中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (18): 3805-3817.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.18.015
收稿日期:
2019-09-18
接受日期:
2020-05-29
出版日期:
2020-09-16
发布日期:
2020-09-25
通讯作者:
成功
作者简介:
田媛,E-mail: 基金资助:
TIAN Yuan1(),WANG Li1,LONG Feng1,ZAN LinSen1,2,CHENG Gong1,2()
Received:
2019-09-18
Accepted:
2020-05-29
Online:
2020-09-16
Published:
2020-09-25
Contact:
Gong CHENG
摘要:
【目的】分析牛乳腺中7种主要乳蛋白基因密码子使用偏好性,筛选高频密码子和低频密码子,依据其对人溶菌酶基因进行密码子局部优化和全局优化,通过牛乳腺上皮细胞等多种细胞对优化效果进行分析评价,为提高重组人溶菌酶表达量,开发新型、高效、安全的重组人溶菌酶提供理论依据。【方法】利用CodonW和EMBOSS等软件对7种主要牛乳蛋白和人溶菌酶基因密码子偏好进行生物信息学分析,筛选牛乳蛋白基因高频、低频密码子并根据牛乳蛋白基因密码子使用偏好对人溶菌酶基因翻译起始区前22位密码子(LYZop22)和全局密码子(LYZop)分别进行优化。构建人溶菌酶-荧光素酶融合表达载体(pGL3-LYZcw/op22/op)和人溶菌酶过表达载体(pcDNA-LYZcw/op22/op),将上述载体分别转染牛乳腺上皮细胞(BMEC)、牛成纤维细胞(BFFC)和C127小鼠乳腺上皮细胞等3种细胞,通过荧光素酶、实时荧光定量PCR及Western-blot等方法检测密码子优化对溶菌酶表达的影响。【结果】牛乳蛋白基因密码子偏好以GC结尾,GC3s平均含量为0.537±0.062,而人溶菌酶GC3s含量为0.407,偏好以AT结尾;聚类结果表明,牛乳中酪蛋白与乳清蛋白类基因在密码子使用偏好性上也存在一定差异。依据筛选获得的牛主要乳蛋白基因5个高频密码子(RSCU>1.5)和7个低频密码子(RSCU<0.5)对人溶菌酶基因密码子进行优化并转染多种细胞进行表达效果分析。荧光素酶分析发现,相比野生型溶菌酶密码子(LYZcw),翻译起始区密码子优化类型LYZop22分别在BMEC、BFFC细胞中提高1.48倍(P<0.01)和1.30倍(P>0.05);而全局密码子优化类型LYZop分别在BMEC、BFFC中提高2.2倍(P<0.01)和2.44倍(P<0.01),说明密码子优化能明显提高人溶菌酶在多种细胞中表达量。实时荧光定量PCR结果表明,LYZop22相比LYZcw在BMEC和BFFC细胞中分别提高了2.08倍(P<0.05)和1.5倍(P>0.05),而LYZop则分别提高了22倍(P<0.01)和17.8倍(P<0.01),mRNA表达水平与密码子优化后的mRNA二级结构稳定性呈正相关。Western-blot结果也进一步表明,密码子优化后的LYZop22和LYZop能明显提高重组人溶菌酶在牛乳腺上皮细胞中的表达量。上述结果表明,根据牛乳腺中主要乳蛋白基因密码子使用偏好进行密码子优化,能显著提高人溶菌酶在牛乳腺上皮细胞及成纤维细胞中的表达量,且溶菌酶基因全局密码子优化效果优于翻译起始区密码子优化效果。【结论】通过生物信息学分析获得了牛乳蛋白基因使密码子使用偏好及高低频密码子;依据牛乳蛋白密码子使用偏好性对人溶菌酶密码子优化能显著提高重组人溶菌酶mRNA水平和蛋白水平的表达量,为今后利用生物反应器高效生产重组人溶菌酶奠定基础。
田媛,王力,龙凤,昝林森,成功. 人溶菌酶密码子优化及其在牛乳腺细胞中高效表达[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(18): 3805-3817.
TIAN Yuan,WANG Li,LONG Feng,ZAN LinSen,CHENG Gong. Codon Optimization of Human Lysozyme and High-Efficiency Expression in Bovine Mammary Cells[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(18): 3805-3817.
表1
7种牛乳蛋白基因GenBank登录号及序列信息"
基因名称 Gene name | GenBank号 GenBank No. | 序列长度 Length of CDS |
---|---|---|
alpha-s1 casein (CSN1S1) | M33123 | 645 bp |
alpha-s2 casein (CSN1S2) | BC114773 | 669 bp |
beta casein (CSN2) | NM_181008 | 675 bp |
kappa casein (CSN3) | BC102120 | 573 bp |
beta-lactoglogbulin (LGB) | NM_173929 | 537 bp |
alpha-lactalbumin (LALBA) | M18780 | 429 bp |
lactotransferrin (LTF) | NM_180998 | 2127 bp |
表2
LYZcw、LYZop22、LYZop序列克隆引物信息及基因合成"
引物名称 Primer name | 基因名称 Gene name | 引物序列 Primer sequence | 产物长度 Product length | 酶切位点 Restriction site |
---|---|---|---|---|
P-pGL3-cw | LYZcw | F:CCATGGCCATGAAGGCTCTCATTG R:CCATGGTTACTCCACATCACTCCACAACCTTGAAC | 459bp | NcoI / Nco |
P-pGL3-op22 | LYZop22 | F:CCATGGACCATGAAGGCCCTGATCGTGCTGGGAC TGGTGCTGCTGTCTGTGACCGTGCAGGGCAAGGT GTTTGAGAGGTGTGAGTTGGCCAGAACTCTG R:CCATGGTCACTCCACAACCTTGAAC | 459bp | NcoI / NcoI |
—— | LYZop | 全基因合成 Whole gene synthesis | 459 bp | NcoI / NcoI |
P-pcDNA-cw | LYZcw | F:AAGCTTCCATGAAGGCTCTCATTG R:CTCGAGCTCCACAACCTTGAAC | 456 bp | HindIII / XhoI |
P-pcDNA-op22 | LYZop22 | F:CCATGGACCATGAAGGCCCTGATCG R:CTCGAGCTCCACAACCTTGAAC | 456bp | HindIII / XhoI |
P-pcDNA-op | LYZop | F:CCATGGACCATGAAGGCCCTGATCG R:CTCGAG CACTCCACATCCCTGCACAT | 456 bp | HindIII / XhoI |
表3
牛乳蛋白及人溶菌酶基因密码子组成分析"
Bos taurus | A3s | T3s | C3s | G3s | GC3s | GC | CAI | ENc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
αs1酪蛋白alpha-s1 casein | 0.311 | 0.461 | 0.290 | 0.258 | 0.408 | 0.445 | 0.227 | 52.300 |
αs2酪蛋白alpha-s2 casein | 0.253 | 0.453 | 0.340 | 0.335 | 0.484 | 0.417 | 0.317 | 49.970 |
β酪蛋白beta casein | 0.201 | 0.421 | 0.342 | 0.298 | 0.505 | 0.512 | 0.234 | 48.750 |
κ-酪蛋白 kappa casein | 0.399 | 0.412 | 0.243 | 0.194 | 0.341 | 0.430 | 0.240 | 58.250 |
乳球蛋白lactoglogbulin | 0.079 | 0.147 | 0.574 | 0.519 | 0.825 | 0.586 | 0.349 | 36.270 |
α乳清白蛋白alpha-lactalbumin | 0.283 | 0.349 | 0.395 | 0.337 | 0.526 | 0.441 | 0.281 | 55.510 |
乳铁蛋白lactotransferrin | 0.170 | 0.242 | 0.410 | 0.449 | 0.671 | 0.561 | 0.262 | 47.650 |
Mean ± SEM | 0.242±0.039 | 0.355±0.045 | 0.371±0.040 | 0.341±0.042 | 0.537±0.062 | 0.485±0.026 | 0.273±0.017 | 49.814±2.668 |
人溶菌酶 human lysozyme | 0.3143 | 0.4032 | 0.2742 | 0.2323 | 0.407 | 0.473 | 0.193 | 50.270 |
表4
牛乳蛋白基因密码子使用偏好性分析"
密码子 Codon | 氨基酸 Amino acid | 频率/1000 Frequency/1000 | 个数 Number | 同义密码子 相对使用度RSCU | 密码子 Codon | 氨基酸 Amino acid | 频率/1000 Frequency/1000 | 个数 Number | 同义密码子 相对使用度RSCU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCA | A | 13.793 | 26 | 0.73 | AAT | N | 19.629 | 37 | 0.96 | |
GCC | A | 32.891 | 62 | 1.73 | CCA | P | 17.507 | 33 | 1.06 | |
GCG | A | 8.488 | 16 | 0.45 | CCC | P | 19.629 | 37 | 1.19 | |
GCT | A | 20.69 | 39 | 1.09 | CCG | P | 4.244 | 8 | 0.26 | |
TGC | C | 14.854 | 28 | 0.98 | CCT | P | 24.403 | 46 | 1.48 | |
TGT | C | 15.385 | 29 | 1.02 | CAA | Q | 16.976 | 32 | 0.57 | |
GAC | D | 22.281 | 42 | 1.09 | CAG | Q | 42.44 | 80 | 1.43 | |
GAT | D | 18.568 | 35 | 0.91 | AGA | R | 5.836 | 11 | 1.06 | |
GAA | E | 33.952 | 64 | 0.90 | AGG | R | 12.732 | 24 | 2.32 | |
GAG | E | 41.91 | 79 | 1.10 | CGA | R | 2.122 | 4 | 0.39 | |
TTC | F | 21.22 | 40 | 1.13 | CGC | R | 3.183 | 6 | 0.58 | |
TTT | F | 16.446 | 31 | 0.87 | CGG | R | 6.897 | 13 | 1.26 | |
GGA | G | 11.671 | 22 | 1.07 | CGT | R | 2.122 | 4 | 0.39 | |
GGC | G | 15.385 | 29 | 1.41 | AGC | S | 14.324 | 27 | 1.30 | |
GGG | G | 9.019 | 17 | 0.83 | AGT | S | 13.263 | 25 | 1.20 | |
GGT | G | 7.427 | 14 | 0.68 | TCA | S | 7.427 | 14 | 0.67 | |
CAC | H | 11.141 | 21 | 1.35 | TCC | S | 14.854 | 28 | 1.34 | |
CAT | H | 5.305 | 10 | 0.65 | TCG | S | 2.122 | 4 | 0.19 | |
ATA | I | 2.653 | 5 | 0.18 | TCT | S | 14.324 | 27 | 1.30 | |
ATC | I | 24.403 | 46 | 1.64 | ACA | T | 11.141 | 21 | 0.84 | |
ATT | I | 17.507 | 33 | 1.18 | ACC | T | 18.037 | 34 | 1.36 | |
AAA | K | 33.952 | 64 | 0.88 | ACG | T | 6.366 | 12 | 0.48 | |
AAG | K | 42.971 | 81 | 1.12 | ACT | T | 17.507 | 33 | 1.32 | |
CTA | L | 4.244 | 8 | 0.25 | GTA | V | 6.897 | 13 | 0.41 | |
CTC | L | 19.629 | 37 | 1.14 | GTC | V | 15.915 | 30 | 0.95 | |
CTG | L | 46.684 | 88 | 2.71 | GTG | V | 28.117 | 53 | 1.68 | |
CTT | L | 18.037 | 34 | 1.05 | GTT | V | 15.915 | 30 | 0.95 | |
TTA | L | 2.122 | 4 | 0.12 | TAC | Y | 15.385 | 29 | 0.91 | |
TTG | L | 12.732 | 24 | 0.74 | TAT | Y | 18.568 | 35 | 1.09 | |
AAC | N | 21.22 | 40 | 1.04 |
表5
人溶菌酶基因密码子优化情况"
LYZcw | LYZop22 | LYZop |
---|---|---|
1 ATG AAG GCT CTC ATT GTT 19 CTG GGG CTT GTC CTC CTT 37 TCT GTT ACG GTC CAG GGC 55 AAG GTC TTT GAA AGG TGT 73 GAG TTG GCC AGA ACT CTG 91 AAA AGA TTG GGA ATG GAT 109 GGC TAC AGG GGA ATC AGC 127 CTA GCA AAC TGG ATG TGT 145 TTG GCC AAA TGG GAG AGT 163 GGT TAC AAC ACA CGA GCT 181 ACA AAC TAC AAT GCT GGA 199 GAC AGA AGC ACT GAT TAT 217 GGG ATA TTT CAG ATC AAT 235 AGC CGC TAC TGG TGT AAT 253 GAT GGC AAA ACC CCA GGA 271 GCA GTT AAT GCC TGT CAT 289 TTA TCC TGC AGT GCT TTG 307 CTG CAA GAT AAC ATC GCT 325 GAT GCT GTA GCT TGT GCA 343 AAG AGG GTT GTC CGT GAT 361 CCA CAA GGC ATT AGA GCA 379 TGG GTG GCA TGG AGA AAT 397 CGT TGT CAA AAC AGA GAT 415 GTC CGT CAG TAT GTT CAA 433 GGT TGT GGA GTG TAA | 1 ATG AAG GCC CTG ATC GTG 19 CTG GGA CTG GTG CTG CTG 37 TCT GTG ACC GTG CAG GGC 55 AAG GTG TTT GAG AGG TGT 73 GAG TTG GCC AGA ACT CTG 91 AAA AGA TTG GGA ATG GAT 109 GGC TAC AGG GGA ATC AGC 127 CTA GCA AAC TGG ATG TGT 145 TTG GCC AAA TGG GAG AGT 163 GGT TAC AAC ACA CGA GCT 181 ACA AAC TAC AAT GCT GGA 199 GAC AGA AGC ACT GAT TAT 217 GGG ATA TTT CAG ATC AAT 235 AGC CGC TAC TGG TGT AAT 253 GAT GGC AAA ACC CCA GGA 271 GCA GTT AAT GCC TGT CAT 289 TTA TCC TGC AGT GCT TTG 307 CTG CAA GAT AAC ATC GCT 325 GAT GCT GTA GCT TGT GCA 343 AAG AGG GTT GTC CGT GAT 361 CCA CAA GGC ATT AGA GCA 379 TGG GTG GCA TGG AGA AAT 397 CGT TGT CAA AAC AGA GAT 415 GTC CGT CAG TAT GTT CAA 433 GGT TGT GGA GTG TAA | 1 ATG AAG GCC CTG ATC GTG 19 CTG GGA CTG GTG CTG CTG 37 TCT GTG ACC GTG CAG GGC 55 AAG GTG TTT GAG AGG TGC 73 GAG CTG GCC AGG ACT CTG 91 AAG AGG CTG GGA ATG GAT 109 GGC TAT AGG GGA ATC AGC 127 CTG GCC AAC TGG ATG TGT 145 CTG GCC AAG TGG GAG TCT 163 GGC TAT AAC ACC AGG GCC 181 ACC AAC TAT AAC GCC GGA 199 GAC AGG AGC ACC GAC TAT 217 GGC ATC TTT CAG ATC AAC 235 TCT AGG TAT TGG TGT AAC 253 GAC GGC AAG ACC CCT GGC 271 GCC GTG AAT GCC TGT CAC 289 CTG TCT TGT AGC GCC CTG 307 CTG CAG GAC AAC ATC GCC 325 GAT GCT GTG GCC TGC GCC 343 AAG AGG GTG GTG AGG GAT 361 CCT CAG GGA ATC AGG GCT 379 TGG GTG GCC TGG AGG AAT 397 AGG TGC CAG AAC AGG GAC 415 GTG AGG CAG TAT GTG CAG 433 GGA TGT GGA GTG TAA |
[1] | 李永富, 孙震, 史锋, 张颖, 马金生, 蒋立凤. 溶菌酶对猪肉的保鲜作用. 上海农业学报, 2009,25(04):61-63. |
LI Y F, SUN Z, SHI F, ZHANG Y, MA J S, JIANG L F. The effect of lysozyme on keeping chilled pork fresh. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2009,25(04):61-63. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 朱军英, 崔立, 沈彦萍, 施彬. 溶菌酶对仔猪腹泻的预防作用. 中国畜牧杂志, 2009,45(03):40-42. |
ZHU J Y, CUI L, SHEN Y P, SHI B. The preventive effect of lysozyme on diarrhea in piglets. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2009,45(03):40-42. (in Chinese) | |
[3] |
RAGLAND S A, CRISS A K. From bacterial killing to immune modulation: Recent insights into the functions of lysozyme. PLoS Pathogens, 2017,13(9):e1006512.
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006512 pmid: 28934357 |
[4] |
THELLIN O, ZORZI D, MELIN P, DELVENNE P, HEINEN E, ZORZI W, EL MOUALIJ B, QUATRESOOZ P. Hen egg white lysozyme is less active against Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm than human lysozyme. Microbiology Research International, 2018,6(1):1-6.
doi: 10.30918/MRI |
[5] |
ERCAN D, DEMIRCI A. Recent advances for the production and recovery methods of lysozyme. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2016,36(6):1078-1088.
doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1084263 pmid: 26383819 |
[6] |
MAGA E A, SHOEMAKER C F, ROWE J D, BONDURANT R H, ANDERSON G B, MURRAY J D. Production and processing of milk from transgenic goats expressing human lysozyme in the mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science, 2006,89(2):518-524.
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72114-2 pmid: 16428620 |
[7] |
LIU X, WANG Y, TIAN Y, YU Y, GAO M, HU G, SU F, PAN S, LUO Y, GUO Z, QUAN F, ZHANG Y. Generation of mastitis resistance in cows by targeting human lysozyme gene to beta-casein locus using zinc-finger nucleases. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 2014,281(1780):20133368.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3368 |
[8] | 熊显荣, 李文哲, 王丽君, 王勇胜, 苏建民, 华松, 张涌. 体细胞核移植技术生产转人溶菌酶基因(hLYZ)牛胚胎的研究. 农业生物技术学报, 2011,19(02):294-301. |
XIONG X R, LI W Z, WANG L J, WANG Y S, SU J M, HUA S, ZHANG Y. Human lysozyme gene (hLYZ) transgenic bovine embryos produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2011,19(02):294-301. (in Chinese) | |
[9] |
YANG B, WANG J, TANG B, LIU Y, GUO C, YANG P, YU T, LI R, ZHAO J, ZHANG L, DAI Y, LI N. Characterization of bioactive recombinant human lysozyme expressed in milk of cloned transgenic cattle. PLoS One, 2011,6(3):e17593.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017593 pmid: 21436886 |
[10] |
LU D, LIU S, SHANG S, WU F, WEN X, LI Z, LI Y, HU X, ZHAO Y, LI Q, LI N. Production of transgenic-cloned pigs expressing large quantities of recombinant human lysozyme in milk. PLoS One, 2015,10(5):e0123551.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123551 pmid: 25955256 |
[11] |
YU H, CHEN J, LIU S, ZHANG A, XU X, WANG X, LU P, CHENG G. Large-scale production of functional human lysozyme in transgenic cloned goats. Journal of Biotechnology, 2013,168(4):676-683.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.10.023 |
[12] |
MAURO V P, CHAPPELL S A. Considerations in the use of codon optimization for recombinant protein expression. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2018,1850:275-288.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9086-3_20 pmid: 30788833 |
[13] |
LI G W, OH E, WEISSMAN J S. The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria. Nature, 2012,484(7395):538-541.
doi: 10.1038/nature10965 |
[14] |
HANSON G, COLLER J. Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2018,19(1):20-30.
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.91 pmid: 29018283 |
[15] |
CARNEIRO R L, REQUIAO R D, ROSSETTO S, DOMITROVIC T, PALHANO F L. Codon stabilization coefficient as a metric to gain insights into mRNA stability and codon bias and their relationships with translation. Nucleic Acids Research, 2019,47(5):2216-2228.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz033 pmid: 30698781 |
[16] |
GUSTAFSSON C, GOVINDARAJAN S, MINSHULL J. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends in Biotechnology, 2004,22(7):346-353.
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.006 |
[17] |
COOPER C A, MAGA E A, MURRAY J D. Production of human lactoferrin and lysozyme in the milk of transgenic dairy animals: past, present, and future. Transgenic Research, 2015,24(4):605-614.
doi: 10.1007/s11248-015-9885-5 pmid: 26059245 |
[18] |
PLOTKIN J B, ROBINS H, LEVINE A J. Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004,101(34):12588-12591.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404957101 pmid: 15314228 |
[19] |
NEWMAN Z R, YOUNG J M, INGOLIA N T, BARTON G M. Differences in codon bias and GC content contribute to the balanced expression of TLR7 and TLR9. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016,113(10):e1362-e1371.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518976113 |
[20] |
KUDLA G, LIPINSKI L, CAFFIN F, HELWAK A, ZYLICZ M. High guanine and cytosine content increases mRNA levels in mammalian cells. PLoS Biology, 2006,4(6):e180.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040180 pmid: 16700628 |
[21] |
PLOTKIN J B, KUDLA G. Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2011,12(1):32-42.
doi: 10.1038/nrg2899 pmid: 21102527 |
[22] |
BOEL G, LETSO R, NEELY H, PRICE W N, WONG K H, SU M, LUFF J, VALECHA M, EVERETT J K, ACTON T B, XIAO R, MONTELIONE G T, AALBERTS D P, HUNT J F. Codon influence on protein expression in E. coli correlates with mRNA levels. Nature, 2016,529(7586):358-363.
doi: 10.1038/nature16509 pmid: 26760206 |
[23] |
HANSON G, COLLER J. Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2018,19(1):20-30.
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.91 pmid: 29018283 |
[24] | WANG X, LI P, GUTENKUNST R N. Systematic effects of mRNA secondary structure on gene expression and molecular function in budding yeast. BioRxiv, 2017: 138792. |
[25] |
ZUR H, TULLER T. Strong association between mRNA folding strength and protein abundance in S. cerevisiae. Embo Reports, 2012,13(3):272-277.
doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.262 |
[26] |
JAGODNIK J, CHIARUTTINI C, GUILLIER M. Stem-loop structures within mRNA coding sequences activate translation initiation and mediate control by small regulatory RNAs. Molecular Cell, 2017, 68(1): 158-170.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.015 pmid: 28918899 |
[27] |
TULLER T, ZUR H. Multiple roles of the coding sequence 5' end in gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Research, 2015,43(1):13-28.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1313 pmid: 25505165 |
[28] |
PAULUS M, HASLBECK M, WATZELE M. RNA stem-loop enhanced expression of previously non-expressible genes. Nucleic Acids Research, 2004,32(9):e78.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gnh076 pmid: 15163763 |
[29] |
MAO Y, LIU H, LIU Y, TAO S. Deciphering the rules by which dynamics of mRNA secondary structure affect translation efficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Research, 2014,42(8):4813-4822.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku159 pmid: 24561808 |
[30] |
ZHOU Z, DANG Y, ZHOU M, LI L, YU C, FU J, CHEN S, LIU Y. Codon usage is an important determinant of gene expression levels largely through its effects on transcription. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016,113(41):e6117.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606724113 |
[31] |
PRESNYAK V, ALHUSAINI N, CHEN Y H, MARTIN S, MORRIS N, KLINE N, OLSON S, WEINBERG D, BAKER K E, GRAVELEY B R, COLLER J. Codon optimality is a major determinant of mRNA stability. Cell, 2015,160(6):1111-1124.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.029 pmid: 25768907 |
[32] |
MITARAI N, SNEPPEN K, PEDERSEN S. Ribosome collisions and translation efficiency: optimization by codon usage and mRNA destabilization. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2008,382(1):236-245.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.068 pmid: 18619977 |
[33] |
YU C H, DANG Y, ZHOU Z, WU C, ZHAO F, SACHS M S, LIU Y. Codon usage influences the local rate of translation elongation to regulate co-translational protein folding. Molecular Cell, 2015,59(5):744-754.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.018 pmid: 26321254 |
[34] |
KOUSSOUNADIS A, LANGDON S P, UM I H, HARRISON D J, SMITH V A. Relationship between differentially expressed mRNA and mRNA-protein correlations in a xenograft model system. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:10775.
doi: 10.1038/srep10775 pmid: 26053859 |
[1] | 邱一蕾,吴帆,张莉,李红亮. 亚致死剂量吡虫啉对中华蜜蜂神经代谢基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1685-1694. |
[2] | 朱春艳,宋佳伟,白天亮,王娜,马帅国,普正菲,董艳,吕建东,李杰,田蓉蓉,罗成科,张银霞,马天利,李培富,田蕾. NaCl胁迫对不同耐盐性粳稻种质幼苗叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2509-2525. |
[3] | 李晓菁,张思雨,刘迪,袁晓伟,李兴盛,石延霞,谢学文,李磊,范腾飞,李宝聚,柴阿丽. 芸薹根肿菌活细胞PMAxx-qPCR快速定量检测方法的建立与应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1938-1948. |
[4] | 许晨,王文静,曹珊,李如雪,张贝贝,孙爱清,张春庆. 花后DA-6处理调控小麦种子活力的机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(9): 1821-1834. |
[5] | 李天聪,朱行,魏宁,龙凤,武建颖,张燕,董金皋,申珅,郝志敏. 玉米大斑病菌SC35同源基因表达规律与互作分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(4): 733-743. |
[6] | 赵立群,邱艳红,张晓飞,刘慧,杨静静,张建,张海军,徐秀兰,温常龙. TaqMan探针法实时荧光定量PCR检测西瓜潜隐病毒[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(20): 4337-4347. |
[7] | 龙凤,王擎,朱行,王建霞,申珅,刘宁,郝志敏,董金皋. 玉米大斑病菌Septin基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(24): 5017-5026. |
[8] | 康俊梅,张俏燕,蒋旭,王珍,张铁军,龙瑞才,崔会婷,杨青川. 紫花苜蓿MsSQE1的克隆及对皂甙合成的功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(2): 247-260. |
[9] | 赵绪生,齐永志,甄文超. 小麦、玉米两熟区小麦纹枯病菌群体组成及其农田分布特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(16): 3269-3279. |
[10] | 张道伟,康奎,余亚娅,匡富萍,潘碧莹,陈静,唐斌. 白背飞虱酚氧化酶原PPO基因特性及其免疫应答[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15): 3108-3119. |
[11] | 刘亦然,张虹,靳继苏,周忠实,郭建英. 莲草直胸跳甲Halloween基因家族鉴定及表达分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(10): 2009-2019. |
[12] | 李文学, 肖瑞刚, 吕苗苗, 丁宁, 石华荣, 顾沛雯. 葡萄霜霉病菌实时荧光定量PCR检测体系的建立和应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(9): 1529-1540. |
[13] | 丁艳娟,刘永康,罗雨嘉,邓颖梅,徐红星,唐斌,徐彩娣. 褐飞虱GSK-3调控糖原与海藻糖代谢的潜在功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(7): 1237-1246. |
[14] | 唐斌,沈祺达,曾伯平,肖仲久,邱玲玉,潘碧莹,李昆,张道伟. 褐飞虱一个新的海藻糖合成酶基因的特性、 发育表达及RNAi效果分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(3): 466-477. |
[15] | 彭军波,李兴红,张玮,周莹,黄金宝,燕继晔. 葡萄溃疡病菌外泌蛋白LtGH61A的致病力及基因表达模式[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(24): 4518-4526. |
|