Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2018, Vol. 17 Issue (06): 1241-1245    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61781-7
Special Focus: Hot spots in bovine mastitis research Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Evaluation of a new qPCR test to identify the organisms causing high total bacterial count in bulk tank milk
Jørgen Katholm1, Lene Trier Olesen2, Anders Petersen1, Snorri Sigurdsson
1 DNA Diagnostic A/S, Risskov 8240, Denmark
2 ARLA Foods amba, Viby 8260, Denmark
3 SEGES, Aarhus N 8200, Denmark
Download:  PDF (715KB) ( )  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Milk quality in bulk tank milk (BTM) is measured by flow cytometry technology as total bacterial count (TBC) and somatic cell count (SCC).  To investigate SCC problems, culture or PCR can be used to identify mastitis causing bacteria, e.g., Mastit 4, a commercially available qPCR test.  TBC in BTM can be investigated further using culture-based methods such as standard plate count, laboratory pasteurization count, coliform count, and spore counts.  To our knowledge, no qPCR addressing the bacteria involved in TBC has been commercially introduced.  The aim of this study is to evaluate a recently introduced 3-h qPCR test, TBC 4.  The TBC 4 qPCR detects four target groups, Pseudomonas, Streptococci, Enterobacteriacea/Enterococcus, and Bacillus/Clostridia.  These target groups relate to problems on the farm such as cooling, mastitis, environment, and silage.  We will continue with new research to compare the TBC 4 qPCR test with traditional culture.  For this study, BTM samples from different TBC intervals were selected based on BactoCount results found at routine payment investigation at Eurofins laboratory (Vejen, Denmark).  These samples were analyzed using TBC 4 qPCR assay within 24 h.  In total, 346 BTM samples were divided into six different intervals of colony forming units (CFU).  For all four targets in each of the different intervals of CFU, the percent of positive samples, the average Ct-value, the percent of positive samples with Ct<30 and Ct<25 were calculated.  For Pseudomonas, Streptococci, and Enterobacteriacea/Enterococcus, the number of positive samples with lower Ct-values (high bacteria content) correlated with the CFU mL–1.  We found Enterobacteriacea/Enterococcus, Pseudomonas, and Streptococci in high number of bacteria (Ct<25) in 25, 19 and 56% of samples with CFU mL–1 between 50 001–100 000 and 53, 44, and 39% in samples with CFU mL–1>100 000.  The TBC 4 qPCR test showed to be a strong and fast tool for farmers, advisors and service technicians to address problems with high TBC and ensuring the delivery of good quality milk to the dairy.
Keywords:  TBC        bulk tank milk        qPCR        milk quality  
Received: 21 April 2017   Accepted:
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence J?rgen Katholm, E-mail: jk@dna-diagnostic.com   

Cite this article: 

J?rgen Katholm, Lene Trier Olesen, Anders Petersen, Snorri Sigurdsson. 2018. Evaluation of a new qPCR test to identify the organisms causing high total bacterial count in bulk tank milk. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(06): 1241-1245.

Costello M, Rhee M S, Bates M P, Clark S, Luedecke  O, Kang D H. 2003. Eleven-year trends of microbiological quality in bulk tank milk. Food Protect Trends, 23, 393–400.
Danish Agriculture and Food Council. 2017. Danish Dairy Statistics. 2016. [2017-04-21]. http://www.lf.dk/tal-og-analyser/statistik/mejeri/mejeristatistik/mejeristatistik-2016
Elmoslemany A M, Keefe G P, Dohoo I R, Jayarao B M. 2009. Risk factors for bacteriological quality of bulk tank milk in Prince Edward Island dairy herds. Part 1: Overall risk factors. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 2634–2643.
Gillespie B E, Lewis M J, Boonyayatra S, Maxwell M L, Saxton A, Oliver S P, Almeida R A. 2012. Short communication: Evaluation of bulk tank milk microbiological quality of nine dairy farms in Tennessee. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 4275–4279.
Guterbock  M, Blackmer P E. 1984. Veterinary interpretation of bulk-tank milk. Veterinary Clinnics of North America: Large Animal Practice, 6, 257–268.
Hayes M C, Ralyea R D, Murphy S C, Carey N R, Scarlett J M, Boor K J. 2001. Identification and characterization of elevated microbial counts in bulk tank raw milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 292–298.
Holm C, Jepsen L, Larsen M, Jespersen L. 2004. Predominant microflora of downgraded danish bulk tank milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 1151–1157.
Kable M E, Srisengfa Y, Laird M, Zaragoza J, McLeod J, Heidenreich J, Marco M L. 2016. The core and seasonal microbiota of raw bovine milk in tanker trucks and the impact of transfer to a milk processing facility. Mbio, 7, e00836-16.
Katholm J, Bennedsgaard T W, Koskinen M T, Rattenborg E. 2012. Quality of bulk tank milk samples from Danish dairy herds based on real-time polymerase chain reaction identification of mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 5702–5708.
Keefe G P, Dohoo I R, Spangler E. 1997. Herd prevalence and incidence of Streptococcus agalactiae in the dairy industry of prince edward island. Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 464–470.
Murphy S C. 1997. Raw milk bacteria tests: Standard plate count, preliminary incubation count, lab, pasteurization count and coliform count. What do they mean for your farm? In: Regional Meeting Proceedings. National Mastitis Council, Syracuse, NY, Madison, WI. pp. 34–41.
Pantoja J C F,  Reinemann D J, Ruegg P L. 2011. Factors associated with coliform count in unpasteurized bulk milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 2680–2691.
Pyz-Lukasik R, Paszkiewicz W, Tatara M R, Brodzki P, Belkot Z. 2015. Microbiological quality of milk sold directly from producers to consumers. Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 4294–4301.
Rattenborg E, Paulrud C O, Jensen S K S, Katholm J. 2015. Bulk tank milk surveillance for contagious mastitis pathogens: Comparison of two commercial real-time PCR test kits. In:  Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. National Mastitis Council In., Madison, WI. pp. 215–216.
Schukken Y H, Gunther J, Fitzpatrick J, Fontaine M C, Goetze L, Holst O, Leigh J, Petzl W, Schuberth H J, Sipka A, Smith D G E, Quesnell R, Watts L, Yancey R, Zerbe H, Gurjar A, Zadoks R N, Seyfert H M, 2011. Pfizer mastitis research consortium. Host-response patterns of intramammary infections in dairy cows. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 144, 270–289.
Vacheyrou M, Normand A C, Guyot P, Cassagne C, Piarroux R, Bouton Y. 2011. Cultivable microbial communities in raw cow milk and potential transfers from stables of sixteen French farms. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 146, 253–262.
Zadoks R N, Gonzàlez R N, Boor K J, Schukken Y H. 2004. Mastitis-causing Streptococci are important contributors to bacterial counts in raw bulk tank milk. Journal of Food Protection, 67, 2644–2650.
[1] SHU Ben-shui, YU Hai-kuo, DAI Jing-hua, XIE Zi-ge, QIAN Wan-qiang, LIN Jin-tian. Stability evaluation of reference genes for real-time quantitative PCR normalization in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2471-2482.
[2] Pavel Cejnar, Ludmila Ohnoutková, Jan Ripl, Tomá? Vl?ko, Jiban Kumar Kundu. Two mutations in the truncated Rep gene RBR domain delayed the Wheat dwarf virus infection in transgenic barley plants[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(11): 2492-2500.
[3] SUN Bao, SUN Guo-qing, MENG Zhi-gang, ZHANG Rui, GUO San-dui. A novel constitutive promoter and its downstream 5´ UTR derived from cotton (Gossypium spp.) drive high-level gene expression in stem and leaf tissues[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(4): 755-762.
[4] JIN Di, ZHAO Sheng-guo, ZHANG Yang-dong, SUN Peng, BU Deng-pan, Yves Beckers, WANG Jia-qi. Diversity shifts of rumen bacteria induced by dietary forages in dairy cows and quantification of the changed bacteria using a new primer design strategy[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(11): 2596-2603.
No Suggested Reading articles found!