Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2019, Vol. 18 Issue (8): 1680-1689    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62101-X
Special Focus: Science and Technology Backyard Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Causes of maize density loss in farmers’ fields in Northeast China
ZHAO Ying-jie1, 2, XING Sen1, 2, ZHANG Qing-song1, 2, ZHANG Fu-suo1, 2, MA Wen-qi
 
1 Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100193, P.R.China
2 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.China
3 College of Resources and Environmental Science, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Increasing plant density is an effective and important way to reduce maize yield gaps in Northeast China.  However, the fact is that a significant plant density gap exists between optimum plant density and actual plant density in farmers’ fields.  To quantify the density gap between planned planting density and final harvest plant density (HPD), we studied 60 farmers’ fields on three types of soil for three crop seasons from 2015 to 2017 by measuring their plant-plant distance, actual seedlings density (ASD), final HPD and yield.  We also explored the potential causes of density loss by digging the places where the seedlings were missing for two consecutive years in 2016–2017.  Results show that the three-year average HPD in farmers’ fields was 59 699 plants ha–1, which was significantly lower than the planned density, including both the machine setting density (MSD; 67 962 plants ha–1) and theoretical plant density (TPD; 67 467 plants ha–1).  No significant difference was found in HPD between years and soil types.  However, for MSD and TPD, the average value in 2015 was significantly higher than that in 2016 and 2017.  No significant difference between soil types was observed.  Furthermore, the results from 2016 till 2017 indicated that a lack of seeds in the soil, a failure to germinate due to low-quality seeds, and a lack of seedlings breaking out of the soil due to environmental problems explained approximately 60.88, 10.33 and 28.80% of density loss, respectively.  According to our survey, 63% of farmers did not know their own TPD and HPD, and 54% of farmers did not know the density loss.  Therefore, we argue that farmers’ limited knowledge of density and density loss is an urgent problem that needs to be solved in maize production.  These observations will be useful for determining best management practices for maize production and for providing helpful suggestions for machine improvement. 
Keywords:  plant density        maize production        density loss        density gap        farmers&rsquo      fields  
Received: 12 June 2018   Accepted:
Fund: This study was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB150405).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence MA Wen-qi, Tel: +86-312-7528220, E-mail: mawq@hebau.edu.cn    
About author:  ZHAO Ying-jie, Mobile: +86-15652780085, E-mail: zhaoyingjie0228@163.com;

Cite this article: 

ZHAO Ying-jie, XING Sen, ZHANG Qing-song, ZHANG Fu-suo, MA Wen-qi. 2019. Causes of maize density loss in farmers’ fields in Northeast China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18(8): 1680-1689.

Andonova P S, Rattin J, Di Benedetto A. 2014. Yield increase as influenced by transplanting of sweet maize (Zea mays L. Saccharata). American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 4, 1314.
Bavec F, Bavec M. 2002. Effects of plant population on leaf area index, cob characteristics and grain yield of early maturing maize cultivars (FAO 100–400). European Journal of Agronomy, 16, 151–159.
Berzsenyi Z, Tokatlidis I S. 2012. Density dependence rather than maturity determines hybrid selection in dryland maize production. Agronomy Journal, 104, 331–336.
Casal J J, Deregibus V A, Sanchez R A. 1985. Variations in tiller dynamics and morphology in Lolium multi?orum Lam. vegetative and reproductive plants as affected by differences in red/far-red irradiation. Annals of Botany, 56, 553–559.
Chen G P, Gao J L, Zhao M, Dong S T, Li S K, Yang Q F, Liu Y H, Wang L C, Xue J Q, Liu J G, Li C H, Wang Y H, Wang Y D, Song H X, Zhao J R. 2012. Distribution, yield structure, and key cultural techniques of maize super-high yield plots in recent years. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 38, 80–85. (in Chinesse)
Chen X P, Cui Z L, Vitousek P M, Cassman K G, Matson P A, Bai J S, Meng Q F, Hou P, Yue S C, Romheld V, Zhang F S. 2011. Integrated soil-crop system management for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 6399–6404.
Furlan L, Contiero B, Chiarini F, Colauzzi M, Sartori E, Benvegnù I, Fracasso F, Giandon P. 2017a. Risk assessment of maize damage by wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) as the first step in implementing IPM and in reducing the environmental impact of soil insecticides. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 236–251.
Furlan L, Vasileiadis V P, Chiarini F, Huiting H, Leskovšek R, Razinger J, Holb I J, Sartori E, Urek G, Verschwele A, Benvegnù I, Sattin M. 2017b. Risk assessment of soil-pest damage to grain maize in Europe within the framework of Integrated Pest Management. Crop Protection, 97, 52–59.
Holt R F, Timmons D R. 1968. Influence of precipitation soil water and plant population interactions on corn grain yields. Agronomy Journal, 60, 379–381.
Li S K, Wang C T. 2009. Evolution and development of maize production techniques in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 42, 1941–1951. (in Chinese)
Li S K, Wang K R, Xie R Z, Hou P, Ming B, Yang X X, Han D S, Wang Y H. 2016. Implementing higher population and full mechanization technologies to achieve high yield and high efficiency in maize production. Crops, 4, 1–6.
Li Y, Ma X L, Wang T Y, Li Y X, Liu C, Liu Z Z, Sun B C, Shi Y S, Song Y C, Carlone M, Bubeck D, Bhardwaj H, Whitaker D, Wilson W, Jones E, Wright K, Sun S K, Niebur W, Smith S. 2011. Increasing maize productivity in china by planting hybrids with germplasm that responds favorably to higher planting densities. Crop Science, 51, 2391.
Liu B H, Chen X P, Meng Q F, Yang H S, Justin V W. 2017. Estimating maize yield potential and yield gap with agro-climatic zones in China - Distinguish irrigated and rainfed conditions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 239, 108–117.
Liu Z J, Yang X G, Hubbard K G, Lin X M. 2012. Maize potential yields and yield gaps in the changing climate of northeast China. Global Change Biology, 18, 3441–3454.
Liu Z J, Yang X G, Lin X M, Hubbard K G, Lv S, Wang J. 2016a. Maize yield gaps caused by non-controllable, agronomic, and socioeconomic factors in a changing climate of Northeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 541, 756–764.
Liu Z J, Yang X G, Lin X M, Hubbard K G, Lv S, Wang J. 2016b. Narrowing the agronomic yield gaps of maize by improved soil, cultivar, and agricultural management practices in different climate zones of Northeast China. Earth Interactions, 20, 1–18.
Lobell D B, Cassman K G, Field C B. 2009. Crop yield gaps: Their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 179–204.
Magaia E, Famba S, Wesstrom I, Brito R, Joel A. 2017. Modelling maize yield response to plant density and water and nitrogen supply in a semi-arid region. Field Crops Research, 205, 170–181.
Mansfield B D, Mumm R H. 2014. Survey of plant density tolerance in US maize germplasm. Crop Science, 54, 157–173.
Meng Q F, Hou P, Wu L, Chen X P, Cui Z L, Zhang F S. 2013. Understanding production potentials and yield gaps in intensive maize production in China. Field Crops Research, 143, 91–97.
Ming B, Xie R Z, Hou P, Li L L, Wang K R, Li S K. 2017. Changes of maize planting density in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 50, 1960–1972. (in Chinese)
Nafziger E D. 1996. Effects of missing and two-plant hills on corn grain yield. Journal of Production Agriculture, 9, 238–240.
Nafziger E D, Carter P R, Graham E E. 1991. Response of corn to uneven emergence. Crop Science, 31, 811–815.
Pommel B, Bonhomme R. 1998. Variations in the vegetative and reproductive systems in individual plants of a heterogeneous maize crop. European Journal of Agronomy, 8, 39–49.
Ren X M, Sun D B, Wang Q S. 2016. Modeling the effects of plant density on maize productivity and water balance in the loess plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management, 171, 40–48.
Shen J B, Cui Z L, Miao Y X, Mi G H, Zhang H Y, Fan M S, Zhang C C, Jiang R F, Zhang W F, Li H G. 2013. Transforming agriculture in China: From solely high yield to both high yield and high resource use efficiency. Global Food Security, 2, 1–8.
Shi D Y, Li Y H, Xia D J, Zhang J W, Liu P, Zhao B, Dong S T. 2017. Effects of planting density on root characteristics and nitrogen uptake in summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 50, 2006–2017. (in Chinese)
Song Z W, Qi H, Zhang Z P, Qian C R, Guo J R, Deng A X, Zhang W J. 2012. Effects of plant density on agronomic traits and yield in spring maize Zhongdan 909 and their regional differences in northeast China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 38, 2267–2277. (in Chinese)
Timmons D R, Holt R F, Moraghan J T. 1966. Effect of corn population on yield evapotranspiration and water-use efficiency in northwest corn belt. Agronomy Journal, 58, 429–432.
Tittonell P, Shepherd K, Vanlauwe B, Giller K. 2008. Unravelling the effects of soil and crop management on maize productivity in smallholder agricultural systems of western Kenya - An application of classification and regression tree analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 123, 137–150.
Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, de Ridder N, Giller K E. 2007. Heterogeneity of crop productivity and resource use efficiency within smallholder Kenyan farms: Soil fertility gradients or management intensity gradients? Agricultural Systems, 94, 376–390.
Tokatlidis I S, Koutroubas S D. 2004. A review of maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Research, 88, 103–114.
Vanlauwe B, Kanampiu F, Odhiambo G D, De Groote H, Wadhams L J, Khan Z R. 2008. Integrated management of Striga hermonthica, stemborers, and declining soil fertility in western Kenya. Field Crops Research, 107, 102–115.
Xu C L, Huang S B, Tian B J, Ren J H, Meng Q F, Wang P. 2017. Manipulating planting density and nitrogen fertilizer application to improve yield and reduce environmental impact in Chinese maize production. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8,1234
Xu W J, Liu C W, Wang K R, Xie R Z, Ming B, Wang Y H, Zhang G Q, Liu G Z, Zhao R L, Fan P P, Li S K, Hou P. 2017. Adjusting maize plant density to different climatic conditions across a large longitudinal distance in China. Field Crops Research, 212, 126–134.
Yang J C. 2016. Science and technology backyard improves farmers’ productivity. Science China (Life Sciences), 59, 1348–1349.
Zhang F S, Cui Z L, Fan M S, Zhang W F, Chen X P, Jiang R F. 2011. Integrated soil-crop system management: Rreducing environmental risk while increasing crop productivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in China. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40, 1051–1057.
Zhang Q, Zhang L Z, Evers J, van der Werf W, Zhang W Q, Duan L S. 2014. Maize yield and quality in response to plant density and application of a novel plant growth regulator. Field Crops Research, 164, 82–89.
Zhang W F, Cao G X, Li X L, Zhang H Y, Wang C, Liu Q Q, Chen X P, Cui Z L, Shen J B, Jiang R F, Mi G H, Miao Y X, Zhang F S, Dou Z X. 2016. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 537, 671–674.
Zhao J F, Guo J P, Mu J. 2015. Exploring the relationships between climatic variables and climate-induced yield of spring maize in Northeast China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 207, 79–90.
Zhao R R, He P, Xie J G, Johnston A M, Xu X P, Qiu S J, Zhao S C. 2016. Ecological intensification management of maize in northeast China: Agronomic and environmental response. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 224, 123–130.
[1] Irshad AHMAD, Maksat BATYRBEK, Khushnuma IKRAM, Shakeel AHMAD, Muhammad KAMRAN, Misbah, Raham Sher KHAN, HOU Fu-jiang, HAN Qing-fang.

Nitrogen management improves lodging resistance and production in maize (Zea mays L.) at a high plant density [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 417-433.

[2] CHEN Yuan, LIU Zhen-yu, HENG Li, Leila I. M. TAMBEL, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN Yuan, CHEN De-hua. Effects of plant density and mepiquat chloride application on cotton boll setting in wheat–cotton double cropping system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2372-2381.
[3] Subrahmaniyan KASIRAJAN, Perumal VEERAMANI, ZHOU Wei-jun. Does heat accumulation alter crop phenology, fibre yield and fibre properties of sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) genotypes with changing seasons?[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2395-2409.
[4] CHEN Yuan, LIU Zhen-yu, HENG Li, Leila I. M. TAMBEL, CHEN De-hua. High plant density increases seed Bt endotoxin content in Bt transgenic cotton[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1796-1806.
[5] WENG Yan-zhen, ZENG Ya-ting, LIN Wen-sheng. Do rural highways narrow Chinese farmers’ income gap among provinces?[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 905-914.
[6] LIU Yue-e, LI Yu-xin, LÜ Tian-fang, XING Jin-feng, XU Tian-jun, CAI Wan-tao, ZHANG Yong, ZHAO Jiu-ran, WANG Rong-huan . The priority of management factors for reducing the yield gap of summer maize in the north of Huang-Huai-Hai region, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(2): 450-459.
[7] LUO Chong, LIU Huan-jun, FU Qiang, GUAN Hai-xiang, YE Qiang, ZHANG Xin-le, KONG Fan-chang. Mapping the fallowed area of paddy fields on Sanjiang Plain of Northeast China to assist water security assessments[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(7): 1885-1896.
[8] ZHANG Li-li, ZHOU Xiang-li, FAN Ye, FU Jun, HOU Peng, YANG Hai-long, QI Hua . Post-silking nitrogen accumulation and remobilization are associated with green leaf persistence and plant density in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(8): 1882-1892.
[9] ZHAI Li-chao, XIE Rui-zhi, MING Bo, LI Shao-kun, MA Da-ling. Evaluation and analysis of intraspecific competition in maize: A case study on plant density experiment[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(10): 2235-2244.
[10] S Najeeb, F A Sheikh, G A Parray, A B Shikari, G zaffar, S C Kashyp, M A Ganie, A B Shah. Farmers’ participatory selection of new rice varieties to boost production under temperate agro-ecosystems#br#[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(06): 1307-1314.
[11] XUE Jun, XIE Rui-zhi, ZHANG Wang-feng, WANG Ke-ru, HOU Peng, MING Bo, GOU Ling, LI Shao-kun. Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and -density maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(12): 2717-2725.
[12] ZHI Xiao-yu, HAN Ying-chun, LI Ya-bing, WANG Guo-ping, DU Wen-li, LI Xiao-xin, MAO Shu-chun, FENG Lu. Effects of plant density on cotton yield components and quality[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(7): 1469-1479.
[13] SHI De-yang, LI Yan-hong, ZHANG Ji-wang, LIU Peng, ZHAO Bin, DONG Shu-ting. Increased plant density and reduced N rate lead to more grain yield and higher resource utilization in summer maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(11): 2515-2528.
[14] YANG Guo-zheng, LUO Xue-jiao, NIE Yi-chun , ZHANG Xian-long. Effects of Plant Density on Yield and Canopy Micro Environment in Hybrid Cotton[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(10): 2154-2163.
[15] JIN Hui, LIU Jun, SONG Bo-tao , XIE Cong-hua. Impact of Plant Density on the Formation of Potato Mimitubers Derived from Microtubers and Tip-Cuttings in Plastic Houses[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(6): 1008-1017.
No Suggested Reading articles found!