不同颜色地膜和种植密度对春玉米田间地温、耗水及产量的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.19.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 探求不同颜色地膜和种植密度对东北雨养区春玉米田间地温、耗水量、产量和降水利用效率的影响,进一步挖掘旱作雨养玉米水分生产潜力。【方法】 2016—2018年开展了3种覆盖处理（裸地、透明地膜覆盖和黑色地膜覆盖）和3种种植密度（60 000、75 000和90 000株/hm ²）的栽培试验,定位监测0—25 cm土壤耕层温度和0—120 cm土壤水分动态变化,结合作物产量分析农田水分利用效率。【结果】 在生育前期,透明地膜覆盖处理土壤耕层积温显著高于黑色地膜覆盖处理,黑色地膜覆盖处理土壤耕层积温显著高于裸地处理;种植密度的增加使得玉米拔节期以后的土壤耕层积温下降;从全生育期耗水量看,黑色地膜和透明地膜覆盖处理间无显著差异,但均显著低于裸地处理;无论在平水年还是枯水年,玉米耗水量均随种植密度的增加而增加;黑色地膜覆盖玉米产量和水分利用效率显著提高,平均较透明地膜分别高4.3%和4.6%,较裸地分别高9.2%和13.3%;在相同覆盖处理下,产量和水分利用效率随着种植密度的增加而增加;在高密度处理下,地膜覆盖明显提高经济效益,黑色地膜覆盖平均比透明地膜覆盖获得的利润多807.82元/hm ²。【结论】 黑色地膜覆盖结合高密度（90 000株/hm ²）栽培模式,在保证玉米高产的基础上,水分利用效率达到最高,本研究可为东北雨养旱作玉米进一步挖掘降水生产潜力及增产增效提供参考。

关键词: 玉米, 地膜颜色, 耕层积温, 耗水, 产量, 水分利用效率, 经济效益

Abstract:

【Objective】 Field experiments were conducted to explore the effects of different colored plastic film mulching and planting density on the topsoil temperature, evapotranspiration, grain yield of spring maize and precipitation utilization efficiency in the rain-fed area of Northeast China, in order to further tap the water production potential of dryland and rain-fed maize. 【Method】 Complete combination field, including three types of mulching ( non-mulching, transparent plastic film mulching and black plastic film mulching ) and three planting densities ( 60 000, 75 000 and 90 000 plants/hm ²) , were conducted to monitor the topsoil temperature dynamics in 0-25 cm depths and the soil moisture dynamics in 0-120 cm depths, and to analyze the water use efficiency combined with grain yield of maize in 2016-2018.【Result】 The results showed that the accumulated temperature of the plough layer in the transparent mulching film treatment was significantly higher than that in the black mulching film, and the accumulated temperature of the plough layer in the black mulching film treatment was significantly higher than that in the non-mulching treatment in the early growth stages of maize. The increase of planting density reduced the accumulated temperature of the plough layer after jointing stage of maize. For the evapotranspiration of the growing season, there was no significant difference between the black plastic film mulching treatment and the transparent plastic film mulching treatment, but they were significantly lower than the non-mulching treatment. The evapotranspiration increased with the increasing of the planting density whether in the normal precipitation year or the dry year. Maize grain yields and water use efficiency were significantly improved in the black plastic film mulching treatment, with an average of 4.3% and 4.6% higher than that of the transparent plastic film mulching treatment, respectively, and 9.2% and 13.3% higher than that of the non-mulching treatment, respectively. Yield and water use efficiency increased in tandem with planting density under the same mulching treatment. The plastic film mulching significantly improved the economic benefits under high-density treatment, and the profit of the black plastic film mulching was 807.82 yuan/hm ² more than that of the transparent plastic film mulching.【Conclusion】 The cultivation mode of black plastic film mulching and high density (90 000 plants/hm ²) combined treatment could improve the utilization rate of natural precipitation and achieve the highest water use efficiency on the basis of ensuring high grain yields. This paper provided a scientific and effective way to further tap the water and crop production potential in the dryland and rain-fed regions of China

Key words: maize, different colored plastic film, accumulated temperature of the plough layer, evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency, economic benefit.

孙仕军,朱振闯,陈志君,杨丹,张旭东. 不同颜色地膜和种植密度对春玉米田间地温、耗水及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(19): 3323-3336.

SUN ShiJun,ZHU ZhenChuang,CHEN ZhiJun,YANG Dan,ZHANG XuDong. Effects of Different Colored Plastic Film Mulching and Planting Density on Soil Temperature, Evapotranspiration and Yield of Spring Maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(19): 3323-3336.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.19.004

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2019/V52/I19/3323

图/表 16

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

表2

图8

表3

图9

表4

图10

表5

表6

参考文献 32

[1]	李少昆, 赵久然, 董树亭, 赵明, 李潮海, 崔彦宏, 刘永红, 高聚林, 薛吉全, 王立春, 王璞, 陆卫平, 王俊河, 杨祁峰, 王子明 . 中国玉米栽培研究进展与展望. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(11):1941-1959. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.001
	LI S K, ZHAO J R, DONG S T, ZHAO M, LI C H, CUI Y H, LIU Y H, GAO J L, XUE J Q, WNAG L C, WANG P, LIU W P, WANG J H, YANG Q F, WANG Z M . Advances and prospects of maize cultivation in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(11):1941-1959. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.001
[2]	张琳琳, 孙仕军, 陈志君, 姜浩, 张旭东, 迟道才 . 不同颜色地膜与种植密度对春玉米干物质积累和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(1):113-124.
	ZHANG L L, SUN S J, CHEN Z J, JIANG H, ZHANG X D, CHI D C . Effects of different colored plastic film mulching and planting density on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring maize. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018,29(1):113-124. (in Chinese)
[3]	朱大威, 金之庆 . 气候及其变率变化对东北地区粮食生产的影响. 作物学报, 2008,34(9):1588-1597 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01588
	ZHU D W, JIN Z Q . Impacts of changes in both climate and its variability on food production in Northeast China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008,34(9):1588-1597. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01588
[4]	陈林, 杨新国, 翟德苹, 宋乃平, 杨明秀, 候静 . 柠条秸秆和地膜覆盖对土壤水分和玉米产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(2):108-116.
	CHEN L, YANG X G, ZHAI D P, SONG N P, YANG M X, HOU J . Effects of mulching with caragana powder and plastic film on soil water and maize yield. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015,31(2):108-116. (in Chinese)
[5]	宋振伟, 郭金瑞, 邓艾兴, 寇太记, 任军, 张卫建 . 耕作方式对东北春玉米农田土壤水热特征的影响. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(16):108-114.
	SONG Z W, GUO J R, DENG A X, KOU T J, REN J, ZHANG W J . Effects of surface tillage regimes on soil moisture and temperature of spring corn farmland in Northeast China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012,28(16):108-114. (in Chinese)
[6]	徐宗贵, 孙磊, 王浩, 王淑兰, 王小利, 李军 . 种植密度对旱地不同株型春玉米品种光合特性与产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(13):2463-2475. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.006
	XU Z G, SUN L, WANG H, WANG S L, WANG X L, LI J . Effects of different planting densities on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of different variety types of spring maize on dryland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(13):2463-2475. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.006
[7]	NYAKUDYA I W, STROOSNIJDER L . Effect of rooting depth, plant density and planting date on maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water use efficiency in semi-arid Zimbabwe: Modelling with AquaCrop. Agricultural Water Management, 2014,146:280-296.
[8]	LI Z X, LIU K C, LIU C X, ZHANG X Q, LIU X, ZHANG H, LIU S C, WANG Q C, LI Q Q . Aboveground dry matter and grain yield of summer maize under different varieties and densities in North China Plain. Maydica, 2013,58:189-194.
[9]	SANGOI L, GRACIETTI M A, RAMPAZZO C, BIANCHETTI P . Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density. Field Crops Research, 2002,79:39-51
[10]	REN X M, SUN D B, WANG Q S . Modeling the effects of plant density on maize productivity and water balance in the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management, 2016,171:40-48.
[11]	KUCHARIK C J . Contribution of planting date trends to increased maize yields in the central united states. Agronomy Journal, 2008,100(2):328-336.
[12]	BURKEN D B, HARDING J L, MCGEE A L, HOEGEMEYER T C, KLOPFENSTEIN T J, ERICKSON G E . Effects of corn hybrid, plant density, and harvest time on yield and quality of corn plants. Nebraska Beef Cattle Report, 2013: 42-43.
[13]	张杰, 任小龙, 罗诗峰, 海江波, 贾志宽 . 环保地膜覆盖对土壤水分及玉米产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2010,26(6):14-19.
	ZHANG J, REN X L, LUO S F, HAI J B, JIA Z K . Influences of different covering materials mulching on soil moisture and corn yield. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010,26(6):14-19. (in Chinese)
[14]	WU Y, HUANG F Y, JIA Z K, REN X L, CAI T . Response of soil water, temperature, and maize (Zea may L.) production to different plastic film mulching patterns in semi-arid areas of northwest China. Soil & Tillage Research, 2017,166:113-121.
[15]	GAN Y T, SIDDIQUE K H M, TURNER N C, LI X G, NIU J Y, YANG C, LIU L P, CHAI Q . Chapter seven-ridge-furrow mulching systems: An innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. Advances in Agronomy, 2013,118:429-476
[16]	LIU C A, JIN S L, ZHOU L M, JIA Y, LI F M, XIONG Y C, LI X G . Effects of plastic film mulch and tillage on maize productivity and soil parameters. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009,31(4):241-249.
[17]	LIU Q F, CHEN Y, LI W W, LIU Y, HAN J, WEN X X, LIAO Y C . Plastic-film mulching and urea types affect soil CO₂ emissions and grain yield in spring maize on the Loess Plateau, China. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:28150.
[18]	路海东, 薛吉全, 郝引川, 高杰 . 黑色地膜覆盖对旱地玉米土壤环境和植株生长的影响. 生态学报, 2016,36(7):1997-2004. doi: 10.5846/stxb201409301936
	LU H D, XUE J Q, HAO Y C, GAO J . Effects of black film mulching on soil environment and maize growth in dry land. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(7):1997-2004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.5846/stxb201409301936
[19]	FILIPOVIC V, ROMIC D, ROMIC M, BOROSIC J, FILIPOVIC L, MALLMANN F J K, ROBINSON D A . Plastic mulch and nitrogen fertigation in growing vegetables modify soil temperature, water and nitrate dynamics: Experimental results and a modeling study. Agricultural Water Management, 2016,176:100-110.
[20]	SUN S J, CHEN Z J, JIANG H, ZHANG L L . Black film mulching and plant density influencing soil water-temperature conditions and maize root growth. Vadose Zone Journal, 2018,17(1):1-12
[21]	HUANG Y L, CHEN L D, FU B J, HUANG J L, GONG J . The wheat yields and water-use efficiency in the Loess Plateau: Straw mulch and irrigation effects. Agricultural Water Management, 2005,72:209-222.
[22]	RAMAKRISHNA A, TAM H M, WANI S P, LONG T D . Effect of mulch on soil temperature moisture, weeds infestation and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam. Field Crops Research, 2006,95:115-125.
[23]	张琴 . 不同颜色地膜覆盖对玉米土壤水热状况及产量的影响. 节水灌溉, 2017(4):57-61.
	ZHANG Q . Effects of different color film mulching on soil moisture- heat and yield of maize. Water Saving Irrigation, 2017(4):57-61. (in Chinese)
[24]	TARARA J M . Microclimate modification with plastic mulch. HortScience, 2000,35(2):169-180.
[25]	ZHAO H, WANG R Y, MA B L, XIONG Y C, QIANG S C, WANG C L, LIU C A, LI F M . Ridge-furrow with full plastic film mulching improves water use efficiency and tuber yields of potato in a semiarid rain-fed ecosystem. Field Crops Research, 2014,161:137-148.
[26]	WANG Y P, LI X G, ZHU J, FAN C Y, KONG X J, TURNER N C, SIDDIQUE K H M, LI F M . Multi-site assessment of the effects of plastic-film mulch on dry land maize productivity in semiarid areas in China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016,220:160-169.
[27]	ZHOU L M, LI F M, JIN S L, SONG Y J . How double ridges and furrows mulched with plastic film affect soil water, soil temperature and yield of maize on the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Field Crops Research, 2009,113(1):41-47.
[28]	王罕博, 龚道枝, 梅旭荣, 郝卫平 . 覆膜和露地旱作春玉米生长与蒸散动态比较. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(22):88-94.
	WANG H B, GONG D Z, MEI X R, HAO W P . Dynamics comparison of rain-fed spring maize growth and evapotranspiration in plastic mulching and un-mulching fields. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012,28(22):88-94. (in Chinese)
[29]	张冬梅, 张伟, 陈琼, 黄学芳, 姜春霞, 韩彦龙, 刘恩科, 池宝亮 . 种植密度对旱地玉米植株性状及耗水特性的影响. 玉米科学, 2014,22(4):102-108.
	ZHANG D M, ZHANG W, CHEN Q, HUANG X F, JIANG C X, HAN Y L, LIU E K, CHI B L . Effects of planting density on plant traits and water consumption characteristics of dryland maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014,22(4):102-108. (in Chinese)
[30]	刘战东, 肖俊夫, 于景春, 刘祖贵, 南纪琴 . 春玉米品种和种植密度对植株性状和耗水特性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(11):125-131.
	LIU Z D, XIAO J F, YU J C, LIU Z G, NAN J Q . Effects of varieties and planting density on plant traits and water consumption characteristics of spring maize. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012,28(11):125-131. (in Chinese)
[31]	ANTONIETTA M, FANELLO D D, ACCIARESI H A, GUIAMET J J . Senescence and yield responses to plant density in stay green and earlier-senescing maize hybrids from Argentina. Field Crops Research, 2014,155:111-119.
[32]	CHEN C Q, LEI C X, DENG A X, QIAN C R, HOOGMOED W, ZHANG W J . Will higher minimum temperatures increase corn production in Northeast China? An analysis of historical data over 1965 to 2008. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011,151(12):1580-1588.

覆盖处理 Mulching	种植密度 Planting density (plants/hm²)	处理编号 Treatment
裸地 Non-mulching	60000	M0D1
	75000	M0D2
	90000	M0D3
透明地膜覆盖 Transparent plastic film mulching	60000	M1D1
	75000	M1D2
	90000	M1D3
黑色地膜覆盖 Black plastic film mulching	60000	M2D1
	75000	M2D2
	90000	M2D3

处理 Treatment	2016	2017	2018
M0D1	10516.0±369.6b	10540.1±351.9b	9708.3±422.4b
M0D2	13086.0±511.7a	12124.1±565.3a	11032.8±307.8a
M0D3	12885.7±120.1a	12576.1±173.0a	11504.8±699.5a
均值Mean	12162.6±1277.6B	11746.7±987.7C	10748.7±917.2C
M1D1	11426.6±126.4c	11024.6±254.1c	10346.8±428.3b
M1D2	12839.9±334.6b	12244.3±470.8b	11500.1±604.2a
M1D3	13687.2±743.2a	13419.8±265.9a	12306.4±246.9a
均值Mean	12651.2±1071.6AB	12229.6±1079.4B	11384.4±938.0B
M2D1	11503.5±549.1c	11350.1±495.0b	10773.0±488.0c
M2D2	13201.7±621.4b	13300.7±267.4a	12101.8±326.9b
M2D3	14264.6±315.3a	13804.5±546.2a	13140.3±86.0a
均值Mean	12989.9±1285.1A	12818.5±1189.1A	12005.0±1069.6A
M	*	**	*
D	**	**	**
M×D	*	ns	ns

因子 Factor	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	直接通径系数 Direct path coefficient	间接通径系数 Indirect path coefficient					R²贡献率Contribution rate R²
因子 Factor	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	直接通径系数 Direct path coefficient	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	R²贡献率Contribution rate R²
X₁	0.23	0.9133		-0.4942	-0.093	-0.0296	-0.0686	0.2101
X₂	-0.38*	-0.8244	0.5474		-0.0162	0.0228	-0.1107	0.3133
X₃	0.31	-0.1982	0.4284	-0.0676		-0.0158	0.1597	-0.0614
X₄	-0.22	-0.1632	0.1658	0.1154	-0.0191		-0.3209	0.0359
X₅	-0.54**	-0.4220	0.1486	-0.2163	0.075	-0.1241		0.2279

因子Factor	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	直接通径系数 Direct path coefficient	间接通径系数 Indirect path coefficient					R²贡献率Contribution rate R²
因子Factor	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	直接通径系数 Direct path coefficient	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	R²贡献率Contribution rate R²
X₁	0.33	0.4398		0.0328	-0.0611	-0.0655	-0.0162	0.1451
X₂	0.72*	0.1175	0.1227		0.1051	0.1787	0.1937	0.0846
X₃	0.74**	0.4075	-0.0659	0.0303		0.2213	0.1488	0.3016
X₄	-0.41	0.2944	0.0897	-0.1983	-0.3724		-0.2254	-0.1207
X₅	-0.70*	-0.2406	0.1988	-0.0894	-0.3064	-0.2641		0.1684

处理 Treatment	2017		2018
处理 Treatment	耗水量 ET (mm)	水分利用效率 WUE (kg·hm^-2·mm^-1)	耗水量 ET (mm)	水分利用效率 WUE (kg·hm^-2·mm^-1)
M0D1	366.0±7.5b	28.7±1.0b	493.8±12.7c	19.7±0.9b
M0D2	372.9±4.4a	32.5±1.5a	499.8±8.1b	22.1±0.6a
M0D3	373.2±10.5a	33.7±0.5a	504.8±14.0a	22.8±1.4a
均值Mean	371.0±8.2A	31.6±2.4C	499.4±12.4A	21.5±1.7B
M1D1	355.3±7.4b	31.0±0.7c	482.7±11.4b	21.4±0.9c
M1D2	357.1±12.7b	34.3±1.3b	485.6±15.3ab	23.7±1.2b
M1D3	362.8±7.9a	37.0±0.7a	488.5±12.9a	25.2±0.5a
均值Mean	358.4±10.5B	34.1±2.7B	485.6±13.1B	23.4±1.8A
M2D1	357.6±11.3b	31.7±1.4b	482.7±10.4c	22.3±1.0c
M2D2	358.8±6.4b	37.1±0.7a	487.5±12.5b	24.8±0.7b
M2D3	365.8±8.4a	37.7±1.5a	493.2±9.7a	26.6±0.2a
均值Mean	360.7±8.9B	35.5±3.0A	487.8±11.7B	24.6±2.0A
M	**	**	**	**
D	*	**	**	**
M×D	ns	ns	ns	ns