中国农业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 593-600.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.03.016

• 农牧系统养分管理 • 上一篇    

农业面源污染的趋势研判、政策评述和对策建议

金书秦1,邢晓旭2

 
  

  1. 1农业部农村经济研究中心,北京 100810;2中国科学院科技促进发展局,北京100864
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-17 出版日期:2018-02-01 发布日期:2018-02-01
  • 作者简介:金书秦,E-mail:jinshuqin@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016ZY0600374704)、农业部农业生态环境保护专项、农业部农村资源统计专项、环境保护部重大经济政策环境评价财政专项(2110203)

Trend Analysis, Policy Evaluation, and Recommendations of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution

JIN ShuQin1, XING XiaoXu2   

  1. 1Research Center for Rural Economy, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100810; 2Bureau of Sciences and technology for Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864
  • Received:2017-05-17 Online:2018-02-01 Published:2018-02-01

摘要: 【目的】论文对农业面源污染排放的形势和影响进行科学判断,有助于下一步政策方向和策略的选择,对现行主要政策进行评估,则有利于更高效地解决当前问题,及时纠正政策可能出现的偏差。【方法】全面回顾自20世纪70年代以来中国在农业面源污染治理领域的有关政策,综合运用政策文本分析、实地调研、文献归纳等方法,对当前治理农业面源污染的主要政策逐一进行评估。【结果】随着监测和统计口径的不断完善,未来农业面源污染排放的绝对数和占比均可能上升,对环境质量的影响将更加明显。当前农业面源污染受到社会关注、政府重视,同时农业转型需求迫切,具备打好攻坚战的各项条件。政策的顶层设计基本形成,但是要谨防政策执行过程中的形式主义。化肥零增长行动目标的实现具有较大确定性,而农药零增长目标则面临更多不确定性,均需要警惕落入“数字游戏”陷阱。畜禽污染防治约束有余而激励不足,严重阻碍了畜禽粪便的综合利用。秸秆禁烧政策不计代价,耗费大量人力、物力却屡禁不止。【结论】从长期看,防治农业面源污染要做好打持久战的预期和行动准备,完善监测体系,摸清家底,避免急于求成导致数字浮夸。强化已有政策的落实,避免重形式、轻内容,重出台、轻落实。投入端主要是源头减量,要加强投入品的供给侧管理,产后端主要是资源化利用,提供更加适合当地的技术手段,政策手段则要疏堵结合,以疏为主。加大针对农业面源污染防治的财政投入,应与其排放占比相匹配。

关键词: 生态文明, 农业面源污染, 趋势, 政策评估

Abstract: 【Objective】The paper makes a scientific judgement on the trend and impact of agricultural non-point source pollution (NPSP), which is important for policy strategy in the future. To better solve the current problems and correct policy deviations in a timely manner, evaluation on policy implementation is necessary. 【Method】A comprehensive review of the relevant policies of China in the field of agricultural non-point source pollution control since 1970s has been made. The current policies of agricultural non-point source pollution were evaluated with methods of documentary analysis, field survey, and literature review. 【Result】As the statistic and monitoring system being more complete, the data of emission quantity for agricultural non-point source pollution will get larger, and its impact on water quality will also be more directly. At present, agricultural non-point source pollution is concerned by the society and the government attaches great importance to it. At the same time, the demand for agricultural transformation is urgent. The top-level design of the policy is basically formed, but it is important to guard against formalism in the implementation of the policy. The realization of the goal of zero growth of chemical fertilizer is more certainly, while the zero growth target of pesticides faces more uncertainty, and all of them need to guard against falling into the ‘digital game’ trap. The pollution control of livestock and poultry is restricted and lack of motivation, which seriously hinders the comprehensive utilization of livestock and poultry manure. The ‘forbidden-burning’ policy on straw regardless of cost, spend a lot of manpower and material resources, which need to be reconsidered.【Conclusion】In the long run, the prevention and control of agricultural non-point source pollution need to make long-term preparation, improve the monitoring system, find out the actual situation, and avoid ‘numeric game’. The implementation of policies must be stressed. Supply side structural reform is necessary for agricultural inputs in order to reduce the quantity of chemical use. At the end of agricultural producing, reuse is the major outlet of the by-product such as straw, manure, et al. The public financial investment for agricultural non-point source pollution control should be increased, and matched with its emission ratio.

Key words: ecological civilization, agricultural non-point source pollution, trend, policy evaluation