|
|
|
|
|
| Impact of temperature on yield and related traits in cotton genotypes |
| Kalim Ullah, Niamatullah Khan, Zahid Usman, Rehmat Ullah, Fazal Yazdan Saleem, Syed Asif Imran Shah, Muhammad Salman |
1、Pakistan Central Cotton Committee, Cotton Research Station, Dera Ismail Khan 29050, Pakistan
2、Department of Agricultural Extension, Education & Communication, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
3、Oil Seed Programme, National Agriculture Research Center, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan |
|
|
|
摘要 Cotton growth and development is influenced by various uncontrollable environmental conditions. Temperature variations in the field can be created by planting at different dates. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of planting dates and thermal temperatures (growing degree days) on yield of 4 cotton genotypes, viz., CIM-598, CIM-599, CIM- 602 and Ali Akbar-703. Plants were subjected to 6 planting dates during 2013 and 2014 in a trial conducted in randomized complete block design with four replications. For boll number, boll weight and seed cotton yield, cotton genotypes exhibited significant differences, CIM-599 produced the highest seed cotton yield of 2 062 kg ha–1 on account of maximum boll number and boll weight. The highest seed cotton yield was recorded in planting dates from 15th April to 1st May whereas early and delayed planting reduced the yield due to less accumulation of heat units. Regression analysis revealed that increase of one unit (15 days) from early to optimum date (15th March to 15th April) increased yield by 93.58 kg ha–1. Delay in planting also decreased the seed cotton yield with the same ratio. Thus it is concluded that cotton must be sown from 15th April to 1st May to have good productivity in this kind of environment.
Abstract Cotton growth and development is influenced by various uncontrollable environmental conditions. Temperature variations in the field can be created by planting at different dates. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of planting dates and thermal temperatures (growing degree days) on yield of 4 cotton genotypes, viz., CIM-598, CIM-599, CIM- 602 and Ali Akbar-703. Plants were subjected to 6 planting dates during 2013 and 2014 in a trial conducted in randomized complete block design with four replications. For boll number, boll weight and seed cotton yield, cotton genotypes exhibited significant differences, CIM-599 produced the highest seed cotton yield of 2 062 kg ha–1 on account of maximum boll number and boll weight. The highest seed cotton yield was recorded in planting dates from 15th April to 1st May whereas early and delayed planting reduced the yield due to less accumulation of heat units. Regression analysis revealed that increase of one unit (15 days) from early to optimum date (15th March to 15th April) increased yield by 93.58 kg ha–1. Delay in planting also decreased the seed cotton yield with the same ratio. Thus it is concluded that cotton must be sown from 15th April to 1st May to have good productivity in this kind of environment.
|
|
Received: 06 February 2015
Accepted:
|
| Fund: Pakistan Central Cotton Committee (PCCC) is highly acknowledged for the financial support of this work. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Kalim Ullah, E-mail: kalimpbgian@yahoo.com
E-mail: kalimpbgian@yahoo.com
|
| About author: Kalim Ullah, E-mail: kalimpbgian@yahoo.com |
Cite this article:
Kalim Ullah, Niamatullah Khan, Zahid Usman, Rehmat Ullah, Fazal Yazdan Saleem, Syed Asif Imran Shah, Muhammad Salman.
2016.
Impact of temperature on yield and related traits in cotton genotypes. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(3): 678-683.
|
| Ahmed A E, Abdalla A H, Fadlalla A S. 2006. A note on thestability of five medium staple cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) varieties for some fiber properties in the Gezira schemeof the Sudan. University of Khartoum Journal of AgriculturalScience, 14, 313-319Ali Y, Aslam Z, Hussain F. 2005. Genotype and environmentinteraction effect on yield of cotton under naturally salt stresscondition. International Journal of Environmental Scienceand Technology, 2, 169-173Allard R W, Bradshaw A D. 1964. Implications of genotypeenvironmentinteraction in applied plant breeding. CropScience, 4, 503-507Batool S, Khan N U, Gul S, Baloch M J, Turi N A, Taran SA, Saeed M. 2013. Genetic analysis for yield and yieldcontributing variables in upland cotton. Journal of Food,Agriculture and Environment, 11, 624-630Best E C. 2005. Source-sink relations in cotton: Genetic andenvironmental affectors. MSc thesis, Texas Tech University,Texas, USA.Dwyer L M, Stewart D W. 1986. Leaf area development in fieldgrown maize. Agronomy Journal, 78, 334-343Freed R, Einensmith S P, Gutez S, Reicosky D, Smail V W,Wolberg P. 1989. User’s Guide to MSTAT-C Analysisof Agronomic Research Experiments. Michigan StateUniversity, East Lansing, USA.Gecgel U, Demirci M, Esendal E. 2007. Fatty acid compositionof the oil from developing seeds of different varieties ofsafflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of AmericanOil & Chemical Society, 84, 47-54Gul S. 2013. Genotype by environment interaction for morphoyieldtraits in upland cotton. MSc thesis, The University ofAgriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.Kaleem S, Hassan F U, Saleem A. 2009. Influence ofenvironmental variations on physiological attributes ofsunflower. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8, 3531-3539Khan N G, Naveed M, Khan N I. 2008. Assessment of somenovel upland cotton genotypes for yield constancy andmalleability. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology,10, 109-111Khan N U. 2013. Diallel analysis of cotton leaf curl virus(CLCuV) disease, earliness, yield and fiber traits underCLCuV infestation in upland cotton. Australian Journal ofCrop Science, 7, 1955-1966Machado J R D A, Penna J C V, Fallieri J, Santos P G, LanzaM A. 2002. Stability and adaptability of seed cotton yieldsof upland cotton genotypes in the state of Minas Gerais,Brazil. Crop Breeding & Applied Biotechnology, 2, 401-410Makhdoom K, Khan N U, Batool S, Bibi Z, Farhatullah, KhanS, Mohammad F, Hussain D, Raziuddin, Sajjad M, KhanN. 2010. Genetic aptitude and correlation studies inG. hirsutum L. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42, 2011-2017Rauf S, Khan T M, Sadaqat H A, Khan A I. 2004. Correlationand path coefficient analysis of yield components in cotton(G. hirsutum L.). International Journal of Agriculture &Biology, 6, 686-688Ritchie J T, Ne Smith D S. 1991. Temperature and cropdevelopment. In: Hanks J, Ritchie J T, eds., Modeling Plantand Soil Systems. American Society of Agronomy, Madison,USA. pp. 5-29Satish Y, Jain P P, Chhabra B S. 2009. Stability analysis for yieldand its component traits in American cotton (G. hirsutum L.).Journal of Cotton Research & Development, 23, 175-182Snedecor G W, Cochran W G. 1983. Statistical Methods. 6thed. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, India.Steel R G D, Torrie J H, Dickey D A. 1997. Principles andProcedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed.McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Unay A, Basal H, Erkul A, Yuksekkaya Z. 2004. Stability analysisof upland cotton genotypes to the Aegean Region in Turkey.Asian Journal of Plant Science, 3, 36-38 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
