Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2017, Vol. 16 Issue (06): 1331-1340    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61525-3
Physiology·Biochemistry·Cultivation·Tillage Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Shade adaptive response and yield analysis of different soybean genotypes in relay intercropping systems
WU Yu-shan1, YANG Feng1, 2, 3, GONG Wan-zhuo4, Shoaib Ahmed1, FAN Yuan-fang1, WU Xiao-ling1, 2, 3, YONG Tai-wen1, 2, 3, LIU Wei-guo1, 2, 3, SHU Kai1, 2, 3, LIU Jiang1, 2, 3, DU Jun-bo1, 2, 3, YANG Wen-yu1, 2, 3

1 College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China

2 Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China

3 Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China

4 Characteristic Crops Research Institute, Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 402160, P.R.China

Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Soybean is one of the major oil seed crops, which is usually intercropped with other crops to increase soybean production area and yield.  However, soybean is highly sensitive to shading.  It is unclear if soybean morphology responds to shading (i.e., shade tolerance or avoidance) and which features may be suitable as screening materials in relay strip intercropping.  Therefore, in this study, various agronomic characteristics of different soybean genotypes were analyzed under relay intercropping conditions.  The soybean materials used in this study exhibited genetic diversity, and the coefficient of variations of the agronomic parameters ranged from 13.84 to 72.08% during the shade period and from 6.44 to 52.49% during the maturity period.  The ratios of shading to full irradiance in stem mass fraction (SMF) were almost greater than 1, whereas opposite results were found in the leaves.  Compared with full irradiance, the average stem length (SL), leaf area ratio (LAR) and specific leaf area (SLA) for the two years (2013 and 2014) increased by 0.78, 0.47 and 0.65 under shady conditions, respectively.  However, the stem diameter (SD), total biomass (TB), leaf area (LA), number of nodes (NN) on the main stem, and number of branches (BN) all decreased.  During the shady period, the SL and SMF exhibited a significant negative correlation with yield, and the SD exhibited a significant positive correlation with yield.  The correlation between the soybean yield and agronomic parameters during the mature period, except for SL, the first pod height (FPH), 100-seed weight (100-SW), and reproductive growth period (RGP), were significant (P<0.01), especially for seed weight per branch (SWB), pods per plant (PP), BN, and vegetative growth period (VGP).  These results provide an insight into screening the shade tolerance of soybean varieties and can be useful in targeted breeding programs of relay intercropped soybeans.  
Keywords:   intercropping      light      morphological parameters      shade avoidance      soybean  
Received: 01 July 2016   Accepted:
Fund: 

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571615), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0300602, 2016YFD0300209), the Major Project of Education Department in Sichuan, China (16ZA0041), and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System, China (CARS-04-PS19).

Corresponding Authors:  YANG Feng, Tel: +86-28-86290960, E-mail: f.yang@sicau.edu.cn; YANG Wen-yu, Tel: +86-835-2882004, E-mail: mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn   
About author:  WU Yu-shan, E-mail: wuys513@foxmail.com

Cite this article: 

WU Yu-shan, YANG Feng, GONG Wan-zhuo, Shoaib Ahmed, FAN Yuan-fang, WU Xiao-ling, YONG Tai-wen, LIU Wei-guo, SHU Kai, LIU Jiang, DU Jun-bo, YANG Wen-yu. 2017. Shade adaptive response and yield analysis of different soybean genotypes in relay intercropping systems. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(06): 1331-1340.

Ao X, Zhao M H, Zhu Q, Li J, Zhang H J, Wang H Y, Yu C M, Li C H, Xie F T, Han X R. 2013. Study on plant morphological traits and production characteristics of super high-yielding soybean. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12, 1173–1182.
Andrade J F, Cerrudo A, Rizzalli R H, Monzon J P. 2012. Sunflower-soybean intercrop productivity under different water conditions and sowing managements. Agronomy Journal, 104, 1049–1055.
Cheng Y C, Fleming G R. 2009. Dynamics of light harvesting in photosynthesis. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 60, 241–262.
Corré W J. 1983. Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants I. The influence of light intensity. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 32, 49–62.
Echarte L, Maggiora A D, Cerrudo D, Gonzalez V H, Abbate P, Cerrudo A, Sadras V O, Calviño P. 2011. Yield response to plant density of maize and sunflower intercropped with soybean. Field Crops Research, 121, 423–429.
Evans J R, Poorter H. 2001. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: The relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant Cell Environment, 24, 755–767.
Fehr W R, Caviness C E. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station Special Reports. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, USA. pp. 1–12.
Feng Y L, Cao K F, Zhang J L. 2004. Photosynthetic characteristics, dark respiration, and leaf mass per unit area in seedlings of four tropical tree species grown under three irradiances. Photosynthetica, 42, 431–437.
Feng Y L, Wang J F, Sang W G. 2007. Biomass allocation, morphology and photosynthesis of invasive and noninvasive exotic species grown at four irradiance levels. Acta Oecologica, 31, 40–47.
Ghosh P K, Tripathi A K, Bandyopadhyay K K, Manna M C. 2009. Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. European Journal of Agronomy, 31, 43–50.
Gommers C, Visser E, Onge K, Voesenek L, Pierik R. 2013. Shade tolerance: When growing tall is not an option. Trends in Plant Science, 18, 1360–1385.
Gong W G, Jiang C D, Wu Y S, Chen H H, Liu W Y, Yang W Y. 2015. Tolerance vs. avoidance: Two strategies of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings in response to shade in intercropping. Photosynthetica, 53, 259–268.
González A V, Gianoli E. 2004. Morphological plasticity in response to shading in three Convolvulus species of different ecological breadth. Acta Oecologica, 26, 185–190.
Huang D, Wu L, Chen J R, Dong L. 2011. Morphological plasticity, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Athyrium pachyphlebium at different shade levels. Photosynthetica, 49, 611–618.
Ijoyah M O, Ogar A O, Ojo G O S. 2013. Soybean-maize intercropping on yield and system productivity in Makurdi, Central Nigeria. Scientific Journal of Crop Science, 2, 49–55.
Kurepin L V, Walton L J, Hayward A, Neil Emery R J, Reid D M, Chinnappa C C. 2012. Shade light interaction with salicylic acid in regulating growth of sun (alpine) and shade (prairie) ecotypes of Stellaria longipes. Plant Growth Regulation, 68, 1–8.
Knörzer H, Graeff-Hönninger S, Guo B Q, Wang P, Claupein W. 2009. Rediscovery of intercropping in China: A traditional cropping system for future Chinese agriculture - A review. In: Lichtfouse E, ed., Climate Change, Intercropping, Pest Control and Beneficial Microorganisms. Springer Netherlands Publication, Berlin, Germany. pp. 13–44.
Li L, Sun J, Zhang F, Li X, Rengel Z, Yang S. 2001. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crops Research, 71, 173–181.
Lithourgidis A S, Vlachostergios D N, Dordas C A, Damalas C A. 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 287–294.
Liu B, Liu X B, Liu C, Wang Y S, Li J, Herbert S J. 2010. Soybean yield and yield component distribution across the main axis in response to light enrichment and shading under different densities. Plant Soil Environment, 56, 384–392.
Liu W G, Zou J L, Yuan J, Jiang T, Wu X L, Yang W Y. 2014. Research on the agronomic traits of relay cropping soybean. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 36, 219–223. (in Chinese)
Liu W G, Zou J L, Zhang J, Yang F, Wang Y, Yang W Y. 2015. Evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) stem vining in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. Plant Production. Science, 18, 69–75.
Manceur A M, Boland G J, Thevathasan N V, Gordon A M. 2009. Dry matter partitions and specific leaf weight of soybean change with tree competition in an intercropping system. Agroforest Systems, 76, 295–301.
Page E R, Tollenaar M, Lee E A, Lukens L, Swanton C J. 2010. Shade avoidance: An integral component of crop-weed competition. Weed Research, 50, 281–288.
Paquette A, Bouchard A, Cogliastro, A. 2007. Morphological plasticity in seedlings of three deciduous species under shelter wood under-planting management does not correspond to shade tolerance ranks. Forest Ecology and Management, 241, 278–287.
Poorter L, Rose S A. 2005. Light-dependent changes in the relationship between seed mass and seedling traits: Ameta-analysis for rain forest tree species. Oecologia, 142, 378–387.
Rodríguez-López N F, Martins S, Cavatte P C, Silva P E M, Morais L E, Pereira L F, Reis J V, Ávila R T, Godoy A G. 2014. Morphological and physiological acclimations of coffee seedlings to growth over a range of fixed or changing light supplies. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 102, 1–10.
Ruberti I, Sessa G, Ciolfi A, Possenti M, Carabelli M, Morelli G. 2012. Plant adaptation to dynamically changing environment: The shade avoidance response. Biotechnology Advances, 30, 1047–1058.
Skálová H. 2005. Morphological plasticity of Festuca rubra clones from three neighbouring communities in response to red:far-red levels. Folia Geobotanica, 40, 77–90.
Smith H. 2000. Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants - An emerging synthesis. Nature, 407, 585–591.
Su B Y, Song Y X, Song C, Cui L, Yong T W, Yang W Y. 2014. Growth and photosynthetic responses of soybean seedlings to maize shading in relay intercropping system in Southwest China. Photosynthetica, 52, 332–340.
Tacarindua C R P, Shiraiwa S, Homma K, Kumagai E, Sameshima R. 2013. The effects of increased temperature on crop growth and yield of soybean grown in a temperature gradient chamber. Field Crops Research, 154, 74–81.
Valladares F, Niinemets Ü. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 39, 237–257.
Vermeulen P J, Stuefer J F, Anten N P R, During H J. 2009. Carbon gain in the competition for light between genotypes of the clonal herb Potentilla reptans. Journal of Ecology, 97, 508–517.
Wang N, Huang Q, Sun J, Yan S, Ding C, Mei X, Li D, Zeng X, Su X, Shen Y. 2014. Shade tolerance plays an important role in biomass production of different poplar genotypes in a high-density plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 331, 40–49.
Xue A, Zhao M H, Zhu Q, Li J, Zhang H J, Wang H Y, Yu C M, Li C H, Yao X D, Xie F T, Han X R. 2013. Study on plant morphological traits and production characteristics of super high-yielding soybean. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12, 1173–1182.
Yao H, Zhang Y, Yi X, Zhang X, Zhang W. 2016. Cotton responds to different plant population densities by adjusting specific leaf area to optimize canopy photosynthetic use efficiency of light and nitrogen. Field Crops Research, 188, 10–16.
Yang F, Huang S, Gao R C, Liu W G, Yong T W, Wang X C, Yang W Y. 2014. Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red:far-red ratio. Field Crops Research, 155, 245–253.
Yang F, Wang X C, Liao D P, Lu F Z, Gao R C, Liu W G, Yong T W, Wu X L, Du J B, Liu J, Yang W Y. 2015. Yield response to different planting geometries in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 107, 296–304.
Zhou W J, Zhang Y Z, Wang K R, Li H S, Hao Y J, Liu X. 2009. Plant phosphorus uptake in a soybean-citrus intercropping system in the red soil hilly region of south China. Pedosphere, 19, 244–250.
[1] YANG Hong-jun, YE Wen-wu, YU Ze, SHEN Wei-liang, LI Su-zhen, WANG Xing, CHEN Jia-jia, WANG Yuan-chao, ZHENG Xiao-bo. Host niche, genotype, and field location shape the diversity and composition of the soybean microbiome[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2412-2425.
[2] XU Lei, ZHAO Tong-hua, Xing Xing, XU Guo-qing, XU Biao, ZHAO Ji-qiu.

Model fitting of the seasonal population dynamics of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, in the field [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1797-1808.

[3] CHEN Xiao-dong, CAI Wei-jian, XIA Jin, YUAN Hua-zhao, WANG Qing-lian, PANG Fu-hua, ZHAO Mi-zhen. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals the molecular mechanism by which blue light promotes lutein synthesis in strawberry[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1695-1703.
[4] HU Wen-jing, FU Lu-ping, GAO De-rong, LI Dong-sheng, LIAO Sen, LU Cheng-bin. Marker-assisted selection to pyramid Fusarium head blight resistance loci Fhb1 and Fhb2 in a high-quality soft wheat cultivar Yangmai 15[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 360-370.
[5] GAO Hua-wei, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, HONG Hui-long, ZHANG Xiang, SUN Ru-jian, WANG Hao-rang, WANG Xiao-bo, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Identification of tolerance to high density and lodging in short petiolate germplasm M657 and the effect of density on yield-related phenotypes of soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 434-446.
[6] QU Zheng, LI Yue-han, XU Wei-hui, CHEN Wen-jing, HU Yun-long, WANG Zhi-gang. Different genotypes regulate the microbial community structure in the soybean rhizosphere[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 585-597.
[7] Wannaporn THEPBANDIT, Narendra Kumar PAPATHOTI, Jayasimha Rayulu DADDAM, Nguyen Huy HOANG, Toan LE THANH, Chanon SAENGCHAN, Kumrai BUENSANTEAI. In vitro and in silico studies of salicylic acid on systemic induced resistance against bacterial leaf blight disease and enhancement of crop yield[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 170-184.
[8] GAO Hua-wei, SUN Ru-jian, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, FU Guang-hui, HONG Hui-long, GUO Bing-fu, ZHANG Xiang, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Characterization of the petiole length in soybean compact architecture mutant M657 and the breeding of new lines[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2508-2520.
[9] ZHANG Hua, WU Hai-yan, TIAN Rui, KONG You-bin, CHU Jia-hao, XING Xin-zhu, DU Hui, JIN Yuan, LI Xi-huan, ZHANG Cai-ying. Genome-wide association and linkage mapping strategies reveal genetic loci and candidate genes of phosphorus utilization in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2521-2537.
[10] ZOU Jia-nan, ZHANG Zhan-guo, KANG Qing-lin, YU Si-yang, WANG Jie-qi, CHEN Lin, LIU Yan-ru, MA Chao, ZHU Rong-sheng, ZHU Yong-xu, DONG Xiao-hui, JIANG Hong-wei, WU Xiao-xia, WANG Nan-nan, HU Zhen-bang, QI Zhao-ming, LIU Chun-yan, CHEN Qing-shan, XIN Da-wei, WANG Jin-hui. Characterization of chromosome segment substitution lines reveals candidate genes associated with the nodule number in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2197-2210.
[11] PAN Wen-jing, HAN Xue, HUANG Shi-yu, YU Jing-yao, ZHAO Ying, QU Ke-xin, ZHANG Ze-xin, YIN Zhen-gong, QI Hui-dong, YU Guo-long, ZHANG Yong, XIN Da-wei, ZHU Rong-sheng, LIU Chun-yan, WU Xiao-xia, JIANG Hong-wei, HU Zhen-bang, ZUO Yu-hu, CHEN Qing-shan, QI Zhao-ming. Identification of candidate genes related to soluble sugar contents in soybean seeds using multiple genetic analyses[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1886-1902.
[12] LIU Chen, TIAN Yu, LIU Zhang-xiong, GU Yong-zhe, ZHANG Bo, LI Ying-hui, NA Jie, QIU Li-juan. Identification and characterization of long-InDels through whole genome resequencing to facilitate fine-mapping of a QTL for plant height in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1903-1912.
[13] HUI Fang, XIE Zi-wen, LI Hai-gang, GUO Yan, LI Bao-guo, LIU Yun-ling, MA Yun-tao. Image-based root phenotyping for field-grown crops: An example under maize/soybean intercropping[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(6): 1606-1619.
[14] TIAN Yu, YANG Lei, LU Hong-feng, ZHANG Bo, LI Yan-fei, LIU Chen, GE Tian-li, LIU Yu-lin, HAN Jia-nan, LI Ying-hui, QIU Li-juan. QTL analysis for plant height and fine mapping of two environmentally stable QTLs with major effects in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 933-946.
[15] FAN Xiao-xue, BIAN Zhong-hua, SONG Bo, XU Hai. Transcriptome analysis reveals the differential regulatory effects of red and blue light on nitrate metabolism in pakchoi (Brassica campestris L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 1015-1027.
No Suggested Reading articles found!