilities and environmental dynamism for food traceability and firm performance in a food supply chain: A moderated mediation model . Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18(8): 1820-1837.
|
Alfaro J A, Rábade L A. 2009. Traceability as a strategic tool to improve inventory management: A case study in the food industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 118, 104–110.
Anderson J C, Gerbing D W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
Anica-Popa I. 2012. Food traceability systems and information sharing in food supply chain. Management & Marketing, 7, 749–758
Argyris C, Schön D A. 1996. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, Boston.
Baron R M, Kenny D A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Calisir F, Gumussoy C A, Guzelsoy E. 2013. Impacts of learning orientation on product innovation performance. Learning Organization, 20, 52–54.
Canavari M, Centonze R, Hingley M, Spadoni R. 2010. Traceability as part of competitive strategy in the fruit supply chain. British Food Journal, 112, 171–186.
Chang W, Ellinger A E, Kim K, Franke G R. 2016. Supply chain integration and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis of positional advantage mediation and moderating factors. European Management Journal, 34, 282–295.
Chavez R, Yu W, Gimenez C, Fynes B, Wiengarten F. 2015. Customer integration and operational performance: The mediating role of information quality. Decision Support Systems, 80, 83–95.
Cheung G W, Rensvold R B. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-?t indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Chryssochoidis G, Karagiannaki A, Pramatari K, Kehagia O. 2009. A cost-benefit evaluation framework of an electronic-based traceability system. British Food Journal, 111, 565–582.
Dabbene F, Gay P. 2011. Food traceability systems: Performance evaluation and optimization. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 75, 139–146.
Day G S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58, 37–52.
Dutta S, Narasimhan O, Rajiv S. 1999. Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science, 18, 547–568.
Epelbaum F M B, Martinez M G. 2014. The technological evolution of food traceability systems and their impact on firm sustainable performance: A RBV approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 215–224.
Ferdows K, De Meyer A. 1990. Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory. Journal of Operations Management, 9, 168–184.
Finger A B, Flynn B B, Paiva E L. 2014. Anticipation of new technologies: Supply chain antecedents and competitive performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34, 807–828.
Flynn B B, Huo B, Zhao X. 2010. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 58–71.
Flynn B B, Koufteros X, Lu G. 2016. On theory in supply chain uncertainty and its implications for supply chain integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52, 3–27.
Fornell C, Larcker D F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
Frazier G L, Maltz E, Antia K D, Rindfleisch A. 2009. Distributor sharing of strategic information with suppliers. Journal of Marketing, 73, 31–43.
Fynes B, de Búrca S, Marshall D. 2004. Environmental uncertainty, supply chain relationship quality and performance. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 10, 179–190.
Größler A, Grübner A. 2006. An empirical model of the relationships between manufacturing capabilities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26, 458–485.
Handfield R, Petersen K, Cousins P, Lawson B. 2009. An organizational entrepreneurship model of supply management integration and performance outcomes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29, 100–126.
Hayes A F. 2012. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.[2018-2-1]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
Helfat C E, Winter S G. 2011. Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N) ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1243–1250.
Hosseini S M, Azizi S, Sheikhi N. 2012. An investigation on the effect of supply chain integration on competitive capability: An empirical analysis of Iranian food industry. International Journal of Business & Management, 7, 73–90.
Huber G P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88–115.
Hult G T M, Ketchen D J, Arrfelt M. 2007. Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1035–1052.
ISO 22005:2007. 2007. Traceability in Feed and Food Chain - General Principles and Basic Requirements for System Design and Implementation. International Standards Organization.
Jain A K, Moreno A. 2015. Organizational learning, knowledge management practices and firm’s performance. Learning Organization, 22, 14–39.
Jaworski B J, Kohli A K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 54, 53–70.
Jraisat L, Gotsi M, Bourlakis M. 2013. Drivers of information sharing and export performance in the Jordanian agri-food export supply chain. International Marketing Review, 30, 323–356.
Koufteros X A, Vonderembse M, Jayaram J. 2005. Internal and external integration for product development: The contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Sciences, 36, 97–133.
Kumar V, Chibuzo E N, Garza-Reyes J A, Kumari A, Rocha-Lona L, Lopez-Torres G C. 2017. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: Evidence from the UK food sector. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 814–821.
Levitt B, March J G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
March J G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
Miller D. 1987. The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 55–78.
Moe T. 1998. Perspectives on traceability in food manufacture. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 9, 211–214.
Muller D, Judd C, Yzerbyt V. 2005. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.
Noble M A. 1995. Manufacturing strategy: Testing the cumulative model in a multiple country context. Decision Sciences, 26, 693–721.
Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Lee J Y, Podsakoff N P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Pouliot S, Sumner D A. 2008. Traceability, liability, and incentives for food safety and quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90, 15–27.
Ralston P M, Blackhurst J, Cantor D E, Crum M R. 2015. A structure-conduct-performance perspective of how strategic supply chain integration affects firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51, 47–64.
Schoenherr T, Swink M. 2012. Revisiting the arcs of integration: Cross-validations and extensions. Journal of Operations Management, 30, 99–115.
Selnes F, Sallis J. 2003. Promoting relationship learning. Journal of Marketing, 67, 80–95.
Sinkula J M. 1994. Market information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing, 58, 35–45.
Slater S F, Narver J C. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59, 63–74.
Song X M, Parry M E. 1997. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 61, 1–18.
Srinivasana M, Mukherjeea D. 2011. Buyer–supplier partnership quality and supply chain performance: Moderating role of risks, and environmental uncertainty. European Management Journal, 29, 260–271.
Starbird S A, Amanor-Boadu V. 2006. Do inspection and traceability provide incentives for food safety? Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 31, 14–26.
Stonebraker P W, Liao J. 2006. Supply chain integration: Exploring product and environmental contingencies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11, 34–43.
Swink M, Narasimhan R, Wang C. 2007. Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 148–164.
Tamayo-Torres J, Roehrich J K, Lewis M A. 2017. Organizational ambidexterity, manufacturing performance and environmental dynamism. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37, 282–299.
Vorhies D W, Morgan N A. 2005. Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69, 80–94.
Wiengarten F, Pagell M, Ahmed M U, Gimenez C. 2014. Do a country’s logistical capabilities moderate the external integration performance relationship? Journal of Operations Management, 32, 51–63.
Wilson W W, Henry X, Dahl B L. 2010. Costs and risks of conforming to EU traceability requirements: The case of hard red spring wheat. Agribusiness, 24, 85–101.
Wong C Y, Boon-Itt S, Wong C W Y. 2011. The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 604–615.
Zheng Y M, Zhao K, Stylianou A. 2013. The impacts of information quality and system quality on users’ continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 56, 513–524.
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
