Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2018, Vol. 17 Issue (05): 1085-1092    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)61910-0
Crop Science Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Nectar secretion of RN-type cytoplasmic male sterility three lines in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]
ZHANG Jing-yong1, 2, SUN Huan2, ZHAO Li-mei2, ZHANG Chun-bao2, YAN Hao2, PENG Bao2, LI Wen-bin1 
1 Soybean Institute, Northeast Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology and Breeding (Genetics), Ministry of Agriculture, Harbin 150030, P.R.China
2 Soybean Research Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Soybean, Changchun 130033, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  Received  21 December, 2017    Accepted  14 March, 2018

© 2018 CAAS. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.  All rights reserved.
doi:

Abstract  Significant progress has been achieved in the use of heterosis in soybean and several soybean hybrids have been released in China. However, broad use of hybrid soybean seed is limited due to low seed setting of female parents.  Breeding cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) lines with high out-crossing rate is necessary to solve the problem.  The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between out-crossing rate of CMS lines and their nectar secretion.  The daily nectar secretion rhythm, meteorological effect on nectar secretion, and differences in nectar secretion among genotypes and years were investigated in 27 soybean CMS lines (A-lines) with their maintainers (B-lines) and restorers (R-lines).  The correlation between out-crossing rate of CMS lines and nectar production was also evaluated.  Nectar secretion had diurnal variation.  Secretion initiated at about 06:00 for most materials and reached a peak at 07:00–08:30 after flower opened, then the nectar secretion decreased gradually.  A sub-peak appeared at about 13:00, while the nectar could not be detected at 17:00.  Nectar secretion was greatly influenced by the weather conditions.  The amount of nectar secretion increased gradually over time during periods of high temperature and no rainfall for several days.  Rainy weather and low temperatures inhibited nectar secretion.  There were obvious variations of nectar amount among different genotypes tested.  Significant nectar variation within a genotype among years was also observed, and the highest nectar secretion was 3-fold higher than the lowest.  The amount of nectar secretion from R-lines was significantly higher than that of A- and B-lines.  There was no significant difference in nectar secretion between A- and B-lines.  A- and B-lines with higher out-crossing rates secreted more nectar.  The amount of nectar secretion of A- and B-lines were significantly positively correlated with the out-crossing rate of A-lines.
Keywords:  soybean        RN cytoplasmic male sterility        nectar secretion        out-crossing rate   
Received: 21 December 2017   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0101500, 2016YFD0101502), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project of Jilin Province, China (CXGC2017Z004).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence LI Wen-bin, Tel: +86-451-55190778, E-mail: wenbinli@neau.edu.cn; SUN Huan, Tel: +86-431-87063126, E-mail: sunh@cjaas.com; ZHAO Li-mei, Tel: +86-431-87063125, E-mail: l_mzhao@126.com   

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Jing-yong, SUN Huan, ZHAO Li-mei, ZHANG Chun-bao, YAN Hao, PENG Bao, LI Wen-bin. 2018. Nectar secretion of RN-type cytoplasmic male sterility three lines in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(05): 1085-1092.

Ahrent D K, Caviness C E. 1994. Natural cross pollination of twelve soybean cultivars in Arkansas. Crop Science, 34, 376–378.

Carlson J B, Lersten N R. 1987. Reproductive morphology. In: Boerma H R, Specht J E, eds., Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph No. 16. American Society of Agronomy/Crop Science Society of America/Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 95–134.

Caviness C E. 1966. Estimates of natural cross pollination in Jackson soybeans in Arkansas. Crop Science, 6, 211–212.

Dai J Y, Zhang R J, Wei B G, Nie Z X, Xing G N, Zhao T J, Yang S P, Gai J Y. 2017. Key biological factors related to outcrossing-productivity of cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterile lines in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Euphytica, 213, 1–18.

Erickson E H. 1975. Variability of floral characteristics influences honey bee visitation to soybean blossoms. Crop Science, 15, 767–771.

Erickson E H. 1983. Soybean for bees and beekeeping. Apiacta, 8, 1–7.

Erickson E H. 1984a. Soybean floral economy and insect pollination. Soybean Gentics Newsletter, 11, 152–162.

Erickson E H. 1984b. Soybean pollination and honey production - A research progress report. American Bee Journal, 124, 775–779.

Fehr W R, Caviness C E, Burmood D T, Pennington J S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science, 11, 929–931.

Gai J Y, Ding D R, Cui Z L, Qiu J X. 1999. Development and performance of the cytoplasmic-nuclear male sterile line NJCMS1A of soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 32, 23–27. (in Chinese)

Graybosch R A, Palmer R G. 1988. Male sterility in soybean - An overview. American Journal of Botany, 75, 144–156.

Horner H T. 1998. Floral nectaries in soybean: Engineering a system to improving cross-pollination for commercial hybrid seed production. Iowa Academic Science Abstract, 12.

Horner H T, Healy R A, Cervantis-Martinez T, Palmer R G. 2003. Floral nectar fine structure and development in Glycine max L. (Fabaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164, 675–690.

Jaycox E R. 1970. Ecological relationships between honeybees and soybeans. III. The honeybee factors. Amercian Bee Journal, 110, 383–385.

Jeffery D R, Thomas C K, Craig A  A, Robert L P. 2003. Soybean natural cross-pollination rates under field conditions. Environmental Biosafety Research, 2, 133–138.

Nie Z X, Zhao T J, Yang S P, Gai J Y. 2017. Development of a cytoplasmic male-sterile line NJCMS4A for hybrid soybean production. Plant Breeding, 136, 516–525.

Ortiz-Perez E, Horner H T, Hanlin S J, Palmer R G. 2006a. Evaluation of insect-mediated seed set among soybean lines segregating for male sterility at the ms6 locus. Field Crops Research, 97, 353–362.

Ortiz-Perez E, Horner H T, Hanlin S J, Palmer R G. 2006b. Insect-mediated seed-set evaluation of 21 soybean lines segregating for male sterility at 10 different loci. Euphytica, 152, 351–360.

Ortiz-Perez E, Hunt W T, Horner W H, Davis R G. 2008. Insect-mediated cross-pollination in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]: II. Phenotypic recurrent selection. Euphytica, 162, 269–280.

Palmer R G, Gai J Y, Sun H, Burton J W. 2001. Production and evaluation of hybrid soybean. Plant Breed Reviews, 21, 263–308.

Robacker D C, Meese B J D, Erickson E C. 1988. Floral aroma: How far will plants go to attract pollinator? American Institute of Biological Science, 38, 390–398.

SPSS Version 19.0. 2010. IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. version 19.0. Armonk, NY, USA.  

Sun H, Zhao L M, Huang M. 1993. Studies on cytoplasmic-nuclear male sterile soybean. Chinese Science Bulletin, 38, 1535–1536. (in Chinese)

Sun H, Zhao L M, Huang M. 1997. Cytoplasmic-nuclear male sterile soybean line from interspecific crosses between

G. max and G. soja. In: Proceedings of International Soybean Research Conference V. Banpot Napompethedited by Banpot Napompeth, Chiang Mai, Thailand. pp. 99–102.

Sun H, Zhao L M, Huang M. 2001. Cytoplasmic-Genetic Male Sterile Soybean and Method for Producing Hybrid Soybean. United State Patent, No. US 6,320,098B1, 2001-11-20.

Sun H, Zhao L M, Wang S M, Wang Y Q, Li J P. 2003. Research progress on the use of heterosis in soybean. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 25, 92–96, 100. (in Chinese)

Sun Z Q, Tian P Z, Wang J, Yan R H. 1992. Estimation of the frequency of natural cross pollination in soybeam. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Scineces, 14, 13–17. (in Chinese)

Zhang L, Dai O H. 1997. Selection and breeding of nucleo-cytoplasmic male sterile line W931A in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 30, 90–91. (in Chinese)

Zhao L M, Peng B, Zhang W L, Zhang L F, Zhang J Y, Li J P, Li M H, Sun H. 2010. Establishment of technology system for hybrid soybean seed production. Soybean Sciences, 29, 707–711. (in Chinese)

Zhao L M, Sun H, Peng B, Li J P, Wang S M, Li M H, Zhang W L, Zhang J Y, Wang Y Q. 2009. Pollinator effects on genotypically distinct soybean cytoplasmic male sterile lines. Crop Science, 49, 2080–2086.

Zhao L M, Sun H, Wang S M, Wang Y Q, Huang M, Li J P. 2004. Breeding of hybrid soybean “HybSoy1”. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Scineces, 26, 15–17. (in Chinese)

Zhao T J, Gai J Y. 2006. Discovery of new male-sterile cytoplasm sources and development of a new cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterile line NJCMS3A in soybean. Eupytica, 152, 387–396.
 
[1] YANG Hong-jun, YE Wen-wu, YU Ze, SHEN Wei-liang, LI Su-zhen, WANG Xing, CHEN Jia-jia, WANG Yuan-chao, ZHENG Xiao-bo. Host niche, genotype, and field location shape the diversity and composition of the soybean microbiome[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2412-2425.
[2] XU Lei, ZHAO Tong-hua, Xing Xing, XU Guo-qing, XU Biao, ZHAO Ji-qiu.

Model fitting of the seasonal population dynamics of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, in the field [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1797-1808.

[3] GAO Hua-wei, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, HONG Hui-long, ZHANG Xiang, SUN Ru-jian, WANG Hao-rang, WANG Xiao-bo, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Identification of tolerance to high density and lodging in short petiolate germplasm M657 and the effect of density on yield-related phenotypes of soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 434-446.
[4] QU Zheng, LI Yue-han, XU Wei-hui, CHEN Wen-jing, HU Yun-long, WANG Zhi-gang. Different genotypes regulate the microbial community structure in the soybean rhizosphere[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 585-597.
[5] GAO Hua-wei, SUN Ru-jian, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, FU Guang-hui, HONG Hui-long, GUO Bing-fu, ZHANG Xiang, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Characterization of the petiole length in soybean compact architecture mutant M657 and the breeding of new lines[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2508-2520.
[6] ZHANG Hua, WU Hai-yan, TIAN Rui, KONG You-bin, CHU Jia-hao, XING Xin-zhu, DU Hui, JIN Yuan, LI Xi-huan, ZHANG Cai-ying. Genome-wide association and linkage mapping strategies reveal genetic loci and candidate genes of phosphorus utilization in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2521-2537.
[7] ZOU Jia-nan, ZHANG Zhan-guo, KANG Qing-lin, YU Si-yang, WANG Jie-qi, CHEN Lin, LIU Yan-ru, MA Chao, ZHU Rong-sheng, ZHU Yong-xu, DONG Xiao-hui, JIANG Hong-wei, WU Xiao-xia, WANG Nan-nan, HU Zhen-bang, QI Zhao-ming, LIU Chun-yan, CHEN Qing-shan, XIN Da-wei, WANG Jin-hui. Characterization of chromosome segment substitution lines reveals candidate genes associated with the nodule number in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2197-2210.
[8] PAN Wen-jing, HAN Xue, HUANG Shi-yu, YU Jing-yao, ZHAO Ying, QU Ke-xin, ZHANG Ze-xin, YIN Zhen-gong, QI Hui-dong, YU Guo-long, ZHANG Yong, XIN Da-wei, ZHU Rong-sheng, LIU Chun-yan, WU Xiao-xia, JIANG Hong-wei, HU Zhen-bang, ZUO Yu-hu, CHEN Qing-shan, QI Zhao-ming. Identification of candidate genes related to soluble sugar contents in soybean seeds using multiple genetic analyses[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1886-1902.
[9] LIU Chen, TIAN Yu, LIU Zhang-xiong, GU Yong-zhe, ZHANG Bo, LI Ying-hui, NA Jie, QIU Li-juan. Identification and characterization of long-InDels through whole genome resequencing to facilitate fine-mapping of a QTL for plant height in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1903-1912.
[10] HUI Fang, XIE Zi-wen, LI Hai-gang, GUO Yan, LI Bao-guo, LIU Yun-ling, MA Yun-tao. Image-based root phenotyping for field-grown crops: An example under maize/soybean intercropping[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(6): 1606-1619.
[11] TIAN Yu, YANG Lei, LU Hong-feng, ZHANG Bo, LI Yan-fei, LIU Chen, GE Tian-li, LIU Yu-lin, HAN Jia-nan, LI Ying-hui, QIU Li-juan. QTL analysis for plant height and fine mapping of two environmentally stable QTLs with major effects in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 933-946.
[12] LIU Sang-lin, CHENG Yan-bo, MA Qi-bin, LI Mu JIANG Ze, XIA Qiu-ju, NIAN Hai. Fine mapping and genetic analysis of resistance genes, Rsc18, against soybean mosaic virus[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 644-653.
[13] LIU Li-feng, GAO Le, ZHANG Li-xin, CAI Yu-peng, SONG Wen-wen, CHEN Li, YUAN Shan, WU Ting-ting, JIANG Bing-jun, SUN Shi, WU Cun-xiang, HOU Wen-sheng, HAN Tian-fu. Co-silencing E1 and its homologs in an extremely late-maturing soybean cultivar confers super-early maturity and adaptation to high-latitude short-season regions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 326-335.
[14] OCHAR Kingsley, SU Bo-hong, ZHOU Ming-ming, LIU Zhang-xiong, GAO Hua-wei, SOBHI F. Lamlom, QIU Li-juan. Identification of the genetic locus associated with the crinkled leaf phenotype in a soybean (Glycine max L.) mutant by BSA-Seq technology[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(12): 3524-3539.
[15] JIA Jia, WANG Huan, CAI Zhan-dong, WEI Ru-qian, HUANG Jing-hua, XIA Qiu-ju, XIAO Xiao-hui, MA Qi-bin, NIAN Hai, CHENG Yan-bo. Identification and validation of stable and novel quantitative trait loci for pod shattering in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.][J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3169-3184.
No Suggested Reading articles found!