protein kinases , associated domains , Ascomycota , Basidiomycota," /> protein kinases , associated domains , Ascomycota , Basidiomycota,"/> protein kinases , associated domains , Ascomycota , Basidiomycota,"/>
Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2019, Vol. 18 Issue (1): 96-107    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62022-2
Plant Protection Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Comparative analysis of protein kinases and associated domains between Ascomycota and Basidiomycota
PEI Guo-liang, GUO Jun, WANG Qin-hu, KANG Zhen-sheng
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China
Download:  PDF (1842KB) ( )  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Protein kinases play an important role in every aspect of cellular life.  In this study, we systemically identified protein kinases from the predicted proteomes of 59 representative fungi from Ascomycota and Basidiomycota.  Comparative analysis revealed that fungi from Ascomycota and Basidiomycota differed in the number and variety of protein kinases.  Some groups of protein kinases, such as calmodulin/calcium regulated kinases (CMGC) and those with the highest group percentages are the most prevalent protein kinases among all fungal species tested.  In contrast, the STE group (homologs of the yeast STE7, STE11 and STE20 genes), was more abundant in Basidiomycetes than in Ascomycetes.  Importantly, the distribution of some protein kinase families appeared to be subphylum-specific.  The tyrosine kinase-like (TKL) group had a higher protein kinase density in Agaricomycotina fungi.  In addition, the distribution of accessory domains, which could have functional implications, demonstrated that usage bias varied between the two phyla.  Principal component analysis revealed a divergence between the main functional domains and associated domains in fungi.  This study provides novel insights into the variety and expansion of fungal protein kinases between Ascomycota and Basidiomycota.
Keywords:  protein kinases ')" href="#">  
Received: 27 April 2018   Accepted:
Fund: This work was supported by the National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period (2012BAD19B04), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31371924), the 111 Project from the Ministry of Education of China (B07049), and the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB127700).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence KANG Zhen-sheng, Tel/Fax: +86-29-87080061, E-mail: kangzs@nwsuaf.edu.cn; GUO Jun, Tel/Fax: +86-29-87082439, E-mail: guojunwgq@nwsuaf.edu.cn    
About author:  PEI Guo-liang, E-mail: peiguoliang@nwafu.edu.cn;
Service
E-mail this article protein kinases | associated domains | Ascomycota | Basidiomycota”. Please open it by linking:https://www.chinaagrisci.com/Jwk_zgnykxen/EN/abstract/abstract12059.shtml" name="neirong"> protein kinases | associated domains | Ascomycota | Basidiomycota">
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
PEI Guo-liang
GUO Jun
WANG Qin-hu
KANG Zhen-sheng

Cite this article: 

PEI Guo-liang, GUO Jun, WANG Qin-hu, KANG Zhen-sheng . 2019. Comparative analysis of protein kinases and associated domains between Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18(1): 96-107.

Becker W, Joost H G. 1998. Structural and functional characteristics of Dyrk, a novel subfamily of protein kinases with dual specificity. Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology, 62, 1–17.
Caenepeel S, Charydczak G, Sudarsanam S, Hunter T, Manning G. 2004. The mouse kinome: Discovery and comparative genomics of all mouse protein kinases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11707–11712.
Champion A, Kreis M, Mockaitis K, Picaud A, Henry Y. 2004. Arabidopsis kinome: After the casting. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 4, 163–187.
Cohen P. 2000. The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation - A 25 year update. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 25, 596–601.
Dray S, Dufour A B. 2007. The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software, 22, 1–20.
Goldberg J M, Griggs A, Smith J L, Haas B, Wortman J, Zeng Q. 2013. Kinannote, a computer program to identify and classify members of the eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily. Bioinformatics, 29, 2387–2394.
Hanks S K. 2003. Genomic analysis of the eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: A perspective. Genome Biology, 4, 111.
Hanks S K, Hunter T. 1995. Protein kinases 6. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: Kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. The FASEB Journal, 9, 576–596.
Hibbett D S, Binder M, Bischoff J F, Blackwell M, Cannon P F, Eriksson O E, Huhndorf S, James T, Kirk P M, Lücking R. 2007. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the fungi. Mycological Research, 111, 509–547.
Jones P, Binns D, Chang H Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn A F, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong S Y, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics, 30, 1236–1240.
Kosti I, Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Glaser F, Horwitz B A. 2010. Comparative analysis of fungal protein kinases and associated domains. BMC Genomics, 11, 133.
Krupa A, Abhinandan K, Srinivasan N. 2004. KinG: A database of protein kinases in genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, D153–D155.
LaRonde-LeBlanc N, Wlodawer A. 2005. The RIO kinases: An atypical protein kinase family required for ribosome biogenesis and cell cycle progression. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA: Proteins and Proteomics), 1754, 14–24.
Manning G, Plowman G D, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. 2002a. Evolution of protein kinase signaling from yeast to man. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 27, 514–520.
Manning G, Whyte D B, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. 2002b. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science, 298, 1912–1934.
Martin D M, Miranda-Saavedra D, Barton G J. 2009. Kinomer v. 1.0: A database of systematically classified eukaryotic protein kinases. Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D244–D250.
Mclaughlin D J, Hibbett D S, Lutzoni F, Spatafora J W, Vilgalys R. 2009. The search for the fungal tree of life. Trends in Microbiology, 17, 488.
Scheeff E D, Bourne P E. 2005. Structural evolution of the protein kinase-like superfamily. PLoS Computational Biology, 1, e49.
Stajich J E, Berbee M L, Blackwell M, Hibbett D S, James T Y, Spatafora J W, Taylor J W. 2009. The fungi. Current Biology, 19, R840–R845.
Taylor J W, Berbee M L. 2006. Dating divergences in the fungal tree of life: Review and new analyses. Mycologia, 98, 838–849.
Wang H, Guo S, Huang M, Thorsten L H, Wei J. 2010. Ascomycota has a faster evolutionary rate and higher species diversity than Basidiomycota. Science China (Life Sciences), 53, 1163–1169.
Wuichet K, Cantwell B J, Zhulin I B. 2010. Evolution and phyletic distribution of two-component signal transduction systems. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 13, 219–225.
Zhao Z, Liu H, Wang C, Xu J R. 2013. Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genomics, 14, 274.
No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!