|
|
|
Effect of grazing time and intensity on growth and yield of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) |
Ketema Tilahun Zeleke1, 2 |
1 School of Agricultural & Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
2 Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia |
|
|
Abstract A simulated grazing field experiment was conducted to determine the effect of timing and intensity of grazing on the growth and yield of a mid-late maturing spring wheat (cv. Flanker) under different watering regimes, at Wagga Wagga in south-eastern Australia. The experiment was a factorial design of watering regime and pasture “grazing” as factors, with three replications. The two watering regimes were rainfed (R) and supplemental irrigation (I). There were four simulated grazing treatments: no grazing, “crash” grazing by mowing to 5 cm height on 13 June (Cut1-5), “crash” grazing by mowing to 5 cm on 15 July (Cut2-5) and “clip” grazing by mowing to 15 cm height on 15 July (Cut2-15). The lowest dry matter (simulated grazing) was obtained from RCut1-5 (0.13 t ha–1) and the highest (0.86 t ha–1) was from ICut2-5. There was no significant difference (P<0.05) among the grain yields of the grazing treatments in the respective watering regimes. However, there was significant difference (P<0.05) between the grain yields of the rainfed (3.60 t ha–1) and irrigated (6.0 t ha–1) treatments. Under both watering regimes, the highest grain yield was obtained from the late “clip” grazings: 3.79 t ha–1 (RCut2-15) for rainfed and 6.47 t ha–1 (ICut2-15) for irrigated treatments. The lowest grain yield for the rainfed treatment was 3.26 t ha–1 (RCut1-5) and for the irrigated treatments, the lowest grain yield was 5.50 t ha–1 (ICut2-5). Harvest index (HI) was not significantly affected (P>0.05) by either the watering regime or grazing. Seed weight was significantly (P<0.05) affected both by the watering regime and grazing with the lowest value for 1 000-seed weight of 30.05 g (RCut2-5) and the highest value of 38.00 g (ICut2-15). Water use efficiency was significantly (P<0.05) affected both by the watering regime and grazing with the lowest value of 9.94 kg ha–1 mm–1 (ICut2-5) and the highest value 13.43 kg ha–1 mm–1 (RCut2-5). By “crash” grazing late (just before stem elongation stage) to a height of 5 cm, a significantly higher (P<0.05) above ground dry matter can be grazed without significantly affecting the yield both in seasons with low amount of rainfall and high amount of rainfall (irrigated in this study) although in a wet season a slightly lower (15% lower) grain yield is obtained relative to “clip grazing” to 15 cm height. Grazing of mid-late maturing wheat cultivars has the potential to fill the feed gap without significantly affecting grain yield.
|
Received: 25 July 2018
Accepted:
|
Fund: The study was supported by the Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Australia. |
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence Ketema Tilahun Zeleke, E-mail: kzeleke@csu.edu.au
|
Cite this article:
Ketema Tilahun Zeleke.
2019.
Effect of grazing time and intensity on growth and yield of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18(5): 1138-1147.
|
Arzadun M J, Arroquy J I, Laborde H E, Brevedan R E. 2006. Effect of planting date, clipping height, and cultivar on forage and grain yield of winter wheat in Argentinean Pampas. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1274–1279.
Browne N, Kingwell R, Behrendt R, Eckard R. 2013. The relative profitability of dairy, sheep, beef and grain farm enterprises in southeast Australia under selected rainfall and price scenarios. Agricultural Systems, 117, 35–44.
Dean G. 2007. Optimal plant density and the effect of grazing on grain yield of early sown wheat - Epping Forest, Tasmania. Southern Farming Systems. [2018-01-12]. www.ccmaknowledgebase.vic.gov.au/resources/16.pdf
Dove H, Holst P J, Stanley D F, Flint P W. 2002. Grazing value of dual purpose wheats for young sheep. Animal Production in Australia, 24, 53–56.
Edwards J T, Carver B F, Horn G W, Payton M E. 2011. Impact of dual-purpose management on wheat grain yield. Crop Science, 51, 1–5.
van Genuchten M T. 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 892–898.
Harrison M T, Evans J R, Dove H, Moore A D. 2011a. Dual-purpose cereals: Can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected? Crop and Pasture Science, 62, 930–946.
Harrison M T, Evans J R, Dove H, Moore A D. 2011b. Recovery dynamics of rainfed winter wheat after livestock grazing. 1. Growth rates, grain yields, soil water use and water-use efficiency. Crop and Pasture Science, 62, 947–959.
van Herwaarden A F. 1996. Haying-off in wheat: Enduring myth or current problem? In: Michalk D L, Pratleyn J E, eds., Agronomy-Science with Its Sleeves Rolled Up. Australian Society of Agronomy, Toowoomba, Queensland. pp. 566–569.
Holzapfel C B, Lafond G P, Brandt S A, Bullock P R, Irvine R B, Morrison M J, May W E, James D C. 2009. Estimating canola (Brassica napus L.) yield potential using an active optical sensor. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 89, 1149–1160.
Isbell R F. 2002. The Australian Soil Classification. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeffrey S J, Carter J O, Moodie K M, Beswick A R. 2001. Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environmental Modelling Software, 16, 309–330.
Kelman W M, Dove H. 2009. Growth and phenology of winter wheat and oats in a dual-purpose management system. Crop Science, 60, 921–932.
Kirkegaard K, Sprague S, Lilley J, Bell L. 2016. Managing dual purpose crops to optimise profit from grazing and grain yield north. [2018-01-12]. https://grdc.com.au/resources-and-publications/grdc-update-papers/tab-content/grdc-update-papers/2016/02/managing-dual-purpose-crops-to-optimise-profit-from-grazing-and-grain-yield
R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Redmon L A, Horn G W, Krenzer E G, Bernardo D J. 1995. A review of livestock grazing and wheat grain yield: Boom or bust? Agronomy Journal, 87, 137–147.
Sadras V O, Angus J F. 2006. Benchmarking water-use efficiency of rainfed wheat in dry environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57, 847–856.
Seymour M, England J H, Malik R, Rogers D, Sutherland A, Randell A. 2015. Effect of timing and height of defoliation on the grain yield of barley, wheat, oats and canola in Western Australia. Crop and Pasture Science, 66, 287–300.
Sinclair T R, Muchow R C. 1999. Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy, 65, 215–265.
Sprague M A. 1954. The effect of grazing management on forage and grain production from rye, wheat and oats. Agronomy Journal, 46, 29–33.
Winter S R, Thompson E K. 1990. Grazing winter wheat. I. Response of semidwarf cultivars to grain and grazed production systems. Agronomy Journal, 82, 33–37.
Zadoks J C, Chang T T, Konzak C F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, 14, 415–421.
Zeleke K T. 2014. Water use and root zone water dynamics of drip-irrigated olive (Olea europaea L.) under different soil water regimes. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 42, 217–232.
Zeleke K T, Luckett D J, Cowley R B. 2014. The influence of soil water conditions on canola yields and production in Southern Australia. Agricultural Water Management, 144, 20–32.
Zeleke K T, Luckett D J, Cowley R B. 2011. Calibration and testing of the FAO AquaCrop model for canola. Agronomy Journal, 103, 1610–1618. |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|